Jennifer E. Arnold
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jennifer E. Arnold.
Cognition | 2000
Jennifer E. Arnold; Janet G. Eisenband; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; John C. Trueswell
Eye movements of listeners were monitored to investigate how gender information and accessibility influence the initial processes of pronoun interpretation. Previous studies on this issue have produced mixed results, and several studies have concluded that gender cues are not automatically used during the early processes of pronoun interpretation (e.g. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 73 (4), 231-255; Greene, S. B., McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 182, 266-283). In the two experiments presented here, participants viewed a picture with two familiar cartoon characters of either same or different gender. They listened to a text describing the picture, in which a pronoun referred to either the first, more accessible, character, or the second. (For example, Donald is bringing some mail to ¿Mickey/Minnie¿ while a violent storm is beginning. Hes carrying an umbrellaellipsis.) The results of both experiments show rapid use of both gender and accessibility at approximately 200 ms after the pronoun offset.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research | 2003
Jennifer E. Arnold; Maria Fagnano; Michael K. Tanenhaus
Speakers are often disfluent, for example, saying “theee uh candle” instead of “the candle.” Production data show that disfluencies occur more often during references to things that are discourse-new, rather than given. An eyetracking experiment shows that this correlation between disfluency and discourse status affects speech comprehension. Subjects viewed scenes containing four objects, including two cohort competitors (e.g., camel, candle), and followed spoken instructions to move the objects. The first instruction established one cohort as discourse-given; the other was discourse-new. The second instruction was either fluent or disfluent, and referred to either the given or new cohort. Fluent instructions led to more initial fixations on the given cohort object (replicating Dahan et al., 2002). By contrast, disfluent instructions resulted in more fixations on the new cohort. This shows that discourse-new information can be accessible under some circumstances. More generally, it suggests that disfluency affects core language comprehension processes.
Psychological Science | 2004
Jennifer E. Arnold; Michael K. Tanenhaus; Rebecca J. Altmann; Maria Fagnano
Most research on the rapid mental processes of online language processing has been limited to the study of idealized, fluent utterances. Yet speakers are often disfluent, for example, saying “thee, uh, candle” instead of “the candle.” By monitoring listeners eye movements to objects in a display, we demonstrated that the fluency of an article (“thee uh” vs. “the”) affects how listeners interpret the following noun. With a fluent article, listeners were biased toward an object that had been mentioned previously, but with a disfluent article, they were biased toward an object that had not been mentioned. These biases were apparent as early as lexical information became available, showing that disfluency affects the basic processes of decoding linguistic input.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research | 2000
Robert Thornton; Maryellen C. MacDonald; Jennifer E. Arnold
Recent evidence suggests that phrase length plays a crucial role in modification ambiguities. Using a self-paced reading task, we extended these results by examining the additional pragmatic effects that length manipulations may exert. The results demonstrate that length not only modulates modification preferences directly, but that it also necessarily changes the informational content of a sentence, which itself affects modification preferences. Our findings suggest that the same length manipulation affects multiple sources of constraints, both structural and pragmatic, which can each exert differing effects on processing.
Language | 2000
Jennifer E. Arnold; Anthony Losongco; Thomas Wasow; Ryan Ginstrom
Lingua | 2005
Thomas Wasow; Jennifer E. Arnold
Journal of Memory and Language | 2004
Jennifer E. Arnold; Thomas Wasow; Ash Asudeh; Peter Alrenga
Archive | 2003
Thomas Wasow; Jennifer E. Arnold
Archive | 2011
Jennifer E. Arnold; Michael K. Tanenhaus
Archive | 2006
Duane G. Watson; Jennifer E. Arnold; Michael K. Tanenhaus