Jean-Marie Machet

A review of tillage effects on crop residue management, seedbed conditions and seedling establishment

There is considerable discussion about the influence of soil management techniques on soil erosion, water use and conservation, and more recently carbon dioxide sequestration and waste disposal. The soil–atmosphere interface, particularly the seed bed layer is of particular concern to agronomists and soil scientists because it is the focus of the physical processes affecting crop establishment and biological activity. This paper evaluates the current knowledge (1) in modeling seedling emergence and residue decomposition, (2) seedbed structure and its resulting physical conditions, and (3) tillage operations affect on seedbed structure and residue distribution.

Deviation from the grain protein concentration–grain yield negative relationship is highly correlated to post-anthesis N uptake in winter wheat

In plants, carbon and nitrogen (N) economies are intimately linked at the physiological and biochemical level. The strong genetic negative correlation between grain yield and grain protein concentration observed in various cereals is an illustration of this inter-relationship. Studies have shown that deviation from this negative relationship (grain protein deviation or GPD) has a genetic basis, but its physiological basis is still poorly understood. This study analysed data on 27 genotypes grown in multienvironment field trials, representing a wide range of agricultural practices and climatic conditions. The objective was to identify physiological processes related to the genetic variability in GPD. Under most environments, GPD was significantly related to post-anthesis N uptake independently of anthesis date and total N at anthesis. The underlying physiological trait might be related to genotypic differences in either access to soil N, regulation of N uptake by plant N status, or ability to maintain root activity during the grain-filling period. GPD is an interesting potential target in breeding as it appears to be relatively robust across different environments and would be valuable in increasing total N uptake by maturity.

The partitioning of fertilizer-N between soil and crop: Comparison of ammonium and nitrate applications

Field experiments were carried out in 1987 on winter wheat crops grown on three types of soil. 15N-labelled urea, 15NH4NO3 or NH415NO3 (80 kg N ha-1) was applied at tillering. The soils (chalky soil, hydromorphic loamy soil, sandy clay soil) were chosen to obtain a range of nitrogen dynamics, particularly nitrification. Soil microbial N immobilization and crop N uptake were measured at five dates. Shortly after fertilizer application (0–26 days), the amount of N immobilized in soil were markedly higher with labelled urea or ammonium than that with nitrate in all soils. During the same period, crop 15N uptake occurred preferentially at the expense of nitrate. Nitrification differed little between soils, the rates were 2.0 to 4.7 kg N ha-1 day-1 at 9°C daily mean temperature. The differences in immobilization and uptake had almost disappeared at flowering and harvest. 15N recovery in soil and crop varied between 50 and 100%. Gaseous losses probably occurred by volatilization in the chalky soil and denitrification in the hydromorphic loamy soil. These losses affected the NH4+ and NO3- pools differently and determined the partitioning of fertilizer-N between immobilization and absorption.

The fate of labelled 15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop. II: Plant uptake and N efficiency

A field experiment was conducted on a winter wheat crop in Northern France with either15N-urea or ammonium nitrate, labelled either on NH4 or on NO3. The fertilizer was split between two dressings, one applied in early March and the second in mid-April, labelled separately. N uptake by the crop was measured at 8 successive times after each dressing. The N uptake efficiency of nitrate was higher than that of ammonium or urea over the whole growth cycle for both dressings. The RUC (Real Utilization Coefficient) reached a maximum at anthesis or even before anthesis, and decreased during the grain-filling period, indicative of N turnover in shoots. Thus the annual N use efficiency appeared highly dependent upon the date of measurement. At harvest, the contribution of soil N (residual N+mineralized N) to the crop was comparable to that from fertilizer, but the two pools were utilized at different periods.

Short-term immobilisation and crop uptake of fertiliser nitrogen applied to winter wheat: effect of date of application in spring

Previous studies on the fate of fertiliser nitrogen applied to winter wheat in temperate climates have shown that nitrogen (N) applied early, at tillering for wheat, was less efficiently taken up than N applied later in the growth cycle. We examined the extent to which the soil microbial N immobilisation varied during the wheat spring growth cycle and how microbial immobilisation and plant uptake competed for nitrogen. We set up a pulse-15N labelled field experiment in which N was applied at eight development stages from tillering (beginning of March) to anthesis (mid-June). Each application was 50 kg N ha-1 as 15N labelled urea except for the first application which was 25 kg N ha-1. The distribution of fertiliser 15N in shoots, roots, mineral and organic soil N was examined by destructive sampling 7 and 14 days after each 15N pulse. The inorganic 15N pool was almost depleted by day 14. The N uptake efficiency increased with later applications from 45% at tillering to 65% at flowering. N immobilisation was rather constant at 13–16% of N applied, whatever the date of application. The increase in plant 15N uptake resulted in an increase in the total 15N recovery in the plant-soil system (15N in soil +15N in plant), suggesting that gaseous losses were lower at the later application dates.

Implications of productivity and nutrient requirements on greenhouse gas balance of annual and perennial bioenergy crops

Biomass from dedicated crops is expected to contribute significantly to the replacement of fossil resources. However, sustainable bioenergy cropping systems must provide high biomass production and low environmental impacts. This study aimed at quantifying biomass production, nutrient removal, expected ethanol production, and greenhouse gas (GHG) balance of six bioenergy crops: Miscanthus × giganteus, switchgrass, fescue, alfalfa, triticale, and fiber sorghum. Biomass production and N, P, K balances (input‐output) were measured during 4 years in a long‐term experiment, which included two nitrogen fertilization treatments. These results were used to calculate a posteriori ‘optimized’ fertilization practices, which would ensure a sustainable production with a nil balance of nutrients. A modified version of the cost/benefit approach proposed by Crutzen et al. (2008), comparing the GHG emissions resulting from N‐P‐K fertilization of bioenergy crops and the GHG emissions saved by replacing fossil fuel, was applied to these ‘optimized’ situations. Biomass production varied among crops between 10.0 (fescue) and 26.9 t DM ha−1 yr−1 (miscanthus harvested early) and the expected ethanol production between 1.3 (alfalfa) and 6.1 t ha−1 yr−1 (miscanthus harvested early). The cost/benefit ratio ranged from 0.10 (miscanthus harvested late) to 0.71 (fescue); it was closely correlated with the N/C ratio of the harvested biomass, except for alfalfa. The amount of saved CO2 emissions varied from 1.0 (fescue) to 8.6 t CO2eq ha−1 yr−1 (miscanthus harvested early or late). Due to its high biomass production, miscanthus was able to combine a high production of ethanol and a large saving of CO2 emissions. Miscanthus and switchgrass harvested late gave the best compromise between low N‐P‐K requirements, high GHG saving per unit of biomass, and high productivity per hectare.