Jeffrey D. Blanchard
Grinnell College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jeffrey D. Blanchard.
Siam Review | 2011
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Coralia Cartis; Jared Tanner
Compressed sensing (CS) seeks to recover an unknown vector with
Mathematical Programming Computation | 2013
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Jared Tanner
N
ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithms | 2012
Tolu Alabi; Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Bradley Gordon; Russel Steinbach
entries by making far fewer than
Numerical Linear Algebra With Applications | 2015
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Jared Tanner
N
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing | 2015
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Jared Tanner; Ke Wei
measurements; it posits that the number of CS measurements should be comparable to the information content of the vector, not simply
Mathematics of Computation | 2011
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Ilya A. Krishtal
N
IEEE Signal Processing Letters | 2012
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Mike E. Davies
. CS combines directly the important task of compression with the measurement task. Since its introduction in 2004 there have been hundreds of papers on CS, a large fraction of which develop algorithms to recover a signal from its compressed measurements. Because of the paradoxical nature of CS—exact reconstruction from seemingly undersampled measurements—it is crucial for acceptance of an algorithm that rigorous analyses verify the degree of undersampling the algorithm permits. The restricted isometry property (RIP) has become the dominant tool used for the analysis in such cases. We present here an asymmetric form of RIP that gives tighter bounds than the usual symmetric one. We give the best known bounds on the RIP constants for matrices from the Gaussian ensemble. Our derivations illustrate the way in which the combinatorial nature of CS is controlled. Our quantitative bounds on the RIP allow precise statements as to how aggressively a signal can be undersampled, the essential question for practitioners. We also document the extent to which RIP gives precise information about the true performance limits of CS, by comparison with approaches from high-dimensional geometry.
Archive | 2011
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Kyle R. Steffen
For appropriate matrix ensembles, greedy algorithms have proven to be an efficient means of solving the combinatorial optimization problem associated with compressed sensing. This paper describes an implementation for graphics processing units (GPU) of hard thresholding, iterative hard thresholding, normalized iterative hard thresholding, hard thresholding pursuit, and a two-stage thresholding algorithm based on compressive sampling matching pursuit and subspace pursuit. The GPU acceleration of the former bottleneck, namely the matrix–vector multiplications, transfers a significant portion of the computational burden to the identification of the support set. The software solves high-dimensional problems in fractions of a second which permits large-scale testing at dimensions currently unavailable in the literature. The GPU implementations exhibit up to 70
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013
Jeffrey D. Blanchard
ICNAAM 2010: International Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics 2010 | 2010
Jeffrey D. Blanchard; Jared Tanner
\times