Jef M Hammond
Australian Animal Health Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jef M Hammond.
Veterinary Microbiology | 2001
Jef M Hammond; Elisa S Jansen; C. Morrissy; Winsome V Goff; Greer Meehan; Mark M Williamson; Cor Lenghaus; Kathy Sproat; Marion E. Andrew; Barbara E.H. Coupar; Michael A Johnson
Weaned pigs (6-week-old) and 7-day-old pre-weaned piglets were vaccinated with naked plasmid DNA expressing the gp55/E2 gene from classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Both groups of pigs were then given a booster dose of recombinant porcine adenovirus expressing the gp55 gene (rPAV-gp55). Following challenge with CSFV, 100% of weaned pigs and 75% pre-weaned piglets were protected from disease. Weaned pigs given a single dose of rPAV-gp55 were also protected, but showed a slight increase in temperature immediately post-challenge. However, weaned animals given a DNA prime before rPAV-gp55 showed no fluctuation in body temperature following challenge and no pathology in spleen or lymph nodes upon post-mortem. In addition, no CSFV could be re-isolated from the rPAV vaccinated group and from only one pig in the prime-boost group following challenge, suggesting that both vaccination regimes have the potential to reduce or prevent virus shedding following experimental challenge.
Archives of Virology | 2001
Jef M Hammond; Elisa S Jansen; C. Morrissy; Mark M Williamson; Adrian L.M Hodgson; Michael A Johnson
Summary. A recombinant porcine adenovirus expressing the classical swine fever virus (CSFV) gp55/E2 gene was administered to commercially available pigs via oral or subcutaneous routes and their susceptibility to oral and subcutaneous challenge with CSFV was determined. 100% of animals vaccinated and challenged subcutaneously were protected. In the groups of pigs vaccinated either orally or subcutaneously and then challenged orally, 60% of animals were protected. Before challenge, neutralising antibodies to CSFV were detected in 60% of pigs vaccinated subcutaneously, but in none of those given the vaccine orally. CSFV antigen was found in the spleens of surviving pigs that had been vaccinated orally. In contrast, subcutaneous vaccination was shown to preclude the presence of CSFV in the spleen of animals that survived challenge.
Veterinary Journal | 2005
Jef M Hammond; Michael A Johnson
Abstract Porcine adenovirus (PAdV) has many qualities which make it an ideal choice for use as a delivery vector in swine. It is a low grade pathogen, present almost world-wide in a number of serotypes varying in their virulence and tissue tropism, which may allow for serotype specific vaccine targeting. PAdV is species specific having only been isolated from swine, reducing the possibility of its spread to other animals or man following administration. When engineered to contain a foreign gene, recombinant PAdV (rPAdV) can be grown to high titres in tissue culture cells making it cheap to produce. Knowledge of the complete nucleotide sequence of the PAdV genome has enabled rationally directed insertions of foreign genes which remain stably inserted in the genome and can be expressed at high levels following delivery to the target host. Importantly, recombinant PAdV can be administered by injection or by the oral route in feed or drinking water. We have delivered a range of antigens and immunomodulatory molecules to commercially available pigs using rPAdV and found it to be a very effective delivery system. Significantly, recombinant PAdV serotype 3 is highly effective as a delivery vehicle even when administered in the face of high levels of artificially induced serotype specific neutralising antibody to the vector.
Vaccine | 2001
Jef M Hammond; Elisa S Jansen; C. Morrissy; Brenda van der Heide; Winsome V Goff; Mark M Williamson; Peter T. Hooper; Lorne A. Babiuk; Suresh K. Tikoo; Michael A Johnson
Five week old, commercially available large white pigs were vaccinated with either a single dose or two doses of a recombinant porcine adenovirus expressing the glycoprotein D gene from pseudorabies virus (PRV). Pigs were monitored for the development of serum neutralizing antibodies to PRV and challenged 3 weeks after final vaccination. Prior to challenge, pigs given 2 doses of the vaccine demonstrated boosted levels of antibody compared with those given a single dose, and all surviving pigs had increased neutralization titres over pre-challenge levels. Following challenge, pigs were monitored for clinical signs of disease, with blood and nasal swabs collected for virus isolation. All control animals became sick with elevated temperatures for 6 days post challenge, whereas; vaccinated animals displayed an increase in body temperature for only 2-3 days. Control pigs and those given a single dose all lost condition, but the group given 2 doses remained healthy. At postmortem, gross lesions of pneumonia only occurred in control animals and those given a single dose of vaccine. Histology carried out on the brains of all animals demonstrated a difference in severity of infection and frequency of immunohistochemical antigen detection between test animals, with control and single dose groups being most severely affected and pigs given 2 doses the least. Virus isolation studies demonstrated that no viraemia could be detected, but virus was found in nasal swabs from some animals in both groups of vaccinates following challenge.
Journal of Virological Methods | 1997
Jef M Hammond; Pam Oke; Barbara E.H. Coupar
A synthetic vaccinia virus promoter (Psel) was constructed based upon sequences which increase activity of the P7.5 early/late promoter. Comparison of luciferase activity in lysates from cells infected with recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the luciferase gene either under the control of the P7.5 promoter or Psel, demonstrated significantly enhanced activity mediated by Psel at both early and late times post infection. This promoter may be of considerable benefit in the construction of recombinant poxviruses where early foreign gene expression is important for generating a protective immune response in vaccinated animals, or in reporter/target gene expression in vitro.
Vaccine | 2000
Jef M Hammond; Richard J McCoy; Elisa S Jansen; C. Morrissy; Adrian L.M Hodgson; Michael A Johnson
Virus Research | 2003
Jef M Hammond; Elisa S Jansen; C. Morrissy; Adrian L.M Hodgson; Michael A Johnson
Australian Veterinary Journal | 2014
Axel Colling; C. Morrissy; J Barr; Greer Meehan; Lynda Wright; Winsome V Goff; Gleeson Lj; B.M. van der Heide; S Riddell; Meng Yu; Debbie Eagles; Ross A. Lunt; Syseng Khounsy; Ngo Than Long; Pham Phong Vu; Nguyen Than Phuong; Nguyen Tung; Wilai Linchongsubongkoch; Jef M Hammond; Michael A Johnson; Wo Johnson; H Unger; Pw Daniels; Jr Crowther
Journal of Virological Methods | 2008
Janine D. Muller; Jennifer A. McEachern; Katharine N. Bossart; Eric Hansson; Meng Yu; Alfonso Clavijo; Jef M Hammond; Lin-Fa Wang
Journal of RNAi and Gene Silencing : An International Journal of RNA and Gene Targeting Research | 2008
David M. Cummins; Timothy J. Doran; Scott G. Tyack; Damian Purcell; Jef M Hammond