Jean-Michel Guerit

Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing : An ERP study

In order to investigate stimulus-related and task-related electrophysiological activity relevant for face processing, event-related potentials (ERPs) from 58 electrodes at standard EEG sites were recorded while subjects performed a simple visual discrimination (control) task, in addition to various face processing tasks: recognition of previously learned faces and gender decision on familiar and unfamiliar faces. Three electrophysiological components or dipolar complex were recorded in all subjects: an occipital early component (P1, around 110 ms); a vertex positive potential (VPP; around 158 ms) which appeared to be specific to faces; and a negative central component, N2 (around 230 ms). Parametric analysis and source localization were applied to these components by means of a single-subject analysis methodology. No effect of familiarity was observed on any of these early component. While the VPP appears to be independent of the kind of processing performed, face task modulations of the early P1 and the N2 were observed, with a higher amplitude for the recognition than for the gender discrimination task. An attentional modulation of early visual areas is proposed for the first effect (P1 modulation), while the N2 seems to be related to general visual memory processing. This study strongly suggests that the VPP reflects an early visual stage of face processing in the fusiform gyrus that is strictly stimulus-related and independent of familiarity. It also shows that source localization algorithms may give reliable solutions on single subject averages for early visual components despite high inter-subject variability of the surface characteristics of ERPs.

Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: an event-related potentials study.

Pictures from the Ekman and Friesen series were used in an event-related potentials study to define the timing of occurrence of gender differences in the processing of positive (happy) and negative (fear) facial expressions. Ten male and 10 female volunteers were confronted with a visual oddball design, in which they had to detect, as quickly as possible, deviant happy or fearful faces amongst a train of standard stimuli (neutral faces). Behavioral results suggest that men and women detected fearful faces more quickly than happy ones. The main result is that the N2b component, functionally considered as an attentional orienting mechanism, was delayed in men for happy stimuli as compared with fearful ones. Gender differences observed in the processing of emotional stimuli could then originate at the attentional level of the information processing system.

ERPs obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm in coma and altered states of consciousness: clinical relationships, prognostic value, and origin of components.

OBJECTIVE To study the event related potentials (ERPs) in coma and altered states of consciousness, their relationship with the clinical status and coma outcome. METHODS ERPs were recorded with a passive auditory oddball paradigm in 103 patients. Their probability of occurrence and the peak latencies and amplitudes were studied as a function of the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). Their relationship with outcome was studied in a subset of 83 patients examined within the first 4 days, and expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and negative or positive prognostic values. RESULTS When present, the ERPs to rare stimuli consisted of a fronto-central negativity (N(endog), mean latency: 330 ms) and a fronto-central positivity (P(endog), mean latency: 431 ms) following the exogenous N100-P200 complex. Both their probability of occurrence and their latencies and amplitudes were related with the GCS in anoxic and traumatic comas. The N(endog) and P(endog) had high sensitivity with a negative predictive value of 70% and 100%, respectively, but a low specificity, with a positive predictive value of 44% and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ERPs can be recorded in some comatose patients and are likely to reflect implicit orienting processes rather than preserved consciousness. Their presence implies a good prognosis but no conclusion can be drawn from their absence.

Nociceptive processing in the human brain of infrequent task-relevant and task-irrelevant noxious stimuli. A study with event-related potentials evoked by CO2 laser radiant heat stimuli.

&NA; Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) are nociceptive‐related brain responses to activation of cutaneous nociceptors by laser radiant heat stimuli. We previously showed that LEP amplitude during the P2 period (∼400 ms) was increased by rare noxious stimuli, inside and outside the focus of spatial attention. It was postulated that this effect reflected a P3a response indexing an involuntary shift of attention. In the present study, LEPs were recorded in a three‐stimulus oddball paradigm, commonly used to evoke P3a (or novelty‐P3). CO2 laser‐induced noxious stimuli were delivered on one hand (80%, frequent). Two series of rare stronger‐intensity deviant stimuli were randomly intermixed: target stimuli (10%) were delivered on the same hand while distractor stimuli (10%) were delivered on the other hand. Subjects were instructed to count targets. During an additional session, strong stimuli were delivered alone on one hand without instruction (100%, no‐task stimuli). All stimulus types evoked a first positivity around 360 ms (P360). Targets and distractors elicited a late positive complex (LPC) around 465–500 ms. Topography of LPC to distractors was central and significantly more anterior than that of LPC to targets. Distractor LPC corresponds to P3a (or novelty‐P3) indexing an involuntary orientation of attention toward an unexpected new/deviant event. It suggests that at least an early part of the LEP positivity (P360) is independent of P3‐activities.Abbreviations: ISI, interstimulus interval; LEP, laser evoked potential; LPC, late positive complex; SW, subtraction wave

Propofol infusion syndrome associated with short-term large-dose infusion during surgical anesthesia in an adult

In this case report we describe a case of propofol infusion syndrome in an adult after a short-term infusion of large-dose propofol during a neurosurgical procedure. Large-dose propofol (9 mg.kg(-1).h(-1)) was given for only 3 h during surgery and was followed by a small-dose infusion (2.3 mg.kg(-1).h(-1)) for 20 h postoperatively. The patient had also received large doses of methylprednisolone. He developed a marked lactic acidosis with mild biological signs of renal impairment and rhabdomyolysis but no cardiocirculatory failure. There were no other evident causes of lactic acidosis as documented by laboratory data. We believe this is the first report of reversible lactic acidosis associated with a short duration of large-dose propofol anesthesia.

Neuromonitoring in the operating room: why, when, and how to monitor?

This review considers the main principles and indications of EEG and evoked potential (EP) neuromonitoring in the operating room. Neuromonitoring has a threefold purpose: to warn the surgeon that he has to adjust his strategy, to confirm his decision, and to help him improve subsequent procedures. The pathophysiology of intraoperative events liable to alter the EEG or the EPs is first considered. The usefulness of neuromonitoring in preventing neurological complication relies on its ability to detect neurological dysfunction at a reversible stage. This applies especially to ischemia and compressive damage. The anesthetic influences on EEG and EPs are then considered. Knowledge of them is essential to disentangle these neurophysiological alterations due to intraoperative events from those merely due to anesthesia and to use neurophysiological parameters to evaluate the depth of anesthesia. Third, the main indications and limitations of neuromonitoring are considered: prevention of ischemic brain or spinal cord damage, prevention of mechanical injuries of the brain, spinal cord or peripheral nerve, and localization of the motor cortex in cortical neurosurgery or of cranial nerves in posterior fossa surgery. Finally, the 3 levels of neuromonitoring (neurophysiological feature extraction, neurophysiological pattern recognition, clinical integration of the neurophysiological patterns) are discussed together with the rules that should guide the dialogue between the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the neurophysiologist.

Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials

GOALS To give an overview on the theoretical and practical applications of chemosensory event-related potentials. METHODS Chemosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) may be elicited by brief and precisely defined odorous stimuli. Based on the principles of air-dilution olfactometry, a stimulator was developed in the late 1970s, which allows stimulation of the olfactory neuroepithelium and the nasal mucosa with no concomitant mechanical stimulation. Chemosensory ERPs were obtained after stimulation of the olfactory nerve (olfactory ERPs) or the trigeminal nerve (somatosensory or trigeminal ERPs). The characteristics of the stimulator for chemosensory research as well as the variables influencing the responses are discussed in this paper. RESULTS Implementation and normative data from our department are reported with different clinical examples from otorhinolaryngologic clinic. The bulk of the evoked response consists of a large negative component (often referred to as N1), which occurs between 320 and 450 ms after stimulus onset. This component is followed by a large positive component, often referred to as P2, occurring between 530 and 800 ms after stimulus onset. Absence of olfactory ERPs and presence (even with subtle changes) of somatosensory ERPs is a strong indicator of the presence of an olfactory dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS This review examines and discusses the methods of chemosensory stimulation as well as the electrophysiological correlates elicited by such stimuli. The clinical applications of chemosensory ERPs in neurology and otorhinolaryngology are outlined.

Sensitivity, specificity, and surgical impact of somatosensory evoked potentials in descending aorta surgery.

BACKGROUND We evaluate the efficiency of multilevel somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring for intraoperative re-establishment of blood flow to the spinal cord in 63 patients undergoing descending aorta repair. METHODS The presence of critical vessels in a cross-clamped aortic segment was ascertained by a 15 minute SEP observation period while the segment between the clamps was vented to drain out the collateral flow. RESULTS SEPs influenced the surgical strategy in 17 cases (27%): use of the Biomedicus in 1 traumatic rupture; critical vessel reimplantation or distal clamp replacement in 13 cases of segmental spinal ischemia; and hastening the procedure or proximal clamp replacement in 3 cases of left carotid ischemia. There were no cases of unexplained multilevel SEP abnormalities. Immediate paraplegia was observed in 2 cases (1 pre-existing; 1 forecast by a 199-minute period of SEP absence due to segmental ischemia); 2 patients presented delayed paraplegias despite unchanged intraoperative SEPs, and 1 case presented a transient paraplegia due to lower motoneuronal involvement. CONCLUSIONS SEPs efficiently identified critical vessels to be reimplanted in order to avoid immediate paraplegia. However, systematic additional vessel reimplantation, if technically feasible, and prolongation of SEP monitoring during the postoperative period with careful blood pressure control are needed to prevent delayed paraplegia.

Multilevel somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for spinal cord monitoring in descending thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic surgery

The usefulness of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring as a means of preventing paraplegia in descending aorta surgery was evaluated in 47 consecutive cases operated on for isthmic (14 cases), thoracic (22 cases), or thoraco-abdominal (11 cases) repair. An aortic dissection was found in 11 cases (acute in 6). Somatosensory evoked potentials were obtained by unilateral left and right posterior tibial nerve (PTN) stimulation at the ankle and recordings were performed on four channels: peripheral nerve, lumbar spinal, brain-stem, and cortical recordings. Our experience led to the following current strategy: the establishment of atrio(aorto)-femoral(aortic) bypass (29 cases), proximal and distal aortic cross-clamping, aortic repair with reimplantation of the culprit artery(ies) as indicated by SEP alterations. Five types of SEP alterations were defined on the basis of the neural level involved: type I (27.7% of cases) = distal spinal ischemia due to proximal aortic cross-clamping in the absence of bypass; type II (21.3%) = PTN ischemia due to left common femoral artery cross-clamping; type III (12.8%) = segmental spinal ischemia due to the exclusion of critical feeding arteries; type IV (4.3%) = ischemia in the left carotid artery territory; type V (4.3%) = global brain hypoperfusion due to systemic hypotension. Forty-five patients survived the operation and could be tested for neurological dysfunction. Three patients presented a postoperative spinal cord deficit, but this deficit was already present preoperatively in one case, so that the actual incidence of a new paraplegia in our series was 2/45 cases (4.4%). One of the two cases was clearly a delayed paraplegia with SEP alterations appearing several hours after the operation. Somatosensory evoked potentials were evaluated on the basis of their sensitivity, specificity, and impact on the surgical strategy. Regarding SEP sensitivity, we did not encounter any unexpected immediate paraplegia, but the critical factor appeared to be the duration of SEP absence due to spinal cord ischemia, which, according to the literature, should never exceed 30 min; after a longer absence, SEP return does not guarantee neurological recovery. Somatosensory evoked potential specificity was also 100%, but only 58% of the abnormalities found were actually consequent to spinal cord ischemia, the rest of the abnormalities being consequent to peripheral nerve or brain ischemia. Finally, SEP monitoring had a significant impact on surgical strategy in 19% of the cases. It is concluded that distal aortic perfusion and multilevel SEP monitoring play a significant role in preventing paraplegia in descending aorta surgery.

State-of-the-art of neuromonitoring for prevention of immediate and delayed paraplegia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta surgery.

BACKGROUND The prevention of immediate and delayed paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aorta surgery relies on hemodynamic maneuvers (aimed at restoration of an adequate spinal cord perfusion pressure) and cytoprotective measures (hypothermia, drugs). METHODS The indications for implementing these measures can be provided by motor-evoked potential (MEP) or somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) monitoring. RESULTS Intraoperative interactions between the surgeon and the neurophysiologist can be described by algorithms to be applied in the presence or absence of intraoperative MEP or SEP changes. CONCLUSIONS It should be noted that normal SEPs or MEPs at the end of surgery do not systematically guarantee the nonoccurrence of delayed paraplegia, especially when segmental arteries have been ligated, in which case postoperative SEP monitoring is indicated.