Jennie Medin

Multiple sclerosis in the real world: A systematic review of fingolimod as a case study

INTRODUCTION The aim of our study was to systematically review the growing body of published literature reporting on one specific multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment, fingolimod, in the real world to assess its effectiveness in patients with MS, evaluate methodologies used to investigate MS in clinical practice, and describe the evidence gaps for MS as exemplified by fingolimod. METHODS We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of the literature (cut-off date: 4 March 2016). Published papers reporting real-world data for fingolimod with regard to clinical outcomes, persistence, adherence, healthcare costs, healthcare resource use, treatment patterns, and patient-reported outcomes that met all the eligibility criteria were included for data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Based on 34 included studies, this analysis found that fingolimod treatment improved outcomes compared to the period before treatment initiation and was more effective than interferons or glatiramer acetate. However, among studies comparing fingolimod with natalizumab, overall trends were inconsistent: some reported natalizumab to be more effective than fingolimod and others reported similar effectiveness for natalizumab and fingolimod. These studies illustrate the challenges of investigating MS in the real world, including the subjectivity in evaluating some clinical outcomes and the heterogeneity of methodologies used and patient populations investigated, which limit comparisons across studies. Gaps in available real-world evidence for MS are also highlighted, including those relating to patient-reported outcomes, combined clinical outcomes (to measure overall treatment effectiveness), and healthcare costs/resource use. CONCLUSIONS The included studies provide good evidence of the real-world effectiveness of fingolimod and highlight the diversity of methodologies used to assess treatment benefit in clinical practice. Future studies could address the evidence gaps found in the literature and the challenges associated with researching MS when designing real-world studies, assessing data, and comparing evidence across studies.

An Observational Study to Assess Brain MRI Change and Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Practice—The MS‐MRIUS Study

To describe methodology, interim baseline, and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition parameter characteristics of the multiple sclerosis clinical outcome and MRI in the United States (MS‐MRIUS).

Patient‐reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a systematic comparison of available measures

Multiple patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are currently being used in multiple sclerosis (MS) but their application is inconsistent and guidance on the appropriateness of each tool is lacking. The objective of our study was to identify MS‐specific PROs and systematically to assess the development process and the reliability and validity of various instruments. A systematic literature search was conducted on multiple data sources, including MEDLINE, Embase (using the Ovid platform) and Google Scholar, from 1996 to March 2015. Search terms included combinations of MS, PROs and quality of life. Randomized controlled trials or observational studies conducted on patients with MS and published in English were included. In addition, the PROQOLID database was explored. The MS‐specific PROs were systematically assessed using the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient‐Reported Outcomes tool. In total, 8094 articles were screened and 405 PROs were identified from 1102 relevant articles. PROs were classified into MS‐specific (n = 82) and non‐MS‐specific (n = 323). The results for the eight PROs that are most commonly used in MS clinical trials are presented here. For these eight PROs, the overall summary scores ranged between 50.1 and 68.7. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale‐29 had the best overall mean score (68.7), followed by the Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (67.0). This is the first study to provide a standardized assessment of all PROs for MS. There is a lack of data on content validity for PROs used in MS research, which indicates the need for a robust instrument in MS developed according to the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines.

Two studies in one: A propensity-score-matched comparison of fingolimod versus interferons and glatiramer acetate using real-world data from the independent German studies, PANGAEA and PEARL

Background This study compared outcomes following fingolimod or BRACE treatments (beta-interferons/glatiramer acetate) in patients with active MS (≥ 1 relapse in the previous year) following previous BRACE treatment. Methods and findings Patients with active MS who previously received BRACE were identified from German prospective, observational studies, PANGAEA and PEARL. A novel methodology was developed to compare outcomes between propensity-score-matched cohorts (3:1 ratio) from the independent single-arm studies. Patients in PANGAEA (n = 1287) experienced 48% fewer relapses per year than those in PEARL (n = 429; annualized relapse rate ratio: 0.52; p < 0.001). The risk of 3-month or 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was reduced in PANGAEA versus PEARL (3-month: 37% reduction; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; p < 0.001; 6-month: 47% reduction; HR, 0.53; p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients in PANGAEA (n = 1234) than PEARL (n = 401) were free from relapses and 3-month (65.7% vs 38.7%; p < 0.001) or 6-month (68.2% vs 39.2%; p < 0.001) CDP. The probability of confirmed disability improvement was higher in PANGAEA (n = 1163) than PEARL (n = 372; 3-month: 175% increase; HR, 2.75; p < 0.001; 6-month: 126% increase; HR, 2.26; p < 0.001). Patients in PANGAEA (n = 149) were less likely than those in PEARL (n = 307) to have taken sick leave (proportion with 0 days off work: 62.4% vs 44.6%; p = 0.0005). For change in disease severity from baseline (assessed by clinicians using the Clinical Global Impressions scale; PANGAEA, n = 1207; PEARL, n = 427), a larger proportion of patients had subjective improvement and a smaller proportion had worsening status in PANGAEA than PEARL (improvement: 28.2% vs 15.2%; worsening: 16.4% vs 30.4%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions Fingolimod appears to be more effective than BRACE in improving clinical and physician-/patient-reported outcomes in individuals with active MS.

Confirmed Disability Improvement In Patients With Active Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Fingolimod Versus Brace: A Matched Comparison of Treatments From The Pangaea And Pearl Registry Studies

1. Multiple Sclerosis International Federation, 2013. Available from: http://www.msif.org/about-us/advocacy/atlas/ (Accessed 22 September 2015). 2. Derwenskus J. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78:161–175. 3. Cohen JA et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:402–415. 4. Kappos L et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:387–401. 5. Calabresi A et al. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:545−556. 6. Korn J et al. Presented at the 66th American Academy of Neurology (AAN) annual meeting, 26 April−3 May 2014, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 7. Ziemssen T et al. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:93–100. 8. Vormfelde SV et al. JMIR Res Protoc. In press. 9. Duerr H-P et al. Presented at the 67th American Academy of Neurology (AAN) annual meeting, 18–25 April 2015, Washington, DC, USA. 10. Kurtzke JF. Neurology. 1983;33:1444–1452.

Establishing pathological cut-offs for lateral ventricular volume expansion rates

Background A percent brain volume change (PBVC) cut-off of −0.4% per year has been proposed to distinguish between pathological and physiological changes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Unfortunately, standardized PBVC measurement is not always feasible on scans acquired outside research studies or academic centers. Percent lateral ventricular volume change (PLVVC) is a strong surrogate measure of PBVC, and may be more feasible for atrophy assessment on real-world scans. However, the PLVVC rate corresponding to the established PBVC cut-off of −0.4% is unknown. Objective To establish a pathological PLVVC expansion rate cut-off analogous to −0.4% PBVC. Methods We used three complementary approaches. First, the original follow-up-length-weighted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis method establishing whole brain atrophy rates was adapted to a longitudinal ventricular atrophy dataset of 177 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients and 48 healthy controls. Second, in the same dataset, SIENA PBVCs were used with non-linear regression to directly predict the PLVVC value corresponding to −0.4% PBVC. Third, in an unstandardized, real world dataset of 590 RRMS patients from 33 centers, the cut-off maximizing correspondence to PBVC was found. Finally, correspondences to clinical outcomes were evaluated in both datasets. Results ROC analysis suggested a cut-off of 3.09% (AUC = 0.83, p < 0.001). Non-linear regression R2 was 0.71 (p < 0.001) and a − 0.4% PBVC corresponded to a PLVVC of 3.51%. A peak in accuracy in the real-world dataset was found at a 3.51% PLVVC cut-off. Accuracy of a 3.5% cut-off in predicting clinical progression was 0.62 (compared to 0.68 for PBVC). Conclusions Ventricular expansion of between 3.09% and 3.51% on T2-FLAIR corresponds to the pathological whole brain atrophy rate of 0.4% for RRMS. A conservative cut-off of 3.5% performs comparably to PBVC for clinical outcomes.

Impact of fingolimod on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes in routine clinical practice: A retrospective analysis of the multiple sclerosis, clinical and MRI outcomes in the USA (MS-MRIUS) study

BACKGROUND The effectiveness of fingolimod on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has been well established in trials and, to a lesser extent, in the real world. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing MS receiving fingolimod in US clinical practice. METHODS Clinical and MRI data from 590 patients initiating fingolimod treatment at 33 MS centers in the USA were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. MRI data were systematically quantified at a centralized imaging facility. Patients had an index (within 6 months before and 1 month after starting fingolimod) and post-index (9-24 months after starting fingolimod) MRI scan; 184 individuals had a pre-index scan (9-24 months before starting fingolimod). RESULTS In the index to post-index period, mean annualized relapse rates decreased from 0.36 to 0.13 and disability progression occurred in 18.5% of patients. Median T2, T1 and gadolinium-enhancing lesion volume changed by 1.15%, 2.36%, and -100% between the index and post-index scans, respectively, and median annualized percentage changes in brain volume and lateral ventricular volume were -0.32% and +0.66%, respectively. For patients with pre-index scans, MRI outcomes were unchanged or improved during treatment. Outcomes were generally comparable with those in fingolimod phase 3 trials. CONCLUSION This real-world study highlights the effectiveness of fingolimod and the feasibility of quantifying clinical and MRI data collected from multiple centers during routine clinical practice on a group level using a systematic, quantitative methodology.

Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA

The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) to assess prospectively baseline characteristics and outcomes after 12 months (± 90 days) of fingolimod treatment. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: fingolimod starter [first received fingolimod in PANGAEA (n = 3315)] and previous study [received fingolimod before enrollment in PANGAEA in RCTs (n = 875), some of whom also had baseline data at entry into RCTs (n = 505)]. At PANGAEA baseline, patients in the fingolimod starter versus the previous study cohort had a higher annualized relapse rate [ARR (95% confidence interval): 1.79 (1.75–1.83) vs 1.32 (1.25–1.40)] and Expanded Disability Status Scale score [3.11 (3.04–3.17) vs 2.55 (2.44–2.66)]. A greater proportion in the fingolimod starter versus previous study cohort had diabetes (2.0% vs 0.7%). After 12 months of fingolimod, ARRs were lower than in the 12 months before PANGAEA enrollment in the fingolimod starter [0.386 (0.360–0.414)] and previous study [0.276 (0.238–0.320)] cohorts. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were stable versus baseline. Adverse events were experienced by similar proportions in both cohorts during fingolimod treatment. Relevant differences exist in disease activity and comorbidities between patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice versus RCTs. Irrespective of baseline differences indicating a higher proportion at an advanced stage of multiple sclerosis in the real world versus RCTs, fingolimod remains effective, with a manageable safety profile.

Fingolimod's Impact on MRI Brain Volume Measures in Multiple Sclerosis: Results from MS-MRIUS: Active Disease and Brain Atrophy in MS

Evidence is needed to understand the effect of fingolimod on slowing down brain atrophy progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in clinical practice. We investigated the effect of fingolimod on brain atrophy in MS patients with active disease (clinically and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) versus no evidence of active disease (NEAD).

No evidence of disease activity in patients receiving fingolimod at private or academic centers in clinical practice: a retrospective analysis of the multiple sclerosis, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes in the USA (MS-MRIUS) study

Abstract Objective: The impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) center type on outcomes has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes in patients with MS receiving fingolimod over 16 months’ follow-up at private or academic centers in the USA. Methods: Clinical and MRI data collected in clinical practice from patients initiating fingolimod were stratified by center type and retrospectively analyzed. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) was defined as patients with no new/enlarged T2/gadolinium-enhancing lesions, no relapses, and no disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores). Results: Data were collected for 398 patients from 25 private centers and 192 patients from eight academic centers. Patients were older (median age = 43 vs 41 years; p = .0047) and had a numerically shorter median disease duration (7.0 vs 8.5 years; p = .0985) at private vs academic centers. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was higher in patients at private than academic centers in the pre-index (0.40 vs 0.29; p = .0127) and post-index (0.16 vs 0.08; p = .0334) periods. The opposite was true for T2 lesion volume in the pre-index (2.86 vs 5.23 mL; p = .0002) and post-index (2.86 vs 5.11 mL; p = .0016) periods; other MRI outcomes were similar between center types. After initiating fingolimod, ARRs were reduced, disability and most MRI outcomes remained stable, and a similar proportion of patients achieved NEDA-3 at private and academic centers (64.1% vs 56.1%; p = .0659). Conclusion: Patient characteristics differ between private and academic centers. Over 55% of patients achieved NEDA-3 during fingolimod treatment at both center types.