Jean-Louis Bonnet

Comparison of omeprazole and pantoprazole influence on a high 150-mg clopidogrel maintenance dose the PACA (Proton Pump Inhibitors And Clopidogrel Association) prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare the effect of 2 proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on platelet response to clopidogrel after coronary stenting for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS). BACKGROUND Use of omeprazole has been reported to significantly decrease the clopidogrel antiplatelet effect because of cytochrome P450 interaction. Because all PPIs are metabolized by CYP2C19, but to a varying degree, we hypothesized that the reported negative omeprazole-clopidogrel drug interaction may not be caused by a class effect. METHODS A total of 104 patients undergoing coronary stenting for NSTE ACS were prospectively included and randomized to omeprazole or pantoprazole 20 mg. They received at discharge 75-mg aspirin and 150-mg clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity index (PRI) vasoactive stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) was used to assess clopidogrel response and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation for platelet reactivity (ADP-Ag). RESULTS After 1 month, patients receiving pantoprazole had a significantly better platelet response to clopidogrel as assessed with the PRI VASP: 36 +/- 20% versus 48 +/- 17% (p = 0.007). We identified more clopidogrel nonresponders in the omeprazole group than in the pantoprazole group: 44% versus 23% (p = 0.04), odds ratio: 2.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 6.2). Conversely, we did not observe any significant difference in platelet reactivity with ADP-Ag between the omeprazole and pantoprazole groups: 52 +/- 15% and 50 +/- 18%, respectively (p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS The present findings suggest the preferential use of pantoprazole compared with omeprazole in patients receiving clopidogrel to avoid any potential negative interaction with CYP2C19.

Effect of Cytochrome P450 Polymorphisms on Platelet Reactivity After Treatment With Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms may promote variability in platelet response to clopidogrel. This study was conducted to analyze, in 603 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, the effect of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on clopidogrel response and post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index, and ADP-induced P-selectin expression. The CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was significantly associated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index, and ADP-induced P-selectin expression in recessive (p <0.01, p <0.007, and p <0.06, respectively) and codominant (p <0.08, p <0.0001, and p <0.009, respectively) models, but the CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms were not. The CYP2C19*2 allele carriers exhibited the highest platelet index levels in multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). After covariate adjustment, the CYP2C19*2 allele was more frequent in clopidogrel nonresponders, defined by persistent high post-treatment platelet reactivity (ADP-induced platelet aggregation >70%; p = 0.03). In conclusion, the present data suggest that the CYPC19*2 allele influences post-treatment platelet reactivity and clopidogrel response in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.

ADP-induced platelet aggregation and platelet reactivity index VASP are good predictive markers for clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Clopidogrel responsiveness has been proposed to be involved in recurrent ischemic events after stenting for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). However, its biological definition is not consensual. We assess the value of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (ADP-Ag) and platelet reactivity index VASP (PRI VASP) in predicting recurrent ischemic events in patients with NSTE ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We studied 195 consecutive NSTE ACS patients undergoing PCI after a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. ADP-Ag and PRI VASP were analysed. The primary end-point was recurrent ischemic events within 30 days of PCI. It occurred in 14 patients (7%). Construction of ROC curves to examine the value of predictive models showed that sensitivity and specificity for primary endpoint were 79% and 76%, respectively, for a maximal intensity of ADP-Ag >or=70%, 93% and 50% for PRIVASP > 53%. The positive and negative predictive values were 21% and 98%, respectively, for ADP-Ag >or=70%, 12% and 99% for PRIVASP > 53%. In patients with NSTE ACS undergoing PCI, ADP-Ag and PRI VASP identify low responders to clopidogrel with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events with respective cut-off values of 70% and 53%.

Etiologic diagnosis of 204 pericardial effusions.

The etiologic evaluation of pericardial effusion is frequently unsuccessful when noninvasive methods are used. To determine the cause of the current episode, all patients with echographically identified pericardial effusion from May 1998 to December 2002 underwent noninvasive diagnostic testing of blood, throat, and stool samples. Patients with postpericardiotomy syndrome were excluded. To analyze the value of our tests, we tested randomly selected blood donors as negative controls.Among 204 included patients, 107 (52.4%) had a final etiologic diagnosis: the etiology of 52 was highly suspected at first examination and later confirmed (thyroid deficiency, 5 cases; systemic lupus erythematous, 7; rheumatoid arthritis, 7; scleroderma, 3; cancer, 25; and renal insufficiency, 5). A definite etiologic diagnosis was made in 11 patients from pericardial fluid analysis (cancer, 5 cases; tuberculosis, 3; Streptococcus pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii, and Actinomyces, 1 case each). Among 141 patients considered to have idiopathic pericarditis, 44 (32.1%) gained an etiologic diagnosis by our systematic testing strategy. This included serologic evaluation of serum (Coxiella burnetii, 10 cases; Bartonella quintana, 1; Legionella pneumophila, 1; Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 4; influenza virus, 1), viral culture of throat swabs (enterovirus, 8 cases; and adenovirus, 1), high-level antinuclear antibodies (>1/400, 3 cases), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (15 abnormal results). Antibodies to Toxoplasma and cytomegalovirus, enterovirus recovered from rectal swabs, and low-level antinuclear antibodies were seen with equal frequency in patients and controls.Using our evaluation strategy, the number of pericardial effusions classified as idiopathic was less than in other series. Systematic testing for Q fever, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, thyroid abnormalities, and antinuclear antibodies, accompanied by viral throat cultures, frequently enabled us to diagnose diseases not initially suspected in patients with pericardial effusion.

Effect of intravenous TRO40303 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: MITOCARE study results

AIM The MITOCARE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TRO40303 for the reduction of reperfusion injury in patients undergoing revascularization for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS Patients presenting with STEMI within 6 h of the onset of pain randomly received TRO40303 (n = 83) or placebo (n = 80) via i.v. bolus injection prior to balloon inflation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a double-blind manner. The primary endpoint was infarct size expressed as area under the curve (AUC) for creatine kinase (CK) and for troponin I (TnI) over 3 days. Secondary endpoints included measures of infarct size using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and safety outcomes. RESULTS The median pain-to-balloon time was 180 min for both groups, and the median (mean) door-to-balloon time was 60 (38) min for all sites. Infarct size, as measured by CK and TnI AUCs at 3 days, was not significantly different between treatment groups. There were no significant differences in the CMR-assessed myocardial salvage index (1-infarct size/myocardium at risk) (mean 52 vs. 58% with placebo, P = 0.1000), mean CMR-assessed infarct size (21.9 g vs. 20.0 g, or 17 vs. 15% of LV-mass) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (46 vs. 48%), or in the mean 30-day echocardiographic LVEF (51.5 vs. 52.2%) between TRO40303 and placebo. A greater number of adjudicated safety events occurred in the TRO40303 group for unexplained reasons. CONCLUSION This study in STEMI patients treated with contemporary mechanical revascularization principles did not show any effect of TRO40303 in limiting reperfusion injury of the ischaemic myocardium.

High post-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with a high incidence of myonecrosis after stenting for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

High post-treatment platelet reactivity (HPPR=adenosine diphosphate [ADP] 10 microM-induced platelet aggregation >70%) identifies low responders to dual antiplatelet therapy with increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events after stenting for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). This study was designed to compare the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) after stenting for NSTE-ACS patients between non-responders to dual antiplatelet therapy defined by HPPR and normo-responders. One hundred ninety NSTE-ACS consecutive patients undergoing coronary stenting were included in this prospective study. They received 250 mg aspirin and a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel at least 12 hours (h) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A single post-treatment blood sample was obtained before PCI to analyze maximal intensity of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, and troponin levels were analyzed before PCI, and 12 and 24 h after PCI. Troponin I was considered elevated if >0.4 ng/ml. HPPR was present in 22% of patients (n=42). Periprocedural MI occurred significantly more frequently in patients with HPPR than in the normo-responders (43% vs. 24%, p=0.014). After being correlated with recurrent ischemic events after stenting for NSTE-ACS, the HPPR seems to be also a marker of increased risk of periprocedural MI for NSTE-ACS patients.

Circulating Endothelial Cell Count as a Diagnostic Marker for Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Background—Shedding of endothelial cells from damaged endothelium into the blood occurs in a variety of vascular disorders. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of circulating endothelial cell (CEC) count as a diagnostic marker of non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Methods and Results—CEC counts were determined immediately (H0), 4 hours (H4), and 8 hours (H8) after admission in 60 patients with documented non–ST-elevation ACS and 40 control patients with no evidence of coronary artery disease. A total of 32 patients in the ACS group had elevated CEC counts (>3 cells/mL) in relation to early admission and single-episode chest pain. Patients from the control group had normal CEC counts. The interval between the chest pain episode and elevation was significantly shorter for CEC than troponin I. No correlation was found between the 2 markers. Interestingly, a subgroup of ACS patients with initially normal troponin I levels had high CEC counts, thus allowing early diagnosis in 30% more cases. At H0, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly higher with the CEC count than with the troponin I level. At H4 and H8, the combined use of CEC and troponin was significantly better as a marker of ACS than CEC alone or troponin I alone. Conclusions—This study demonstrates that CEC count can be used as an early, specific, independent diagnostic marker for non–ST-elevation ACS. A combined strategy using CEC count and troponin I level could provide an effective diagnostic tool.

Relationship between aspirin and clopidogrel responses in acute coronary syndrome and clinical predictors of non response.

OBJECTIVES We have prospectively investigated the association between aspirin and clopidogrel responses and the clinical predictors of non response. METHODS 635 Non ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE ACS) patients were included and received loading doses of 250 mg aspirin and 600 mg clopidogrel. We analyzed post-treatment maximal intensity of arachidonic acid and ADP-induced platelet aggregation (AA-Ag and ADP-Ag) and Platelet Reactivity Index of VAsodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein (PRI VASP). Aspirin and clopidogrel non responses were defined respectively by AA-Ag>30% and ADP-Ag>70%. RESULTS Aspirin non responders patients had significantly higher ADP-Ag and PRI VASP than aspirin responders: 63.7+/-15.9% vs 55+/-19% (p=0.0001) and 73.6+/-13.3% vs 53+/-23% (p=0.0001) respectively and the rate of clopidogrel non responders was higher among aspirin non responders than aspirin responders: 36.7% vs 22.7% (p=0.003). In addition, clopidogrel non responders had significantly higher AA-Ag and rate of aspirin non responders than clopidogrel responders: 21.6+/-24% vs 10.3+/-19% (p=0.0001) and 22.8% vs 12.9% (p=0.003) respectively. Age and Body Mass Index (BMI) were significantly associated with non response to Clopidogrel (p=0.035 and 0.02 respectively) and diabetes mellitus by trend (p=0.07). CONCLUSION We observed a relationship between aspirin and clopidogrel non responses and an association between age, BMI and diabetes mellitus and clopidogrel response.

CYP2C19*2 and *17 Alleles Have a Significant Impact on Platelet Response and Bleeding Risk in Patients Treated With Prasugrel After Acute Coronary Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES The present study was designed to assess the effect of genetic variants on chronic biological response to prasugrel and bleeding complications. BACKGROUND CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function allele and CYP2C19*17 gain-of-function allele have been linked with response to clopidogrel, but preliminary data did not show any significant influence of these alleles on prasugrel effect. METHODS A total of 213 patients undergoing successful coronary stenting for acute coronary syndrome and discharged with prasugrel 10 mg daily were included. Prasugrel response was assessed at 1 month with the platelet reactivity index (PRI) vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) defined as PRI VASP > 50% and hyper-response as PRI VASP <75th percentile (PRI VASP < 17%). CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 genotyping were performed. RESULTS Carriers of loss-of-function *2 allele had significantly higher PRI VASP than noncarriers (33 ± 15% vs. 27 ± 14%, p = 0.03) and higher rate of HTPR (16% vs. 4%, p = 0.01). Conversely, carriers of *17 gain-of-function allele had significantly lower PRI VASP than noncarriers (25 ± 13% vs. 31 ± 15%, p = 0.03, p = 0.03), lower rate of HTPR (1% vs. 10%, p = 0.02), higher rate of hyper-response (34% vs. 21%, p = 0.02), and higher rate of bleeding complications than noncarriers: 23% versus 11%, (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.5 [1.2 to 5.4]; p = 0.02). No significant influence of genotypes on platelet reactivity assessed by adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation was observed. CONCLUSIONS The present study shows a significant influence of CYP2C19*2 and *17 alleles on response to chronic treatment by prasugrel 10 mg daily and occurrence of bleeding complications.

Predictive Values of Post-Treatment Adenosine Diphosphate–Induced Aggregation and Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein Index for Stent Thrombosis After Acute Coronary Syndrome in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients

A low response to clopidogrel has been associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. However, the definition of a nonresponse to clopidogrel remains controversial, and different tests have been used to assess the clopidogrel response. The present study was designed to assess the predictive value of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation (ADP-Ag) and the Platelet Reactivity Index of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein for the occurrence of stent thrombosis in patients admitted for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 598 consecutive patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary stenting were prospectively included. They received 600 mg of clopidogrel >or=12 hours before percutaneous coronary intervention. Acute or subacute definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 11 patients (1.8%). These patients had significantly greater ADP-Ag compared to patients free of stent thrombosis (68 +/- 14% vs 56 +/- 19%, p = 0.002) but only a trend toward a greater Platelet Reactivity Index of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (62 +/- 14% vs 53 +/- 23%, p = 0.19). The construction of receiver operating characteristic curves to examine the most predictive value of ADP-Ag for stent thrombosis gave a threshold of ADP-Ag of >67% to identify low responders. These patients were at a greater risk of stent thrombosis than the clopidogrel responders (4.3% vs 0.8%, odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 24.6, p = 0.003). In conclusion, in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, ADP-Ag is a good parameter to identify clopidogrel nonresponders who are at increased risk of stent thrombosis, with a cutoff value of ADP-Ag of >67%.