Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeffrey J. Popma is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeffrey J. Popma.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2010

Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis

Thomas G. Brott; Robert W. Hobson; George Howard; Gary S. Roubin; Wayne M. Clark; William Brooks; Ariane Mackey; Michael D. Hill; Pierre P. Leimgruber; Alice J. Sheffet; Virginia J. Howard; Wesley S. Moore; Jenifer H. Voeks; L. Nelson Hopkins; Donald E. Cutlip; David J. Cohen; Jeffrey J. Popma; Robert D. Ferguson; Stanley N. Cohen; Joseph L. Blackshear; Frank L. Silver; J. P. Mohr; Brajesh K. Lal; James F. Meschia

BACKGROUND Carotid-artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy are both options for treating carotid-artery stenosis, an important cause of stroke. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis to undergo carotid-artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. The primary composite end point was stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from any cause during the periprocedural period or any ipsilateral stroke within 4 years after randomization. RESULTS For 2502 patients over a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, there was no significant difference in the estimated 4-year rates of the primary end point between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group (7.2% and 6.8%, respectively; hazard ratio with stenting, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.51; P=0.51). There was no differential treatment effect with regard to the primary end point according to symptomatic status (P=0.84) or sex (P=0.34). The 4-year rate of stroke or death was 6.4% with stenting and 4.7% with endarterectomy (hazard ratio, 1.50; P=0.03); the rates among symptomatic patients were 8.0% and 6.4% (hazard ratio, 1.37; P=0.14), and the rates among asymptomatic patients were 4.5% and 2.7% (hazard ratio, 1.86; P=0.07), respectively. Periprocedural rates of individual components of the end points differed between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group: for death (0.7% vs. 0.3%, P=0.18), for stroke (4.1% vs. 2.3%, P=0.01), and for myocardial infarction (1.1% vs. 2.3%, P=0.03). After this period, the incidences of ipsilateral stroke with stenting and with endarterectomy were similarly low (2.0% and 2.4%, respectively; P=0.85). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the risk of the composite primary outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death did not differ significantly in the group undergoing carotid-artery stenting and the group undergoing carotid endarterectomy. During the periprocedural period, there was a higher risk of stroke with stenting and a higher risk of myocardial infarction with endarterectomy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004732.)


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1998

A Clinical Trial Comparing Three Antithrombotic-Drug Regimens after Coronary-Artery Stenting

Martin B. Leon; Donald S. Baim; Jeffrey J. Popma; Paul C. Gordon; Donald E. Cutlip; Kalon K.L. Ho; Alex Giambartolomei; Daniel J. Diver; David Lasorda; David O. Williams; Stuart J. Pocock; Richard E. Kuntz

Background Antithrombotic drugs are used after coronary-artery stenting to prevent stent thrombosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of three antithrombotic-drug regimens — aspirin alone, aspirin and warfarin, and aspirin and ticlopidine — after coronary stenting. Methods Of 1965 patients who underwent coronary stenting at 50 centers, 1653 (84.1 percent) met angiographic criteria for successful placement of the stent and were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: aspirin alone (557 patients), aspirin and warfarin (550 patients), or aspirin and ticlopidine (546 patients). All clinical events reflecting stent thrombosis were included in the prespecified primary end point: death, revascularization of the target lesion, angiographically evident thrombosis, or myocardial infarction within 30 days. Results The primary end point was observed in 38 patients: 20 (3.6 percent) assigned to receive aspirin alone, 15 (2.7 percent) assigned to receive aspirin and warfarin, and 3 (0.5 percent) assigned to rece...


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2014

Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis.

David H. Adams; Jeffrey J. Popma; Michael J. Reardon; Steven J. Yakubov; Joseph S. Coselli; G. Michael Deeb; Thomas G. Gleason; Maurice Buchbinder; James B. Hermiller; Neal S. Kleiman; Stan Chetcuti; John Heiser; William Merhi; George L. Zorn; Peter Tadros; Newell Robinson; George Petrossian; G. Chad Hughes; J. Kevin Harrison; John V. Conte; Brijeshwar Maini; Mubashir Mumtaz; Sharla Chenoweth; Jae K. Oh

BACKGROUND We compared transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR), using a self-expanding transcatheter aortic-valve bioprosthesis, with surgical aortic-valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and an increased risk of death during surgery. METHODS We recruited patients with severe aortic stenosis who were at increased surgical risk as determined by the heart team at each study center. Risk assessment included the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predictor Risk of Mortality estimate and consideration of other key risk factors. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to TAVR with the self-expanding transcatheter valve (TAVR group) or to surgical aortic-valve replacement (surgical group). The primary end point was the rate of death from any cause at 1 year, evaluated with the use of both noninferiority and superiority testing. RESULTS A total of 795 patients underwent randomization at 45 centers in the United States. In the as-treated analysis, the rate of death from any cause at 1 year was significantly lower in the TAVR group than in the surgical group (14.2% vs. 19.1%), with an absolute reduction in risk of 4.9 percentage points (upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval, -0.4; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.04 for superiority). The results were similar in the intention-to-treat analysis. In a hierarchical testing procedure, TAVR was noninferior with respect to echocardiographic indexes of valve stenosis, functional status, and quality of life. Exploratory analyses suggested a reduction in the rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and no increase in the risk of stroke. CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at increased surgical risk, TAVR with a self-expanding transcatheter aortic-valve bioprosthesis was associated with a significantly higher rate of survival at 1 year than surgical aortic-valve replacement. (Funded by Medtronic; U.S. CoreValve High Risk Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01240902.).


Circulation | 1996

Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent Restenosis A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Rainer Hoffmann; Gary S. Mintz; Gaston R. Dussaillant; Jeffrey J. Popma; Augusto D. Pichard; Lowell F. Satler; Kenneth M. Kent; Jennifer Griffin; Martin B. Leon

BACKGROUND Studies have suggested that restenosis within Palmaz-Schatz stents results from neointimal hyperplasia or chronic stent recoil and occurs more frequently at the articulation. METHODS AND RESULTS Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed after intervention and at follow-up in 142 stents in 115 lesions. IVUS measurements (external elastic membrane [EEM], stent, and lumen cross-sectional areas [CSAs] and diameters) were performed, and plaque CSA (EEM lumen in reference segments and stent lumen in stented segments), late lumen loss (delta lumen), remodeling (delta EEM in reference segments and delta stent in stented segments), and tissue growth (delta plaque) were calculated. After intervention, the lumen tended to be smallest at the articulation because of tissue prolapse. At follow-up, tissue growth was uniformly distributed throughout the stent; the tendency for greater neointimal tissue accumulation at the central articulation reached statistical significance only when normalized for the smaller postintervention lumen CSA. In stented segments, late lumen area loss correlated strongly with tissue growth but only weakly with remodeling. Stents affected adjacent vessel segments; remodeling progressively increased and tissue growth progressively decreased at distances from the edge of the stent. These findings were similar in native arteries and saphenous vein grafts and in lesions treated with one or two stents. There was no difference in the postintervention or follow-up lumen (at the junction of the two stents) when overlapped were compared with nonoverlapped stents. CONCLUSIONS Late lumen loss and in-stent restenosis were the result of neointimal tissue proliferation, which tended to be uniformly distributed over the length of the stent.


European Heart Journal | 2011

Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials : A Consensus Report From the Valve Academic Research Consortium

Martin B. Leon; Nicolo Piazza; Eugenia Nikolsky; Eugene H. Blackstone; Donald E. Cutlip; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Mitchell W. Krucoff; Michael J. Mack; Roxana Mehran; Craig S. Miller; Marie-Angèle Morel; John R. Petersen; Jeffrey J. Popma; Johanna J.M. Takkenberg; Alec Vahanian; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Pascal Vranckx; John G. Webb; Stephan Windecker; Patrick Serruys

Objectives To propose standardized consensus definitions for important clinical endpoints in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), investigations in an effort to improve the quality of clinical research and to enable meaningful comparisons between clinical trials. To make these consensus definitions accessible to all stakeholders in TAVI clinical research through a peer reviewed publication, on behalf of the public health. Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation may provide a worthwhile less invasive treatment in many patients with severe aortic stenosis and since its introduction to the medical community in 2002, there has been an explosive growth in procedures. The integration of TAVI into daily clinical practice should be guided by academic activities, which requires a harmonized and structured process for data collection, interpretation, and reporting during well-conducted clinical trials. Methods and results The Valve Academic Research Consortium established an independent collaboration between Academic Research organizations and specialty societies (cardiology and cardiac surgery) in the USA and Europe. Two meetings, in San Francisco, California (September 2009) and in Amsterdam, the Netherlands (December 2009), including key physician experts, and representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and device manufacturers, were focused on creating consistent endpoint definitions and consensus recommendations for implementation in TAVI clinical research programs. Important considerations in developing endpoint definitions included (i) respect for the historical legacy of surgical valve guidelines; (ii) identification of pathophysiological mechanisms associated with clinical events; (iii) emphasis on clinical relevance. Consensus criteria were developed for the following endpoints: mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding, acute kidney injury, vascular complications, and prosthetic valve performance. Composite endpoints for TAVI safety and effectiveness were also recommended. Conclusion Although consensus criteria will invariably include certain arbitrary features, an organized multidisciplinary process to develop specific definitions for TAVI clinical research should provide consistency across studies that can facilitate the evaluation of this new important catheter-based therapy. The broadly based consensus endpoint definitions described in this document may be useful for regulatory and clinical trial purposes.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1997

Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary Stenting

Paul S. Teirstein; Vincent Massullo; Shirish Jani; Jeffrey J. Popma; Gary S. Mintz; Robert J. Russo; Richard A. Schatz; Erminia M. Guarneri; Stephen Steuterman; Nancy B. Morris; Martin B. Leon; Prabhakar Tripuraneni

BACKGROUND In animal models of coronary restenosis, intracoronary radiotherapy has been shown to reduce the intimal hyperplasia that is a part of restenosis. We studied the safety and efficacy of catheter-based intracoronary gamma radiation plus stenting to reduce coronary restenosis in patients with previous restenosis. METHODS Patients with restenosis underwent coronary stenting, as required, and balloon dilation and were then randomly assigned to receive catheter-based irradiation with iridium-192 or placebo. Clinical follow-up was performed, with quantitative coronary angiographic and intravascular ultrasonographic measurements at six months. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were enrolled; 26 were assigned to the iridium-192 group and 29 to the placebo group. Angiographic studies were performed in 53 patients (96 percent) at a mean (+/-SD) of 6.7+/-2.2 months. The mean minimal luminal diameter at follow-up was larger in the iridium-192 group than in the placebo group (2.43+/-0.78 mm vs. 1.85+/-0.89 mm, P=0.02). Late luminal loss was significantly lower in the iridium-192 group than in the placebo group (0.38+/-1.06 mm vs. 1.03+/-0.97 mm, P=0.03). Angiographically identified restenosis (stenosis of 50 percent or more of the luminal diameter at follow-up) occurred in 17 percent of the patients in the iridium-192 group, as compared with 54 percent of those in the placebo group (P= 0.01). There were no apparent complications of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS In this preliminary, short-term study of patients with previous coronary restenosis, coronary stenting followed by catheter-based intracoronary radiotherapy substantially reduced the rate of subsequent restenosis.


Circulation | 1996

Arterial Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Gary S. Mintz; Jeffrey J. Popma; Augusto D. Pichard; Kenneth M. Kent; Lowell F. Satler; S. Chiu Wong; Mun K. Hong; Julie A. Kovach; Martin B. Leon

BACKGROUND Restenosis occurs after 30% to 50% of transcatheter coronary procedures; however, the natural history and pathophysiology of restenosis are still incompletely understood. METHODS AND RESULTS Serial (postintervention and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound imaging was used to study 212 native coronary lesions in 209 patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, or excimer laser angioplasty. The external elastic membrane (EEM) and lumen cross-sectional areas (CSA) were measured; plaque plus media (P+M) CSA was calculated as EEM minus lumen CSA. The anatomic slice selected for serial analysis had an axial location within the target lesion at the smallest follow-up lumen CSA. At follow-up, 73% of the decrease in lumen (from 6.6+/-2.5 to 4.0+/-3.7 mm2, P<.0001) was due to a decrease in EEM (from 20.1+/-6.4 to 18.2+/-6.4 mm2, P<.0001); 27% was due to an increase in P+M (from 13.5+/-5.5 to 14.2+/-5.4 mm2, P<.0001). Delta Lumen CSA correlated more strongly with delta EEM CSA (r=.751, P<.0001) than with delta P+M CSA (r=.284, P<.0001). Delta EEM was bidirectional; 47 lesions (22%) showed an increase in EEM. Despite a greater increase in P+M (1.5+/-2.5 versus 0.5+/-2.0 mm2, P=.0009), lesions exhibiting an increase in EEM had (1) no change in lumen (-0.1+/-3.3 versus 3.6+/-2.3 mm2, P<.0001), (2) a reduced restenosis rate (26% versus 62%, P<.0001), and (3) a 49% frequency of late lumen gain (versus 1%, P<.0001) compared with lesions with no increase in EEM. CONCLUSIONS Restenosis appears to be determined primarily by the direction and magnitude of vessel wall remodeling (delta EEM). An increase in EEM is adaptive, whereas a decrease in EEM contributes to restenosis.


Circulation | 2004

One-Year Clinical Results With the Slow-Release, Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Stent: The TAXUS-IV Trial

Gregg W. Stone; Stephen G. Ellis; David A. Cox; James B. Hermiller; Charles O’Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald P. Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J. Popma; Mary E. Russell

Background—The safety and efficacy of the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent after implantation in a broad cross section of de novo coronary lesions at 1 year are unknown. Methods and Results—In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1314 patients with single de novo coronary lesions 10 to 28 mm in length, with reference-vessel diameter 2.5 to 3.75 mm, coverable by a single study stent, were prospectively randomized to the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or an identical-appearing bare-metal EXPRESS stent. By actuarial analysis, the TAXUS stent compared with the bare-metal stent reduced the 12-month rates of target-lesion revascularization by 73% (4.4% versus 15.1%, P <0.0001), target-vessel revascularization by 62% (7.1% versus 17.1%, P <0.0001), target-vessel failure by 52% (10.0% versus 19.4%, P <0.0001), and composite major adverse cardiac events by 49% (10.8% versus 20.0%, P <0.0001). The 1-year rates of cardiac death (1.4% versus 1.3%), myocardial infarction (3.5% versus 4.7%), and subacute thrombosis (0.6% versus 0.8%) were similar between the paclitaxel-eluting and control stents, respectively. Between 9 and 12 months, there were significantly fewer myocardial infarctions (0% versus 1.1%, P =0.007), target-vessel revascularizations (2.4% versus 5.8%, P =0.002), and major adverse cardiac events (2.4% versus 6.3%, P =0.0009) in the paclitaxel-eluting stent than in the control stent group, respectively. Conclusions—The relative efficacy reported at 9 months for the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent compared with the EXPRESS stent is preserved and continues to increase at 1 year, with no safety concerns apparent.


Circulation | 2001

Stent Thrombosis in the Modern Era

Donald E. Cutlip; Donald S. Baim; Kalon K.L. Ho; Jeffrey J. Popma; Alexandra J. Lansky; David J. Cohen; Joseph P. Carrozza; Manish S. Chauhan; Orlando Rodriguez; Richard E. Kuntz

Background—There are limited studies of stent thrombosis in the modern era of second-generation stents, high-pressure deployment, and current antithrombotic regimens. Methods and Results—Six recently completed coronary stent trials and associated nonrandomized registries that enrolled 6186 patients (6219 treated vessels) treated with ≥1 coronary stent followed by antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine were pooled for this analysis. Within 30 days, clinical stent thrombosis developed in 53 patients (0.9%). The variables most significantly associated with the probability of stent thrombosis were persistent dissection NHLBI grade B or higher after stenting (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9 to 7.7), total stent length (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5 per 10 mm), and final minimal lumen diameter within the stent (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7 per 1 mm). Stent thrombosis was documented by angiography in 45 patients (0.7%). Clinical consequences of angiographic stent thrombosis included 64.4% incidence of death or myoc...


Circulation | 2001

Lack of Neointimal Proliferation After Implantation of Sirolimus-Coated Stents in Human Coronary Arteries

J. Eduardo Sousa; Marco A. Costa; Alexandre Abizaid; Andrea Abizaid; Fausto Feres; Ibraim M. F Pinto; A Seixas; Rodolfo Staico; Luiz Alberto Mattos; Amanda Sousa; Robert Falotico; Judith Jaeger; Jeffrey J. Popma; Patrick W. Serruys

Background—Restenosis remains an important limitation of interventional cardiology. Therefore, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of sirolimus (a cell-cycle inhibitor)-coated BX Velocity...

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeffrey J. Popma's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin B. Leon

Columbia University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary S. Mintz

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth M. Kent

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lowell F. Satler

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Augusto D. Pichard

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard E. Kuntz

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald E. Cutlip

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald S. Baim

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge