Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jean-Louis Rullière is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jean-Louis Rullière.


Theory and Decision | 1993

Are game theoretic concepts suitable negotiation support tools? From Nash equilibrium refinements toward a cognitive concept of rationality

Bertrand Munier; Jean-Louis Rullière

If game theory is to be used as a negotiation support tool, it should be able to provide unambiguous recommendations for a target to aim at and for actions to reach this target. This need cannot be satisfied with the Nash equilibrium concept, based on the standard instrumental concept of rationality. These equilibria, as is well known, are generally multiple in a game. The concept of substantive or instrumental rationality has proved to be so pregnant, however, that researchers, instead of re-evaluating its use in game theory, have simply tried to design concepts related to the Nash equilibrium, but with the property of being unique in a game — i.e., they have devised ways ofselecting among Nash equilibria. These concepts have been labeledrefined Nash equilibria.The purpose of this paper is to show the following.(a)The different types of refined Nash equilibria, based on the principle of backward induction, can lead to severe contradictions within the framework itself. This makes these concepts utterly unsatisfactory and calls for a new appraisal of the reasoning process of the players.(b)The degree of confidence in the principle of backward induction depends upon the evaluation of potential deviations with respect to the extended Nash equilibrium concept used and upon the possible interpretations of such deviations by the different players. Our goal is to show that the nature of these possible interpretations reinforces the argument that a serious conceptual reappraisal is necessary.(c)Some form of forward induction should then become the real yardstick of rationality, extending Simonianprocedural rationality towards the concept ofcognitive rationality. This could open the way to a renewed game theoretic approach to negotiation support systems. Such a research program, which would be a revision of the basic game theoretic concepts, is dealt with in the end of the paper.


Experimental Economics | 2003

Does Team-Based Compensation Give Rise to Problems when Agents Vary in their Ability?

Claude Meidinger; Jean-Louis Rullière; Marie Claire Villeval


Journal of Public Economic Theory | 2011

Breaking collusion in auctions through speculation: an experiment on CO2 emission permit markets

Michel Mougeot; Florence Naegelen; Benjamin Pelloux; Jean-Louis Rullière


Revue économique | 1998

Equilibration et dépendance du contexte. Une évaluation expérimentale du jeu de négociation sous ultimatum

Werner Güth; Nadège Marchand; Jean-Louis Rullière


Archive | 2001

Free-riding and Fairness in Principal-Multi-Agent Relationships: Experimental Evidence

Claude Meidinger; Jean-Louis Rullière; Marie Claire Villeval


Journal of Economic Psychology | 2008

Monitoring Optimistic Agents

Nicolas Jacquemet; Jean-Louis Rullière; Isabelle Vialle


Archive | 2004

Incentives and Anonymity Principle: Crowding Out Toward Users

Patricia Crifo; Jean-Louis Rullière


Experimental Methods and Economic Modelling Workshop, Capoue, Italie, 3-4 juin 2011 | 2011

Self-confidence and teamwork: An experimental test

Isabelle Vialle; Luís Santos-Pinto; Jean-Louis Rullière


Economie & prévision | 2004

Union Bargaining Strength as a Public Good: Experimental Evidence

Claudia Keser; Jean-Louis Rullière; Marie Claire Villeval


Archive | 1997

On the reliability of reprocal fairness -An experimental study-

Werner Güth; Nadège Marchand; Jean-Louis Rullière

Collaboration


Dive into the Jean-Louis Rullière's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marie Claire Villeval

École normale supérieure de Lyon

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marie Claire Villeval

École normale supérieure de Lyon

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nadège Marchand

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Romain Zeiliger

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge