Jean-Paul Belgrado

Near-Infrared Fluorescence Lymphatic Imaging to Reconsider Occlusion Pressure of Superficial Lymphatic Collectors in Upper Extremities of Healthy Volunteers

Abstract Background: There are very little scientific data on occlusion pressure for superficial lymphatic collectors. Given its importance in determining the transport capacity of lymphatic vessels, it is crucial to know its value. The novel method of near-infrared fluorescence lymphatic imaging (NIRFLI) can be used to visualize lymphatic flow in real time. The goal of this study was to see if this method could be used to measure the lymphatic occlusion pressure. Methods: We observed and recorded lymph flow in the upper limb of healthy volunteers through a transparent cuff using near-infrared fluorescence lymphatic imaging. After obtaining a baseline of the lymph flow without pressure inside the cuff, the cuff was inflated by increments of 10 mm Hg starting at 30 mm Hg. A NIRFLI guided manual lymphatic drainage technique named “Fill & Flush Drainage Method” was performed during the measurement to promote lymph flow. Lymphatic occlusion pressure was determined by observing when lymph flow stopped under the cuff. Results: We measured the lymphatic occlusion pressure on 30 healthy volunteers (11 men and 19 women). Mean lymphatic occlusion pressure in the upper limb was 86 mm Hg (CI ±3.7 mm Hg, α = 0.5%). No significant differences were found between age groups (p = 0.18), gender (p = 0.12), or limb side (p = 0.85). Conclusions: NIRFLI, a transparent sphygmomanometer cuff and the “Fill and Flush” manual lymphatic drainage method were used to measure the lymphatic occlusion pressure in 30 healthy humans. That combination of these techniques allows the visualization of the lymph flow in real time, while ensuring the continuous filling of the lymph collectors during the measurement session, reducing false negative observations. The measured occlusion pressures are much higher than previously described in the medical literature.

Scintigraphic investigations of the superficial lymphatic system: quantitative differences between intradermal and subcutaneous injections.

Rationale and objectivesBoth subcutaneous and intradermal injections are used for the scintigraphic investigations of the superficial lymphatic system. The qualitative differences between these types of injections are well known. This study quantified their differences in a group of volunteers. MethodsWith the limbs at rest, activities in the axillary nodes (AxN) were recorded at 1, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 min after subcutaneous or intradermal injection of 99mTC-labelled human serum albumin nanocolloids in the ventral middle part of each forearm of nine young, healthy, male volunteers and the results were compared. ResultsExpressed as per 10 000 of injected activity, activities recorded in the AxN were significantly higher (32.5 times as a mean value, ranging from 8.4 to 130.7 times) after intradermal injections than after subcutaneous injections (P<0.001 by using two-tailed Wilcoxons signed-rank test). The mean AxN activity after intradermal injections was also apparently higher for the right limbs than for the left limbs, but when the paired t-test was used to compare the right with the left values of the nine volunteers, the comparison did not reach statistical significance (at T+100, 2P=0.087). When their handedness is taken into account, however, a level of statistical significance is reached (at T+100, 2P=0.025). ConclusionThis study quantifies the differences between subcutaneous and intradermal injections, but also shows, although on a limited number of volunteers, that handedness influences the results of the intradermal injections.