Jeffrey A. Frost

Cross-cascade activation of ERKs and ternary complex factors by Rho family proteins.

Mitogens promote cell growth through integrated signal transduction networks that alter cellular metabolism, gene expression and cytoskeletal organization. Many such signals are propagated through activation of MAP kinase cascades partly regulated by upstream small GTP‐binding proteins. Interactions among cascades are suspected but not defined. Here we show that Rho family small G proteins such as Rac1 and Cdc42hs, which activate the JNK/SAPK pathway, cooperate with Raf‐1 to activate the ERK pathway. This causes activation of ternary complex factors (TCFs), which regulate c‐fos gene expression through the serum response element. Examination of ERK pathway kinases shows that neither MEK1 nor Ras will synergize with Rho‐type proteins, and that only MEK1 is fully activated, indicating that MEKs are a focal point for cross‐cascade regulation. Rho family proteins utilize PAKs for this effect, as expression of an active PAK1 mutant can substitute for Rho family small G proteins, and expression of an interfering PAK1 mutant blocks Rho‐type protein stimulation of ERKs. PAK1 phosphorylates MEK1 on Ser298, a site important for binding of Raf‐1 to MEK1 in vivo. Expression of interfering PAK1 also reduces stimulation of TCF function by serum growth factors, while expression of active PAK1 enhances EGF‐stimulated MEK1 activity. This demonstrates interaction among MAP kinase pathway elements not previously recognized and suggests an explanation for the cooperative effect of Raf‐1 and Rho family proteins on cellular transformation.

Actions of Rho family small G proteins and p21-activated protein kinases on mitogen-activated protein kinase family members

The mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases that are regulated by distinct extracellular stimuli. The currently known members include extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1 (ERK1), ERK2, the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinases (JNK/SAPKs), and p38 MAP kinases. We find that overexpression of the Ste20-related enzymes p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) and PAK2 in 293 cells is sufficient to activate JNK/SAPK and to a lesser extent p38 MAP kinase but not ERK2. Rat MAP/ERK kinase kinase 1 can stimulate the activity of each of these MAP kinases. Although neither activated Rac nor the PAKs stimulate ERK2 activity, overexpression of either dominant negative Rac2 or the N-terminal regulatory domain of PAK1 inhibits Ras-mediated activation of ERK2, suggesting a permissive role for Rac in the control of the ERK pathway. Furthermore, constitutively active Rac2, Cdc42hs, and RhoA synergize with an activated form of Raf to increase ERK2 activity. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized connection between Rho family small G proteins and the ERK pathway.

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulates Raf1 through Pak phosphorylation of serine 338

We have previously shown that inhibition of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase severely attenuates the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) following engagement of integrin/fibronectin receptors and that Raf is the critical target of PI 3-kinase regulation [1]. To investigate how PI 3-kinase regulates Raf, we examined sites on Raf1 required for regulation by PI 3-kinase and explored the mechanisms involved in this regulation. Serine 338 (Ser338), which was critical for fibronectin stimulation of Raf1, was phosphorylated in a PI 3-kinase-dependent manner following engagement of fibronectin receptors. In addition, fibronectin activation of a Raf1 mutant containing a phospho-mimic mutation (S338D) was independent of PI 3-kinase. Furthermore, integrin-induced activation of the serine/threonine kinase Pak-1, which has been shown to phosphorylate Raf1 Ser338, was also dependent on PI 3-kinase activity and expression of a kinase-inactive Pak-1 mutant blocked phosphorylation of Raf1 Ser338. These results indicate that PI 3-kinase regulates phosphorylation of Raf1 Ser338 through the serine/threonine kinase Pak. Thus, phosphorylation of Raf1 Ser338 through PI 3-kinase and Pak provides a co-stimulatory signal which together with Ras leads to strong activation of Raf1 kinase activity by integrins.

Differential Effects of PAK1-activating Mutations Reveal Activity-dependent and -independent Effects on Cytoskeletal Regulation*

PAKs are serine/threonine protein kinases that are activated by binding to Rac or Cdc42hs. Different forms of activated PAK1 have been reported to either promote membrane ruffling and focal adhesion assembly or cause focal adhesion disassembly and stress fiber dissolution. To understand the basis for these distinct morphological effects, we have examined the mechanism of mutational activation of PAK1, and characterized the effects of different active PAK1 proteins on cytoskeletal structure in vivo. We find that PAK1 contains an autoinhibitory domain that overlaps with its small G protein binding domain and that two separate activating mutations within this regulatory region each decrease autoinhibitory activity. Because only one of these mutations affects Cdc42hs binding activity, this indicates that activation of PAK1 by these mutations results from interference with the function of the autoinhibitory domain and not with small G protein binding activity. When we examined the morphological effects of these different forms of PAK1 in vivo, we found that PAK1 kinase activity was associated with disassembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers and that this may require interaction with potential SH3 domain-containing proteins. Lamellipodia formation and membrane ruffling caused by active PAK1 expression, however, was independent of PAK1 catalytic activity and likely requires interaction among multiple proteins binding to the PAK1 regulatory domain.

p21-Activated Kinase 1 Plays a Critical Role in Cellular Activation by Nef

ABSTRACT The activation of Nef-associated kinase (NAK) by Nef from human and simian immunodeficiency viruses is critical for efficient viral replication and pathogenesis. This induction occurs via the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vav and the small GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42. In this study, we identified NAK as p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1). PAK1 bound to Nef in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the induction of cytoskeletal rearrangements such as the formation of trichopodia, the activation of Jun N-terminal kinase, and the increase of viral production were blocked by an inhibitory peptide that targets the kinase activity of PAK1 (PAK1 83-149). These results identify NAK as PAK1 and emphasize the central role its kinase activity plays in cytoskeletal rearrangements and cellular signaling by Nef.

c-Myc cooperates with activated Ras to induce the cdc2 promoter.

Expression of c-myc with constitutively active mutants of the ras gene results in the cooperative transformation of primary fibroblasts, although the precise mechanism by which these genes cooperate is unknown. Since c-Myc has been shown to function as a transcriptional activator, we have examined the ability of c-Myc and activated Ras (H-RasV-12) to cooperatively induce the promoter activity of cdc2, a gene which is critical for cell cycle progression. Microinjection of expression constructs encoding H-RasV-12 and c-Myc along with a cdc2 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid into quiescent cells led to an increase in cdc2 promoter activity approximately 30 h after injection, a period which coincides with the S-to-G2/M transition in these cells. Expression of H-RasV-12 alone weakly activated the cdc2 promoter, while expression of c-Myc alone had no effect. Mutants of c-Myc lacking either the leucine zipper dimerization domain or the phosphoacceptor site Ser-62 could not cooperate with H-RasV-12 to induce the cdc2 promoter. These mutants also lacked the ability to cooperate with H-RasV-12 to stimulate DNA synthesis. Deletion analysis identified a distinct region of the cdc2 promoter which was required for c-Myc responsiveness. Taken together, these observations suggest a mechanistic link between the molecular activities of c-Myc and Ras and induction of the cell cycle regulator Cdc2.

Reciprocal Signaling between Heterotrimeric G Proteins and the p21-stimulated Protein Kinase

p21-activated protein kinase (PAK)-1 phosphorylated Gαz, a member of the Gαi family that is found in the brain, platelets, and adrenal medulla. Phosphorylation approached 1 mol of phosphate/mol of Gαz in vitro. In transfected cells, Gαz was phosphorylated both by wild-type PAK1 when stimulated by the GTP-binding protein Rac1 and by constitutively active PAK1 mutants. In vitro, phosphorylation occurred only at Ser16, one of two Ser residues that are the major substrate sites for protein kinase C (PKC). PAK1 did not phosphorylate other Gα subunits (i1, i2, i3, o, s, or q). PAK1-phosphorylated Gαz was resistant both to RGSZ1, a Gz-selective GTPase-activating protein (GAP), and to RGS4, a relatively nonselective GAP for the Gi and Gqfamilies of G proteins. Phosphorylation of Ser27 by PKC did not alter sensitivity to either GAP. The previously described inhibition of Gz GAPs by PKC is therefore mediated by phosphorylation of Ser16. Phosphorylation of either Ser16 by PAK1 or Ser27 by PKC decreased the affinity of Gαz for Gβγ; phosphorylation of both residues by PKC caused no further effect. PAK1 thus regulates Gαz function by attenuating the inhibitory effects of both GAPs and Gβγ. In this context, the kinase activity of PAK1 toward several protein substrates was directly inhibited by Gβγ, suggesting that PAK1 acts as a Gβγ-regulated effector protein. This inhibition of mammalian PAK1 by Gβγ contrasts with the stimulation of the PAK homolog Ste20p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the Gβγ homolog Ste4p/Ste18p.

The MEK1 proline-rich insert is required for efficient activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1 and ERK2 in mammalian cells

MEK1 and MEK2 contain a proline-rich insert not present in any other known MEK (MAP (mitogen-activated protein)/ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) kinase) family members. We examined the effect of removing the MEK1 polyproline insert on MEK activity, its binding to Raf, and its ability to activate ERKs in cells. Deletion of the insert had no effect on either the activity of MEK1 or on its ability to bind to Raf-1. Both wild type and constitutively active MEK1 coimmunoprecipitated with Raf-1 whether or not the insert was present. Deletion of the insert did not reduce activation of MEK1 by EGF or activated Raf in cells. The proline-rich insert enhanced the ability of an otherwise equally active MEK1 protein to regulate endogenous ERKs in mammalian cells. Overexpression of either constitutively active MEK1 lacking the insert or ERK2 compensates for the weaker in vivo activity of the MEK1 deletion mutant. Expression of the insert in cells reduced activation of ERKs by EGF. We conclude that the proline-rich insert is not the site of the MEK-Raf interaction and that the polyproline insert is required for its efficient activation of downstream ERKs in cells.