Jeff Shea

Effect of cementless acetabular cup geometry on strain distribution and press-fit stability

Use of cementless acetabular cups, which are slightly larger than the reamed acetabulum, can provide press-fit stability without screws; however, the ideal cup geometry to maximize stability is not clear. Acetabular strain distribution, deformation, and implant stability were studied using an axisymmetric finite-element model, and mechanical stability was assessed by testing lever-out and extraction forces required to displace different cup geometries from foam bones. The implants tested included four nonhemispheric cup geometries and 1- and 2-mm oversized hemispheric geometries. A nonhemispheric cup that provides a gradual transition from a hemisphere at the dome to a larger peripheral dimension appears to maximize peripheral strains and implant stability without increasing overall acetabular deformation as much as a larger oversized hemispheric cup.

Photoelastic analysis of stresses produced by different acetabular cups.

Porous-coated acetabular components can provide long-term biologic fixation to bone. However, the periacetabular stress patterns and mechanisms by which different types of cementless acetabular cups obtain initial stability is not clear. In the current study, periacetabular stresses produced by different cementless acetabular cup geometries were quantitated using a three-dimensional photoelastic model. The cup geometries consisted of trispiked, finned, hemispherical, and nonhemispherical (wider than a hemisphere at the periphery) geometries. The cup models were loaded incrementally in the photoelastic material to simulate periacetabular stress distributions at the time of implantation during surgery rather than under physiologic weightbearing loads. The peripheral stress distributions and their magnitudes induced by the trispiked and oversized hemispherical cups were similar, but the trispiked cup induced localized high stress regions where the spikes penetrate the bone model. The fins separated the periacetabular material into quadrants, which was associated with decreased peripheral stresses. A nonhemispherical geometry with a wider diameter at the rim than a hemisphere increased peripheral stresses more than an oversized hemispherical geometry and required less force to seat the implant. Although various cementless acetabular cups can perform well clinically, they produce different periacetabular stresses and appear to obtain initial fixation by different mechanisms.