Jeanne Martinez

Characterization of an acute inpatient hospice palliative care unit in a U.S. teaching hospital.

An existing hospice palliative care inpatient unit was studied from September 1993 to November 1993 to characterize it for two qualities: demographics of admitted patients and family satisfaction after discharge. The purpose of this study was to identify current uses of the unit and determine whether the high level of satisfaction among family members, as perceived by the staff, was accurate. To characterize demographics, 100 consecutive admissions to the unit were assessed prospectively beginning in September 1993. To characterize family satisfaction, a survey was sent to the families of 240 patients who had been cared for on the inpatient unit. Since this study, it has been identified that care on the hospice palliative care unit is provided at a 50% reduction in daily hospital charges. The hospital has benefited from establishing and maintaining an acute care inpatient hospice palliative care unit. Other academic medical centers in the United States should consider a designated unit for symptom management and terminal care as part of their comprehensive range of healthcare services.

Evidence of improved knowledge and skills after an elective rotation in a hospice and palliative care program for internal medicine residents

There is compelling evidence that residents training in primary care need education in palliative care. Evidence for effective curricula is needed. The objective of this study was to test whether a clinical elective improves measures of knowledge and skill. Residents from three categorical training programs in internal medicine were recruited to an elective including clinical experiences in an acute hospital palliative care consultation service, on an acute hospice and palliative care unit, and in-home hospice care. A 25-question pre- and post-test and a videotaped interview with a standardized patient were used to assess communication skills and measure outcomes. Residents demonstrated a 10 percent improvement in knowledge after the four-week elective (p < 0.05). All residents demonstrated basic competency in communication skills at the end of the rotation. These results indicate that clinical rotation shows promise as an educational intervention to improve palliative care knowledge and skills in primary care residents. An important limitation of the study is that it is an elective; further studies with a required rotation and/or a control group are needed to confirm the findings.

Hospice and palliative care: Attitudes and practices of the physician faculty of an academic hospital:

It has been suggested that physicians, particularly in academic hospitals, are resistant to the hospice approach to palliative care for terminally ill patients. It is of interest, therefore, to assess the attitudes and practices of the physician faculty of an academic hospital where a hospice program has been in existence for more than 10 years. This was assessed with two faculty surveys. All 966 physician faculty that were on staff at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in thefall of 1993 were sent a survey about their opinion of hospice care (Survey A). Then, all physicians who had referred patients to the hospice program between September 1993 and September 1994 at Northwestern Memorial Hospital received a survey letter after the death of their patient (Survey B). Seventy-seven percent of faculty physician respondents to Survey A had either referred patients, or knew of colleagues who had referred patients to a hospice program. Ninetyfour percent of those who answered “yes” to the question about referrals reported satisfaction with their care. Ninety-four percent would refer patients in the future and 96 percent thought the hospice program was a valuable resource to the medical center Of the respondents to Survey B, nearly 100 percent thought the referral had been handled in an “excellent”or “good”fashion, that communication with hospice staff was “excellent” or “good, “that symptom control was “excellent” or “good,” that their patients and families had received “excellent” or “good” psychosocial support, and that their patients and families were satisfied with the hospice care they received. When asked if their patients could have benefited from earlier referral, 29 percent said “definitely, ” 30 percent said “possibly,” 13 percent responded “doubtful” and 26 percent responded “no.” When asked if they would refer another patient to the hospice program, 95 percent responded “definitely” and 5 percent responded “possibly.” We conclude that a hospice program can be effectively utilized and valued by the attending physician faculty at an academic medical center

Navigation and palliative care

Patient navigation represents an opportunity to further the integration of palliative care with standard cancer care. This article defines palliative and hospice care and describes some of the current challenges of integrating palliative care into other forms of care. It also considers outcomes that navigation might be expected to improve for patients receiving palliative care or enrolled in hospice. These outcomes include symptom relief; communication efficacy; transitions of care; and access to palliative care, hospice, and bereavement care for families. Although these outcomes may not have been specifically assessed in patients in cancer navigation programs, they represent important outcomes for patients receiving palliative care and their families. It is recognized that the types of outcomes that are important to track for patients and families receiving palliative care should be consistent with outcomes at other stages of illness. Cancer 2011;117(15 suppl):3583–589.

AIDS and hospice

Which AIDS patients should be admmited to hospice programs? Many health care professionals feel that any anti-viral drug or treatment directed against the opportunistic infections characteristic of AIDS to be incompatible with hospice philosophy. Others argue that inclusion of AIDS patients blurs the distinction between hospice and community service programs. We argue that achieving consensus on this issue is best served by focusing on the defining characteristic of hospice programs — the care of the dying. Consensus is not served by dwelling on the specific palliative or supportive measures used to achieve the hospice goal. We suggest a framework by which AIDS patients may be accommodated in existing hospice programs while maintaining hospice program integrity. It is further suggested that these may be used for the consideration of any patient for hospice care.