Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeffrey P. Salomone is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeffrey P. Salomone.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2009

Improvements in early mortality and coagulopathy are sustained better in patients with blunt trauma after institution of a massive transfusion protocol in a civilian level I trauma center.

Christopher J. Dente; Beth H. Shaz; Jeffery M. Nicholas; Robert S. Harris; Amy D. Wyrzykowski; Snehal S. Patel; Amit J. Shah; Gary Vercruysse; David V. Feliciano; Grace S. Rozycki; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Walter L. Ingram

INTRODUCTION Transfusion practices across the country are changing with aggressive use of plasma (fresh-frozen plasma [FFP]) and platelets during massive transfusion with current military recommendations to use component therapy at a 1:1:1 ratio of packed red blood cells to FFP to platelets. METHODS A massive transfusion protocol (MTP) was designed to achieve a packed red blood cell:FFP:platelet ratio of 1:1:1 We prospectively gathered demographic, transfusion, and patient outcome data during the first year of the MTP and compared this with a similar cohort of injured patients (pre-MTP) receiving > or = 10 red blood cell (RBC) in the first 24 hours of hospitalization before instituting the MTP. RESULTS One hundred sixteen MTP activations occurred. Twelve non-trauma patients and 31 who did not receive 10 RBC (15 deaths, 16 early bleeding controls) were excluded. Seventy-three MTP patients were compared with 84 patients with pre-MTP who had similar demographics and injury severity score (29 vs. 29, p = 0.99). MTP patients received an average of 23.7 RBC and 15.6 FFP transfusions compared with 22.8 RBC (p = 0.67) and 7.6 FFP (p < 0.001) transfusions in pre-MTP patients. Early crystalloid usage dropped from 9.4 L (pre-MTP) to 6.9 L (MTP) (p = 0.006). Overall patient mortality was markedly improved at 24 hours, from 36% in the pre-MTP group to 17% in the MTP group (p = 0.008) and at 30 days (34% mortality MTP group vs. 55% mortality in pre-MTP group, p = 0.04). Blunt trauma survival improvements were more marked and more sustained than victims of penetrating trauma. Early deaths from coagulopathic bleeding occurred in 4 of 13 patients in the MTP group vs. 21 of 31 patients in the pre-MTP group (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS In the civilian setting, aggressive use of FFP and platelets drastically reduces 24-hour mortality and early coagulopathy in patients with trauma. Reduction in 30 day mortality was only seen after blunt trauma in this small subset.


Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | 2008

Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline.

E. Brooke Lerner; Richard B. Schwartz; Phillip L. Coule; Eric S. Weinstein; David C. Cone; Richard C. Hunt; Scott M. Sasser; J. Marc Liu; Nikiah G. Nudell; Ian S. Wedmore; Jeffrey Hammond; Eileen M. Bulger; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Teri L. Sanddal; Graydon Lord; David Markenson; Robert E. O'Connor

Mass casualty triage is a critical skill. Although many systems exist to guide providers in making triage decisions, there is little scientific evidence available to demonstrate that any of the available systems have been validated. Furthermore, in the United States there is little consistency from one jurisdiction to the next in the application of mass casualty triage methodology. There are no nationally agreed upon categories or color designations. This review reports on a consensus committee process used to evaluate and compare commonly used triage systems, and to develop a proposed national mass casualty triage guideline. The proposed guideline, entitled SALT (sort, assess, life-saving interventions, treatment and/or transport) triage, was developed based on the best available science and consensus opinion. It incorporates aspects from all of the existing triage systems to create a single overarching guide for unifying the mass casualty triage process across the United States.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 1998

Rapid Detection of Traumatic Effusion Using Surgeon-Performed Ultrasonography

Amy C. Sisley; Grace S. Rozycki; Robert B. Ballard; Nicholas Namias; Jeffrey P. Salomone; David V. Feliciano

BACKGROUND In the injured patient, rapid assessment of the thorax can yield critical information for patient management and triage. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this prospective study were (1) to determine if experienced surgeon sonographers could successfully use a focused thoracic ultrasonographic examination to detect traumatic effusion, and (2) to compare the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasonography with supine portable chest radiography. METHODS Surgeon-sonographers performed thoracic ultrasonographic examinations on patients with blunt and penetrating torso injuries during the Advanced Trauma Life Support secondary survey. All patients also underwent portable chest radiography. Performance times for ultrasonography and chest radiography were recorded. Comparisons were made of the performance times and accuracy of both tests in detecting traumatic effusion. RESULTS In 360 patients, there were 40 effusions, 39 of which were detected by ultrasonography and 37 of which were detected by chest radiography. The 97.5% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity observed for thoracic ultrasonography were similar to the 92.5% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity for portable chest radiography. Performance time for ultrasonography was significantly faster than that for chest radiography (1.30 +/- 0.08 vs. 14.18 +/- 0.91 minutes, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Surgeons can accurately perform and interpret a focused thoracic ultrasonographic examination to detect traumatic effusion. Surgeon-performed thoracic ultrasonography is as accurate but is significantly faster than supine portable chest radiography for the detection of traumatic effusion.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2003

Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Jeffrey M. Nicholas; Emily Parker Rix; Kerr Anthony Easley; David V. Feliciano; Raymond A. Cava; Walter L. Ingram; Neil Parry; Grace S. Rozycki; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Lorraine N. Tremblay

BACKGROUND Damage control surgery (DCS) and treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome have had major impacts on care of the severely injured. The objective of this study was to see whether advances in critical care, DCS, and recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome have improved survival from penetrating abdominal injury (PAI). METHODS The care of 250 consecutive patients requiring laparotomy for PAI (1997-2000) was reviewed retrospectively. Organ injury patterns, survival, and use of DCS and its impact on outcome were compared with a similar experience reported in 1988. RESULTS Two hundred fifty patients had a positive laparotomy for PAI. Twenty-seven (10.8%) required abdominal packing and 45 (17.9%) did not have fascial closure. Seven (2.8%) required emergency department thoracotomy and 21 (8.4%) required operating room thoracotomy. Two hundred seventeen (86.8%) survived overall. Small bowel (47.2%), colon (36.4%), and liver (34.4%) were most often injured. Mortality was associated with the number of organs injured (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-2.37; p < 0.001). Vascular injury was a risk factor for mortality (p < 0.001), as was need for DCS (p < 0.001), emergency department thoracotomy (p < 0.001), and operating room thoracotomy (p < 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of deaths occurred within 24 hours from refractory hemorrhagic shock. DCS was used in 17.9% (n = 45) versus 7.0% (n = 21) in 1988, with a higher survival rate (73.3% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.001). DCS was associated with significant morbidity including sepsis (42.4%, p < 0.001), intra-abdominal abscess (18.2%, p = 0.009), and gastrointestinal fistula (18.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Penetrating abdominal organ injury patterns and survival from PAI have remained similar over the past decade. Death from refractory hemorrhagic shock in the first 24 hours remains the most common cause of mortality. DCS and the open abdomen are being used more frequently with improved survival but result in significant morbidity.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 1999

An algorithm to reduce the incidence of false-negative FAST∗ ∗ examinations in patients at high risk for occult injury 1

Robert B. Ballard; Grace S. Rozycki; Paul G. Newman; Javier E. Cubillos; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Walter L. Ingram; David V. Feliciano

Abstract Background: The Focused Assessment for the Sonographic Examination of the Trauma patient (FAST) sequentially surveys for the presence or absence of blood in dependent abdominal regions including the right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, and the pelvis. But it does not readily identify intraparenchymal or retroperitoneal injuries, and a CT scan of the abdomen may be needed to reduce the incidence of missed injuries. We hypothesized that select patients who are considered high risk for occult injuries should undergo a CT scan of the abdomen when the FAST is negative so that occult injuries can be detected. Study Design: An algorithm was prospectively tested for the evaluation of select injured patients over a 312-year period. Entrance criteria included adult patients with a blunt mechanism of trauma, a negative FAST examination, and a spine fracture (with or without cord injury), or a pelvic fracture. Trauma team members performed the FAST on patients during the Advanced Trauma Life Support secondary survey. Data recorded included the patients mechanism and type of injury, the results of the FAST and CT scan examinations, operative or postmortem findings or both, and patient outcomes. Patients with spine injuries were grouped according to spine level and the presence or absence of neurologic deficit. The patients with pelvic fractures were grouped according to the Young and Resnick classification. Results: One hundred two of 1,490 patients (6.8%) who had FAST examinations were entered into this study. Thirty-two patients (30.5%) had spine injuries, with only one false-negative ultrasound result. Seventy patients (68.6%) had pelvic fractures with 13 false-negative ultrasound results: 11 ring (9 from motor vehicle crashes, 2 from pedestrians struck), 1 acetabular, and 1 isolated pelvic fracture. Nine patients underwent nonoperative management for solid organ injuries, and 4 patients needed surgery. Conclusions: Based on these preliminary data, we conclude that patients with pelvic ring-type fractures should have CT scans of the abdomen because of the higher yield for occult injuries.BACKGROUND The Focused Assessment for the Sonographic Examination of the Trauma patient (FAST) sequentially surveys for the presence or absence of blood in dependent abdominal regions including the right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, and the pelvis. But it does not readily identify intraparenchymal or retroperitoneal injuries, and a CT scan of the abdomen may be needed to reduce the incidence of missed injuries. We hypothesized that select patients who are considered high risk for occult injuries should undergo a CT scan of the abdomen when the FAST is negative so that occult injuries can be detected. STUDY DESIGN An algorithm was prospectively tested for the evaluation of select injured patients over a 3 1/2-year period. Entrance criteria included adult patients with a blunt mechanism of trauma, a negative FAST examination, and a spine fracture (with or without cord injury), or a pelvic fracture. Trauma team members performed the FAST on patients during the Advanced Trauma Life Support secondary survey. Data recorded included the patients mechanism and type of injury, the results of the FAST and CT scan examinations, operative or postmortem findings or both, and patient outcomes. Patients with spine injuries were grouped according to spine level and the presence or absence of neurologic deficit. The patients with pelvic fractures were grouped according to the Young and Resnick classification. RESULTS One hundred two of 1,490 patients (6.8%) who had FAST examinations were entered into this study. Thirty-two patients (30.5%) had spine injuries, with only one false-negative ultrasound result. Seventy patients (68.6%) had pelvic fractures with 13 false-negative ultrasound results: 11 ring (9 from motor vehicle crashes, 2 from pedestrians struck), 1 acetabular, and 1 isolated pelvic fracture. Nine patients underwent nonoperative management for solid organ injuries, and 4 patients needed surgery. CONCLUSIONS Based on these preliminary data, we conclude that patients with pelvic ring-type fractures should have CT scans of the abdomen because of the higher yield for occult injuries.


Prehospital Emergency Care | 2014

An Evidence-based Prehospital Guideline for External Hemorrhage Control: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma

Eileen M. Bulger; David Snyder; Karen M Schoelles; Cathy Gotschall; Drew E. Dawson; Eddy Lang; Nels D. Sanddal; Frank K. Butler; Mary E. Fallat; Peter Taillac; Lynn J. White; Jeffrey P. Salomone; William Seifarth; Michael J. Betzner; Jay A. Johannigman; Norman E. McSwain

Abstract This report describes the development of an evidence-based guideline for external hemorrhage control in the prehospital setting. This project included a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of tourniquets and hemostatic agents for management of life-threatening extremity and junctional hemorrhage. Using the GRADE methodology to define the key clinical questions, an expert panel then reviewed the results of the literature review, established the quality of the evidence and made recommendations for EMS care. A clinical care guideline is proposed for adoption by EMS systems. Key words: tourniquet; hemostatic agents; external hemorrhage


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 1999

Cost and morbidity associated with antibiotic prophylaxis in the ICU

Nicholas Namias; Sarah Harvill; Suzette Ball; Mark G. McKenney; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Joseph Civetta

BACKGROUND Although the high cost and inappropriate use of antibiotics have been documented before, we are not aware of any data on nonsurgical site infectious morbidity associated with prolonged courses of prophylactic antibiotics (PA). STUDY DESIGN Data regarding antibiotic orders were collected using a custom designed microbiology database in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit of a teaching hospital from October 1, 1995 through April 30, 1997. The database was retrospectively reviewed. The cost of PA in excess of 1 day was calculated. Frequency of bacteremia and line infections were compared in patients receiving 1 day or less of PA versus more than 4 days of PA. RESULTS Sixty-one percent of PA orders were continued for more than 1 day. Cost of PA beyond 1 day totaled


Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | 2011

Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Science and Refinement of a National Guideline

E. Brooke Lerner; David C. Cone; Eric S. Weinstein; Richard B. Schwartz; Phillip L. Coule; Michael Cronin; Ian S. Wedmore; Eileen M. Bulger; Deborah Ann Mulligan; Raymond E. Swienton; Scott M. Sasser; Umair A. Shah; Leonard J. Weireter; Teri L. Sanddal; Julio Lairet; David Markenson; Lou Romig; Gregg Lord; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Robert E. O'Connor; Richard C. Hunt

44,893. Bacteremia and line infection were more frequent in the patients receiving more than 4 days of PA. CONCLUSIONS There was poor compliance with the protocol of stopping PA at 24 hours. The cost of noncompliance was


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2010

Early Predictors of Massive Transfusion in Patients Sustaining Torso Gunshot Wounds in a Civilian Level I Trauma Center

Christopher J. Dente; Beth H. Shaz; Jeffery M. Nicholas; Robert S. Harris; Amy D. Wyrzykowski; Brooks W. Ficke; Gary Vercruysse; David V. Feliciano; Grace S. Rozycki; Jeffrey P. Salomone; Walter L. Ingram

44,893. There were more bacteremias and line infections in patients with duration of PA of more than 4 days.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2005

Opinions of trauma practitioners regarding prehospital interventions for critically injured patients.

Jeffrey P. Salomone; Jeffrey Ustin; Norman E. McSwain; David V. Feliciano

Mass casualty triage is the process of prioritizing multiple victims when resources are not sufficient to treat everyone immediately. No national guideline for mass casualty triage exists in the United States. The lack of a national guideline has resulted in variability in triage processes, tags, and nomenclature. This variability has the potential to inject confusion and miscommunication into the disaster incident, particularly when multiple jurisdictions are involved. The Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Triage were developed to be a national guideline for mass casualty triage to ensure interoperability and standardization when responding to a mass casualty incident. The Core Criteria consist of 4 categories: general considerations, global sorting, lifesaving interventions, and individual assessment of triage category. The criteria within each of these categories were developed by a workgroup of experts representing national stakeholder organizations who used the best available science and, when necessary, consensus opinion. This article describes how the Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Triage were developed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeffrey P. Salomone's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Brooke Lerner

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge