Jeffrey Bradley

High-energy total body irradiation as preparation for bone marrow transplantation in leukemia patients: Treatment technique and related complications

PURPOSE Bone marrow transplantation with conditioning regimens that include total-body irradiation (TBI) is widely used in patients with acute lymphoblastic and acute myelocytic leukemias. The major causes of death in this population are relapse of leukemia, infection, and treatment related complications. Our purpose was to achieve a homogenous radiation dose distribution and to minimize the dose to the lungs, liver, and kidneys so that the incidence of organ injury was reduced. METHODS AND MATERIALS Dose to the bone marrow, midplane, and periphery was quantified by use of thermoluminescent detectors in a bone-equivalent tissue phantom. In an effort to reduce the risk of complications, we treated relapsed or refractory leukemia patients with TBI administered in fractionated, parallel opposed large fields with 24 MV photons, using tissue compensation and partial-transmission lung shielding. Tissue toxicities were then determined. RESULTS Dose quantitation in bone-equivalent and tissue-equivalent phantoms demonstrated that backscatter and pair production interactions adjacent to bone increased the bone marrow dose by 6 to 11%. At an SSD of 400 cm and at patient diameters of 20 to 40 cm, the percent inhomogeneity across the phantom with 24 MV photons was 0 to 0.3%, compared to 4 to 6% for 6 MV photons. End-organ toxicities consisted of clinical interstitial pneumonitis in six patients, idiopathic interstitial pneumonitis in three patients, renal toxicity in seven patients, and veno-occlusive disease of the liver in one patient. Toxicities did not correlate with fractionation schedule. CONCLUSIONS Total-body irradiation administered with 24 MV photons increases the dose deposition in bone marrow through pair production and backscatter interactions occurring in bone. Because percent depth dose increases with SSD, the 24 MV beam is more penetrating at a 400 cm distance than at 100 cm and dose homogeneity is improved with higher energies. Thus, the incidence of radiation-mediated injury to lung, liver, and kidney is reduced. This is an effective preparatory regimen for patients with high-risk leukemias requiring bone marrow transplantation.

The benefits of mammography are not limited to women of ages older than 50 years

Although the benefits of mammography are established in women age ≥ 50 years, its use in women age < 50 years is controversial. It is the purpose of this study to determine whether the better outcome in mammographically detected breast carcinoma compared with clinically detected breast carcinoma observed in women age ≥ 50 years also is observed in women age < 50 years.

Stereotactic MR-guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Ultra-Central Thorax Malignancies: Results of a Phase I Trial

Purpose Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for oligometastatic or unresectable primary malignancies, although target proximity to organs at risk (OARs) within the ultracentral thorax (UCT) limits safe delivery of an ablative dose. Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)–guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic ratio using reoptimization to account for daily variation in target and OAR anatomy. This study assessed the feasibility of UCT SMART and characterized dosimetric and clinical outcomes in patients treated for UCT lesions on a prospective phase 1 trial. Methods and Materials Five patients with oligometastatic (n = 4) or unresectable primary (n = 1) UCT malignancies underwent SMART. Initial plans prescribed 50 Gy in 5 fractions with goal 95% planning target volume (PTV) coverage by 95% of prescription, subject to strict OAR constraints. Daily real-time online adaptive plans were created as needed to preserve hard OAR constraints, escalate PTV dose, or both, based on daily setup MR image set anatomy. Treatment times, patient outcomes, and dosimetric comparisons were prospectively recorded. Results All initial and daily adaptive plans met strict OAR constraints based on simulation and daily setup MR imaging anatomy, respectively. Four of the 5 patients received ≥1 adapted fraction. Ten of the 25 total delivered fractions were adapted. A total of 30% of plan adaptations were performed to improve PTV coverage; 70% were for reversal of ≥1 OAR violation. Local control by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 100% at 3 and 6 months. No grade ≥3 acute (within 6 months of radiation completion) treatment-related toxicities were identified. Conclusions SMART may allow PTV coverage improvement and/or OAR sparing compared with nonadaptive SBRT and may widen the therapeutic index of UCT SBRT. In this small prospective cohort, we found that SMART was clinically deliverable to 100% of patients, although treatment delivery times surpassed our predefined, timing-based feasibility endpoint. This technique is well tolerated, offering excellent local control with no identified acute grade ≥3 toxicity.

Toward adaptive proton therapy guided with a mobile helical CT scanner

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of image-guided adaptive proton therapy (IGAPT) with a mobile helical-CT without rails. METHOD CT images were acquired with a 32-slice mobile CT (mCT) scanning through a 6 degree-of-freedom robotic couch rotated isocentrically 90 degrees from an initial setup position. The relationship between the treatment isocenter and the mCT imaging isocenter was established by a stereotactic reference frame attached to the treatment couch. Imaging quality, geometric integrity and localization accuracy were evaluated according to AAPM TG-66. Accuracy of relative stopping power ratio (RSPR) was evaluated by comparing water equivalent distance (WED) and dose calculations on anthropomorphic phantoms to that of planning CT (pCT). Feasibility of image-guided adaptive proton therapy was demonstrated on fractional images acquired with the mCT scanner. RESULTS mCT images showed slightly lower spatial resolution and a higher contrast-to-noise ratio compared to pCT images from the standard helical CT scanner. The geometric accuracy of the mCT was <1 mm. Localization accuracy was <0.4 mm and <0.3° with respect to 2DkV/kV matching. WED differences between mCT and pCT images were negligible, with discrepancies of 0.8 ± 0.6 mm and 1.3 ± 0.9 mm for brain and lung phantoms respectively. 3D gamma analysis (3% and 3 mm) passing rate was >95% on dose computed on mCT, with respect to dose calculation on pCT. CONCLUSION Our study has demonstrated that the geometric integrity, image quality and RSPR accuracy of the mCT are sufficient for IGAPT.

Optimizing radiation dose and fractionation for the definitive treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Radiation therapy is the foundation for treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a disease that is often inoperable and has limited long term survival. Local control of disease is strongly linked to patient survival and continues to be problematic despite continued attempts at changing the dose and fractionation of radiation delivered. Technological advancements such as 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) based planning, positron emission tomography (PET) based target delineation, and daily image guidance have allowed for ever more accurate and conformal treatments. A limit to dose escalation with conventional fractions of 2 Gy once per day appears to have been reached at 60 Gy in the randomized trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617. Higher doses were surprisingly associated with worse overall survival. Approaches other than conventional dose escalation have been explored to better control disease including accelerating treatment to limit tumor repopulation both with hyperfractionation and its multiple small (<2 Gy) fractions each day and with hypofractionation and its single larger (>2 Gy) fraction each day. These accelerated regimens are increasingly being used with concurrent chemotherapy, and multiple institutions have reported it as tolerable. Tailoring treatment to individual patient disease and normal anatomic characteristics has been explored with isotoxic dose escalation up to the tolerance of organs at risk, with both hyperfractionation and hypofractionation. Metabolic imaging during and after treatment is increasingly being used to boost doses to residual disease. Boost doses have included moderate hypofractionation of 2-4 Gy, and more recently extreme hypofractionation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In spite of all these changes in dose and fractionation, lung and cardiovascular toxicity remain obstacles that limit disease control and patient survival.