Jeanette Ward

Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study

Objective To quantify the risk and severity of negative effects of treatment for localised prostate cancer on long term quality of life. Design Population based, prospective cohort study with follow-up over three years. Setting New South Wales, Australia. Participants Men with localised prostate cancer were eligible if aged less than 70 years, diagnosed between October 2000 and October 2002, and notified to the New South Wales central cancer registry. Controls were randomly selected from the New South Wales electoral roll and matched to cases by age and postcode. Main outcome measures General health specific and disease specific function up to three years after diagnosis, according to the 12 item short form health survey and the University of California, Los Angeles prostate cancer index. Results 1642 (64%) cases and 495 (63%) eligible and contacted controls took part in the study. After adjustment for confounders, all active treatment groups had low odds of having better sexual function than controls, in particular men on androgen deprivation therapy (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.07). Men treated surgically reported the worst urinary function (adjusted OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.22). Bowel function was poorest in cases who had external beam radiotherapy (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.64). General physical and mental health scores were similar across treatment groups, but poorest in men who had androgen deprivation therapy. Conclusions The various treatments for localised prostate cancer each have persistent effects on quality of life. Sexual dysfunction three years after diagnosis was common in all treatment groups, whereas poor urinary function was less common. Bowel function was most compromised in those who had external beam radiotherapy. Men with prostate cancer and the clinicians who treat them should be aware of the effects of treatment on quality of life, and weigh them up against the patient’s age and the risk of progression of prostate cancer if untreated to make informed decisions about treatment.

Evidence‐based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screening

Objectives:To elicit community preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) using discrete choice modeling (DCM). To provide policymakers with information that would assist them in designing the future national screening program.

Will men attribute fault to their GP for adverse effects arising from controversial screening tests? An Australian study using scenarios about PSA screening

Objective: To determine mens attribution of fault for adverse consequences of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Setting: Representative, population-based sample recruited from Sydney, Australia (n=405). Methods: Telephone interview to assess reactions to two scenarios: Scenario 1, depicting a GP who dismisses an opportunity to order a PSA test (missed diagnosis); and Scenario 2, depicting a GP who recommends PSA screening to a patient who then experiences adverse outcomes from treatment of his prostate cancer (iatrogenic consequences). Results: Two-thirds of participants (66.9%) ascribed fault to the GP in Scenario 1. Men in fair or poor health (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–3.12; p=0.03) and those with better knowledge about PSA screening (AOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97–0.99; p=0.002) were significantly and independently more likely to ascribe fault in Scenario 1. By contrast, only 15.8% of participants ascribed responsibility to the GP in Scenario 2. Older men (AOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00–1.10; p=0.04) and those with higher levels of decisional conflict (AOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04–1.37; p=0.01) were significantly and independently more likely to ascribe responsibility. Conclusion: Public education could better target mens tendency to ascribe fault to GPs when they miss an opportunity to diagnose prostate cancer early through PSA screening, even though the corollary of potential iatrogenic consequences is perceived as less blameworthy. As decisional conflict and knowledge were found to predict attribution of fault, evidence-based information may reduce the medicolegal volatility of this controversy.

Measuring the importance of attributes that influence consumer attitudes to colorectal cancer screening

Background:  The aim of the present study was to rate the importance of attributes of screening for bowel cancer.

Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC): process evaluation of an intervention to improve the management of fever, hyperglycemia, and swallowing dysfunction following acute stroke

Background Our randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted evidence-based intervention for improving the inpatient management of fever, hyperglycemia, and swallowing dysfunction in the first three-days following stroke improved outcomes at 90 days by 15%. We designed a quantitative process evaluation to further explain and illuminate this finding. Methods Blinded retrospective medical record audits were undertaken for patients from 19 stroke units prior to and following the implementation of three multidisciplinary evidence-based protocols (supported by team-building workshops, and site-based education and support) for the management of fever (temperature ≥37·5°C), hyperglycemia (glucose >11 mmol/l), and swallowing dysfunction in intervention stroke units. Results Data from 1804 patients (718 preintervention; 1086 postintervention) showed that significantly more patients admitted to hospitals allocated to the intervention group received care according to the fever (n = 186 of 603, 31% vs. n = 74 of 483, 15%, P < 0·001), hyperglycemia (n = 22 of 603, 3·7% vs. n = 3 of 483,0·6%, P = 0·01), and swallowing dysfunction protocols (n = 241 of 603, 40% vs. n = 19 of 483, 4·0%, P ≤ 0·001). Significantly more patients in these intervention stroke units received four-hourly temperature monitoring (n = 222 of 603, 37% vs. n = 90 of 483, 19%, P < 0·001) and six-hourly glucose monitoring (194 of 603, 32% vs. 46 of 483, 9·5%, P < 0·001) within 72 hours of admission to a stroke unit, and a swallowing screen (242 of 522, 46% vs. 24 of 350, 6·8%, P ≤ 0·0001) within the first 24 hours of admission to hospital. There was no difference between the groups in the treatment of patients with fever with paracetamol (22 of 105, 21% vs. 38 of 131, 29%, P = 0·78) or their hyperglycemia with insulin (40 of 100, 40% vs. 17 of 57, 30%, P = 0·49). Interpretation Our intervention resulted in better protocol adherence in intervention stroke units, which explains our main trial findings of improved patient 90-day outcomes. Although monitoring practices significantly improved, there was no difference between the groups in the treatment of fever and hyperglycemia following acute stroke. A significant link between improved treatment practices and improved outcomes would have explained further the success of our intervention, and we are still unable to explain definitively the large improvements in death and dependency found in the main trial results. One potential explanation is that improved monitoring may have led to better overall surveillance of deteriorating patients and faster initiation of treatments not measured as part of the main trial.

Fever, hyperglycaemia and swallowing dysfunction management in acute stroke: A cluster randomised controlled trial of knowledge transfer

BackgroundHyperglycaemia, fever, and swallowing dysfunction are poorly managed in the admission phase of acute stroke, and patient outcomes are compromised. Use of evidence-based guidelines could improve care but have not been effectively implemented. Our study aims to develop and trial an intervention based on multidisciplinary team-building to improve management of fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in patients following acute stroke.Methods and designMetropolitan acute stroke units (ASUs) located in New South Wales, Australia will be stratified by service category (A or B) and, within strata, by baseline patient recruitment numbers (high or low) in this prospective, multicentre, single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial (CRCT). ASUs then will be randomised independently to either intervention or control groups. ASUs allocated to the intervention group will receive: unit-based workshops to identify local barriers and enablers; a standardised core education program; evidence-based clinical treatment protocols; and ongoing engagement of local staff. Control group ASUs will receive only an abridged version of the National Clinical Guidelines for Acute Stroke Management. The following outcome measures will be collected at 90 days post-hospital admission: patient death, disability (modified Rankin Score); dependency (Barthel Index) and Health Status (SF-36). Additional measures include: performance of swallowing screening within 24 hours of admission; glycaemic control and temperature control.DiscussionThis is a unique study of research transfer in acute stroke. Providing optimal inpatient care during the admission phase is essential if we are to combat the rising incidence of debilitating stroke. Our CRCT will also allow us to test interventions focussed on multidisciplinary ASU teams rather than individual disciplines, an imperative of modern hospital services.Trial RegistrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) No: ACTRN12608000563369

Reconciling population benefits and women's individual autonomy in mammographic screening: in-depth interviews to explore women's views about ‘informed choice’

Objective:

Will donations to their learned college increase surgeons' participation in surveys? A randomized trial

Effective strategies to maximize response rates to self-administered surveys of clinicians are crucial to minimize response bias. Offers of charitable donations have been assessed for their potential to promote participation of community samples but not in the context of medical specialist samples. We randomized all Australian colorectal surgeons (n = 219) to whom we mailed a survey about clinical practice guidelines to receive either a standard covering letter or one promising a donation to their peak professional organization upon our receipt of their completed survey. Contrary to expectations, surgeons advised that their participation would secure a donation to their college were significantly less likely to return their questionnaire (84.3%, 95% CI 76.0-90.5%) than those receiving a standard letter (93.7%, 95% CI 87.4-97.4%). They also were more tardy in their response (Hazard Ratio = 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-1.00) (P = 0.047). In this context, offering donations to surgeons was counterproductive in enhancing response rates.

Cardiovascular risk factors among Arabic‐speaking patients attending Arabic‐speaking general practitioners in Sydney, Australia: Opportunities for intervention

BACKGROUND Australia has a high rate of cardiovascular disease mortality and also a significant proportion of migrants. Little is known about the morbidity experience or cardiovascular risk factors among the larger migrant groups, and this is especially true of the Arabic-speaking population. OBJECTIVES The objectives of the study were to identify the health profile of Arabic-speaking people in Sydney, Australia, to explore the relationship between level of acculturation and health indicators and to identify the morbidity profile of patients presenting to Arabic-speaking general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN Adult Arabic-speaking patients aged 18-70 years attending 20 Arabic-speaking GPs in Canterbury, Sydney, during the 2-week study period were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire in Arabic or English while waiting to see the GP. Data on cardiovascular risk factors, level of acculturation and reasons for seeing the GP were collected. RESULTS Data were collected from 851 patients (62% response rate). Almost three-quarters (73%) of males and 36% of females were considered overweight or obese (body mass index > 25). Of concern, 37% of males and 28% of females were smokers. Females were significantly less likely to have been tested for diabetes (p < .05) or raised blood pressure (p < 0.05) compared with females in NSW. Respondents consumed less bread per day and more fruits than in NSW overall. Respiratory complaints (flu and colds) were the most frequently reported reasons for patient encounters. Except for the youngest age group, males gave more reasons for encounters than females. CONCLUSIONS Consecutive sampling of ethnic patients attending a GP who speaks their language holds promise as a method of needs assessment with migrant populations. Further, our results suggest that smoking and weight reduction programs are priorities in the Arabic-speaking community. These risk factors are ideal for intervention by GPs speaking the same language.

Evidence based practice in population health: a regional survey to inform workforce development and organisational change

Study objective: To assess current capacity to implement evidence based practice (EBP) in population health. Design: Postal survey of a regional population health workforce in Sydney, Australia. Setting: Division of Population Health, South Western Sydney Area Health Service. Participants: 104 population health staff (response rate: 73%). Main results: In the sample of regional population health practitioners, views about the current promotion of EBP were positive. Non-medical respondents with less that Masters degree were more likely to report “high self assessed need” to increase their capacity in EBP (p = 0.022). Confidence in understanding of EBP terminology was not associated with seniority but with highest level of education reached (p<0.000) and having medical qualifications (p<0.000). Occupational category was not associated with respondents’ self assessed “need for evidence”, “need for EBP skills” or “need to increase their capacity in EBP” in their current position. The proportion of participants “strongly” supporting implementation of a colorectal cancer screening programme whose benefit was expressed as relative risk reduction was greater than that so supporting a programme whose benefit was expressed as number needed to screen (p = 0.008). Most respondents referred to their immediate managers when seeking support for EBP. Conclusions: The findings provide a quantitative baseline for capacity building through workplace programmes. Managerial commitment has been increased and performance development is now underway.