Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jenna Morgan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jenna Morgan.


British Journal of Surgery | 2015

Case‐mix analysis and variation in rates of non‐surgical treatment of older women with operable breast cancer

Jenna Morgan; Paul Richards; Sue Ward; Matthew Francis; G Lawrence; Karen Collins; Malcolm Reed; Lynda Wyld

Non‐surgical management of older women with oestrogen receptor (ER)‐positive operable breast cancer is common in the UK, with up to 40 per cent of women aged over 70 years receiving primary endocrine therapy. Although this may be appropriate for frailer patients, for some it may result in treatment failure, contributing to the poor outcomes seen in this age group. Wide variation in the rates of non‐operative management of breast cancer in older women exists across the UK. Case mix may explain some of this variation in practice.


Psycho-oncology | 2015

The balance of clinician and patient input into treatment decision-making in older women with operable breast cancer

Jenna Morgan; Maria Burton; Karen Collins; Kate Joanna Lifford; Thompson G. Robinson; Kwok-Leung Cheung; Riccardo A. Audisio; Malcolm Reed; Lynda Wyld

Primary endocrine therapy (PET) is an alternative to surgery for oestrogen receptor positive operable breast cancer in some older women. However the decision to offer PET involves complex trade‐offs and is influenced by both patient choice and healthcare professional (HCP) preference. This study aimed to compare the views of patients and HCPs about this decision and explore decision‐making (DM) preferences and whether these are taken into account during consultations.


Ejso | 2016

The use of surgery in the treatment of ER+ early stage breast cancer in England: Variation by time, age and patient characteristics.

Paul Richards; Sue Ward; Jenna Morgan; C. Lagord; Malcolm Reed; Karen Collins; Lynda Wyld

AIM To assess whether the proportion of patients aged 70 and over with ER+ operable breast cancer in England who are treated with surgery has changed since 2002, and to determine whether age and individual level factors including tumour characteristics and co-morbidity influence treatment choice. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis of routinely collected cancer registration data from two English regions (West Midlands, Northern & Yorkshire) was carried out (n = 17,129). Trends in surgical use over time for different age groups were assessed graphically and with linear regression. Uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the effects of age, comorbidity, deprivation and disease characteristics on treatment choice. Missing data was handled using multiple imputation. RESULTS There is no evidence of a change in the proportion of patients treated surgically over time. The multivariable model shows that age remains an important predictor of whether or not a woman with ER+ operable breast cancer receives surgery after covariate adjustment (Odds ratio of surgery vs no surgery, 0.82 (per year over 70)). Co-morbidity, deprivation, symptomatic presentation, later stage at diagnosis and low grade are also associated with increased probability of non-surgical treatment. CONCLUSION Contrary to current NICE guidance in England, age appears to be an important factor in the decision to treat operable ER+ breast cancer non-surgically. Further research is needed to assess the role of other age-related factors on treatment choice, and the effect that current practice has on survival and mortality from breast cancer for older women.


Cancer biology and medicine | 2015

The decision-making process for senior cancer patients: treatment allocation of older women with operable breast cancer in the UK.

Jenna Morgan; Paul Richards; Osama Zaman; Sue Ward; Karen Collins; Thompson G. Robinson; Kwok-Leung Cheung; Riccardo A. Audisio; Malcolm Reed; Lynda Wyld

Objective Up to 40% of women over 70 years with primary operable breast cancer in the UK are treated with primary endocrine therapy (PET) as an alternative to surgery. A variety of factors are important in determining treatment for older breast cancer patients. This study aimed to identify the patient and tumor factors associated with treatment allocation in this population. Methods Prospectively collected data on treatment received (surgery vs. PET) were analysed with multivariable logistic regression using the variables age, modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), activities of daily living (ADL) score, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, HER2 status, tumour size, grade and nodal status. Results Data were available for 1,122 cancers in 1,098 patients recruited between February 2013 and June 2015 from 51 UK hospitals. About 78% of the population were treated surgically, with the remainder being treated with PET. Increasing patient age at diagnosis, increasing CCI score, large tumor size (5 cm or more) and dependence in one or more ADL categories were all strongly associated with non-surgical treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion Increasing comorbidity, large tumor size and reduced functional ability are associated with reduced likelihood of surgical treatment of breast cancer in older patients. However, age itself remains a significant factor for non-surgical treatment; reinforcing the need for evidence-based guidelines.


Ejso | 2015

Healthcare professionals' preferences for surgery or primary endocrine therapy to treat older women with operable breast cancer

Jenna Morgan; Karen Collins; Thompson G. Robinson; Kwok-Leung Cheung; Riccardo A. Audisio; Malcolm Reed; Lynda Wyld

INTRODUCTION Primary endocrine therapy (PET) is an alternative treatment to surgery for oestrogen receptor (ER) positive operable breast cancer in older women. However, there is variable use of PET in the UK, with up to 40% of patients aged over 70 receiving PET instead of surgery in some regions. Treatment options offered to patients rely heavily on healthcare professional (HCP) assessment and opinion on which treatments are appropriate. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a mixed methods study combining semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in high and low PET regions in the UK, followed by a postal questionnaire survey distributed via the Association of Breast Surgery (ABS). RESULTS Thirty-four HCPs (20 breast surgeons; 13 nurse specialists; 1 geriatrician) were interviewed from 14 sites across the UK and 252/641 questionnaires returned (39%). There was an overriding view that PET is not suitable for patients under the age of 80 unless there are significant comorbidities. Opinion was split regarding the best way to treat patients with dementia. Patient preference was generally stated to be the most important factor when considering treatment, however only around a quarter 65/244 (26.6%) felt that all patients over the age of 70 should be offered PET as an alternative treatment option. CONCLUSIONS Opinions differ on the best way to treat women over 70 with operable breast cancer, especially if they have co-existing dementia, as well as whether they should be offered PET as a treatment option. This may be a significant cause of treatment variation in the UK.


BMJ Open | 2017

Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: evaluation of decision support interventions for older women with operable breast cancer: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Karen Collins; Malcolm Reed; Kate Joanna Lifford; Maria Burton; Adrian Edwards; Alistair Ring; Katherine Emma Brain; Helena Harder; Thompson G. Robinson; Kwok-Leung Cheung; Jenna Morgan; Riccardo A. Audisio; Sue Ward; Paul Richards; Charlene Martin; Timothy Chater; Kirsty Pemberton; Anthony Nettleship; Christopher Murray; Stephen J. Walters; Oscar Bortolami; Fiona Armitage; Robert Leonard; Jacqui Gath; Deirdre Revell; Tracy Green; Lynda Wyld

Introduction While breast cancer outcomes are improving steadily in younger women due to advances in screening and improved therapies, there has been little change in outcomes among the older age group. It is inevitable that comorbidities/frailty rates are higher, which may increase the risks of some breast cancer treatments such as surgery and chemotherapy, many older women are healthy and may benefit from their use. Adjusting treatment regimens appropriately for age/comorbidity/frailty is variable and largely non-evidence based, specifically with regard to rates of surgery for operable oestrogen receptor-positive disease and rates of chemotherapy for high-risk disease. Methods and analysis This multicentre, parallel group, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) (2015-18) reported here is nested within a larger ongoing ‘Age Gap Cohort Study’ (2012-18RP-PG-1209-10071), aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention of decision support interventions to assist in the treatment decision making for early breast cancer in older women. The interventions include two patient decision aids (primary endocrine therapy vs surgery/antioestrogen therapy and chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy) and a clinical treatment outcomes algorithm for clinicians. Ethics and dissemination National and local ethics committee approval was obtained for all UK participating sites. Results from the trial will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. IRAS reference 115550. Trial registration number European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT) number 2015-004220-61;Pre-results. Sponsors Protocol Code Number Sheffield Teaching Hospitals STH17086. ISRCTN 32447*.


British Journal of Surgery | 2018

Omission of surgery in older women with early breast cancer has an adverse impact on breast cancer‐specific survival

Sue Ward; Paul Richards; Jenna Morgan; G. R. Holmes; J. W. Broggio; Karen Collins; Malcolm Reed; Lynda Wyld

Primary endocrine therapy is used as an alternative to surgery in up to 40 per cent of women with early breast cancer aged over 70 years in the UK. This study investigated the impact of surgery versus primary endocrine therapy on breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS) in older women.


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2014

Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)

Jenna Morgan; Lynda Wyld; Karen Collins; Malcolm Reed


Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2017

Platinum‐containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer

Sam Egger; Melina L Willson; Jenna Morgan; Harriet Walker; Sue Carrick; Davina Ghersi; Nicholas Wilcken


Ejso | 2017

What influences healthcare professionals' treatment preferences for older women with operable breast cancer? An application of the discrete choice experiment

Jenna Morgan; Stephen J. Walters; Karen Collins; Thompson G. Robinson; Kwok-Leung Cheung; Riccardo A. Audisio; Malcolm Reed; Lynda Wyld

Collaboration


Dive into the Jenna Morgan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynda Wyld

University of Sheffield

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen Collins

Sheffield Hallam University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Malcolm Reed

Brighton and Sussex Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sue Ward

University of Sheffield

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge