Jeffrey A. Morgan

Total artificial heart implantation for biventricular failure due to eosinophilic myocarditis

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome is a condition of unknown etiology characterized by proliferation of eosinophils and their infiltration into tissues. Although cardiac involvement is rare, eosinophilic myocarditis can lead to life-threating fulminant congestive heart failure. Treatment of patients with eosinophilic myocarditis is challenging as heart failure can be caused by biventricular dysfunction. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported in the literature describing a patient with acute severe biventricular heart failure caused by eosinophilic myocarditis with mural left ventricular apical thrombus who was successfully treated with implantation of a total artificial heart as a bridge to heart transplant.

Nonidentical Continuous-Flow Devices For Biventricular Support

Although biventricular heart failure has been successfully managed with dual continuous-flow ventricular assist devices, the long-term use of 2 mechanically dissimilar pumps has traditionally been discouraged. We present the case of a 52-year-old man whose treatment with a HeartMate II left ventricular assist device was complicated by right ventricular failure, necessitating the implantation of a long-term right ventricular assist device. A HeartWare left ventricular assist device was placed along the right ventricular base to avoid interference with the HeartMate II housing. The patient was discharged from the hospital after routine postoperative care and dual-device training. This case shows that, despite logistical complexities, nonidentical continuous-flow device pairings can successfully provide long-term biventricular support.

Preoperative Prealbumin Level as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Malnutrition has been associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. However, many measurements of malnutrition have been inadequate prognostic markers. In this study, we sought to determine whether low preoperative serum prealbumin level was associated with morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. From November 2003 to March 2016, 526 patients with chronic heart failure underwent implantation of a CF-LVAD (HeartMate II, n = 403; HeartWare HVAD, n = 123). Our cohort comprised the 317 CF-LVAD recipients whose records included the preoperative serum prealbumin level. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those with a normal preoperative serum prealbumin level (>17 g/dL) and those with hypoprealbuminemia (≤17 g/dL). These groups were then compared with regard to preoperative demographics, incidence of postoperative complications, long-term survival rate, and cause of death. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with a low preoperative prealbumin level had significantly decreased survival rates at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months (p <0.001) after CF-LVAD implantation and higher overall mortality (p = 0.04) than the patients with a normal prealbumin level, and that exacerbated heart failure made up the majority of this difference within the first 6 months. However, we found no significant correlations between low prealbumin level and postoperative complications. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that preoperative serum prealbumin levels predict patient outcomes after CF-LVAD implantation.

LVAD Surgical Implant Technique: Infradiaphragmatic Approach

Inserting the inflow cannula into the left ventricular apex was a technique developed in the era of pulsatile left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Despite the evolution to continuous flow devices, this technique has remained popular. However, an apical location can make patients vulnerable to arrhythmias and obstruction due to interaction with the ventricular septum. We developed a method for implanting the HeartMate II, HVAD, and HM3 LVAD along the diaphragmatic surface of the heart. The resulting parallel orientation between the inlet cannula and interventricular septum minimizes the risk of inflow disruption and myocardial irritation and also eliminates the need for a pump pocket.

LVAD Surgical Implant Technique: Extraperitoneal Approach

As the number of LVAD implantations continues to rise and the technology advances, alternate approaches and new techniques have continued to develop. This chapter aims to not only summarize the steps common to the traditional LVAD implantation approach but also to introduce, explore, and summarize the increasing minimally invasive approaches, the variants in outflow graft (OG) anastomosis sites and their perceived benefits, and the varying approaches to “off-pump” LVAD implantation that circumvent the operative risks associated with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Predictive value of preoperative serum albumin levels on outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation

We performed a single‐center retrospective analysis to determine whether preoperative serum albumin levels were associated with postoperative adverse events and short‐ and long‐term survival in patients who underwent continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device (CF‐LVAD) implantation.

Acute kidney injury after implantation of a left ventricular assist device: a comparison of axial-flow (HeartMate II) and centrifugal-flow (HeartWare HVAD) devices

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are increasingly being used to treat advanced, refractory chronic heart failure. Herein, we sought to determine the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in axial-flow (HeartMate II; HM-II) and centrifugal-flow (HVAD) CF-LVAD recipients, as well as the effect of AKI on mortality. The study cohort comprised 520 patients who received a HM-II (n = 398) or HVAD (n = 122) at our center between November 2003 and March 2016. Their records were reviewed to determine the incidence of RIFLE-defined AKI after LVAD implantation. We compared the perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and survival rates of the patients with and without AKI and differentiated the outcomes based on device type (HM-II or HVAD). Seventy-five patients (14.4%) developed AKI postoperatively. Patients with AKI after LVAD implantation had significantly reduced survival compared to patients without AKI (p = 0.01). Cox proportional hazards models showed that AKI was a significant independent predictor of mortality (HR = 1.54, p = 0.03). Preoperative mechanical circulatory support and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent predictors of AKI. The incidence of AKI was similar for HM-II and HVAD recipients (p = 0.25). There was no significant difference in AKI rates for the HM-II and HVAD recipients. Developing AKI adversely affected survival.

Total artificial heart implantation as a bridge to transplantation: a viable model for the future?

ABSTRACT Introduction: Since the first total artificial heart (TAH) surgery in a human patient performed in 1969, over 1300 devices have been implanted worldwide. Patients are benefiting from increased lengths of durable support and indications have expanded beyond biventricular failure including allograft failure, severe restrictive disease, and complex congenital anomalies. Areas covered: The role of the TAH in biventricular failure, rates of successful bridge-to-transplant (BTT), and survival compared with biventricular assist devices (BiVADs) are discussed and differences between TAH and LVAD patient populations are highlighted. The device’s niche role in physiologies not amenable to single ventricle support is further described. New developments such as the 50cc Syncardia, continuous flow mechanisms (BiVACOR and Cleveland Clinic CF-TAH), and a bioprosthetic model (CARMAT) are discussed. Literature review was conducted utilizing the PubMed database selecting published research, database analyses, and case reports under ‘total artificial heart’ relevant to the paper’s aims. Expert commentary: TAH patients have high rates of successful BTT and survival on par with BiVAD-supported patients. Ongoing developments including decreased device size, continuous flow mechanisms, and use of bioprosthetic materials will ensure that the TAH will have an increasing role in advanced heart failure with increased device longevity and decreased post-implant complications.

Bridging to a Long-Term Ventricular Assist Device With Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: BRIDGING TO A LONG-TERM VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE

Implanting short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices as a bridge-to-decision is increasingly popular. However, outcomes have not been well studied in patients who receive short-term MCS before receiving long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. We analyzed outcomes in our single-center experience with long-term continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD recipients with pre-implantation short-term MCS. From November 2003 through March 2016, 526 patients (mean age, 54.7 ± 13.5 years) with chronic heart failure (mean ejection fraction, 21.7 ± 3.6%) underwent implantation of either the HeartMate II (n = 403) or the HeartWare device (n = 123). Before implantation, 269 patients received short-term MCS with the TandemHeart, the Impella 2.5/5.0, an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), or the CentriMag. The short-term MCS patients were compared with the CF-LVAD-only patients regarding preoperative demographics, incidence of postoperative complications, and long-term survival. The 269 patients received the following short-term MCS devices: 57 TandemHeart, 27 Impella, 172 IABP, 12 VA-ECMO, and 1 CentriMag. Survival at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 94.2, 87.2, 79.4, and 72.4%, respectively, for CF-LVAD-only patients versus 91.0, 78.1, 73.4, and 65.6%, respectively, for short-term MCS + CF-LVAD patients (P = 0.17). Within the short-term MCS group, survival at 24 months was poorest for patients supported with VA-ECMO or the TandemHeart (P = 0.03 for both), and survival across all four time points was poorest for patients supported with VA-ECMO (P = 0.02). Short-term MCS was not an independent predictor of mortality in multivariate Cox regression models (hazard ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.84-1.49, P = 0.43). In conclusion, we found that using short-term MCS therapy-except for VA-ECMO-as a bridge to long-term CF-LVAD support was not associated with poorer survival.

Left Ventricular Recovery with Explantation of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device after 5 Years of Support

Mechanical circulatory support may result in sufficient myocardial recovery to allow for explantation of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The duration of support associated with left ventricular recovery has generally been 6-12 months. In this report, we present a patient in whom the left ventricle recovered after 5 years of support with a LVAD. Our report demonstrates that long-term monitoring for left ventricular recovery is prudent and may allow for late device explantation.