Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jean-Michel Antoine is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jean-Michel Antoine.


British Journal of Nutrition | 2009

Inflammatory Disease Processes and Interactions with Nutrition

Philip C. Calder; Ruud Albers; Jean-Michel Antoine; Stephanie Blum; Raphaëlle Bourdet-Sicard; Gordon A. Ferns; Gert Folkerts; P. S. Friedmann; G. S. Frost; Francisco Guarner; M. Løvik; S. Macfarlane; P. D. Meyer; Laura M'Rabet; Mauro Serafini; W. van Eden; J. van Loo; W. Vas Dias; Stéphane Vidry; Brigitte M. Winklhofer-Roob; J. Zhao

Inflammation is a stereotypical physiological response to infections and tissue injury; it initiates pathogen killing as well as tissue repair processes and helps to restore homeostasis at infected or damaged sites. Acute inflammatory reactions are usually self-limiting and resolve rapidly, due to the involvement of negative feedback mechanisms. Thus, regulated inflammatory responses are essential to remain healthy and maintain homeostasis. However, inflammatory responses that fail to regulate themselves can become chronic and contribute to the perpetuation and progression of disease. Characteristics typical of chronic inflammatory responses underlying the pathophysiology of several disorders include loss of barrier function, responsiveness to a normally benign stimulus, infiltration of inflammatory cells into compartments where they are not normally found in such high numbers, and overproduction of oxidants, cytokines, chemokines, eicosanoids and matrix metalloproteinases. The levels of these mediators amplify the inflammatory response, are destructive and contribute to the clinical symptoms. Various dietary components including long chain omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidant vitamins, plant flavonoids, prebiotics and probiotics have the potential to modulate predisposition to chronic inflammatory conditions and may have a role in their therapy. These components act through a variety of mechanisms including decreasing inflammatory mediator production through effects on cell signaling and gene expression (omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin E, plant flavonoids), reducing the production of damaging oxidants (vitamin E and other antioxidants), and promoting gut barrier function and anti-inflammatory responses (prebiotics and probiotics). However, in general really strong evidence of benefit to human health through anti-inflammatory actions is lacking for most of these dietary components. Thus, further studies addressing efficacy in humans linked to studies providing greater understanding of the mechanisms of action involved are required.


British Journal of Nutrition | 2005

Markers to measure immunomodulation in human nutrition intervention studies

Ruud Albers; Jean-Michel Antoine; Raphaëlle Bourdet-Sicard; Philip C. Calder; Michael Gleeson; B Lesourd; S Samartin; Ian R. Sanderson; J. van Loo; Fw Vas Dias; Bernhard Watzl

Normal functioning of the immune system is crucial to the health of man, and diet is one of the major exogenous factors modulating individual immunocompetence. Recently, nutrition research has focused on the role of foods or specific food components in enhancing immune system responsiveness to challenges and thereby improving health and reducing disease risks. Assessing diet-induced changes of immune function, however, requires a thorough methodological approach targeting a large spectrum of immune system parameters. Currently, no single marker is available to predict the outcome of a dietary intervention on the resistance to infection or to other immune system-related diseases. The present review summarises the immune function assays commonly used as markers in human intervention studies and evaluates their biological relevance (e.g. known correlation with clinically relevant endpoints), sensitivity (e.g. within- and between-subject variation), and practical feasibility. Based on these criteria markers were classified into three categories with high, medium or low suitability. Vaccine-specific serum antibody production, delayed-type hypersensitivity response, vaccine-specific or total secretory IgA in saliva and the response to attenuated pathogens, were classified as markers with high suitability. Markers with medium suitability include natural killer cell cytotoxicity, oxidative burst of phagocytes, lymphocyte proliferation and the cytokine pattern produced by activated immune cells. Since no single marker allows conclusions to be drawn about the modulation of the whole immune system, except for the clinical outcome of infection itself, combining markers with high and medium suitability is currently the best approach to measure immunomodulation in human nutrition intervention studies. It would be valuable to include several immune markers in addition to clinical outcome in future clinical trials in this area, as there is too little evidence that correlates markers with global health improvement.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2006

Survival of Yogurt Bacteria in the Human Gut

Marina Elli; Maria Luisa Callegari; Susanna Ferrari; Elena Bessi; Daniela Cattivelli; Sara Soldi; Lorenzo Morelli; Nathalie Goupil Feuillerat; Jean-Michel Antoine

ABSTRACT Whether Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus can be recovered after passage through the human gut was tested by feeding 20 healthy volunteers commercial yogurt. Yogurt bacteria were found in human feces, suggesting that they can survive transit in the gastrointestinal tract.


European Journal of Nutrition | 2013

Markers for nutrition studies: review of criteria for the evaluation of markers

Jan de Vries; Jean-Michel Antoine; Tomasz Burzykowski; Alessandro Chiodini; M. J. Gibney; Gunter Georg Kuhnle; Agnes Meheust; Loek T.J. Pijls; Ian Rowland

IntroductionMarkers are important tools to assess the nutrition status and effects of nutrition interventions. There is currently insufficient consensus in nutrition sciences on how to evaluate markers, despite the need for properly evaluating them.ObjectivesTo identify the criteria for the evaluation of markers related to nutrition, health and disease and to propose generic criteria for evaluation.MethodThe report on “Evaluation of Biomarker and Surrogate Endpoints in Chronic Disease” from the Institute of Medicine was the starting point for the literature search. Additionally, specific search strategies were developed for Pubmed.ResultsIn nutrition, no set of criteria or systematic approach to evaluate markers is currently available. There is a reliance on the medical area where statistical methods have been developed to quantify the evaluation of markers. Even here, a systematic approach is lacking—markers are still evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The review of publications from the literature search resulted in a database with definitions, criteria for validity and the rationale behind the criteria. It was recognized that, in nutrition, a number of methodological aspects differ from medical research.ConclusionsThe following criteria were identified as essential elements in the evaluation of markers: (1) the marker has a causal biological link with the endpoint, (2) there is a significant association between marker and endpoint in the target population, (3) marker changes consistently with the endpoint, e.g., in response to an intervention, and (4) change in the marker explains a substantial proportion of the change in the endpoint in response to the intervention.


European Journal of Nutrition | 2018

Systematic review of the effects of the intestinal microbiota on selected nutrients and non-nutrients

Colette Shortt; Oliver Hasselwander; Alexandra Meynier; Arjen Nauta; Estefanía Noriega Fernández; Peter Putz; Ian Rowland; Jonathan R. Swann; Jessica Türk; Joan Vermeiren; Jean-Michel Antoine

PurposeThere is considerable interest in the effects of the intestinal microbiota (IM) composition, its activities in relation with the metabolism of dietary substrates and the impact these effects may have in the development and prevention of certain non-communicable diseases. It is acknowledged that a complex interdependence exists between the IM and the mammalian host and that the IM possesses a far greater diversity of genes and repertoire of metabolic and enzymatic capabilities than their hosts. However, full knowledge of the metabolic activities and interactions of the IM and the functional redundancy that may exist are lacking. Thus, the current review aims to assess recent literature relating to the role played by the IM in the absorption and metabolism of key nutrients and non-nutrients.MethodsA systematic review (PROSPERO registration: CRD42015019087) was carried out focussing on energy and the following candidate dietary substrates: protein, carbohydrate, fat, fibre, resistant starch (RS), and polyphenols to further understand the effect of the IM on the dietary substrates and the resulting by-products and host impacts. Particular attention was paid to the characterisation of the IM which are predominantly implicated in each case, changes in metabolites, and indirect markers and any potential impacts on the host.ResultsStudies show that the IM plays a key role in the metabolism of the substrates studied. However, with the exception of studies focusing on fibre and polyphenols, there have been relatively few recent human studies specifically evaluating microbial metabolism. In addition, comparison of the effects of the IM across studies was difficult due to lack of specific analysis/description of the bacteria involved. Considerable animal-derived data exist, but experience suggests that care must be taken when extrapolating these results to humans. Nevertheless, it appears that the IM plays a role in energy homeostasis and that protein microbial breakdown and fermentation produced ammonia, amines, phenols and branch chain fatty acids, and a greater diversity in the microbes present. Few recent studies appear to have evaluated the effect of the IM composition and metabolism per se in relation with digestible dietary carbohydrate or fat in humans. Intakes of RS and prebiotics altered levels of specific taxa that selectively metabolised specific prebiotic/carbohydrate-type substances and levels of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were observed to increase. In controlled human studies, consistent data exist that show a correlation between the intake of fibre and an increase in bifidobacteria and short-chain fatty acids, in particular butyrate, which leads to lower intestinal pH. Dietary polyphenols rely on modification either by host digestive enzymes or those derived from the IM for absorption to occur. In the polyphenol-related studies, a large amount of inter-individual variation was observed in the microbial metabolism and absorption of certain polyphenols.ConclusionsThe systematic review demonstrates that the IM plays a major role in the breakdown and transformation of the dietary substrates examined. However, recent human data are limited with the exception of data from studies examining fibres and polyphenols. Results observed in relation with dietary substrates were not always consistent or coherent across studies and methodological limitations and differences in IM analyses made comparisons difficult. Moreover, non-digestible components likely to reach the colon are often not well defined or characterised in studies making comparisons between studies difficult if not impossible. Going forward, further rigorously controlled randomised human trials with well-defined dietary substrates and utilizing omic-based technologies to characterise and measure the IM and their functional activities will advance the field. Current evidence suggests that more detailed knowledge of the metabolic activities and interactions of the IM hold considerable promise in relation with host health.


Nutrition Research Reviews | 2017

Improving selection of markers in nutrition research: evaluation of the criteria proposed by the ILSI Europe Marker Validation Initiative

Philip C. Calder; Alan R. Boobis; Deborah Braun; Claire Champ; Louise Dye; Suzanne Einöther; Arno Greyling; Christophe Matthys; Peter Putz; Suzan Wopereis; Jayne V. Woodside; Jean-Michel Antoine

The conduct of high-quality nutrition research requires the selection of appropriate markers as outcomes, for example as indicators of food or nutrient intake, nutritional status, health status or disease risk. Such selection requires detailed knowledge of the markers, and consideration of the factors that may influence their measurement, other than the effects of nutritional change. A framework to guide selection of markers within nutrition research studies would be a valuable tool for researchers. A multidisciplinary Expert Group set out to test criteria designed to aid the evaluation of candidate markers for their usefulness in nutrition research and subsequently to develop a scoring system for markers. The proposed criteria were tested using thirteen markers selected from a broad range of nutrition research fields. The result of this testing was a modified list of criteria and a template for evaluating a potential marker against the criteria. Subsequently, a semi-quantitative system for scoring a marker and an associated template were developed. This system will enable the evaluation and comparison of different candidate markers within the same field of nutrition research in order to identify their relative usefulness. The ranking criteria of proven, strong, medium or low are likely to vary according to research setting, research field and the type of tool used to assess the marker and therefore the considerations for scoring need to be determined in a setting-, field- and tool-specific manner. A database of such markers, their interpretation and range of possible values would be valuable to nutrition researchers.


European Journal of Nutrition | 2004

PASSCLAIM--gut health and immunity.

John H. Cummings; Jean-Michel Antoine; Fernando Azpiroz; Raphaëlle Bourdet-Sicard; Per Brandtzaeg; Philip C. Calder; Glenn R. Gibson; Francisco Guarner; Erika Isolauri; Daphne Pannemans; Colette Shortt; Sandra Tuijtelaars; Bernhard Watzl


European Journal of Nutrition | 2006

Progress in the science of probiotics: from cellular microbiology and applied immunology to clinical nutrition

W. Allan Walker; Olivier Goulet; Lorenzo Morelli; Jean-Michel Antoine


European Journal of Nutrition | 2003

PASSCLAIM - Physical performance and fitness

Wim H. M. Saris; Jean-Michel Antoine; Fred Brouns; Michael Fogelholm; Michael Gleeson; Peter Hespel; Asker E. Jeukendrup; Ronald J. Maughan; Daphne Pannemans; Vladimir Stich


European Journal of Nutrition 43(2, Supplement | 2004

Gut health and immunity

John H. Cummings; Jean-Michel Antoine; Fernando Azpiroz; R. Bourdet Sicard; Per Brandtzaeg; Philip C. Calder; Glenn R. Gibson; Francisco Guarner; Erika Isolauri; Daphne Pannemans; Colette Shortt; Sandra Tuijtelaars; Bernhard Watzl

Collaboration


Dive into the Jean-Michel Antoine's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francisco Guarner

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fernando Azpiroz

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge