Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles
Brown University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles.
Science | 2009
Carle M. Pieters; Jitendra Nath Goswami; Roger N. Clark; M. Annadurai; Joseph W. Boardman; Bonnie J. Buratti; J.-P. Combe; M. D. Dyar; Robert O. Green; James W. Head; Charles Arthur Hibbitts; Michael D. Hicks; Peter Jonas Isaacson; R. L. Klima; G. Kramer; S. Kumar; E. Livo; Stephen R. Lundeen; E. Malaret; T. B. McCord; John F. Mustard; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Noah E. Petro; Cassandra Runyon; M. Staid; Jessica M. Sunshine; L. A. Taylor; Stefanie Tompkins; Patanjali Varanasi
Lunar Water The Moon has been thought to be primarily anhydrous, although there has been some evidence for accumulated ice in permanently shadowed craters near its poles (see the Perspective by Lucey, published online 24 September). By analyzing recent infrared mapping by Chandrayaan-1 and Deep Impact, and reexamining Cassini data obtained during its early flyby of the Moon, Pieters et al. (p. 568, published online 24 September), Sunshine et al. (p. 565, published online 24 September), and Clark et al. (p. 562, published online 24 September) reveal a noticeable absorption signal for H2O and OH across much of the surface. Some variability in water abundance is seen over the course of the lunar day. The data imply that solar wind is depositing and/or somehow forming water and OH in minerals near the lunar surface, and that this trapped water is dynamic. Space-based spectroscopic measurements provide evidence for water or hydroxyl (OH) on the surface of the Moon The search for water on the surface of the anhydrous Moon had remained an unfulfilled quest for 40 years. However, the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) on Chandrayaan-1 has recently detected absorption features near 2.8 to 3.0 micrometers on the surface of the Moon. For silicate bodies, such features are typically attributed to hydroxyl- and/or water-bearing materials. On the Moon, the feature is seen as a widely distributed absorption that appears strongest at cooler high latitudes and at several fresh feldspathic craters. The general lack of correlation of this feature in sunlit M3 data with neutron spectrometer hydrogen abundance data suggests that the formation and retention of hydroxyl and water are ongoing surficial processes. Hydroxyl/water production processes may feed polar cold traps and make the lunar regolith a candidate source of volatiles for human exploration.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Georgiana Y. Kramer; Sebastien Besse; D. Dhingra; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; R. L. Klima; Ian Garrick-Bethell; Roger N. Clark; Jean-Philippe Combe; James W. Head; L. A. Taylor; Carle M. Pieters; Joseph W. Boardman; Thomas B. McCord
[1] We examined the lunar swirls using data from the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M 3 ). The improved spectral and spatial resolution of M 3 over previous spectral imaging data facilitates distinction of subtle spectral differences, and provides new information about the nature of these enigmatic features. We characterized spectral features of the swirls, interswirl regions (dark lanes), and surrounding terrain for each of three focus regions: Reiner Gamma, Gerasimovich, and Mare Ingenii. We used Principle Component Analysis to identify spectrally distinct surfaces at each focus region, and characterize the spectral features that distinguish them. We compared spectra from small, recent impact craters with the mature soils into which they penetrated to examine differences in maturation trends on‐ and off‐swirl. Fresh, on‐swirl crater spectra are higher albedo, exhibit a wider range in albedos and have well‐preserved mafic absorption features compared with fresh off‐swirl craters. Albedoand mafic absorptions are still evident in undisturbed, on‐swirl surface soils, suggesting the maturation process is retarded. The spectral continuum is more concave compared with off‐swirl spectra; a result of the limited spectral reddening being mostly constrained to wavelengths less than ∼1500 nm. Off‐swirl spectra show very little reddening or change in continuum shape across the entire M 3 spectral range. Off‐swirl spectra are dark, have attenuated absorption features, and the narrow range in off‐swirl albedos suggests off‐swirl regions mature rapidly. Spectral parameter maps depicting the relative OH surface abundance for each of our three swirl focus regions were created using the depth of the hydroxyl absorption feature at 2.82 mm. For each of the studied regions, the 2.82 mm absorption feature is significantly weaker on‐swirl than off‐swirl, indicating the swirls are depleted in OH relative to their surroundings. The spectral characteristics of the swirls and adjacent terrains from all three focus regions support the hypothesis that the magnetic anomalies deflect solar wind ions away from the swirls and onto off‐swirl surfaces. Nanophase iron (npFe 0 ) is largely responsible for the spectral characteristics we attribute to space weathering and maturation, and is created by vaporization/deposition by micrometeorite impacts and sputtering/reduction by solar wind ions. On the swirls, the decreased proton flux slows the spectral effects of space weathering (relative to nonswirl regions) by limiting the npFe 0 production mechanism almost exclusively to micrometeoroid impact vaporization/deposition. Immediately adjacent to the swirls, maturation is accelerated by the increased flux of protons deflected from the swirls. Citation: Kramer, G. Y., et al. (2011), M 3 spectral analysis of lunar swirls and the link between optical maturation and surface
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Robert O. Green; Carle M. Pieters; P. Mouroulis; M. Eastwood; Joseph W. Boardman; T. Glavich; Peter Jonas Isaacson; M. Annadurai; Sebastien Besse; D. Barr; Bonnie J. Buratti; D. Cate; A. Chatterjee; Roger N. Clark; L. C. Cheek; J.-P. Combe; D. Dhingra; V. Essandoh; S. Geier; J.N. Goswami; R. R. Green; V. Haemmerle; James W. Head; L. Hovland; S. Hyman; R. L. Klima; T. Koch; G. Kramer; A.S.K. Kumar; Kenneth Lee
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Carle M. Pieters; Sebastien Besse; Joseph W. Boardman; Bonnie J. Buratti; L. C. Cheek; Roger N. Clark; J.-P. Combe; D. Dhingra; J.N. Goswami; Robert O. Green; James W. Head; Peter Jonas Isaacson; R. L. Klima; G. Kramer; S. Lundeen; E. Malaret; T. B. McCord; John F. Mustard; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Noah E. Petro; Cassandra Runyon; M. Staid; Jessica M. Sunshine; L. A. Taylor; K. G. Thaisen; Stefanie Tompkins; Jennifer L. Whitten
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Joseph W. Boardman; Carle M. Pieters; Robert O. Green; Stephen R. Lundeen; Patanjali Varanasi; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Noah E. Petro; Peter Jonas Isaacson; Sebastien Besse; L. A. Taylor
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Georgiana Y. Kramer; Sebastien Besse; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Jean-Philippe Combe; Roger N. Clark; Carle M. Pieters; Matthew I. Staid; E. Malaret; Joseph W. Boardman; Robert O. Green; James W. Head; Thomas B. McCord
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Michael D. Hicks; Bonnie J. Buratti; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Matthew I. Staid; Jessica M. Sunshine; Carle M. Pieters; Sebastien Besse; Joseph W. Boardman
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
Bonnie J. Buratti; Michael D. Hicks; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Matthew I. Staid; Carle M. Pieters; Jessica M. Sunshine; Joseph W. Boardman; T. C. Stone
Archive | 2009
Carle M. Pieters; Joseph W. Boardman; Bonnie J. Buratti; Roger N. Clark; J-P Combe; Robert O. Green; Jitendra Nath Goswami; James W. Head; Michael D. Hicks; Peter Jonas Isaacson; R. L. Klima; Georgiana Y. Kramer; Sujit Kumar; Stephen R. Lundeen; Erick R. Malaret; T. B. McCord; John F. Mustard; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Noah E. Petro; Cassandra Runyon; M. Staid; Jessica M. Sunshine; L. A. Taylor; Stefanie Tompkins; Patanjali Varanasi
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011
L. C. Cheek; Carle M. Pieters; Joseph W. Boardman; Roger N. Clark; J.-P. Combe; James W. Head; Peter Jonas Isaacson; T. B. McCord; D. P. Moriarty; Jeffrey Wyatt Nettles; Noah E. Petro; Jessica M. Sunshine; L. A. Taylor