Jean-Pierre Gossard
Université de Montréal
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jean-Pierre Gossard.
Brain Research | 1990
Jean-Pierre Gossard; Jean-Marie Cabelguen; Serge Rossignol
Previous results from our laboratory have shown with intra-axonal recordings that hindfoot cutaneous primary afferents are subjected to rhythmic depolarizations during fictive locomotion (L-PAD) suggesting that cutaneous presynaptic mechanisms are activated by the central locomotor program. In this study, we examined the transmission in pathways responsible for primary afferent depolarizations (PAD) of cutaneous fibres during spontaneous fictive locomotion in decorticate cats and in spinal cats injected with nialamide and L-DOPA. PADs were evoked (E-PADs) by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves and recorded intra-axonally with micropipettes in identified superficialis peroneal (SP; n = 7) and tibialis posterior (TP; n = 17) cutaneous primary afferents. Results showed that the amplitude of E-PADs, which were superimposed on the L-PAD, was deeply modulated throughout the locomotor cycle; decreasing to reach a minimum during the flexor phase and increasing to a maximum during the extensor phase. The results were not statistically different in fibres of the two nerves and in both types of preparation. The amplitude of E-PADs was always maximum during the extensor phase whether there was a large L-PAD or not during that phase. This suggests that the presynaptic mechanisms activated by central locomotor networks (L-PAD) and those activated by peripheral inputs (E-PAD) may in part be controlled differently. The results thus show that the transmission in PAD pathways activated by cutaneous inputs is phasically modulated by the central pattern generator for locomotion. This strongly suggests that the presynaptic inhibition in cutaneous fibres evoked by the movement-related feedback during real locomotion could be similarly modulated.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2004
Marie-Pascale Côté; Jean-Pierre Gossard
Plasticity after spinal cord injury can be initiated by specific patterns of sensory feedback, leading to a reorganization of spinal networks. For example, proprioceptive feedback from limb loading during the stance phase is crucial for the recovery of stepping in spinal-injured animals and humans. Our recent results showed that step training modified transmission from group I afferents of extensors in spinal cats. However, cutaneous afferents are also activated during locomotion and are necessary for proper foot placement in spinal cats. We therefore hypothesized that step training would also modify transmission in cutaneous pathways to facilitate recovery of stepping. We tested transmission in cutaneous pathways by comparing intracellular responses in lumbar motoneurons (n = 136) in trained (n = 11) and untrained (n = 7) cats spinalized 3-5 weeks before the acute electrophysiological experiment. Three cutaneous nerves were stimulated, and each evoked up to three motoneuronal responses mediated by at least three different pathways. Overall, of 71 cutaneous pathways tested, 10 were modified by step training: transmission was reduced in 7 and facilitated in 3. Remarkably, 6 of 10 involved the medial plantar nerve innervating the plantar surface of the foot, including two of the facilitated pathways. Because the cutaneous reflexes are exaggerated after spinalization, we interpret the decrease in most pathways as a normalization of cutaneous transmission necessary to recover locomotor movements. Overall, the results showed a high degree of specificity in plasticity among cutaneous pathways and indicate that transmission of skin inputs signaling ground contact, in particular, is modified by step training.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2003
Marie-Pascale Côté; Ariane Ménard; Jean-Pierre Gossard
Treadmill training and clonidine, an α-2 noradrenergic agonist, have been shown to improve locomotion after spinal cord injury. We speculate that transmission in load pathways, which are involved in body support during stance, is specifically modified by training. This was evaluated by comparing two groups of spinal cats; one group (n = 11) was trained to walk until full-weight-bearing (3–4 weeks), and the other (shams;n = 7) was not. During an acute experiment, changes in group I pathways, monosynaptic excitation, disynaptic inhibition, and polysynaptic excitation were investigated by measuring the response amplitude in extensor motoneurons before and after clonidine injection. Monosynaptic excitation was not modified by clonidine but was decreased significantly by training. Disynaptic inhibition was significantly decreased by clonidine in both groups, but more significantly in trained cats, and significantly reduced by training after clonidine. Also, clonidine could reverse group IB inhibition into polysynaptic excitation in both groups but more frequently in trained cats. We also investigated whether fictive stepping revealed additional changes. In trained cats, the phase-dependent modulation of all three responses was similar to patterns reported previously, but in shams, modulation of monosynaptic and polysynaptic responses was not. Overall, training appears to decrease monosynaptic excitation and enhance the effects of clonidine in the reduction of disynaptic inhibition and reversal to polysynaptic excitation. Because it is believed that polysynaptic excitatory group I pathways transmit locomotor drive to extensor motoneurons, we suggest that the latter changes would facilitate the recruitment of extensor muscles for recovering weight-bearing during stepping.
The Journal of Physiology | 2009
Jean-Pierre Gossard
During walking, a change in speed is accomplished by varying the duration of the stance phase, while the swing phase remains relatively invariant. To determine if this asymmetry in the control of locomotor cycles is an inherent property of the spinal central pattern generator (CPG), we recorded episodes of fictive locomotion in decerebrate cats with or without a complete spinal transection (acute or chronic). During fictive locomotion, stance and swing phases typically correspond to extension and flexion phases, respectively. The extension and flexion phases were determined by measuring the duration of extensor and flexor bursts, respectively. In the vast majority of locomotor episodes, cycle period varied more with the extension phase. This was found without phasic sensory feedback, supraspinal structures, pharmacology or sustained stimulation. We conclude that the control of walking speed is governed by an asymmetry within the organization of the spinal CPG, which can be modified by extraneous factors.
Brain Research | 1990
Jean-Pierre Gossard; Serge Rossignol
To help elucidate the role of presynaptic mechanisms in the control of locomotor movements, the transmission of PAD pathways was investigated by recording dorsal root potentials (DRPs) evoked by electrical stimulation of cutaneous and muscle nerves of both hindlimbs at various phases of the fictive step cycle. Fictive locomotion occurred spontaneously in decorticate cats or by stimulating the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) as well as in low spinal cats injected with nialamide and L-DOPA. Evoked DRPs were superimposed on a fluctuating DRP accompanying the fictive locomotor rhythm (locomotor DRP) which typically consisted of two peaks of depolarization per cycle, the largest peak occurring during the flexor phase. The amplitude of evoked DRPs was substantially modulated throughout the locomotor cycle and followed a similar modulation pattern for all stimulated nerves whether ipsilateral (i-) or contralateral (co-). The amplitude of evoked DRPs decreased at the beginning of the flexor phase, dropped to a minimum later in the flexor phase and then increased during the extensor phase where it became maximum. Results were comparable in decorticate and spinal preparations and for L6 and L7 rootlets with cutaneous and muscle nerve stimulation. It is noteworthy that the modulation pattern for a given rootlet was similar for i- and co- stimulation, even though the bilateral locomotor DRPs fluctuate out-of-phase with each other, subjecting the stimulated fibres to opposite presynaptic polarization changes. This suggests that the modulation may depend more on the presynaptic mechanisms of the receiving fibres than on those of the stimulated fibres. These results demonstrate that the transmission in spinal pathways involved in primary afferent depolarization (PAD) is phasically modulated by the activity in the spinal locomotor network. It is further suggested that the presynaptic inhibition associated with PAD evoked by movement-related sensory feedback during real locomotion could be modulated in a similar way.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2010
Jean-Pierre Gossard
Locomotion and scratch are characterized by alternation of flexion and extension phases within one hindlimb, which are mediated by rhythm-generating circuitry within the spinal cord. By definition, the rhythm generator controls cycle period, phase durations, and phase transitions. The aim was to determine whether rhythm-generating mechanisms for locomotion and scratch are similar in adult decerebrate cats. The regulation of cycle period during fictive scratching was evaluated, as were the effects of specific sensory inputs on phase durations and transitions during spontaneous fictive locomotion and pinna-evoked fictive scratching. Results show that cycle period during fictive scratching varied predominantly with flexion phase duration, contrary to spontaneous fictive locomotion, where cycle period varied with extension phase duration. Ankle dorsiflexion greatly increased extension phase duration and cycle period during fictive locomotion but did not alter cycle period during scratching. Moreover, stimulating the plantaris (ankle extensor muscle) nerve during flexion reset the locomotor rhythm to extension but not the scratch rhythm. Stimulating the plantaris nerve during extension prolonged the extension phase and cycle period during fictive locomotion but not during fictive scratching. Stimulating the sartorius nerve (hip flexor muscle) during early flexion reduced the flexion phase and cycle period during fictive locomotion, but considerably prolonged the flexion phase and cycle period during fictive scratching. These data indicate that cycle period, phase durations, and phase transitions are not regulated similarly during fictive locomotion and scratching, with or without sensory inputs, providing evidence for specialized rhythm-generating mechanisms within the adult mammalian spinal cord.
Brain Research | 1999
Jean-Pierre Gossard; Laurent J. Bouyer; Serge Rossignol
This study investigated the effects of antidromically conducted nerve impulses on the transmission of orthodromic volleys in primary afferents of the hindlimb in decerebrated paralyzed cats. Two protocols were used: (A) Single skin and muscle afferents (N=20) isolated from the distal part of cut dorsal rootlets (L7-S1) were recorded while stimulation was applied more caudally. The results showed that during the trains of three to 20 stimuli, the orthodromic firing frequency decreased or ceased, depending on the frequency of stimulation. Remarkably, subsequent to these trains, the occurrence of orthodromic spikes could be delayed for hundreds of ms (15/20 afferents) and sometimes stopped for several seconds (10/20 afferents). Longer stimulation trains, simulating antidromic bursts reported during locomotion, caused a progressive decrease, and a slow recovery of, orthodromic firing frequency (7/20 afferents), indicating a cumulative long-lasting depressing effect from successive bursts. (B) Identified stretch-sensitive muscle afferents were recorded intra-axonally and antidromic spikes were evoked by the injection of square pulses of current through the micropipette. In this case, one to three antidromic spikes were sufficient to delay the occurrence of the next orthodromic spike by more than one control inter-spike interval. If the control inter-spike interval was decreased by stretching the muscle, the delay evoked by antidromic spikes decreased proportionally. Overall, these findings suggest that antidromic activity could alter the mechanisms underlying spike generation in peripheral sensory receptors and modify the orthodromic discharges of afferents during locomotion.
Progress in Brain Research | 2011
Jean-Pierre Gossard; Jennifer Sirois; Patrick Noué; Marie-Pascale Côté; Ariane Menard; Hugues Leblond
During walking, an increase in speed is accompanied by a decrease in the stance phase duration while the swing phase remains relatively invariant. By definition, the rhythm generator in the lumbar spinal cord controls cycle period, phase durations, and phase transitions. Our first aim was to determine if this asymmetry in the control of locomotor cycles is an inherent property of the central pattern generator (CPG). We recorded episodes of fictive locomotion, that is, locomotor patterns in absence of reafference, in decerebrate cats with or without a complete spinal transection (acute or chronic). In fictive locomotion, stance and swing phases typically correspond to extension and flexion, respectively. In the vast majority of locomotor episodes, cycle period varied more with extensor phase duration. This could be observed without phasic sensory feedback or supraspinal structures or pharmacology. In a few experiments, we stimulated the mesencephalic locomotor region or selected peripheral nerves during fictive locomotion and both could alter the phase/cycle period relationship. We conclude that there is a built-in asymmetry within the spinal rhythm generator for locomotion, which can be modified by extraneous factors. Locomotor and scratching rhythms are characterized by alternation of flexion and extension phases within one hindlimb, which are mediated by rhythm-generating circuitry within the spinal cord. Our second aim was to determine if rhythm generators for locomotion and scratch have similar control mechanisms in adult decerebrate cats. The regulation of cycle period during fictive scratching was evaluated, as were the effects of specific sensory inputs on phase durations and transitions during pinna-evoked fictive scratching. Results show that cycle period during fictive scratching varied predominantly with flexion phase duration, contrary to spontaneous fictive locomotion. Ankle dorsiflexion greatly increased extension phase duration and cycle period during fictive locomotion but did not alter cycle period during scratching. These data indicate that cycle period, phase durations, and phase transitions are not regulated similarly during fictive locomotion and scratching, with or without sensory inputs, providing evidence for the existence of distinct interneuronal components of rhythm generation within the mammalian spinal cord.
The Journal of Physiology | 2000
Hugues Leblond; Ariane Ménard; Jean-Pierre Gossard
1 Intracellular recording of lumbosacral motoneurones in the decerebrate and partially spinalized cat injected with nialamide and L‐dihydroxyphenylalanine (l‐DOPA) was used to investigate the interneuronal convergence of two bulbospinal pathways and of the segmental pathways involved with the generation of extensor activities during locomotion. 2 Deiters nucleus (DN) or the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) was stimulated in alternation with, and in combination with, stimulation of group I afferents from extensor muscles or of contralateral flexor reflex afferents (coFRA). The evoked polysynaptic EPSPs were recorded in extensor motoneurones when long‐latency, long‐lasting discharges were evoked by the stimulation of coFRA and when the group I autogenetic inhibition in extensors was reversed to polysynaptic excitation. Spatial facilitation was inferred when the amplitude of the EPSPs evoked by the combined stimuli was notably larger than the algebraic sum of the EPSPs evoked by individual stimulation. 3 Both DN (16 motoneurones) and MLF inputs (8 motoneurones) showed spatial facilitation when preceded by coFRA stimuli and both could reset the rhythm of fictive stepping by triggering a precocious extensor phase. MLF showed spatial facilitation with extensor group I inputs in 69 % of trials but DN failed to show spatial facilitation in any cells. 4 These results indicate that DN and MLF project to the coFRA pathways of the extensor half‐centre for locomotion and MLF, but not DN, converge on segmental interneurones of the extensor group I pathways. The implications of such convergence patterns on the functional organization of the extensor half‐centre are discussed.
Experimental Brain Research | 1997
Hugues Leblond; Jean-Pierre Gossard
Abstract The fine control of locomotion results from a complex interaction between descending signals from supraspinal structures and sensory feedback from the limbs. In this report, we studied the interaction between vestibulospinal volleys descending from Deiters’ nucleus and group I afferent input from extensor muscles. It has been shown that both pathways can exert powerful control over the amplitude and the timing of muscle bursting activity in the different phases of the step cycle. The effects of stimulating these pathways on the fictive locomotor rhythm were compared in decerebrate, partially spinal cats (ipsilateral ventral quadrant intact) injected with nialamide and l-dopa. As reported before, stimulation of both Deiters’ nucleus and group I fibres from ankle extensor muscles, when given during the flexor phase, stopped the flexor activity and initiated activity in extensors. When applied during the extensor phase, the same stimulation prolonged the extensor activity and therefore delayed the onset of flexor activity. This similarity suggests that the two pathways might converge on common spinal interneurones. This possibility was tested with the spatial facilitation technique in lumbosacral motoneurones. Deiters’ nucleus and group I fibres from extensor muscles were stimulated with different intensities and with several different coupling intervals. Motoneurones showing clear di- and/or polysynaptic excitation from both pathways were retained for analysis. Surprisingly, in all cases, there were no signs of spatial facilitation, but a simple algebraic sum of the two excitatory postsynaptic potentials. This result indicates that each input acts on the rhythm generator through separate interneuronal pathways.