Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeff Wintersinger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeff Wintersinger.


bioRxiv | 2017

The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers

Moritz Gerstung; Clemency Jolly; Ignaty Leshchiner; Stefan Dentro; Santiago Gonzalez; Thomas J. Mitchell; Yulia Rubanova; Pavana Anur; Daniel Rosebrock; Kaixan Yu; Maxime Tarabichi; Amit G Deshwar; Jeff Wintersinger; Kortine Kleinheinz; Ignacio Vázquez-García; Kerstin Haase; Subhajit Sengupta; Geoff Macintyre; Salem Malikic; Nilgun Donmez; Dimitri Livitz; Marek Cmero; Jonas Demeulemeester; Steve Schumacher; Yu Fan; Xiaotong Yao; Juhee Lee; Matthias Schlesner; Paul C. Boutros; David Bowtell

Cancer develops through a process of somatic evolution. Here, we use whole-genome sequencing of 2,778 tumour samples from 2,658 donors to reconstruct the life history, evolution of mutational processes, and driver mutation sequences of 39 cancer types. The early phases of oncogenesis are driven by point mutations in a small set of driver genes, often including biallelic inactivation of tumour suppressors. Early oncogenesis is also characterised by specific copy number gains, such as trisomy 7 in glioblastoma or isochromosome 17q in medulloblastoma. By contrast, increased genomic instability, a nearly four-fold diversification of driver genes, and an acceleration of point mutation processes are features of later stages. Copy-number alterations often occur in mitotic crises leading to simultaneous gains of multiple chromosomal segments. Timing analysis suggests that driver mutations often precede diagnosis by many years, and in some cases decades, providing a window of opportunity for early cancer detection.


bioRxiv | 2018

TrackSig: reconstructing evolutionary trajectories of mutation signature exposure

Yulia Rubanova; Ruian Shi; Roujia Li; Jeff Wintersinger; Nil Sahin; Amit G Deshwar; Quaid Morris

We present a new method, TrackSig, to estimate the evolutionary trajectories of signatures of different somatic mutational processes from DNA sequencing data from a single, bulk tumour sample. TrackSig uses probability distributions over mutation types, called mutational signatures, to represent different mutational processes and detects the changes in the signature activity using an optimal segmentation algorithm that groups somatic mutations based on their estimated cancer cellular fraction (CCF) and their mutation type (e.g. CAG->CTG). We use two different simulation frameworks to assess both TrackSig’s reconstruction accuracy and its robustness to violations of its assumptions, as well as to compare it to a baseline approach. We find 2-4% median error in reconstructing the signature activities on simulations with varying difficulty with one to three subclones at an average depth of 30x. The size and the direction of the activity change is consistent in 83% and 95% of cases respectively. There were an average of 0.02 missed and 0.12 false positive subclones per sample. In our simulations, grouping mutations by mutation type (TrackSig), rather than by clustering CCF (baseline strategy), performs better at estimating signature activities and at identifying subclonal populations in the complex scenarios like branching, CNA gain, violation of infinite site assumption, and the inclusion of neutrally evolving mutations. TrackSig is open source software, freely available at https://github.com/morrislab/TrackSig.


bioRxiv | 2018

Creating Standards for Evaluating Tumour Subclonal Reconstruction

Paul C. Boutros; Adriana Salcedo; Maxime Tarabichi; Shadrielle Melijah G. Espiritu; Amit G Deshwar; Matei David; Nathan M Wilson; Stefan Dentro; Jeff Wintersinger; Lydia Y Liu; Minjeong Ko; Srinivasan Sivanandan; Hongjiu Zhang; Kaiyi Zhu; Tai-Hsien Ou Yang; John Chilton; Alex Buchanan; Christopher M Lalansingh; Christine P'ng; Catalina V Anghel; Imaad Umar; Bryan Lo; Jared T. Simpson; Joshua M. Stuart; Dimitris Anastassiou; Yuanfang Guan; Adam D. Ewing; Kyle Ellrott; David C. Wedge; Quaid Morris

Tumours evolve through time and space. To infer these evolutionary dynamics for DNA sequencing data, many subclonal reconstruction techniques have been developed and applied to large datasets. Surprisingly, though, there has been no systematic evaluation of these methods, in part due to the complexity of the mathematical and biological questions and the difficulties in creating gold-standards. To fill this gap, we systematically elucidated key algorithmic problems in subclonal reconstruction, and developed mathematically valid quantitative metrics for evaluating them. We then developed approaches to simulate realistic tumour genomes that harbour all known mutation types and processes. Finally, we benchmarked a set of 500 subclonal reconstructions, creating a key resource, and quantified the impact of sequencing read-depth and somatic variant detection strategies on the accuracy of specific subclonal reconstruction approaches. Inference of tumour phylogenies is rapidly becoming standard practice in cancer genome analysis, and this work sets standards for evaluating its accuracy.


bioRxiv | 2018

Portraits of genetic intra-tumour heterogeneity and subclonal selection across cancer types

Stefan Dentro; Ignaty Leshchiner; Kerstin Haase; Maxime Tarabichi; Jeff Wintersinger; Amit G Deshwar; Kaixian Yu; Yulia Rubanova; Geoff Mcintyre; Ignacio Vázquez-García; Kortine Kleinheinz; Dimitri Livitz; Salem Malikic; Nilgun Donmez; Subhajit Sengupta; Jonas Demeulemeester; Pavana Anur; Clemency Jolly; Marek Cmero; Daniel Rosebrock; Steven E. Schumacher; Yu Fan; Matthew Fittall; Ruben M. Drews; Xiaotong Yao; Juhee Lee; Matthias Schlesner; Hongtu Zhu; David J. Adams; Gad Getz

Intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) is a mechanism of therapeutic resistance and therefore an important clinical challenge. However, the extent, origin and drivers of ITH across cancer types are poorly understood. To address this question, we extensively characterize ITH across whole-genome sequences of 2,658 cancer samples, spanning 38 cancer types. Nearly all informative samples (95.1%) contain evidence of distinct subclonal expansions, with frequent branching relationships between subclones. We observe positive selection of subclonal driver mutations across most cancer types, and identify cancer type specific subclonal patterns of driver gene mutations, fusions, structural variants and copy-number alterations, as well as dynamic changes in mutational processes between subclonal expansions. Our results underline the importance of ITH and its drivers in tumor evolution, and provide an unprecedented pan-cancer resource of comprehensively annotated subclonal events from whole-genome sequencing data.Continued evolution in cancers gives rise to intra-tumour heterogeneity (ITH), which is a major mechanism of therapeutic resistance and therefore an important clinical challenge. However, the extent, origin and drivers of ITH across cancer types are poorly understood. Here, we extensively characterise ITH across 2,778 cancer whole genome sequences from 36 cancer types. We demonstrate that nearly all tumours (95.1%) with sufficient sequencing depth contain evidence of recent subclonal expansions and most cancer types show clear signs of positive selection in both clonal and subclonal protein coding variants. We find distinctive subclonal patterns of driver gene mutations, fusions, structural variation and copy-number alterations across cancer types. Dynamic, tumour-type specific changes of mutational processes between subclonal expansions shape differences between clonal and subclonal events. Our results underline the importance of ITH and its drivers in tumour evolution and provide an unprecedented pan-cancer resource of extensively annotated subclonal events, laying a foundation for future cancer genomic studies.


Symposium: Systems Medicine – Making Sense of Big Data | 2018

33 PAN-cancer whole genome sequencing reveals patterns of subclonal mutations, signature changes and selection

Kerstin Haase; Stefan Dentro; Ignaty Leshchiner; Jeff Wintersinger; Amit G Deshwar; Maxime Tarabichi; Quaid Morris; David C. Wedge; P Van Loo; P. Pcawg Evolution

Introduction During their development, tumour cells accumulate somatic mutations, structural variants and copy number alterations (CNAs). Driver events facilitate clonal expansions and lead to intra-tumour heterogeneity (ITH). While ITH is an important therapeutic challenge, its degree among different cancer types is largely unknown. Material and methods The pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes (PCAWG) enabled us to characterise ITH in an unprecedented set of 2778 tumour samples representing 36 histologically distinct cancer types. We applied six CNA callers and eleven subclonal reconstruction algorithms to integrate their solutions into robust consensus copy number profiles and subclonal reconstructions. Results and discussions Our analysis revealed pervasive ITH in all examined cancer types. We found at least one subclone in 96.7% of the 1801 samples for which we had statistical power to detect subclones. In addition, we find that the average proportions of subclonal point mutations, indels, SVs and CNAs are highly variable across cancer types. These observations suggest distinct evolutionary narratives of each histological cancer type. Analysis of dN/dS ratios shows clear signs of positive selection within both clonal and subclonal mutations. We also identified subclonal mutations in driver genes that are recurrently hit and we found a significant enrichment of subclonal mutations in genes responsible for chromatin regulation. More than 5% of tumours contain driver mutations in genes for which specific treatment is available only in subclones, indicating the importance of assessing the clonality of targeted mutations for clinical decisions. Mutational signatures in the analysed samples show changes in activity over the course of tumour development. Characteristic carcinogen signatures, e.g. UV light exposure in melanomas, make less contributions to subclonal than clonal mutations, while APOBEC-induced mutagenesis has increased activity during the subclonal phase. Conclusion The absence of a detectable driver mutation in a majority of subclones suggests that late tumour development is frequently driven by CNAs or genomic rearrangements, or that a significant number of late drivers have yet to be identified. We found that selection is widespread and likely the rule rather than the exception and we identified differential activity of mutational signatures, reflecting successive waves of subclonal expansion.


Cancer Research | 2018

Abstract 218: The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers

Clemency Jolly; Moritz Gerstung; Ignaty Leshchiner; Stefan Dentro; Santiago Gonzalez; Thomas J. Mitchell; Yulia Rubanova; Pavana Anur; Daniel Rosebrock; Kaixian Yu; Maxime Tarabichi; Amit G Deshwar; Jeff Wintersinger; Kortine Kleinheinz; Ignacio Vásquez-García; Kerstin Haase; Subhajit Sengupta; Geoff Macintyre; Salem Malikic; Nilgun Donmez; Dimitri Livitz; Mark Cmero; Jonas Demeulemeester; Steve Schumacher; Yu Fan; Xiaotong Yao; Juhee Lee; Matthias Schlesner; Paul C. Boutros; David Bowtell

Cancer develops through a continuous process of somatic evolution. Whole genome sequencing provides a snapshot of the tumor genome at the point of sampling, however, the data can contain information that permits the reconstruction of a tumor9s evolutionary past. Here, we apply such life history analyses on an unprecedented scale, to a set of 2,658 tumors spanning 39 cancer types. We estimated the timing of large chromosomal gains during tumor evolution, by comparing the rates of doubled to non-doubled point mutations within gained regions. Although we find that such events typically occur in the second half of clonal evolution, we also observe distinctive and early chromosomal gains in some cancer types, such as gains of chromosomes 7, 19 and 20 in glioblastoma, and isochromosome 17q in medulloblastoma. By integrating these results with the qualitative timing of individual driver mutations, we obtained an overall ranking, from early to late, of frequent somatic events per cancer type, which both identified novel patterns of tumor evolution, and incorporated additional detail into known models, such as the progression of APC-KRAS-TP53 in colorectal cancer proposed by Vogelstein and Fearon. To estimate how mutational processes acting on the tumor genome change over time, we classified mutations in each sample according to three broad time periods (early clonal, late clonal, and subclonal), and quantified the activity of mutational signatures in each period. Most mutational processes appear to remain remarkably constant, however, certain signatures show clear and consistent changes during clonal evolution. Particularly, mutational signatures associated with exposure to carcinogens, such as smoking and UV light, tend to decrease over time. In contrast, signatures associated with defective endogenous processes, such as APOBEC mutagenesis and defective double strand break repair, show an increase between early and late phases of tumor evolution. Making use of clock-like mutational signatures, we converted mutational time estimates for large events, such as whole genome duplication (WGD), and the emergence of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA), into real time estimates, which allowed us to combine our analyses into overall timelines of cancer evolution, per tumor type. For example, the typical timeline of ovarian adenocarcinoma development shows that early tumor evolution is characterized by mutations in TP53, and widespread genome instability, with WGD events taking place on average 8 years prior to diagnosis. In later stages of evolution, signatures of defective repair processes increase, and the MRCA emerges on average 1 year before diagnosis. Taken together, these data reveal the common and divergent evolutionary trajectories available to a cancer, which might be crucial in understanding specific tumor biology, and in providing new opportunities for early detection and cancer prevention. Citation Format: Clemency Jolly, Moritz Gerstung, Ignaty Leshchiner, Stefan C. Dentro, Santiago Gonzalez, Thomas J. Mitchell, Yulia Rubanova, Pavana Anur, Daniel Rosebrock, Kaixian Yu, Maxime Tarabichi, Amit Deshwar, Jeff Wintersinger, Kortine Kleinheinz, Ignacio Vasquez-Garcia, Kerstin Haase, Subhajit Sengupta, Geoff Macintyre, Salem Malikic, Nilgun Donmez, Dimitri G. Livitz, Mark Cmero, Jonas Demeulemeester, Steve Schumacher, Yu Fan, Xiaotong Yao, Juhee Lee, Matthias Schlesner, Paul C. Boutros, David D. Bowtell, Hongtu Zhu, Gad Getz, Marcin Imielinski, Rameen Beroukhim, S Cenk Sahinalp, Yuan Ji, Martin Peifer, Florian Markowetz, Ville Mustonen, Ke Juan, Wenyi Wang, Quaid D. Morris, Paul T. Spellman, David C. Wedge, Peter Van Loo, PCAWG Evolution and Heterogeneity Working Group. The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 218.


Cell | 2018

The Evolutionary Landscape of Localized Prostate Cancers Drives Clinical Aggression

Shadrielle Melijah G. Espiritu; Lydia Y Liu; Yulia Rubanova; Vinayak Bhandari; Erle Holgersen; Lesia Szyca; Natalie S. Fox; Melvin Lee Kiang Chua; Takafumi N. Yamaguchi; Lawrence E. Heisler; Julie Livingstone; Jeff Wintersinger; Fouad Yousif; Emilie Lalonde; Alexandre Rouette; Adriana Salcedo; Kathleen E. Houlahan; Constance H. Li; Vincent Huang; Michael Fraser; Theodorus van der Kwast; Quaid Morris; Robert G. Bristow; Paul C. Boutros


research in computational molecular biology | 2018

Onctopus: Lineage-Based Subclonal Reconstruction

Linda K. Sundermann; Daniel Doerr; Amit G Deshwar; Jeff Wintersinger; Jens Stoye; Quaid Morris; Gunnar Rätsch


research in computational molecular biology | 2018

Subpoplar: reconstructing cancer phylogenies by ordering mutation pairs

Jeff Wintersinger; Quaid Morris


Cancer Research | 2018

Abstract 3000: Pervasive intra-tumour heterogeneity and subclonal selection across cancer types

Stefan Dentro; Ignaty Leshchiner; Kerstin Haase; Jeff Wintersinger; Amit G Deshwar; Maxime Tarabichi; Yulia Rubanova; Kaixian Yu; Ignacio Vázquez García; Geoff Macintyre; Kortine Kleinheinz; Dimitri Livitz; Salem Malikic; Nilgun Donmez; Subhajit Sengupta; Yuan Ji; Jonas Demeulemeester; Pavana Anur; Clemency Jolly; Marek Cmero; Daniel Rosebrock; Steve Schumacher; Yu Fan; Matthew Fittall; Xiaotong Yao; Juhee Lee; Matthias Schlesner; Hongtu Zhu; David J. Adams; Gad Getz

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeff Wintersinger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Dentro

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul C. Boutros

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nilgun Donmez

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge