Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jenifer E. Allsworth is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jenifer E. Allsworth.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F. Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Gina M. Secura

BACKGROUND The rate of unintended pregnancy in the United States is much higher than in other developed nations. Approximately half of unintended pregnancies are due to contraceptive failure, largely owing to inconsistent or incorrect use. METHODS We designed a large prospective cohort study to promote the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods as a means of reducing unintended pregnancies in our region. Participants were provided with reversible contraception of their choice at no cost. We compared the rate of failure of long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine devices [IUDs] and implants) with other commonly prescribed contraceptive methods (oral contraceptive pills, transdermal patch, contraceptive vaginal ring, and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA] injection) in the overall cohort and in groups stratified according to age (less than 21 years of age vs. 21 years or older). RESULTS Among the 7486 participants included in this analysis, we identified 334 unintended pregnancies. The contraceptive failure rate among participants using pills, patch, or ring was 4.55 per 100 participant-years, as compared with 0.27 among participants using long-acting reversible contraception (hazard ratio after adjustment for age, educational level, and history with respect to unintended pregnancy, 21.8; 95% confidence interval, 13.7 to 34.9). Among participants who used pills, patch, or ring, those who were less than 21 years of age had a risk of unintended pregnancy that was almost twice as high as the risk among older participants. Rates of unintended pregnancy were similarly low among participants using DMPA injection and those using an IUD or implant, regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception is superior to that of contraceptive pills, patch, or ring and is not altered in adolescents and young women. (Funded by the Susan Thompson Buffet Foundation.).


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2010

The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception

Gina M. Secura; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L. Mullersman; Jeffrey F. Peipert

OBJECTIVE To introduce and promote the use of long-acting reversible methods of contraception (LARC; intrauterine contraceptives and subdermal implant) by removing financial and knowledge barriers. STUDY DESIGN The Contraceptive CHOICE Project is a prospective cohort study of 10,000 women 14-45 years who want to avoid pregnancy for at least 1 year and are initiating a new form of reversible contraception. Women screened for this study are read a script regarding long-acting reversible methods of contraception to increase awareness of these options. Participants choose their contraceptive method that is provided at no cost. We report the contraceptive choice and baseline characteristics of the first 2500 women enrolled August 2007 through December 2008. RESULTS Sixty-seven percent of women enrolled (95% confidence interval, 65.3-69.0) chose long-acting methods. Fifty-six percent selected intrauterine contraception and 11% selected the subdermal implant. CONCLUSION Once financial barriers were removed and long-acting reversible methods of contraception were introduced to all potential participants as a first-line contraceptive option, two-thirds chose long-acting reversible methods of contraception.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2011

Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception

Jeffrey F. Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Emiko Petrosky; Tessa Madden; David Eisenberg; Gina M. Secura

OBJECTIVE: To estimate 12-month satisfaction and continuation rates of intrauterine device (IUD) and implant users enrolled in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and compare these measures with women using the oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). METHODS: We analyzed 12-month data from the first 5,087 participants enrolled in a prospective cohort study of women in the St. Louis region offered contraception at no cost for 3 years. The primary purpose of CHOICE is to promote the use of long-acting reversible contraception (IUDs and implants) and to reduce unintended pregnancies in our region. This analysis includes those participants who received their baseline contraceptive method within 3 months of enrollment and who reached the 12-month follow-up telephone survey time point (n=4,167). RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of our participants chose a long-acting reversible contraception method (45% levonorgestrel intrauterine system, 10% copper IUD, and 13% subdermal implant), 23% chose combined hormonal methods (11% OCPs, 10% vaginal ring, and 2% transdermal patch), and 8% chose depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Long-acting reversible contraception users had higher 12-month continuation rates (86%) than OCP users (55%). The two IUDs had the highest 12-month continuation rates: levonorgestrel intrauterine system (88%) and copper IUD (84%). Women using the implant also had very high rates of continuation at 1 year (83%). Satisfaction mirrored continuation: more than 80% of users were satisfied with the IUD compared with 54% satisfied with OCPs. CONCLUSION: IUDs and the subdermal implant have the highest rates of satisfaction and 12-month continuation. Given that long-acting reversible contraception methods have the highest contraceptive efficacy, these methods should be the first-line contraceptive methods offered to patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2012

Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception.

Jeffrey F. Peipert; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Gina M. Secura

OBJECTIVE: To promote the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods (intrauterine devices [IUDs] and implants) and provide contraception at no cost to a large cohort of participants in an effort to reduce unintended pregnancies in our region. METHODS: We enrolled 9,256 adolescents and women at risk for unintended pregnancy into the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a prospective cohort study of adolescents and women desiring reversible contraceptive methods. Participants were recruited from the two abortion facilities in the St. Louis region and through provider referral, advertisements, and word of mouth. Contraceptive counseling included all reversible methods but emphasized the superior effectiveness of LARC methods (IUDs and implants). All participants received the reversible contraceptive method of their choice at no cost. We analyzed abortion rates, the percentage of abortions that were repeat abortions, and teenage births. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in the percentage of abortions that were repeat abortions in the St. Louis region compared with Kansas City and nonmetropolitan Missouri (P<.001). Abortion rates in the CHOICE cohort were less than half the regional and national rates (P<.001). The rate of teenage birth within the CHOICE cohort was 6.3 per 1,000, compared with the U.S. rate of 34.3 per 1,000. CONCLUSION: We noted a clinically and statistically significant reduction in abortion rates, repeat abortions, and teenage birth rates. Unintended pregnancies may be reduced by providing no-cost contraception and promoting the most effective contraceptive methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data

Jenifer E. Allsworth; Jeffrey F. Peipert

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and correlates of bacterial vaginosis among women between the ages of 14 and 49 years in the United States. METHODS: Data from the 2001–2001 and 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were combined. Correlates of bacterial vaginosis evaluated included sociodemographic characteristics (age, race or ethnicity, education, poverty income ratio) and sexual history (age of first intercourse, number of sexual partners). Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated from logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Almost one third of women (29%) were positive for bacterial vaginosis. Bacterial vaginosis prevalence varied with age, race or ethnicity, education, and poverty. Black, non-Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.58–3.80) and Mexican-American (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.99–1.69) women had higher odds of bacterial vaginosis than white, non-Hispanic women after adjustment for other sociodemographic characteristics. Douching in the past 6 months was also an important predictor of bacterial vaginosis prevalence (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.54–2.40). CONCLUSION: Bacterial vaginosis is a common condition among U.S. women, and the prevalence is similar to that in many treatment-seeking populations. Further studies are needed to disentangle the interactions between race or ethnicity and other sociodemographic characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III


Contraception | 2011

Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project

Renee Mestad; Gina M. Secura; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F. Peipert

BACKGROUND Adolescent women have a high risk of unintended pregnancy. Currently, there are little data about their choice to initiate long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). STUDY DESIGN We evaluated the association of age and preference for a LARC vs. a non-LARC method among adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, comparing those aged 14-17 years to adolescents aged 18-20 years. We then analyzed the association between age and choice of the implant vs. the intrauterine device (IUD) among adolescents. RESULTS Of the 5086 women enrolled, 70% (n=3557) of participants chose a LARC method. Among adolescents aged 14-20 years, 69% of 14-17-year-olds chose LARC, while 61% of 18-20-year-olds chose LARC (relative risk 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.30). Among adolescents choosing a LARC method, 63% (n=93/148) of the 14-17-year-olds chose the implant, whereas 71% (n=364/510) of the 18-20-year-olds chose the IUD. CONCLUSION Long-acting reversible contraception use is clearly acceptable and common among adolescents enrolled in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, with the younger group being most interested in the implant.


Contraception | 2010

Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes

Tessa Madden; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Katherine J. Hladky; Gina M. Secura; Jeffrey F. Peipert

BACKGROUND Many obstacles to intrauterine contraception (IUC) use exist, including provider and patient misinformation, high upfront cost and clinician practice patterns. The aim of our study was to investigate knowledge and attitudes about IUC among obstetricians and gynecologists in the area of Saint Louis. STUDY DESIGN We mailed a self-administered, anonymous survey to 250 clinicians who provide obstetric and gynecologic care in Saint Louis City and County which included questions about demographics, training, family planning visits and intrauterine contraceptive knowledge and use. RESULTS The overall survey response rate among eligible clinicians was 73.7%. Clinicians who had recently finished training or saw higher numbers of contraceptive patients per week were more likely to insert IUC than clinicians who completed training prior to 1989 or saw fewer contraceptive patients. Several misconceptions among clinicians were identified, including an association between intrauterine contraceptives and an elevated risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. CONCLUSIONS Physician misconceptions about the risks of IUC continue to occur. Improved clinician education is greatly needed to facilitate the use of these highly effective, long-acting, reversible methods of contraception.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

David Stamilio; Emily DeFranco; Emmanuelle Paré; Anthony Odibo; Jeffrey F. Peipert; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Erika Stevens; George A. Macones

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether short or long interpregnancy interval is associated with uterine rupture and other major maternal morbidities in women who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC). METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a U.S. multi-center, record-based, retrospective cohort study of 13,331 pregnant women, identified by a validated International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, code search, with at least one prior cesarean delivery, who attempted VBAC between 1995 and 2000. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the association between long or short interpregnancy interval and three maternal outcomes: 1) uterine rupture, 2) composite major morbidity (including rupture, bladder or bowel injury, and uterine artery laceration), and 3) blood transfusion. We evaluated short interpregnancy interval with cutoffs at less than 6, less than 12, and less than 18 months between prior delivery and conception and defined long interval as 60 months or more. RESULTS: A total of 128 cases (0.9%) of uterine rupture occurred, and 286 (2.2%), 1,109 (8.3%), 1,741 (13.1%), and 2,631 (19.7%) women had interpregnancy intervals of less than 6, 6–11, 12–17, and 60 months or more, respectively. An interval less than 6 months was associated with increased risk of uterine rupture (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–5.82), major morbidity (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.04–3.65), and blood transfusion (aOR 3.14, 95% CI 1.42–6.95). Long interpregnancy interval was not associated with an increase in major morbidity. CONCLUSION: Short interpregnancy interval increases risk for uterine rupture and other major morbidities twofold to threefold in VBAC candidates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II


Sexually Transmitted Diseases | 2009

Trichomoniasis and other sexually transmitted infections: results from the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.

Jenifer E. Allsworth; Jane Alyce Ratner; Jeffrey F. Peipert

Background: To estimate the association between Trichomonas vaginalis infection (TV) and 6 sexually transmitted infections: chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes simplex virus (Types 1 and 2), syphilis, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in a nationally representative sample. Methods: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey combining the 2001–2002 and 2003–2004 waves to estimate the association between TV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among women in the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population. The final sample included data from 3648 women, which when weighted, represents the experience of 65,563,298 US women between the ages of 14 and 49. Crude and adjusted relative risks were estimated using logistic regression for rare STIs (<10%; chlamydia, syphilis, and HIV) and Poisson regression for common STIs (herpes simplex virus [HSV] Types 1 and 2). Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata (version 9.2). Results: The prevalence of trichomoniasis was 3.2% with over 80% of cases asymptomatic in the past month. All STIs examined (chlamydia, gonorrhea, HSV-1, HSV-2, syphilis, and HIV) were more common among women with a positive test for trichomoniasis. HSV-1 (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.34) and HSV-2 (RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 2.32, 3.23) were significantly associated with trichomoniasis after adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and recent sexual partners. In crude analyses, a positive treponemal test was 6 times (95% CI: 2.07, 18.8) more common and HIV was 13 times (95% CI: 2.88, 59.1) more common among women with trichomoniasis, but these estimates were greatly attenuated after adjustment for potential confounders. Conclusion: Trichomoniasis is significantly associated with concurrent STI.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2008

Higher maximum doses of oxytocin are associated with an unacceptably high risk for uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Alison G. Cahill; Brian Waterman; David Stamilio; Anthony Odibo; Jenifer E. Allsworth; Bradley Evanoff; George A. Macones

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to more precisely estimate the effect of maximum oxytocin dose on uterine rupture risk in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) by considering timing and duration of therapy. STUDY DESIGN A nested case-control study was conducted within a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of more than 25,000 women with at least 1 prior cesarean delivery, comparing cases of uterine rupture with controls (no rupture) while attempting VBAC. Time-to-event analyses were performed to examine the effect of maximum oxytocin dose on the risk of uterine rupture considering therapy duration, while adjusting for confounders. RESULTS Within the nested case-control study of 804 patients, 272 were exposed to oxytocin: 62 cases of uterine rupture and 210 controls. Maximum oxytocin ranges above 20 mU/min increased the risk of uterine rupture 4-fold or greater (21-30 mU/min: hazard ratio [HR] 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 14.52; 31-40 mU/min: HR 4.57, 95% CI, 1.00 to 20.82). CONCLUSION These findings support a maximum oxytocin dose of 20 mU/min in VBAC trials to avoid an unacceptably high risk of uterine rupture.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jenifer E. Allsworth's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey F. Peipert

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tessa Madden

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gina M. Secura

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Qiuhong Zhao

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Odibo

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George A. Macones

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Stamilio

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alison G. Cahill

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge