Jelmer J. Nijp
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jelmer J. Nijp.
New Phytologist | 2014
Jelmer J. Nijp; Juul Limpens; Klaas Metselaar; Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee; Frank Berendse; Bjorn J. M. Robroek
Northern peatlands represent a large global carbon store that can potentially be destabilized by summer water table drawdown. Precipitation can moderate the negative impacts of water table drawdown by rewetting peatmoss (Sphagnum spp.), the ecosystems key species. Yet, the frequency of such rewetting required for it to be effective remains unknown. We experimentally assessed the importance of precipitation frequency for Sphagnum water supply and carbon uptake during a stepwise decrease in water tables in a growth chamber. CO2 exchange and the water balance were measured for intact cores of three peatmoss species (Sphagnum majus, Sphagnum balticum and Sphagnum fuscum) representative of three hydrologically distinct peatland microhabitats (hollow, lawn and hummock) and expected to differ in their water table-precipitation relationships. Precipitation contributed significantly to peatmoss water supply when the water table was deep, demonstrating the importance of precipitation during drought. The ability to exploit transient resources was species-specific; S. fuscum carbon uptake increased linearly with precipitation frequency for deep water tables, whereas carbon uptake by S. balticum and S. majus was depressed at intermediate precipitation frequencies. Our results highlight an important role for precipitation in carbon uptake by peatmosses. Yet, the potential to moderate the impact of drought is species-specific and dependent on the temporal distribution of precipitation.
Science of The Total Environment | 2017
Jelmer J. Nijp; Klaas Metselaar; Juul Limpens; Claudia Teutschbein; Matthias Peichl; Mats Nilsson; Frank Berendse; Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee
The water content of the topsoil is one of the key factors controlling biogeochemical processes, greenhouse gas emissions and biosphere - atmosphere interactions in many ecosystems, particularly in northern peatlands. In these wetland ecosystems, the water content of the photosynthetic active peatmoss layer is crucial for ecosystem functioning and carbon sequestration, and is sensitive to future shifts in rainfall and drought characteristics. Current peatland models differ in the degree in which hydrological feedbacks are included, but how this affects peatmoss drought projections is unknown. The aim of this paper was to systematically test whether the level of hydrological detail in models could bias projections of water content and drought stress for peatmoss in northern peatlands using downscaled projections for rainfall and potential evapotranspiration in the current (1991-2020) and future climate (2061-2090). We considered four model variants that either include or exclude moss (rain)water storage and peat volume change, as these are two central processes in the hydrological self-regulation of peatmoss carpets. Model performance was validated using field data of a peatland in northern Sweden. Including moss water storage as well as peat volume change resulted in a significant improvement of model performance, despite the extra parameters added. The best performance was achieved if both processes were included. Including moss water storage and peat volume change consistently reduced projected peatmoss drought frequency with >50%, relative to the model excluding both processes. Projected peatmoss drought frequency in the growing season was 17% smaller under future climate than current climate, but was unaffected by including the hydrological self-regulating processes. Our results suggest that ignoring these two fine-scale processes important in hydrological self-regulation of northern peatlands will have large consequences for projected climate change impact on ecosystem processes related to topsoil water content, such as greenhouse gas emissions.
Hydrological Processes | 2017
Gijs van Dijk; Jelmer J. Nijp; Klaas Metselaar; Leon P. M. Lamers; A.J.P. Smolders
In coastal zones globally, salinization of surface water and groundwater is rapidly taking place due to the combined effects of sea level rise, land use change, land subsidence, altered hydrology and climate change. Although increased salinity levels are known to have a great impact on both biogeochemical and hydrological processes in aquatic sediments, only few studies have included both types of processes and their potential interactions. In the present paper, we used a controlled three years experimental mesocosm approach in the surface water of a Dutch coastal wetland to test these interactions as a result of salinization, and to discuss mechanisms explaining the observed hydrological changes. In enclosures (1000 l), surface water salinity was experimentally increased from 14 mmol to 140 mmol Cl l-1 (0.9 and 9 PSU) by adding sea salt. This not only strongly increased pore water salinity, but also increased sulphate reduction rates, leading to higher sulphide and lower methane concentrations. By analysing slug test data with three different slug test analysis methods, we were able to show that hydraulic conductivity of the hyporheic zone increased 2.8 times by salinization. This shows that increased salinity can strongly change the hydrological characteristics of the hyporheic zone in coastal wetlands. Based on our hydrological and biogeochemical measurements, we conclude that the combination of pore dilation and decreased methane production rates were major controls on the observed increase in hydraulic conductivity. The slug test analysis method comparison allowed to conclude that the adjusted Bouwer & Rice method results in the most reliable estimate of the hydraulic conductivity for hyporheic zones. Our work shows that both physical and biogeochemical processes are vital to explain and predict hydrological changes related to the salinization of hyporheic zones in coastal wetlands and provides a robust methodological approach for doing so.
MethodsX | 2017
Jelmer J. Nijp; Klaas Metselaar; Juul Limpens; Harm Gooren; Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee
Graphical abstract
Global Change Biology | 2015
Jelmer J. Nijp; Juul Limpens; Klaas Metselaar; Matthias Peichl; Mats Nilsson; Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee; Frank Berendse
Stromingen | 2018
G. van Dijk; Jelmer J. Nijp; Leon P. M. Lamers; A.J.P. Smolders
Archive | 2016
Jelmer J. Nijp; Klaas Metselaar; Juul Limpens; Claudia Teutschbein; Matthias Peichl; Mats Nilsson; Frank Berendse; S.E.A.T.M. van der Zee
Geophysical Research Abstracts | 2016
Jelmer J. Nijp; Juul Limpens; Klaas Metselaar; Matthias Peichl; Mats Nilsson; S.E.A.T.M. van der Zee; Frank Berendse
Archive | 2011
Jelmer J. Nijp; Klaas Metselaar; Juul Limpens
De Levende Natuur | 2007
R.H. Kemmers; Albert Grootjans; M. Bakker; G.J. Baaijens; Jelmer J. Nijp; G. van Dijk
Collaboration
Dive into the Jelmer J. Nijp's collaboration.
Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee
Wageningen University and Research Centre
View shared research outputs