Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jenna M. Norton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jenna M. Norton.


Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2015

CKD as a Model for Improving Chronic Disease Care through Electronic Health Records

Paul E. Drawz; Patrick Archdeacon; Clement J. McDonald; Neil R. Powe; Kimberly A. Smith; Jenna M. Norton; Desmond E. Williams; Uptal D. Patel; Andrew S. Narva

Electronic health records have the potential to improve the care of patients with chronic medical conditions. CKD provides a unique opportunity to show this potential: the disease is common in the United States, there is significant room to improve CKD detection and management, CKD and its related conditions are defined primarily by objective laboratory data, CKD care requires collaboration by a diverse team of health care professionals, and improved access to CKD-related data would enable identification of a group of patients at high risk for multiple adverse outcomes. However, to realize the potential for improvement in CKD-related care, electronic health records will need to provide optimal functionality for providers and patients and interoperability across multiple health care settings. The goal of the National Kidney Disease Education Program Health Information Technology Working Group is to enable and support the widespread interoperability of data related to kidney health among health care software applications to optimize CKD detection and management. Over the course of the last 2 years, group members met to identify general strategies for using electronic health records to improve care for patients with CKD. This paper discusses these strategies and provides general goals for appropriate incorporation of CKD-related data into electronic health records and corresponding design features that may facilitate (1) optimal care of individual patients with CKD through improved access to clinical information and decision support, (2) clinical quality improvement through enhanced population management capabilities, (3) CKD surveillance to improve public health through wider availability of population-level CKD data, and (4) research to improve CKD management practices through efficiencies in study recruitment and data collection. Although these strategies may be most effectively applied in the setting of CKD, because it is primarily defined by laboratory abnormalities and therefore, an ideal computable electronic health record phenotype, they may also apply to other chronic diseases.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2016

Social Determinants of Racial Disparities in CKD

Jenna M. Norton; Marva Moxey-Mims; Paul W. Eggers; Andrew S. Narva; Robert A. Star; Paul L. Kimmel; Griffin P. Rodgers

Significant disparities in CKD rates and outcomes exist between black and white Americans. Health disparities are defined as health differences that adversely affect disadvantaged populations, on the basis of one or more health outcomes. CKD is the complex result of genetic and environmental factors, reflecting the balance of nature and nurture. Social determinants of health have an important role as environmental components, especially for black populations, who are disproportionately disadvantaged. Understanding the social determinants of health and appreciating the underlying differences associated with meaningful clinical outcomes may help nephrologists treat all their patients with CKD in an optimal manner. Altering the social determinants of health, although difficult, may embody important policy and research efforts, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes for patients with kidney diseases, and minimizing the disparities between groups.


The Journal of Urology | 2016

Advancing a Comprehensive Approach to the Study of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Tamara Bavendam; Jenna M. Norton; Ziya Kirkali; Chris Mullins; John W. Kusek; Robert A. Star; Griffin P. Rodgers

PURPOSE Lower urinary tract symptoms are common in the United States population, leading to significant economic, quality of life and public health issues. The burden will increase as the population ages, and risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms, including diabetes and obesity, remain highly prevalent. Improving clinical management and establishing the knowledge base to prevent lower urinary tract symptoms will require a comprehensive research approach that examines factors beyond the lower urinary tract. While the study of extra-lower urinary tract factors has increased recently, current urological research does not systematically account for the broad set of potential contributing factors spanning biological, behavioral, psychological/executive function and sociocultural factors. A comprehensive assessment of potential contributors to risk, treatment response and progression is necessary to reduce the burden of this condition in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS We considered challenges to continuing the predominantly lower urinary tract dysfunction centric approach that has dominated previous research of lower urinary tract symptoms. RESULTS We developed a new, comprehensive framework for urology research that includes a broader set of potential factors contributing to lower urinary tract symptoms. This framework aims to broaden research to consider a comprehensive set of potential contributing factors and to engage a broad range of researchers in the investigation of as many extra-lower urinary tract factors as possible, with the goal of improving clinical care and prevention. CONCLUSIONS We propose a new framework for future urology research, which should help to reduce the medical and economic burden of lower urinary tract symptoms in the United States population.


Urology | 2017

Research Needs for Effective Transition in Lifelong Care of Congenital Genitourinary Conditions: A Workshop Sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Michael H. Hsieh; Hadley M. Wood; Brad E. Dicianno; Nienke P. Dosa; Veronica Gomez-Lobo; Tej K. Mattoo; Rosalia Misseri; Jenna M. Norton; Kathleen J. Sawin; Peter Scal; James E. Wright; Robert A. Star; Tamara Bavendam

Over the last 5 decades, health-care advances have yielded quantum improvements in the life expectancy of individuals with congenital genitourinary conditions (CGCs), leading to a crisis of care. Many individuals with CGC enter adulthood unprepared to manage their condition. Pediatric CGC specialists lack training to manage adulthood-related health-care issues, whereas adult genitourinary specialists lack training within the context of CGCs. To address these challenges, the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened individuals with CGCs and experts from a variety of fields to identify research needs to improve transitional urology care. This paper outlines identified research needs.


The Journal of Urology | 2017

Future Directions of Research and Care for Urinary Incontinence: Findings from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Summit on Urinary Incontinence Clinical Research in Women

Toby C. Chai; Tirsit Asfaw; Jan Baker; Becky Clarkson; Pamela Coleman; Susan Hoffstetter; Kimberly Konkel; Missy Lavender; Shailaja Nair; Jenna M. Norton; Leslee L. Subak; Anthony G. Visco; Robert A. Star; Tamara Bavendam

Purpose: Female urinary incontinence is prevalent, costly and morbid. Participants in a NIDDK (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) sponsored summit reviewed findings from NIH (National Institutes of Health) funded clinical research on urinary incontinence in women and discussed the future of urinary incontinence research. Materials and Methods: The NIDDK convened the Summit on Urinary Incontinence Clinical Research in Women on March 14, 2014. Participants representing a broad range of clinical expertise reviewed completed NIH sponsored urinary incontinence related studies, including results from community based epidemiological studies such as the BACH (Boston Area Community Health) Survey and from randomized clinical trials such as PRIDE (Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise), and studies conducted by the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network and the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Results: BACH Survey results improved our understanding of precursors, incidence, prevalence and natural history of urinary incontinence in a diverse group of women. The Pelvic Floor Disorders Network study found that anticholinergic medications and onabotulinumtoxinA are efficacious for treating urge urinary incontinence, and Burch colposuspension and retropubic mid urethral polypropylene slings are efficacious for decreasing stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women with potential stress urinary incontinence. The Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network study found that fascial slings were better than colposuspension, and that retropubic and transobturator mid urethral polypropylene slings were equivalent for stress urinary incontinence. In patients with stress urinary incontinence a preoperative urodynamic study was noninferior to basic office examinations for surgical outcome. The addition of behavioral intervention did not allow female patients to discontinue antimuscarinics for urge urinary incontinence. PRIDE showed that modest weight reductions significantly decreased urinary incontinence. Conclusions: Strategies for future research on urinary incontinence should include a focus on early disease, risk factor identification, better phenotyping, incorporation of new technologies, patient centered research and prevention.


Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2017

Complementary Initiatives from the NIDDK to Advance Kidney Health

Jenna M. Norton; Christian J. Ketchum; Andrew S. Narva; Robert A. Star; Griffin P. Rodgers

Despite the high prevalence and burden of acute and chronic kidney diseases, our understanding of appropriate clinical care and underlying disease pathology is far from complete. Nephrology clinical practice guidelines are littered with weak recommendations on the basis of low or very low evidence.


International Urogynecology Journal | 2017

Nonbiologic factors that impact management in women with urinary incontinence: review of the literature and findings from a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop.

Jenna M. Norton; Jennifer L. Dodson; Diane K. Newman; Rebecca G. Rogers; Andrea D. Fairman; Helen L. Coons; Robert A. Star; Tamara Bavendam

Introduction and hypothesisUrinary incontinence (UI)—defined as a complaint of involuntary loss of urine—is common in women, with major public health, financial, and quality of life (QoL) implications. Despite the high toll of UI and the availability of effective conservative treatments, many women with UI do not seek care. Those who do often continue to experience symptoms. Improving UI treatment may require a comprehensive approach to urology research, including a broad set of potentially influential factors beyond biologic.MethodsTo explore the effects of nonbiologic factors (NBF) on UI management and treatment response, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop for clinical and psychosocial researchers. Participants proposed a UI treatment pathway: recognizing the problem, willingness to seek treatment, access to care, receiving quality treatment, engaging in self-management, and adhering to chosen treatments; discussed potential NBFs that may affect the pathway; and identified areas for future research. After the meeting, a rapid literature review was conducted to assess the current state of research on NBFs in women with UI.ResultsParticipants identified several patient-level NBFs that may influence the UI management pathway, including QoL and perceived bother; stigma, shame, and embarrassment; knowledge and perceptions; social determinants of health; cultural and language characteristics; personal characteristics and skills; and physical abilities. Additionally, participants acknowledged that provider- and system-level factors also play a role and likely interact with patient-level factors.ConclusionsNBFs that potentially affect the UI management pathway are not well understood, and a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach to research is needed to understand and appropriately support effective UI treatment.


Translational behavioral medicine | 2018

NIH research opportunities for the prevention and treatment for chronic conditions

William N. Elwood; Karen Huss; Dawn A Morales; Jenna M. Norton; Melissa Riddle; Rebecca A. Roof; Jerry Suls; Catherine M. Stoney; Tamara Bavendam; Ziya Kirkali

Chronic conditions constitute the leading cause of death and disability in the USA and constitute 86 per cent of the nations annual healthcare expenses. Approximately half of all American adults have at least one chronic condition; 25 per cent of these Americans have two or more chronic conditions. The National Institutes of Health have funded many projects that explain epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention and treatment of chronic conditions, though research questions remain. This commentary discusses some past projects, current areas of interest, and funding opportunities from many NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices.


American Journal of Nursing | 2017

CE: Improving Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Part 2.

Jenna M. Norton; Eileen P. Newman; Gayle Romancito; Stephanie Mahooty; Theresa Kuracina; Andrew S. Narva

: The burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rising both in this country and worldwide. An estimated 10% to 15% of U.S. adults are currently living with CKD. Reducing the CKD burden requires a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to care. The greatest opportunities to reduce the impact of CKD arise early, when most patients are being followed in primary care; yet many clinicians are inadequately educated on this disease. Nurses are well positioned to facilitate the implementation of collaborative care. This two-part article aims to provide nurses with the basic information necessary to assess and manage patients with CKD. Part 1 offers an overview of the disease, describes identification and etiology, and discusses ways to slow disease progression. Part 2, which will appear next month, addresses disease complications and treatment of kidney failure.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2018

Need for a Judicious Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs to Avoid Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury

Amy Barton Pai; Holly Divine; Macary W. Marciniak; Anthony P. Morreale; Joseph J. Saseen; Kenneth Say; Alissa R. Segal; Jenna M. Norton; Andrew S. Narva

Millions of Americans use over-the-counter analgesics on a daily basis, and nearly 100 million nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescriptions are filled per year. In high-risk patients, these medications can disrupt kidney hemodynamics and precipitate community-acquired acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). The risk of NSAID-associated CA-AKI increases 3- to 5-fold in patients taking renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and diuretics concurrently. CA-AKI increases the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD) or accelerating progression of pre-existing CKD. Importantly, many cases of NSAID-induced CA-AKI may be avoided by identifying high-risk patients and providing patient and provider education on when to avoid these medications and minimize risk.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jenna M. Norton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert A. Star

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew S. Narva

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tamara Bavendam

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Griffin P. Rodgers

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ziya Kirkali

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian J. Ketchum

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel R. Gossett

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. Kusek

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul L. Kimmel

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge