Jeffrey M. DeLong

Platelet-Rich Plasma: The PAW Classification System

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been the subject of hundreds of publications in recent years. Reports of its effects in tissue, both positive and negative, have generated great interest in the orthopaedic community. Protocols for PRP preparation vary widely between authors and are often not well documented in the literature, making results difficult to compare or replicate. A classification system is needed to more accurately compare protocols and results and effectively group studies together for meta-analysis. Although some classification systems have been proposed, no single system takes into account the multitude of variables that determine the efficacy of PRP. In this article we propose a simple method for organizing and comparing results in the literature. The PAW classification system is based on 3 components: (1) the absolute number of Platelets, (2) the manner in which platelet Activation occurs, and (3) the presence or absence of White cells. By analyzing these 3 variables, we are able to accurately compare publications.

Posterior Instability of the Shoulder A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Background: To date, there are no reports in the literature of a systematic review and meta-analysis for posterior instability of the shoulder. Purpose: The primary objective was to systematically capture, critically evaluate, and perform a meta-analysis of all available literature on arthroscopic clinical outcomes to provide insight and clinical recommendations for unilateral posterior shoulder instability. The secondary objective was to use the same means to assess clinical outcome literature for open treatment, of which a subset of highly reported outcome measures were used to determine superiority of arthroscopic versus open procedures for unilateral posterior shoulder. Study Design: Systematic review, meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search to obtain every available, published, level of evidence study reporting patient data for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability was performed by use of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed/Medline database, manual searches of high impact factor journals and conference proceedings, and secondary references appraised for studies meeting inclusion criteria. Results: The systematic search captured a total of 1035 publications. After initial exclusion criteria were applied, 607 abstracts were assessed for eligibility. Full-text articles were obtained for 324 articles, and a total of 53 unique publications (27 arthroscopic studies, 26 open studies) reporting clinical outcomes for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Conclusion: Well-defined and uniform shoulder outcome measures to assess posterior shoulder instability are lacking throughout the literature. However, arthroscopic procedures are shown to be an effective and reliable treatment for unidirectional posterior glenohumeral instability with respect to outcome scores, patient satisfaction, and return to play. Despite similar results of outcome measures to the overall athletic population, throwing athletes are less likely to return to their preinjury levels of sport compared with contact athletes or the overall athletic population. Evidence also indicates that arthroscopic stabilization procedures using suture anchors result in fewer recurrences and revisions than anchorless repairs in young adults engaging in highly demanding physical activity. Furthermore, the literature suggests that patients treated arthroscopically have superior outcomes compared with patients who undergo open procedures with respect to stability, recurrence of instability, patient satisfaction, return to sport, and return to previous level of play.

Knot Strength Varies Widely Among Expert Arthroscopists

Background: While most surgeons can tie visually appealing knots under an arthroscope, few surgeons have undergone an objective evaluation of their ability to consistently tie knots with maximum loop and knot security. Purpose/Hypotheses: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare variations in ultimate load to failure, 3-mm displacement (clinical failure), and knot stack height of arthroscopic suture knots tied by 73 independent expert orthopaedic arthroscopists. The hypotheses were (1) that skilled arthroscopic surgeons would be able to routinely tie arthroscopic knots of similar strength, (2) that surgeons with <10 years of clinical practice would tie stronger and more consistent knots, and (3) that surgeons who performed >200 arthroscopic shoulder cases per year would produce stronger and more consistent knots than would surgeons who performed fewer cases. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Each surgeon tied 5 of the same type of their preferred arthroscopic knot and half-hitch locking mechanism. Each knot was mechanically tested for ultimate load to failure and clinical failure. Results: For the 365 individual knots tested, the mean ultimate load across each knot was 231 N (range, 29-360 N). The mean clinical failure load was 139 N (range, 16-328 N). The average knot stack height among the 365 knots was 5.61 mm (range, 2.89-10.32 mm). For an individual surgeon, the standard deviations of the 5 consecutive knots tied ranged from 6 to 133 N. The ultimate load and clinical failure load for surgeons with <10 years of practice (n = 39) were 248 ± 93 N and 142 ± 56 N, respectively. The mean ± SD ultimate and clinical failure loads for surgeons with >10 years of practice (n = 34) were 211 ± 111 N and 136 ± 69 N, respectively. When knot strength was used to measure performance, significant differences existed in ultimate load (P = .001); however, there were no differences in clinical failure load (P = .329). Surgeons with <10 years of practice were able to tie knots more consistently than were surgeons in practice for >10 years, for both ultimate load (P = .018) and clinical failure load (P = .005). There was no significant difference based on number of cases performed with respect to ultimate load or clinical failure load (P = .292 and .479, respectively). There was no difference in consistency, as both groups had similar standard deviations (P = .814 for ultimate load, P = .545 for clinical failure). Conclusion: Considerable variations in knot strength exist between arthroscopic knots tied by surgeons. Study findings revealed that surgeons were unable to tie 5 consecutive knots of the same type consistently; that for both ultimate load and clinical failure load, surgeons with <10 years in practice were able to tie knots more consistently than surgeons with >10 years; and that surgeons performing >200 arthroscopic shoulder cases annually failed to tie stronger or more consistent knots than their counterparts performing fewer cases. Clinical Relevance: This variation in knot tying has the potential to affect the integrity of arthroscopic repairs. Independent objective testing of the ability to tie secure knots as part of a surgeons’ training may be necessary.

Sternoclavicular Reconstruction in the Young Active Patient: Risk Factor Analysis and Clinical Outcomes at Short-Term Follow-up.

Objective: To determine the functional outcomes in young, active individuals after sternoclavicular (SC) joint reconstruction. Design: Level IV, case series. Setting: United States military hospitals, 2008–2012. Patients/Participants: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients from the Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool was performed. Patients who underwent other open-shoulder procedures (eg, acromioclavicular joint reconstruction), those of nonmilitary or retired status, and patients with under 12-month minimum follow-up without medical separation were excluded from further analysis. Intervention: Open reconstruction of SC joint dislocation. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes of interest were clinical failure and medical separation due to persistent shoulder girdle dysfunction. Demographic data, surgical technique, outcomes, complications, and occupational military outcomes were recorded. Results: Fourteen patients, with an average age of 26 years, experienced 8 anterior (57.1%) and 6 posterior (42.9%) SC joint dislocations. Four patients (28.6%) presented with dysphagia or dyspnea, and 10 patients (71.4%) had a missed diagnosis with an average of 13 months until diagnosis. Twelve of 14 (85.7%) patients underwent figure-of-eight tendon reconstruction, and 10 (71.4%) were able to return to full active military duty at an average 26.8 ± 12.9 months follow-up. There were 6 complications in 5 patients (35.7%), whereas 2 (14.3%) reported persistent instability and 2 (14.3%) required reoperation. Conclusions: SC joint dislocations are rare injuries that are frequently missed on clinical presentation in this study. However, acute or delayed surgical reconstruction may afford predictable rates of return to function in young active military service members. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Posterior shoulder instability in the athletic population: Variations in assessment, clinical outcomes, and return to sport

Posterior instability of the shoulder is becoming an increasingly recognized shoulder injury in the athletic population. Diagnostic elements, such as etiology, directionality, and degree of instability are essential factors to assess in the unstable athletic shoulder. Concomitant injuries and associated pathologic lesions continue to be a significant challenge in the surgical management of posterior shoulder instability. Return to sport and previous level of play is ultimately the goal for every committed athlete and surgeon, thus subpopulations of athletes should be recognized as distinct entities requiring unique diagnostic, functional outcome measures, and surgical approaches.

Intra-articular psoas tendon release alters fluid flow during hip arthroscopy

While not proven definitively, the hypothesis that intra-articular psoas tendon release allows fluid to track into the retroperitoneal space has been widely accepted. This study attempts to identify the path through which fluid enters the pelvis and retroperitoneal space. Six hemi-pelvis human cadaveric specimens were utilized for this study. 3 specimens underwent a capsulotomy and psoas tendon release, while 3 had only a capsulotomy. Arthroscopy fluid was combined with Barium and Methylene blue, and fluid was run at 50 mmHg for 2 hours. A gross dissection was performed at the end of the arthroscopy and the path of fluid flow into the pelvis and throughout the thigh was identified. All 6 specimens showed extravasation of fluid into the pelvis at the 5 minute mark. Specimens with a psoas tendon release showed an altered pattern of fluid flow. In all three of these specimens, the psoas muscle belly was bright blue, along with the remaining tendon. Two of the 3 specimens showed tracking of fluid along the vasculature in both directions. The volume of fluid tracking into the pelvis was increased following a psoas release. Arthroscopy fluid rapidly enters the pelvis following the initiation of hip arthroscopy, regardless of the status of the psoas tendon. Release of the psoas tendon allows fluid to diffuse into the psoas muscle and anterior medial thigh, tracking both proximally and distally along the neurovascular structures, and the volume of fluid tracking into the pelvis is increased following a psoas release.