Jeffrey C. Wang

Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.

BACKGROUND A primary concern after posterior lumbar spine arthrodesis is the potential for adjacent segment degeneration cephalad or caudad to the fusion segment. There is controversy regarding the subsequent degeneration of adjacent segments, and we are aware of no long-term studies that have analyzed both cephalad and caudad degeneration following posterior arthrodesis. A retrospective investigation was performed to determine the rates of degeneration and survival of the motion segments adjacent to the site of a posterior lumbar fusion. METHODS Two hundred and fifteen patients who had undergone posterior lumbar arthrodesis were included in this study. The study group included 126 female patients and eighty-nine male patients. The average duration of follow-up was 6.7 years. Radiographs were analyzed with regard to arthritic degeneration at the adjacent levels both preoperatively and at the time of the last follow-up visit. Disc spaces were graded on a 4-point arthritic degeneration scale. Correlation analysis was used to determine the contribution of independent variables to the rate of degeneration. Survivorship analysis was performed to describe the degeneration of the adjacent motion segments. RESULTS Fifty-nine (27.4%) of the 215 patients had evidence of degeneration at the adjacent levels and elected to have an additional decompression (fifteen patients) or arthrodesis (forty-four patients). Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted a disease-free survival rate of 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 77.5% to 89.5%) at five years and of 63.9% (95% confidence interval, 54.0% to 73.8%) at ten years after the index operation. Although there was a trend toward progression of the arthritic grade at the adjacent disc levels, there was no significant correlation, with the numbers available, between the preoperative arthritic grade and the need for additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS The rate of symptomatic degeneration at an adjacent segment warranting either decompression or arthrodesis was predicted to be 16.5% at five years and 36.1% at ten years. There appeared to be no correlation with the length of fusion or the preoperative arthritic degeneration of the adjacent segment.

Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Study Design. A retrospective review of all patients surgically treated by a single surgeon with a three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior plate fixation. Objectives. To compare the clinical and radiographic success of anterior three-level discectomy and fusion performed with and without anterior cervical plate fixation. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies of multilevel cervical discectomies and fusions have shown fusion rates to decrease as the number of surgical levels increases. Anterior cervical plate stabilization can provide more stability and may increase fusion rates for multilevel fusions. Methods. Over a 7-year period, 59 patients were treated surgically with a three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by the senior author. Forty patients had cervical plates, whereas 19 had fusions with no plates. These patients were observed for an average of 3.2 years. Clinical and radiographic follow-up data were obtained. Results. Of the 59 patients, 14 had a pseudarthrosis (7 in each group). The pseudarthrosis rates were 18% (7 of 40) for patients with plating and 37% (7 of 19) for patients with no plating. Although the nonunion rate for unplated fusions was double that of plated fusions, this difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant correlation between pseudarthrosis and gender, age, level of surgery, history of tobacco use, or previous anterior surgery. The fusion rates were improved with the use of a cervical plate. Inferior clinical results were demonstrated in patients with a pseudarthrosis, regardless of the use of a cervical plate. Conclusions. The addition of plate fixation for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is a safe procedure and does not result in higher complication rates. In this study, the pseudarthrosis rate was lower for patients with a cervical plate. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Patients treated with cervical plating had overall better results when compared with those of patients treated without cervical plates. Although the use of cervical plates decreased the pseudarthrosis rate, a three-level procedure is still associated with a high nonunion rate, and other strategies to increase fusion rates should be explored.

Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine : Management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients

We reviewed the results of acute management of patients who had sustained a dural tear during an operation on the lumbar spine, and we attempted to determine the long-term sequelae of this complication. In the five years from July 1989 to July 1994, 641 consecutive patients had a decompression of the lumbar spine, performed by the senior one of us; of these patients, eighty-eight (14 percent) sustained a dural tear, which was repaired during the operation. The duration of follow-up ranged from two to eight years (average, 4.3 years). Postoperative management consisted of closed suction wound drainage for an average of 2.1 days and bed rest for an average of 2.9 days. Of the eighty-eight procedures that resulted in a dural tear, forty-five were revisions; these revisions were performed after an average of 2.2 previous operations on the lumbar spine, all of which resulted in a scar adherent to the dura. Only eight patients had headaches related to the spinal procedure and photophobia in the postoperative period; these symptoms resolved in all but two patients, both of whom had had a revision operation. Each of the two patients had symptoms of a persistent leak of spinal fluid and needed a reoperation for repair. Overall, seventy-six patients had a good or excellent result and twelve had a poor or satisfactory result with some residual back pain. One patient had arachnoiditis, and another had symptoms of viral meningitis one month postoperatively. A dural tear that occurs during an operation on the lumbar spine can be treated successfully with primary repair followed by bed rest. Such a tear does not appear to have any long-term deleterious effects or to increase the risk of postoperative infection, neural damage, or arachnoiditis. Closed suction wound drainage does not seem to aggravate the leak and can be used safely in the presence of a dural repair.

Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Bone grafting is used to augment bone healing and provide stability after spinal surgery. Autologous bone graft is limited in quantity and unfortunately associated with increased surgical time and donor-site morbidity. Alternatives to bone grafting in spinal surgery include the use of allografts, osteoinductive growth factors such as bone morphogenetic proteins and various synthetic osteoconductive carriers. PURPOSE Recent research has provided insight into methods that may modulate the bone healing process at the cellular level in addition to reversing the effects of symptomatic disc degeneration, which is a potentially disabling condition, managed frequently with various fusion procedures. With many adjuncts and alternatives available for use in spinal surgery, a concise review of the current bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery is necessary. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING A systematic review of the contemporary English literature on bone grafting in spinal surgery, including abstract information presented at national meetings. METHODS Bone grafting alternatives were reviewed as to their efficacy in extending or replacing autologous bone graft sources in spinal applications. RESULTS Alternatives to autologous bone graft include allograft bone, demineralized bone matrix, recombinant growth factors and synthetic implants. Each of these alternatives could possibly be combined with autologous bone marrow or various growth factors. Although none of the presently available substitutes provides all three of the fundamental properties of autograft bone (osteogenicity, osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity), there are a number of situations in which they have proven clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS Alternatives to autogenous bone grafting find their greatest appeal when autograft bone is limited in supply or when acceptable rates of fusion may be achieved with these substitutes (or extenders) despite the absence of one or more of the properties of autologous bone graft. In these clinical situations, the morbidity of autograft harvest is reasonably avoided. Future research may discover that combinations of materials may cumulatively result in the expression of osteogenesis, osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity found in autogenous sources.

Osteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion model.

BACKGROUND Although autogenous bone is the most widely used graft material for spinal fusion, demineralized bone matrix preparations are available as alternatives or supplements to autograft. They are prepared by acid extraction of most of the mineralized component, with retention of the collagen and noncollagenous proteins, including growth factors. Differences in allograft processing methods among suppliers might yield products with different osteoinductive activities. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of three different commercially available demineralized bone matrix products for inducing spinal fusion in an athymic rat model. METHODS Sixty male athymic rats underwent spinal fusion and were divided into three groups of eighteen animals each. Group I received Grafton Putty; Group II, DBX Putty; and Group III, AlloMatrix Injectable Putty. A control group of six animals (Group IV) underwent decortication alone. Six animals from each of the three experimental groups were killed at each of three intervals (two, four, and eight weeks), and the six animals from the control group were killed at eight weeks. At each of the time-points, radiographic and histologic analysis and manual testing of the explanted spines were performed. RESULTS The spines in Group I demonstrated higher rates of radiographically evident fusion at eight weeks than did the spines in Group III or Group IV (p < 0.05). Manual testing of the spines at four weeks revealed variable fusion rates (five of six in Group I, two of six in Group II, and none of six in Group III). At eight weeks, all six spines in Group I, three of the six in Group II, and no spine in Group III or IV had fused. Histologic analysis of the spines in Groups I, II, and III demonstrated varying amounts of residual demineralized bone matrix and new bone formation. Group-I spines demonstrated the most new bone formation. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated differences in the osteoinductive potentials of commercially available demineralized bone matrices in this animal model.

The effect of cervical plating on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

The use of anterior plates for single-level cervical fusions is controversial. Previous studies that evaluated single and multiple-level fusions have shown increased and decreased fusion rates when cervical plates are used. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success of single-level discectomy performed with and without anterior cervical plate fixation. During a 6-year period, 80 patients were surgically treated with a single-level anterior cervical discectomy. Forty-four patients had cervical plates, whereas 36 had fusions without plates (average follow-up, 2.3 years). The pseudarthrosis rates were 4.5% (2 of 44) for patients with plating and 8.3% (3 of 36) without plating. This difference was not significant (p = 0.653). There was no correlation of pseudarthrosis with sex, age, level of surgery, history of tobacco use, or the presence of previous anterior surgery. The amount of graft collapse for patients with plating was 0.75 mm compared with 1.5 mm for those without a plate (p = 0.026). The amount of kyphotic deformity of the fused segment was 1.2 degrees with plating compared with 1.9 degrees for patients without plating (p = 0.079). Ninety-one percent of the patients with plating had good or excellent results compared with 88% in the group without cervical plates, based on Odoms criteria. The addition of plate fixation for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is safe and not associated with a significant increase in complication rates. The pseudarthrosis rates are not significantly different when a cervical plate is used.

Effect of Regional Gene Therapy with Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Producing Bone Marrow Cells on Spinal Fusion in Rats

Background: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are now being used as bone-graft substitutes to enhance spinal fusion. However, the large doses of BMP required to induce a spinal fusion in humans suggests that the delivery of these proteins should be improved. We used ex vivo adenoviral gene transfer to create BMP-2-producing bone marrow cells, and these autologous cells were found to induce a posterolateral fusion of the spine in syngeneic rats. Methods: Intertransverse spinal arthrodesis (L4 and L5) was attempted in ten groups of Lewis rats with 5 × 10 6 BMP-2-producing rat bone marrow cells (Ad-BMP-2 cells), created through adenoviral gene transfer with guanidine hydrochloride-extracted demineralized bone matrix as a carrier (Group I); 5 × 10 6 Ad-BMP-2 cells on a collagen sponge carrier (Group II); 10 &mgr;g of recombinant BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) in a guanidine hydrochloride-extracted demineralized bone matrix carrier (Group III); 10 &mgr;g of rhBMP-2 in a collagen sponge carrier (Group IV); autogenous iliac crest bone-grafting (Group V); 5 × 10 6 &bgr;-galactosidase-producing rat bone marrow cells, created through adenoviral gene transfer with guanidine hydrochloride-extracted demineralized bone matrix as a carrier (Group VI); decortication of the transverse processes alone (Group VII); 5 × 10 6 uninfected rat bone marrow cells with a guanidine hydrochloride-extracted demineralized bone matrix carrier (Group VIII); guanidine hydrochloride-extracted demineralized bone matrix only (Group IX); or a collagen sponge alone (Group X). Each specimen underwent plain radiography, manual palpation, and histological analysis. Results: All spines in Groups I and II (BMP-2-producing bone marrow cells) and all spines in Groups III and IV were fused at four weeks postoperatively. In contrast, none of the spines in the other groups had fused at a minimum of eight weeks after implantation. Histological analysis of the specimens revealed that the spines that had received BMP-2-producing bone marrow cells (Groups I and II) were filled with coarse trabecular bone postoperatively, whereas those that had received rhBMP-2 (Groups III and IV) were filled with thin, lace-like trabecular bone. All of the other spines, including those that had been treated with autogenous iliac crest bone-grafting (Group V), produced little or no new bone. Conclusion: BMP-2-producing bone marrow cells, created by adenoviral gene transfer, produce sufficient BMP to induce an intertransverse fusion in the rat spine model. Clinical Relevance: Regional gene therapy can be used to induce spinal fusion. This strategy with use of transduced bone marrow cells created through ex vivo gene transfer with a BMP-2-containing adenovirus could be adapted to enhance spinal fusion in humans.

Graft migration or displacement after multilevel cervical corpectomy and strut grafting.

Study Design. A retrospective review of consecutive patients with graft migration or displacement after anterior cervical corpectomy surgery was performed. Objectives. To examine the associated risk factors and results of treatment among patients who sustained graft displacement or migration after anterior cervical corpectomy surgery. Summary of Background Data. Graft migration or displacement after anterior cervical corpectomy is a potential complication that may require revision surgery, but because of the low incidence, the factors associated with graft movement and the results of treatment are not well defined. Methods. All patients who had undergone a cervical corpectomy were examined for graft migration or displacement. None of the patients had a previous cervical laminectomy or prior posterior cervical surgery. All the patients were treated with autogenous strut grafting after decompression. Results. Over a 25-year period, 249 consecutive patients underwent one- to five-level anterior cervical corpectomies and strut grafting. All the patients were fused using autogenous bone grafts (iliac crest or fibula). During the postoperative period, 16 of the patients (10 women and 6 men; average age, 61.4 years) experienced migration of their grafts. The average follow-up period was 4.7 years (range, 2–12 years). The graft migration rates increased with more levels of fusion (odds ratio of 1.65 for having a displaced graft with each additional level): 4 of 95 single-level grafts, 4 of 76 two-level grafts, 7 of 71 three-level grafts, and 1 of 6 for four-level grafts. Of the 16 patients with graft migration, 14 had procedures involving a corpectomy of C6 with a fusion inferiorly extending to the C7 vertebral body (P = 0.001, statistically significant difference). Of these 16 patients, 5 underwent revision surgeries acutely for displacement and associated fracture of the inferior graft and vertebral body junction. None of the patients sustained a neurologic or respiratory complication as a result of graft migration ordisplacement. All of the patients went on to successfulfusion. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that a greater number of vertebral bodies removed and a longer graft are directly related to an increased frequency of graft displacement. Graft displacement may require revision surgery, but no patient in this study experienced a permanent adverse result from this complication. Corpectomies involving a fusion ending at the C7 vertebral body were associated with a higher rate of graft migration.

Musculoskeletal allograft risks and recalls in the United States.

&NA; There have been several improvements to the US tissue banking industry over the past decade. Tissue banks had limited active government regulation until 1993, at which time the US Food and Drug Administration began regulatory oversight because of reports of disease transmission from allograft tissues. Reports in recent years of disease transmission associated with the use of allografts have further raised concerns about the safety of such implants. A retrospective review of allograft recall data was performed to analyze allograft recall by tissue type, reason, and year during the period from January 1994 to June 30, 2007. During the study period, more than 96.5% of all allograft tissues recalled were musculoskeletal. The reasons underlying recent musculoskeletal tissue recalls include insufficient or improper donor evaluation, contamination, recipient infection, and positive serologic tests. Infectious disease transmission following allograft implantation may occur if potential donors are not adequately evaluated or screened serologically during the prerecovery phase and if the implant is not sterilized before implantation.

Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach.

Few data are available to evaluate approach-related differences in perioperative complications with lumbar interbody fusion devices. Complications occurring in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative period were identified and categorized for 31 consecutive posterior lumbar interbody fusions (PLIFs) and 88 consecutive anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs). In this study, all lumbar interbody fusions were conducted with threaded cylindrical devices as stand-alone internal fixation devices. Multivariate analysis was used to account for potential covariates and identify factors associated with an increased complication risk. Twenty-two percent of the patients had a perioperative complication. The relative risk of having a perioperative complication was 4.75 times higher for the PLIF group. All intraoperative complications occurred in the PLIF group. The relative risk of having a major postoperative complication was 6.8 times higher in the PLIF group than the ALIF group. Anterior approached patients tended to have visceral (ileus, 6%) and vascular (deep venous thrombosis, 2%) complications. In the posterior group, complications were neurologic and dura related (pseudomeningocele, 16%; epidural hematoma, 3%) and occurred most frequently in patients that had had previous posterior lumbar surgery (31% with major complication).