Jeanette D. Cheng

Pathogenesis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma: role of MUC1 glycoprotein

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma, a tumor with highly infiltrative characteristics is defined by a distinctive cleft formation around the neoplastic cell clusters which is presumably a result of the detachment of the cells from the stroma due to as yet undetermined factors. Ultrastructural examination performed on a handful of cases demonstrated an unexpected secretory activity in the stroma-facing surface of the cells. MUC1 is a glycoprotein typically expressed in the apical surface of normal epithelial cells, responsible for maintaining lumen formation. In conventional adenocarcinomas, MUC1 expression is largely intracytoplasmic, intercellular, or apical (in glandular areas). The MUC1 expression pattern was investigated by immunohistochemical staining in invasive micropapillary carcinoma of breast (n=11), pancreas (n=5), gynecologic tract (n=11) and urinary bladder (n=10). The results were contrasted with the staining pattern in conventional carcinomas of the same organs (n=202). In all invasive micropapillary carcinoma, MUC1 expression was predominantly in the stroma-facing surface of the cell clusters (basal), accentuating the outlines of the micropapillary units by forming a distinct band on this surface. In conventional carcinoma the labeling was mostly apical in areas with lumen formation and intracytoplasmic and intercellular in the poorly differentiated areas. In conclusion, in the micropapillary pattern of invasive carcinoma, the expression of MUC1, is largely limited to the basal surface of the cells in contrast to conventional carcinomas in which MUC1 is largely apical, intracytoplasmic or intercellular. This provides support for the reversal of cell orientation as an important factor of the morphogenesis and possibly the pathogenesis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma. Since MUC1 is known to have a role in lumen formation, and has an inhibitory role in the cell to stroma interaction, it is conceivable that it is a key factor in the detachment of cells from stroma allowing for the dissection of the connective tissue and easing the spread of cells.

Lymphoepithelial Cysts of the Pancreas: a Report of 12 Cases and a Review of the Literature

Lymphoepithelial cyst (LEC) of the pancreas is a rare lesion of undetermined pathogenesis that had been documented almost exclusively in males. The literature on this entity is limited to reports of single or small numbers of cases. Here is presented a clinicopathologic analysis of 12 patients with LEC, 4 of whom were female. The mean age of the patients was 56 years. Four patients presented with abdominal pain and nausea, but in two patients, the cysts were detected incidentally. Only one patient had a history of chronic pancreatitis, and another had a family member with pancreatic cancer. In one patient, a clinical diagnosis of pseudocyst was rendered, and the remaining patients were clinically thought to have cystic neoplasms. None of the patients had any identifiable immunosuppression, HIV positivity, autoimmune disorder (such as Sjogren syndrome) or lymphoma. Seven cysts were located in the head of the pancreas, and 5 were in the tail. The mean size was 4.8 cm (range, 1.2–17 cm). Five LECs were multilocular, three were unilocular; in others, the number of loculi was not recorded. All were “macrocystic” lesions. Two patients had two separate lesions, both in the tail of the pancreas. Histologically, all cases were characterized by cysts, some containing keratin, and lined by mature stratified squamous epithelium surrounded by dense lymphoid tissue, often with prominent follicles. In some areas, the lining epithelium had more cuboidal, flattened, or transitional appearance. Mucinous goblet-like cells were seen in one case. Acute inflammation was not seen. Four cases contained solid lymphoepithelial islands, a feature not previously described in LECs. No squamous metaplasia was identified in the uninvolved pancreatic tissue and no epithelial elements were identified in peripancreatic lymph nodes. In summary, LEC of the pancreas is a rare but distinctive lesion that may be seen in the tail of the organ where most cystic pancreatic neoplasms are encountered. In contrast to the impression from the literature, LECs may also develop in females and, therefore, should be considered in the clinical differential diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasms that affect a similar age group. LECs are not associated with the clinical syndromes that are seen with their analogues in the salivary glands.

A proposal for a new and more practical grading scheme for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

There is no uniformly applied grading system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DA). The scheme advocated by the WHO is essentially that of Klöppel et al, and is based on the “highest grade” focus. Although it is precise with good prognostic value, it is unfortunately not widely applied, largely because of the lack of recognition and partly because of its complex nature (interpretation of multiple parameters). Furthermore, it is fundamentally different from the one used in Japan, which evaluates the overall pattern. To establish a more widely applicable, practical, and clinically relevant grading system, a scheme similar to Gleasons scoring system was developed and tested on 112 cases of resected pancreatic DA and was compared with the WHO system. In the grading system devised, patterns (P) of infiltration were classified as follows: P1, well-defined glands with easily discernible contours; P2, fused or poorly formed glands with ill-defined contours; P3, nonglandular patterns. A score was then obtained by the summation of the predominant and the secondary patterns. Scores ≤3 (at least some well-formed glands and no nonglandular pattern) was graded as G1, 4 as G2, and ≥5 (at least some nonglandular patterns and no well-formed glandular pattern) as G3. Seventy-three percent of the cases displayed mixed patterns, with disparate patterns (P1 with P3) in 13%, confirming the high degree of heterogeneity of DA. There was a significant correlation between grade and survival, better than the correlation between survival and either the major or minor patterns evaluated separately. The median survival for G1, G2, and G3 were 22, 14, and 8 months; 1-year survival 68%, 44%, and 33%; 2-year was 67%, 11%, and 0%; and 3-year was 23%, 4%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.0019). In a multivariate analysis, correlating survival with grade, tumor size, and lymph node status, the grade was the strongest independent predictor of survival. Odds ratio of dying of disease were 3.56 (P < 0.0001) in G3 versus G1, 1.79 (P = 0.058) in G2 versus G1, and 1.98 (P = 0.03) in G3 versus G2. Compared with this, the same odds ratio were 1.17 (P = 0.01) in tumors >2 cm versus ≤2 cm and 1.78 (P = 0.01) in cases with positive versus negative lymph nodes. The WHO grading scheme was not found to have as good a correlation with survival in this study, with WHO grade 2 showing a better survival than 1. The reproducibility of both the proposed grading system and that of WHO were found to be moderately good (with kappa values of 0.43 and 0.44, respectively), when 32 slides of DA were graded by four independent observers. The grading scheme for pancreatobiliary adenocarcinoma proposed here is highly applicable because it is practical and readily adoptable. It reflects biologic characteristics of ductal carcinoma (prominent tubule formation and tumor heterogeneity). Most importantly, it is clinically relevant with good prognostic value. Lastly, it is also applicable for use in research, by utilizing “patterns,” even in small specimens like microarrays or biopsies.

Lipid-rich variant of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms

Most pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) show characteristic and well-recognized endocrine morphology; however, a lipid-rich pattern, which can present a diagnostic problem in biopsies, has been reported, mostly as individual cases. Some have been included in descriptions of the rare clear-cell variant associated with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome. The histogenesis, clinicopathologic characteristics, and significance of this lipid-rich pattern have not been unraveled. In this study, 11 PENs exhibiting foamy, microvesicular cytoplasm were analyzed. In some cases, the nuclei were distorted by the vesicles, and the usual endocrine chromatin pattern was not evident. The growth pattern was relatively diffuse, with vague compartmentalization of the cells by a delicate vasculature; prominent nesting was noted in only 4 cases. Pathology reports indicated substantial diagnostic challenge in these cases; on biopsies, 1 case was originally diagnosed as adrenal cortical carcinoma, another as renal cell carcinoma, a third as solid-pseudopapillary tumor, and a fourth had a fine needle aspiration cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. All cases were chromogranin and synaptophysin positive. Electron microscopy in 3 cases confirmed the cytoplasmic vesicles to be lipid vacuoles. Neurosecretory granules were also evident. Clinically, as in conventional PENs, there appeared to be two distinct subsets: Two cases were familial or functional/syndromic (1 with VHL and the other with MEN-1 and glucagonoma syndrome) and occurred in younger adults (ages 41 and 47 years); the majority (n = 9) were nonfunctional/nonsyndromic and nonfamilial. The latter group was mostly represented by elderly males (mean age: 65 vs. 58 years in conventional sporadic PENs). Immunohistochemically, markers implicated in VHL-associated neoplasia, including HIF-1α, inhibin, and Melan-A (in clear-cell PENs) and MUC6 (in serous cystadenomas) were mostly negative in lipid-rich PENs (1 of 10, 1 of 10, 0 of 10 and 0 of 10, respectively). In conclusion, the lipid-rich pattern, reminiscent of adrenal cortical cells, represents a distinct subset of PENs. It presents a diagnostic challenge for surgical pathologists, especially in biopsies. EM supports the name lipid-rich for this variant. The findings suggest that the pathogenesis of lipid-rich tumors may be different from the VHL-associated clear-cell variants of PENs.

Mucinous Carcinomas of the Gallbladder: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 15 Cases Identified in 606 Carcinomas

CONTEXT There are virtually no data in the literature regarding the incidence, patterns, and clinicopathologic characteristics of mucinous carcinomas (MCs) of the gallbladder (GB). OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence of mucinous differentiation in invasive GB carcinomas and the clinicopathologic characteristics of those that qualify as MC. DESIGN Primary invasive GB carcinomas (n  =  606) were reviewed for mucinous differentiation. Some degree of mucin production was identified in 40 cases (6.6%); however, only 15 (2.5%) were qualified for the World Health Organization definition of MC (stromal mucin deposition constituting >50% of the tumor). RESULTS The mean age was 65 years, and the female to male ratio was 1.1 (versus 3.9 for conventional pancreatobiliary-type GB adenocarcinomas; P  =  .04). A significant proportion of the cases (8 of 12, 67%) presented with the clinical picture and intraoperative findings that were interpreted as acute cholecystitis. Mean and median tumor sizes were larger than those of conventional adenocarcinomas (4.8 and 3.4 cm versus 2.9 and 2.5 cm, respectively; P  =  .01). Most (13 of 15, 87%) cases presented with pT3 tumors (versus 48% for ordinary GB carcinomas; P  =  .01). Two cases had almost an exclusive colloid pattern (>90% composed of well-defined stromal mucin nodules that contained scanty carcinoma cells, most of which were floating within the mucin). Eight cases were of mixed-mucinous type, showing a mixture of colloid and noncolloid patterns. Five others had prominent signet-ring cells, both floating within the mucin (which constituted >50% of the tumor by definition) and infiltrating into the stroma as individual signet-ring cells in some areas. Immunohistochemical analysis performed on the 7 cases that had available tissue revealed CK7 in 4 of 7 (57%), CK20 in 2 of 7 (29%), MUC1 in 4 of 7 (57%), MUC2 in 6 of 7 (86%), CDX2 in 1 of 7 (14%), MUC5AC in 6 of 7 (86%), MUC6 in 0 of 7 (0%), and loss of E-cadherin in 6 of 7 (86%). The MLH1 and MSH2 were retained in 6 of 7 cases (100%). Follow-up information was available for 13 cases: 11 (85%) died of disease (1-37 months) and 2 (15%) were alive (23 months and 1 month). Overall survival of MCs was significantly worse than that of conventional adenocarcinomas (13 versus 26 months; P  =  .01); however, that did not seem to be independent of stage. CONCLUSIONS Mucinous carcinomas constitute 2.5% of GB carcinomas. They present with an acute cholecystitis-type picture. Most MCs are a mixed-mucinous, not pure colloid, type. They are typically large and advanced tumors at the time of diagnosis and thus exhibit more-aggressive behavior than do ordinary GB carcinomas. Immunophenotypically, they differ from conventional GB adenocarcinomas by MUC2 positivity, from intestinal carcinomas by an often inverse CK7/20 profile, from pancreatic mucinous carcinomas by CDX2 negativity, and from mammary colloid carcinomas by a lack of MUC6. Unlike gastrointestinal MCs, they appear to be microsatellite stable.

DeltaNp63 expression in pancreas and pancreatic neoplasia

DeltaNp63 (DNp63) has become widely used, in particular, for distinguishing invasive carcinomas from noninvasive ducts by highlighting the myoepithelial or basal cells in the breast and prostate, respectively. It is not known whether this marker may have any application in another exocrine organ, the pancreas. As the ductal and intraductal proliferations of this organ become better characterized, the need for markers to distinguish among these processes increases. We investigated immunohistochemical expression of DNP63 in 105 cases. A total of 25 cases were non-neoplastic pancreata, 25 were pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) of various grades, and 50 were examples of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sections of non-neoplastic pancreata included various types of non-neoplastic processes such as squamous/transitional metaplasia (five cases), which can be mistaken for high-grade PanINs, as well as various degrees of reactive ductal atypia and incidental microcysts with attenuated lining (five cases). No DNp63 expression was noted in normal pancreatic ducts. On the other hand, all five foci of squamous/transitional metaplasia were strongly and uniformly positive for this marker. DNp63 labeling was also noted in those incidental microcysts lined by attenuated cells, seen amidst normal pancreatic lobules. All PanINs were negative. Among invasive carcinomas, DNp63 expression was detected only in areas of squamous differentiation and was completely absent in ordinary ductal areas. Based on this observation, five additional cases of adenosquamous/squamous carcinoma was retrieved and stained, and the squamous components of all of these were also positive. In conclusion, (I) DNp63 is a reliable marker of squamous differentiation in the pancreas. It is valuable in distinguishing squamous/transitional metaplasia from PanINs, a distinction of importance for both researchers and diagnosticians. Among invasive carcinomas, it seems to be entirely specific for areas of squamous differentiation. (II) Those incidental microcysts seen in acinar lobules and lined by attenuated cells are also positive for DNp63, which suggests that they may be metaplastic in nature, and that they do not represent neoplastic cells. (III) Unlike the ducts of other exocrine organs, breast and prostate, there are no DNp63-expressing cells in the normal pancreatic ducts, and therefore, this marker cannot be used in distinguishing invasive carcinomas from the non-invasive ducts. (IV) No p63-expressing ‘stem’ cells are present in the pancreas.

Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas

Distal common bile duct carcinoma is a poorly characterized entity for reasons such as variable terminology and difficulty in determining site of origin of intrapancreatic lesions. We compared clinicopathologic features of pancreatobiliary-type adenocarcinomas within the pancreas, but arising from the distal common bile duct, with those of pancreatic and ampullary origin. Upon careful review of 1017 pancreatoduodenectomy specimens with primary adenocarcinoma, 52 (5%) qualified as intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma. Five associated with an intraductal papillary neoplasm were excluded; the remaining 47 were compared to 109 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and 133 ampullary carcinomas. Distal common bile duct carcinoma patients had a younger median age (58 years) than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients (65 years) and ampullary carcinoma patients (68 years). Distal common bile duct carcinoma was intermediate between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and ampullary carcinoma with regard to tumor size and rates of node metastases and margin positivity. Median survival was better than for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (P=0.0010) but worse than for ampullary carcinoma (P=0.0006). Distal common bile duct carcinoma often formed an even band around the common bile duct and commonly showed intraglandular neutrophil-rich debris and a small tubular pattern. Poor prognostic indicators included node metastasis (P=0.0010), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.0299), and margin positivity (P=0.0069). Categorizing the tumors based on size also had prognostic relevance (P=0.0096), unlike categorization based on anatomic structures invaded. Primary distal common bile duct carcinoma is seen in younger patients than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or ampullary carcinoma. Its prognosis is significantly better than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and worse than ampullary carcinoma, at least partly because of differences in clinical presentation. Use of size-based criteria for staging appears to improve its prognostic relevance. Invasive pancreatobiliary-type distal common bile duct carcinomas are uncommon in the West and have substantial clinicopathologic differences from carcinomas arising from the pancreas and ampulla.