Jeannette Wolfe

Analgesic administration to patients with an acute abdomen: a survey of emergency medicine physicians.

The objective of this study was to examine current practice patterns of analgesia administration among emergency physicians (EPs) when caring for a patient with an acute abdomen. Cross sectional data were acquired by a survey mailed in October 1997 to 1,000 American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) members from a purchased ACEP mailing list which contained 1,000 randomized ACEP members. A repeat survey was sent to nonresponders 2 months later and a random subset of recurrent nonresponders were telephoned. The questionnaire focused on physician demographics, practice patterns, and factors which influenced physician decision of when and whether to administer pain medication, specifically opiates, to patients with an acute abdomen. Forty-four percent of surveys were returned. Seventy-seven percent of respondents were men with an average of 10 years of experience. Fifty-seven percent were residency trained in emergency medicine. Although eighty-five percent felt that the conservative administration of pain medication did not change important physical findings on the physical examination, 76% choose not to give an opiate analgesic until after the examination by a surgeon. Twenty-five percent of patients did not receive any pain medication in the department. In conclusion, although EPs report that the judicious administration of pain medication does not mask important examination findings, the majority wait until after the surgeon has evaluated the patient to deliver analgesics.

Vocal cord dysfunction mimicking a severe asthma attack

Vocal cord dysfunction is a rare type of airway obstruction that may mimic an acute asthma attack. We present a case of a patient who arrived in the Emergency Department (ED) in acute respiratory distress, with a history of severe asthma requiring previous intubation, who was diagnosed with vocal cord dysfunction by bronchoscopy in the ED.

Diagnosing appendicitis with CT and ultrasound using prospective patient stratification by body mass index

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of CT and ultrasonography (US) in diagnosing appendicitis in adults stratified to either modality on the basis of body mass index (BMI), a measure of body habitus. Methods: Seventy-two adults with suspected appendicitis and demonstrating atypical clinical features were prospectively stratified to either appendiceal CT or US based on BMI. Patients with BMI < 30 underwent US and with BMI ≥ 30 underwent CT. Outcomes were determined by surgery, the medical record, and clinical follow-up after 3 months. Results: Of the 72 patients enrolled, 30 (24 women and 6 men) underwent CT and 42 (35 women and 7 men) underwent US. The average BMI was 34 ± 4 among patients who had CT and 24 ± 3 among patients who had US. Of the patients who had CT scans, 4 had positive scans for appendicitis and all of these were proven at surgery to have appendicitis. The remaining 26 patients had negative CT scans for appendicitis. Twenty-two of these were subsequently proven either by surgery or clinical follow-up not to have appendicitis, while 4 were lost to follow-up. This corresponds to a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100 %. Twelve ultrasound examinations were positive for appendicitis. Nine of these patients had appendicitis proven at surgery, 1 had a perforated Meckels diverticulum, and 2 did not have appendicitis after clinical follow-up. Twenty-seven patients had negative ultrasound exams for appendicitis. However, 6 of these had appendicitis proven at surgery, 17 did not have appendicitis, and 4 were lost to follow-up. Three patients had ultrasound exams that were equivocal for appendicitis; of these, 1 had appendicitis and 2 did not. For US, this corresponds to a sensitivity of 60 %, specificity of 85 %, PPV of 75 %, and NPV of 74 %. Conclusion: This study suggests that CT is an accurate method of evaluating adults with suspected appendicitis who have BMI ≥ 30. Stratifying patients with BMI < 30 to US did not reproduce the results already reported in the literature.

Producing a Successful PeRLs Video

Academic Emergency Medicine publishes selected peer-reviewed videos that present state-of-the-art research, practice, and evidence in the field of emergency medicine. These videos are referred to as peer-reviewed lectures (PeRLs). This commentary reviews considerations for creating, filming, and producing high-quality PeRLs videos.