Jennifer Crosbie

Rare Copy Number Variation Discovery and Cross-Disorder Comparisons Identify Risk Genes for ADHD

A high-resolution analysis of copy number variation in patients with ADHD reveals new gene associations, few de novo mutations, and overlap with genes implicated in other disorders such as autism. Complexities of Cognition: The Case of ADHD As for autism and schizophrenia, the closer we look at attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the more complicated it seems. Found in 4% of children, this syndrome of attention, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness is highly heritable, yet we know only a few of the responsible genetic variants. Here, Lionel et al. assessed a particularly well-defined population of 248 children with ADHD, plus many of their parents, for extra copies or deletions of genes. The 306 rare copy number variations (CNVs) found in these individuals were of various kinds—only 1.7% were de novo mutations in brain-specific genes, 7.7% were clearly inherited and occurred in genes known to be associated with ADHD or defined new culprit genes, and several were in genes already implicated in other disorders such as autism. To take a closer look at possible genes that confer risk for more than one developmental disorder, the authors examined the CNVs in a separate group of patients with autism. In four autism patients and two of the patients with ADHD, a cluster of rare disorder-associated CNVs occurred on chromosome 9 in and around two genes: ASTN2, necessary for mammalian brain development, and TRIM32, a neuronal stem cell–associated gene. This region has also been associated with CNVs in bipolar disorder, intellectual disability, and schizophrenia. In all, the authors found rare inherited CNVs at sites that had been previously implicated in ADHD or in other neurodevelopmental disorders in 8% of the individuals with ADHD. Their results implicate common genes and pathways for several neuropsychiatric disorders, which is consistent with the common clinical co-occurrence of ADHD with other such conditions. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and persistent condition characterized by developmentally atypical and impairing inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness. We identified de novo and rare copy number variations (CNVs) in 248 unrelated ADHD patients using million-feature genotyping arrays. We found de novo CNVs in 3 of 173 (1.7%) ADHD patients for whom we had DNA from both parents. These CNVs affected brain-expressed genes: DCLK2, SORCS1, SORCS3, and MACROD2. We also detected rare inherited CNVs in 19 of 248 (7.7%) ADHD probands, which were absent in 2357 controls and which either overlapped previously implicated ADHD loci (for example, DRD5 and 15q13 microduplication) or identified new candidate susceptibility genes (ASTN2, CPLX2, ZBBX, and PTPRN2). Among these de novo and rare inherited CNVs, there were also examples of genes (ASTN2, GABRG1, and CNTN5) previously implicated by rare CNVs in other neurodevelopmental conditions including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To further explore the overlap of risks in ADHD and ASD, we used the same microarrays to test for rare CNVs in an independent, newly collected cohort of 349 unrelated individuals with a primary diagnosis of ASD. Deletions of the neuronal ASTN2 and the ASTN2-intronic TRIM32 genes yielded the strongest association with ADHD and ASD, but numerous other shared candidate genes (such as CHCHD3, MACROD2, and the 16p11.2 region) were also revealed. Our results provide support for a role for rare CNVs in ADHD risk and reinforce evidence for the existence of common underlying susceptibility genes for ADHD, ASD, and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Is the behavior rating inventory of executive function more strongly associated with measures of impairment or executive function

The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is commonly used in the assessment of children and adolescents presenting with a wide range of concerns. It is unclear, however, whether the questionnaire is more closely related to general measures of behavioral disruption and impairment or to specific measures of executive function. In the present study, associations between the Behavioral Regulation Index and Metacognition Index of the BRIEF and cognitive, behavioral, and academic measures were examined in a sample of clinic-referred youth (n = 60) and healthy youth (n = 37) 6-15 years of age. Measures included ratings of inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms in youth, ratings of how well youth functioned in their everyday environments, youths scores on measures of reading and math, and youths scores on measures of inhibition, performance monitoring, and working memory. Although both BRIEF indices were strongly related to parent and teacher ratings of behavioral disruption and impairment, neither was associated with youths scores on the performance-based tasks of executive function. These findings support the use of the BRIEF as a clinical tool for assessing a broad range of concerns, but raise questions about the relation of the BRIEF to performance-based tasks that are commonly used to assess executive function.

Genome-wide analysis of copy number variants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: the role of rare variants and duplications at 15q13.3

Objective: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common, highly heritable psychiatric disorder. Because of its multifactorial etiology, however, identifying the genes involved has been difficult. The authors followed up on recent findings suggesting that rare copy number variants (CNVs) may be important for ADHD etiology. Method: The authors performed a genome-wide analysis of large, rare CNVs (<1% population frequency) in children with ADHD (N=896) and comparison subjects (N=2,455) from the IMAGE II Consortium. Results: The authors observed 1,562 individually rare CNVs >100 kb in size, which segregated into 912 independent loci. Overall, the rate of rare CNVs >100 kb was 1.15 times higher in ADHD case subjects relative to comparison subjects, with duplications spanning known genes showing a 1.2-fold enrichment. In accordance with a previous study, rare CNVs >500 kb showed the greatest enrichment (1.28-fold). CNVs identified in ADHD case subjects were significantly enriched for loci implicated in autism and in schizophrenia. Duplications spanning the CHRNA7 gene at chromosome 15q13.3 were associated with ADHD in single-locus analysis. This finding was consistently replicated in an additional 2,242 ADHD case subjects and 8,552 comparison subjects from four independent cohorts from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada. Presence of the duplication at 15q13.3 appeared to be associated with comorbid conduct disorder. Conclusions: These findings support the enrichment of large, rare CNVs in ADHD and implicate duplications at 15q13.3 as a novel risk factor for ADHD. With a frequency of 0.6% in the populations investigated and a relatively large effect size (odds ratio=2.22, 95% confidence interval=1.5–3.6), this locus could be an important contributor to ADHD etiology.

Disruption at the PTCHD1 locus on Xp22.11 in autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability

Mutations of the X-linked gene PTCHD1 are associated with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. A Patch in the Fabric of Autism What causes autism? This disabling disorder is characterized by severe language and social impairment and is now included under the umbrella term “autism spectrum disorder” (ASD), which also includes milder deficits in communication and social development. Numerous theories have been advanced as to its causes. These have ranged from discredited concepts—“refrigerator” mothers and vaccines—to the modern idea of gene-environment interactions. Although no one gene simply explains the predisposition of patients for ASD, these disorders are wellknown to have a strong genetic component. Here, Noor et al. report the results of genetic analysis in thousands of patients and control subjects: Mutations at the PTCHD1 (patched-related gene) locus are associated with the inheritance of ASD and with intellectual disability in a small fraction of cases. In this study, the authors analyzed the PTCHD1 gene from 1896 patients with ASD and 246 with intellectual disability, and compared these to more than 10,000 control individuals, and found mutations in various parts of this gene in 25 affected individuals in 20 different families, but not in any of the controls. Some patients had large deletions, in one case spanning the entire gene, and in others the culprit was a missense mutation. A result of this gene’s location on the X chromosome, the affected patients were almost all male, and most had unaffected mothers and other female relatives. The authors also present evidence that the PTCHD1 gene may be part of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, which is important in embryonic development. Autism and intellectual disability are not straightforward disorders that can be attributed to mutations in a single gene. Even when candidate genes such as PTCHD1 are known, differences in the gene sequence do not perfectly correlate with phenotype, because there are many as yet undefined additional genes and environmental influences that dictate the ultimate characteristics of the person. Identifying some of these genes, as Noor et al. have done in this study, allows a better understanding of the disorder and the development of ways to compensate for its disabilities. Autism is a common neurodevelopmental disorder with a complex mode of inheritance. It is one of the most highly heritable of the complex disorders, although the underlying genetic factors remain largely unknown. Here, we report mutations in the X-chromosome PTCHD1 (patched-related) gene in seven families with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and in three families with intellectual disability. A 167-kilobase microdeletion spanning exon 1 was found in two brothers, one with ASD and the other with a learning disability and ASD features; a 90-kilobase microdeletion spanning the entire gene was found in three males with intellectual disability in a second family. In 900 probands with ASD and 208 male probands with intellectual disability, we identified seven different missense changes (in eight male probands) that were inherited from unaffected mothers and not found in controls. Two of the ASD individuals with missense changes also carried a de novo deletion at another ASD susceptibility locus (DPYD and DPP6), suggesting complex genetic contributions. In additional males with ASD, we identified deletions in the 5′ flanking region of PTCHD1 that disrupted a complex noncoding RNA and potential regulatory elements; equivalent changes were not found in male control individuals. Thus, our systematic screen of PTCHD1 and its 5′ flanking regions suggests that this locus is involved in ~1% of individuals with ASD and intellectual disability.

Validating psychiatric endophenotypes: inhibitory control and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

ADHD is a heritable condition of childhood for which several risk alleles have been identified. However, observed effect sizes have been small and few replicated polymorphisms have been identified. There are many reasons for the lack of one-to-one correspondence between genotype and phenotype in ADHD. Endophenotypes are non-clinical markers of genetic risk which may facilitate gene discovery in complex disorders like ADHD. The most common endophenotypes under consideration in ADHD are neuropsychological measures of executive function, although a range of psychological, physiological and neuroanatomical endophenotypes have been proposed. If carefully chosen, endophenotypes have the potential to increase the power of genetic research to identify susceptibility genes. If not carefully selected, endophenotypes may generate false negative and false positive results. This paper reviews the theoretical rationale for endophenotypes and proposes a priori criteria by which ADHD endophenotypes should be selected and validated. The literature on motor response inhibition is reviewed to illustrate the validation process which is recommended in the selection of other candidate endophenotypes.

Linkage of the dopamine receptor D1 gene to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has a strong genetic basis, and evidence from human and animal studies suggests the dopamine receptor D1 gene, DRD1, to be a good candidate for involvement. Here, we tested for linkage of DRD1 to ADHD by examining the inheritance of four biallelic DRD1 polymorphisms [D1P.5 (–1251HaeIII), D1P.6 (−800HaeIII), D1.1 (−48DdeI) and D1.7 (+1403Bsp1286I)] in a sample of 156 ADHD families. Owing to linkage disequilibrium between alleles at the four markers, only three haplotypes are common in our sample. Using the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT), we observed a strong bias for transmission of Haplotype 3 (1.1.1.2) from heterozygous parents to their affected children (P=0.008). Furthermore, using quantitative trait TDT analyses, we found significant and positive relationships between Haplotype 3 transmission and the inattentive symptoms, but not the hyperactive/impulsive symptoms, of ADHD. These findings support the proposed involvement of DRD1 in ADHD, and implicate Haplotype 3, in particular, as containing a potential risk factor for the inattentive symptom dimension of the disorder. Since none of the four marker alleles comprising Haplotype 3 is predicted to alter DRD1 function, we hypothesize that a functional DRD1 variant, conferring susceptibility to ADHD, is on this haplotype. To search for such a variant we screened the DRD1 coding region, by sequencing, focusing on the children who showed preferential transmission of Haplotype 3. DNA from 41 children was analysed, and no sequence variations were identified, indicating that the putative DRD1 risk variant for ADHD resides outside of the coding region of the gene.

The SNAP25 gene as a susceptibility gene contributing to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

The synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa gene (SNAP25) has been suggested as a genetic susceptibility factor in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) based on the mouse strain coloboma. This strain is hemizygous for the SNAP25 gene and displays hyperactivity that responds to dextroamphetamine, but not to methylphenidate. Previously, we reported association of SNAP25 and ADHD using two polymorphisms. To further investigate this gene, we screened the exons for DNA variation and genotyped ten additional polymorphisms in an expanded sample of families from Toronto and a second sample of families collected in Irvine, CA. Significant results were observed in the Toronto sample for four markers, although not in the Irvine sample. The paper discusses the possible influence of the selection criteria on these differential results. The Irvine sample selected subjects that met the DSM-IV combined subtype diagnosis, whereas the Toronto sample included all subtypes. Analysis of the DSM-IV subtypes in the Toronto sample indicated that the differential results were not attributable to ADHD subtype. Differences in ethnicity, differential medication response, and other clinical characteristics of the samples cannot be ruled out at this time. Quantitative analysis of the dimensions of hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention in the Toronto sample found that both behavioral traits were associated with SNAP25. Our findings continue to support SNAP25 in the susceptibility to ADHD.

Stop Signal and Conners' Continuous Performance Tasks: Test-Retest Reliability of Two Inhibition Measures in ADHD Children.

Objective: To measure test -retest reliability of the Stop-Signal Task (SST) and the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test (CPT) in children with ADHD. Methods: 12 children with ADHD (age 11.46 ±1.66) participated in the study. Primary outcome measures were stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) for the SST and CPT’s commission errors (%FP). For each participant, we acquired three morning (8:00am) measurements and behavioral observations, separated by two 7-day intervals. Reliability of cognitive measures and behavioral observations was measured using the Intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: ICC values for SSRT and %FP were 0.72. Consistency of behavioral observations was much lower (ICC =0.41). Conclusion: Both the SST and the CPT yielded reliable measurements in ADHD children. Our findings lend further support to using these measures in the study of ADHD. (J. of Att. Dis. 2009; 13(2) 137-143)

Validation and Extension of the Endophenotype Model in ADHD Patterns of Inheritance in a Family Study of Inhibitory Control

OBJECTIVE Endophenotypes, markers of underlying liability to psychiatric disorders, can improve the power to detect genetic risks relative to a complex clinical endpoint. Motor response inhibition is a prime candidate endophenotype in ADHD. In this study, the authors sought to extend the endophenotype model and further demonstrate its utility by investigating the parental origin of shared genetic risk in ADHD. METHOD Inhibitory control was studied in children with ADHD, unaffected siblings, and their biological parents. Covariation in inhibitory control within families was investigated. Differential covariation as a function of parental sex was also studied. A number of validity criteria for inhibitory control as an endophenotype were assessed, including sensitivity to the disorder and presence in unaffected relatives. RESULTS The results confirmed an inhibitory control deficit in children with ADHD as well as in their parents, independent of symptom severity in both generations. Inhibitory control ability in children was significantly predicted by the ability of their parents, particularly their fathers. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that an inhibitory control deficit is a cognitive marker of genetic risk shared by parents and offspring. The endophenotype model is also extended by evidence of differential parental contributions to this risk, consistent with findings of parent-of-origin effects in the transmission of certain risk alleles observed in molecular analyses. The identification of these effects at the endophenotype level and their incorporation in genetic modeling can improve both linkage detection and localization of quantitative trait loci.

Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 2A (GRIN2A) gene as a positional candidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the 16p13 region.

The glutamate system may be involved in the development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) based on animal models and the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) in cognition and motor processes. A follow-up study of the first genome scan for ADHD identified significant evidence for linkage to the 16p13 region.1 The glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-aspartate 2A (GRIN2A) gene that encodes the 2A subunit of the NMDA receptor, resides in this region and a recent study has reported an association between this gene and ADHD.2 We tested for linkage between the alleles and haplotypes of four polymorphisms at the GRIN2A locus and ADHD in our sample of 183 nuclear families with 229 affected children. In contrast to previous findings, we did not identify any evidence for a relationship of these markers and ADHD. Owing to the role of GRIN2A in aspects of cognition, we investigated the relationship of this gene to the cognitive phenotypes of inhibitory control, verbal short-term memory and verbal working memory. There was no significant evidence of linkage between GRIN2A and these phenotypes. While the results were not significant in our sample, the previous association finding suggests that further study of this gene is warranted.