Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jennifer A. Bountry is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jennifer A. Bountry.


Journal of The American Water Resources Association | 2016

Synthesis of common management concerns associated with dam removal

Desiree Tullos; Mathias J. Collins; J. Ryan Bellmore; Jennifer A. Bountry; Patrick J. Connolly; Patrick B. Shafroth; Andrew C. Wilcox

Managers make decisions regarding if and how to remove dams in spite of uncertainty surrounding physical and ecological responses, and stakeholders often raise concerns about certain negative effects, regardless of whether these concerns are warranted at a particular site. We used a dam-removal science database supplemented with other information sources to explore seven frequently raised concerns, herein Common Management Concerns (CMCs). We investigate the occurrence of these concerns and the contributing biophysical controls. The CMCs addressed are the following: degree and rate of reservoir sediment erosion, excessive channel incision upstream of reservoirs, downstream sediment aggradation, elevated downstream turbidity, drawdown impacts on local water infrastructure, colonization of reservoir sediments by nonnative plants, and expansion of invasive fish. Biophysical controls emerged for some of the concerns, providing managers with information to assess whether a given concern is likely to occur at a site. To fully assess CMC risk, managers should concurrently evaluate site conditions and identify the ecosystem or human uses that will be negatively affected if the biophysical phenomenon producing the CMC occurs. We show how many CMCs have one or more controls in common, facilitating the identification of multiple risks at a site, and demonstrate why CMC risks should be considered in the context of other factors such as natural watershed variability and disturbance history.


Water Resources Research | 2017

Dam removal: Listening in

Melissa M. Foley; James Bellmore; Jim E. O'Connor; Jeffrey J. Duda; Amy E. East; Gordon Grant; Chauncey W. Anderson; Jennifer A. Bountry; Mathias J. Collins; Patrick J. Connolly; Laura S. Craig; James E. Evans; Samantha L. Greene; Francis J. Magilligan; Christopher S. Magirl; Jon J. Major; George R. Pess; Timothy J. Randle; Patrick B. Shafroth; Christian E. Torgersen; Desiree Tullos; Andrew C. Wilcox

Dam removal is widely used as an approach for river restoration in the United States. The increase in dam removals—particularly large dams—and associated dam-removal studies over the last few decades motivated a working group at the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis to review and synthesize available studies of dam removals and their findings. Based on dam removals thus far, some general conclusions have emerged: (1) physical responses are typically fast, with the rate of sediment erosion largely dependent on sediment characteristics and dam-removal strategy; (2) ecological responses to dam removal differ among the affected upstream, downstream, and reservoir reaches; (3) dam removal tends to quickly reestablish connectivity, restoring the movement of material and organisms between upstream and downstream river reaches; (4) geographic context, river history, and land use significantly influence river restoration trajectories and recovery potential because they control broader physical and ecological processes and conditions; and (5) quantitative modeling capability is improving, particularly for physical and broad-scale ecological effects, and gives managers information needed to understand and predict long-term effects of dam removal on riverine ecosystems. Although these studies collectively enhance our understanding of how riverine ecosystems respond to dam removal, knowledge gaps remain because most studies have been short (< 5 years) and do not adequately represent the diversity of dam types, watershed conditions, and dam-removal methods in the U.S.


Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2017

Channel-planform evolution in four rivers of Olympic National Park, Washington, USA: the roles of physical drivers and trophic cascades

Amy E. East; Kurt J. Jenkins; Patricia J. Happe; Jennifer A. Bountry; Timothy J. Beechie; Mark C. Mastin; Joel B. Sankey; Timothy J. Randle

Identifying the relative contributions of physical and ecological processes to channel evolution remains a substantial challenge in fluvial geomorphology. We use a 74-year aerial photographic record of the Hoh, Queets, Quinault, and Elwha Rivers, Olympic National Park, Washington, USA, to investigate whether physical or trophic-cascade-driven ecological factors – excessive elk impacts after wolves were extirpated a century ago – are the dominant drivers of channel planform in these gravel-bed rivers. We find that channel width and braiding show strong relationships with recent flood history. All four rivers widened significantly after having been relatively narrow in the 1970s, consistent with increased flood activity since then. Channel planform also reflects sediment-supply changes, evident from landslide response on the Elwha River. We surmise that the Hoh River, which shows a multi-decadal trend toward greater braiding, is adjusting to increased sediment supply associated with rapid glacial retreat. These rivers demonstrate transmission of climatic signals through relatively short sediment-routing systems that lack substantial buffering by sediment storage. Legacy effects of anthropogenic modification likely also affect the Quinault River planform. We infer no correspondence between channel evolution and elk abundance, suggesting that trophic-cascade effects in this setting are subsidiary to physical controls on channel morphology. Our findings differ from previous interpretations of Olympic National Park fluvial dynamics and contrast with the classic example of Yellowstone National Park, where legacy effects of elk overuse are apparent in channel morphology; we attribute these differences to hydrologic regime and large-wood availability. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA


Ecological Applications | 2017

Incorporating food web dynamics into ecological restoration: a modeling approach for river ecosystems

J. Ryan Bellmore; Joseph R. Benjamin; Michael Newsom; Jennifer A. Bountry; Daniel Dombroski

Restoration is frequently aimed at the recovery of target species, but also influences the larger food web in which these species participate. Effects of restoration on this broader network of organisms can influence target species both directly and indirectly via changes in energy flow through food webs. To help incorporate these complexities into river restoration planning, we constructed a model that links river food web dynamics to in-stream physical habitat and riparian vegetation conditions. We present an application of the model to the Methow River, Washington, USA, a location of on-going restoration aimed at recovering salmon. Three restoration strategies were simulated: riparian vegetation restoration, nutrient augmentation via salmon carcass addition, and side channel reconnection. We also added populations of nonnative aquatic snails and fish to the modeled food web to explore how changes in food web structure mediate responses to restoration. Simulations suggest that side channel reconnection may be a better strategy than carcass addition and vegetation planting for improving conditions for salmon in this river segment. However, modeled responses were strongly sensitive to changes in the structure of the food web. The addition of nonnative snails and fish modified pathways of energy through the food web, which negated restoration improvements. This finding illustrates that forecasting responses to restoration may require accounting for the structure of food webs, and that changes in this structure, as might be expected with the spread of invasive species, could compromise restoration outcomes. Unlike habitat-based approaches to restoration assessment that focus on the direct effects of physical habitat conditions on single species of interest, our approach dynamically links the success of target organisms to the success of competitors, predators, and prey. By elucidating the direct and indirect pathways by which restoration affects target species, dynamic food web models can improve restoration planning by fostering a deeper understanding of system connectedness and dynamics.


Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 16-20 May, 2010 | 2010

GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING SEDIMENT-RELATED EFFECTS OF DAM REMOVAL

Timothy J. Randle; Jennifer A. Bountry; Blair P. Greimann

Dam removal is becoming more common in the United States as dams age and environmental concerns increase. Sediment management is an important part of many dam removal projects, but there are no commonly accepted methods to assess the level of risk associated with sediment stored behind dams. Therefore, the interagency Subcommittee on Sedimentation (SOS) is sponsoring the development of a decision framework for assessing sediment-related effects from dam removals. The decision framework provides guidance on the level of sediment data collection, analysis, and modeling needed for reservoir sediment management. The framework is based on criteria which scale the characteristics of the reservoir sediment to sediment characteristics of the river on which the reservoir is located. To assist with the framework development, workshops of invited technical experts from around the United States were convened October 2008 in Portland, Oregon and October 2009 in State College, Pennsylvania. The decision framework developed at these workshops is currently being validated with actual dam-removal case studies from across the United States including small, medium, and large reservoir sediment volumes. This paper provides the latest thinking on key components of the guidelines. The paper represents contributions from over 26 entities who have participated in the development of the guidelines. After completion of the case study application, the framework will be finalized and published.


World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003 | 2003

Case Studies in Dam Decommissioning at the Bureau of Reclamation

Cassie C. Klumpp; Jennifer A. Bountry; Blair P. Greimann

The U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation is involved in many dam decommissioning projects in the Western United States. These projects involve complete to partial dam removal. A primary factor of each project is to identify the characteristics and volume of sediment impounded by the dam and to describe the potential erosion and transport of that sediment into the downstream river channel as a result of dam decommissioning. Three Bureau of Reclamation dam decommissioning projects are: 1.) Savage Rapids Dam on the Rogue River in Oregon, 2.) Matilija Dam on the Ventura River near Ventura, California, and 3).Coleman and South Diversion Dams on Battle Creek in California. The dam decommissioning studies for each project are described and sediment characterization before and after dam removal are compared. Insights into the unique characteristics of each project are also given. Conclusions will be drawn about the dam removal projects.


World Environmental And Water Resources Congress 2012 | 2012

Elwha River Restoration: Sediment Modeling

Timothy J. Randle; Jennifer A. Bountry; Kurt Wille

The National Park Service, with technical support from the Bureau of Reclamation, is in the process of removing Elwha and Glines Canyon Dams on the Elwha River near Port Angeles, Washington to restore anadromous fish and the natural ecosystem and areas of cultural significance to the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. Elwha Dam was completed in 1913 and forms Lake Aldwell. Glines Canyon Dam was completed upstream in 1927 and forms Lake Mills. These two dams are the largest ever removed. These dams are being removed concurrently in controlled increments over a three-year period, which began on September 17, 2011. As of July 2010, reservoir sedimentation for the two lakes was estimated to be 24 million yd 3 , of which 20 million yd 3 are stored in Lake Mills. Reservoir sediment is being eroded and redistributed by the river as the dams are removed and the reservoirs are drawn down. This paper describes a mass balance numerical model that is being used as part of the sediment adaptive management and monitoring program. This program is presently being implemented to compare measured effects with predictions and recommend corrective actions if necessary. Facilities have been constructed for water quality and flood protection to mitigate for sediment effects, including water treatment plants, new wells, a new surface water intake, raising the height of existing levees, and the construction of new levees. The sediment effects of dam removal have been predicted based on a drawdown experiment of Lake Mills, numerical modeling, and physical laboratory modeling. A numerical mass balance model was developed for use during the adaptive management program to provide up-to-date predictions based on changing hydrology and dam removal schedules. In addition, the numerical model is also being used to help guide monitoring activities and synthesize monitoring data.


Watershed Management Conference 2005 | 2005

Bridging the Gap between Numerical Sediment Modeling and Reality for Dam Removal Investigations

Timothy J. Randle; Jennifer A. Bountry

Dam removal projects are becoming increasingly common, yet the accuracy of quantitative sediment predictions remains uncertain. This situation results because of a general lack of scientific monitoring during dam removals, and the fact that the majority of dams that have been removed are small in size. Resource managers dealing with dam removal projects rely heavily on results from predictive numerical modeling to assess environmental impacts on the human environment. If the models are not properly applied, predicted impacts can be erroneous. This paper provides some guidance for the application of numerical sediment transport models to improve their accuracy and utility for dam removal investigations.


Scientific Reports | 2018

Morphodynamic evolution following sediment release from the world’s largest dam removal

Andrew C. Ritchie; Jonathan A. Warrick; Amy E. East; Christopher S. Magirl; Andrew W. Stevens; Jennifer A. Bountry; Timothy J. Randle; Christopher A. Curran; Robert C. Hilldale; Jeffrey J. Duda; Guy Gelfenbaum; Ian M. Miller; George R. Pess; Melissa M. Foley; Randall E. McCoy; Andrea S. Ogston

Sediment pulses can cause widespread, complex changes to rivers and coastal regions. Quantifying landscape response to sediment-supply changes is a long-standing problem in geomorphology, but the unanticipated nature of most sediment pulses rarely allows for detailed measurement of associated landscape processes and evolution. The intentional removal of two large dams on the Elwha River (Washington, USA) exposed ~30 Mt of impounded sediment to fluvial erosion, presenting a unique opportunity to quantify source-to-sink river and coastal responses to a massive sediment-source perturbation. Here we evaluate geomorphic evolution during and after the sediment pulse, presenting a 5-year sediment budget and morphodynamic analysis of the Elwha River and its delta. Approximately 65% of the sediment was eroded, of which only ~10% was deposited in the fluvial system. This restored fluvial supply of sand, gravel, and wood substantially changed the channel morphology. The remaining ~90% of the released sediment was transported to the coast, causing ~60 ha of delta growth. Although metrics of geomorphic change did not follow simple time-coherent paths, many signals peaked 1–2 years after the start of dam removal, indicating combined impulse and step-change disturbance responses.


Geomorphology | 2015

Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: River channel and floodplain geomorphic change

Amy E. East; George R. Pess; Jennifer A. Bountry; Christopher S. Magirl; Andrew C. Ritchie; Joshua B. Logan; Timothy J. Randle; Mark C. Mastin; Justin T. Minear; Jeffrey J. Duda; Martin Liermann; Michael L. McHenry; Timothy J. Beechie; Patrick B. Shafroth

Collaboration


Dive into the Jennifer A. Bountry's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy J. Randle

United States Bureau of Reclamation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy E. East

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher S. Magirl

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey J. Duda

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George R. Pess

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick B. Shafroth

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mathias J. Collins

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge