Jennifer Firn
Queensland University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jennifer Firn.
Nature | 2016
James B. Grace; T. Michael Anderson; Eric W. Seabloom; Elizabeth T. Borer; Peter B. Adler; W. Stanley Harpole; Yann Hautier; Helmut Hillebrand; Eric M. Lind; Meelis Pärtel; Jonathan D. Bakker; Yvonne M. Buckley; Michael J. Crawley; Ellen I. Damschen; Kendi F. Davies; Philip A. Fay; Jennifer Firn; Daniel S. Gruner; Andy Hector; Johannes M. H. Knops; Andrew S. MacDougall; Brett A. Melbourne; John W. Morgan; John L. Orrock; Suzanne M. Prober; Melinda D. Smith
How ecosystem productivity and species richness are interrelated is one of the most debated subjects in the history of ecology. Decades of intensive study have yet to discern the actual mechanisms behind observed global patterns. Here, by integrating the predictions from multiple theories into a single model and using data from 1,126 grassland plots spanning five continents, we detect the clear signals of numerous underlying mechanisms linking productivity and richness. We find that an integrative model has substantially higher explanatory power than traditional bivariate analyses. In addition, the specific results unveil several surprising findings that conflict with classical models. These include the isolation of a strong and consistent enhancement of productivity by richness, an effect in striking contrast with superficial data patterns. Also revealed is a consistent importance of competition across the full range of productivity values, in direct conflict with some (but not all) proposed models. The promotion of local richness by macroecological gradients in climatic favourability, generally seen as a competing hypothesis, is also found to be important in our analysis. The results demonstrate that an integrative modelling approach leads to a major advance in our ability to discern the underlying processes operating in ecological systems.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Lydia R. O’Halloran; Elizabeth T. Borer; Eric W. Seabloom; Andrew S. MacDougall; Elsa E. Cleland; Rebecca L. McCulley; Sarah E. Hobbie; W. Stan Harpole; Nicole M. DeCrappeo; Chengjin Chu; Jonathan D. Bakker; Kendi F. Davies; Guozhen Du; Jennifer Firn; Nicole Hagenah; Kirsten S. Hofmockel; Johannes M. H. Knops; Wei Li; Brett A. Melbourne; John W. Morgan; John L. Orrock; Suzanne M. Prober; Carly J. Stevens
Based on regional-scale studies, aboveground production and litter decomposition are thought to positively covary, because they are driven by shared biotic and climatic factors. Until now we have been unable to test whether production and decomposition are generally coupled across climatically dissimilar regions, because we lacked replicated data collected within a single vegetation type across multiple regions, obfuscating the drivers and generality of the association between production and decomposition. Furthermore, our understanding of the relationships between production and decomposition rests heavily on separate meta-analyses of each response, because no studies have simultaneously measured production and the accumulation or decomposition of litter using consistent methods at globally relevant scales. Here, we use a multi-country grassland dataset collected using a standardized protocol to show that live plant biomass (an estimate of aboveground net primary production) and litter disappearance (represented by mass loss of aboveground litter) do not strongly covary. Live biomass and litter disappearance varied at different spatial scales. There was substantial variation in live biomass among continents, sites and plots whereas among continent differences accounted for most of the variation in litter disappearance rates. Although there were strong associations among aboveground biomass, litter disappearance and climatic factors in some regions (e.g. U.S. Great Plains), these relationships were inconsistent within and among the regions represented by this study. These results highlight the importance of replication among regions and continents when characterizing the correlations between ecosystem processes and interpreting their global-scale implications for carbon flux. We must exercise caution in parameterizing litter decomposition and aboveground production in future regional and global carbon models as their relationship is complex.
Nature plants | 2015
Philip A. Fay; Suzanne M. Prober; W. Stanley Harpole; Johannes M. H. Knops; Jonathan D. Bakker; Elizabeth T. Borer; Eric M. Lind; Andrew S. MacDougall; Eric W. Seabloom; Peter D. Wragg; Peter B. Adler; Dana M. Blumenthal; Yvonne M. Buckley; Chengjin Chu; Elsa E. Cleland; Scott L. Collins; Kendi F. Davies; Guozhen Du; Xiaohui Feng; Jennifer Firn; Daniel S. Gruner; Nicole Hagenah; Yann Hautier; Robert W. Heckman; Virginia L. Jin; Kevin P. Kirkman; Julia A. Klein; Laura M. Ladwig; Qi Li; Rebecca L. McCulley
Terrestrial ecosystem productivity is widely accepted to be nutrient limited1. Although nitrogen (N) is deemed a key determinant of aboveground net primary production (ANPP)2,3, the prevalence of co-limitation by N and phosphorus (P) is increasingly recognized4–8. However, the extent to which terrestrial productivity is co-limited by nutrients other than N and P has remained unclear. Here, we report results from a standardized factorial nutrient addition experiment, in which we added N, P and potassium (K) combined with a selection of micronutrients (K+μ), alone or in concert, to 42 grassland sites spanning five continents, and monitored ANPP. Nutrient availability limited productivity at 31 of the 42 grassland sites. And pairwise combinations of N, P, and K+μ co-limited ANPP at 29 of the sites. Nitrogen limitation peaked in cool, high latitude sites. Our findings highlight the importance of less studied nutrients, such as K and micronutrients, for grassland productivity, and point to significant variations in the type and degree of nutrient limitation. We suggest that multiple-nutrient constraints must be considered when assessing the ecosystem-scale consequences of nutrient enrichment.
Ecology Letters | 2013
Eric M. Lind; Elizabeth T. Borer; Eric W. Seabloom; Peter B. Adler; Jonathan D. Bakker; Dana M. Blumenthal; Michael J. Crawley; Kendi F. Davies; Jennifer Firn; Daniel S. Gruner; W. Stanley Harpole; Yann Hautier; Helmut Hillebrand; Johannes M. H. Knops; Brett A. Melbourne; Brent Mortensen; Anita C. Risch; Martin Schuetz; Carly J. Stevens; Peter D. Wragg
Plant growth can be limited by resource acquisition and defence against consumers, leading to contrasting trade-off possibilities. The competition-defence hypothesis posits a trade-off between competitive ability and defence against enemies (e.g. herbivores and pathogens). The growth-defence hypothesis suggests that strong competitors for nutrients are also defended against enemies, at a cost to growth rate. We tested these hypotheses using observations of 706 plant populations of over 500 species before and following identical fertilisation and fencing treatments at 39 grassland sites worldwide. Strong positive covariance in species responses to both treatments provided support for a growth-defence trade-off: populations that increased with the removal of nutrient limitation (poor competitors) also increased following removal of consumers. This result held globally across 4 years within plant life-history groups and within the majority of individual sites. Thus, a growth-defence trade-off appears to be the norm, and mechanisms maintaining grassland biodiversity may operate within this constraint.
Ecology Letters | 2011
Jennifer Firn; Joslin L. Moore; Andrew S. MacDougall; Elizabeth T. Borer; Eric W. Seabloom; Janneke HilleRisLambers; W. Stanley Harpole; Elsa E. Cleland; Cynthia S. Brown; Johannes M. H. Knops; Suzanne M. Prober; David A. Pyke; Kelly A. Farrell; John D. Bakker; Lydia R. O’Halloran; Peter B. Adler; Scott L. Collins; Carla M. D’Antonio; Michael J. Crawley; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Kimberly J. La Pierre; Brett A. Melbourne; Yann Hautier; John W. Morgan; Andrew D. B. Leakey; Adam D. Kay; Rebecca L. McCulley; Kendi F. Davies; Carly J. Stevens; Chengjin Chu
Many ecosystems worldwide are dominated by introduced plant species, leading to loss of biodiversity and ecosystem function. A common but rarely tested assumption is that these plants are more abundant in introduced vs. native communities, because ecological or evolutionary-based shifts in populations underlie invasion success. Here, data for 26 herbaceous species at 39 sites, within eight countries, revealed that species abundances were similar at native (home) and introduced (away) sites - grass species were generally abundant home and away, while forbs were low in abundance, but more abundant at home. Sites with six or more of these species had similar community abundance hierarchies, suggesting that suites of introduced species are assembling similarly on different continents. Overall, we found that substantial changes to populations are not necessarily a pre-condition for invasion success and that increases in species abundance are unusual. Instead, abundance at home predicts abundance away, a potentially useful additional criterion for biosecurity programmes.
Archive | 2011
Jennifer Firn; Joslin L. Moore; Andrew S. MacDougall; Elizabeth T. Borer; Eric W. Seabloom; Janneke HilleRisLambers; W. Stanley Harpole; Elsa E. Cleland; Cindy S. Brown; Johannes M. H. Knops; Suzanne M. Prober; David A. Pyke; Kelly A. Farrell; John D. Bakker; Lydia R. O'Halloran; Peter B. Adler; Scott L. Collins; Carla M. D'Antonio; Michael J. Crawley; Elizabeth M. Wolkovich; Kimberley La Pierre; Brett A. Melbourne; Yann Hautier; John W. Morgan; Andrew D. B. Leakey; Adam D. Kay; Rebecca L. McCulley; Kendi F. Davies; Carly J. Stevens; Chengjin Chu
Many ecosystems worldwide are dominated by introduced plant species, leading to loss of biodiversity and ecosystem function. A common but rarely tested assumption is that these plants are more abundant in introduced vs. native communities, because ecological or evolutionary-based shifts in populations underlie invasion success. Here, data for 26 herbaceous species at 39 sites, within eight countries, revealed that species abundances were similar at native (home) and introduced (away) sites - grass species were generally abundant home and away, while forbs were low in abundance, but more abundant at home. Sites with six or more of these species had similar community abundance hierarchies, suggesting that suites of introduced species are assembling similarly on different continents. Overall, we found that substantial changes to populations are not necessarily a pre-condition for invasion success and that increases in species abundance are unusual. Instead, abundance at home predicts abundance away, a potentially useful additional criterion for biosecurity programmes.
Conservation Biology | 2015
Iadine Chadès; Sam Nicol; Stephen van Leeuwen; Belinda Walters; Jennifer Firn; Andrew Reeson; Tara G. Martin; Josie Carwardine
Conservation decision tools based on cost-effectiveness analysis are used to assess threat management strategies for improving species persistence. These approaches rank alternative strategies by their benefit to cost ratio but may fail to identify the optimal sets of strategies to implement under limited budgets because they do not account for redundancies. We devised a multiobjective optimization approach in which the complementarity principle is applied to identify the sets of threat management strategies that protect the most species for any budget. We used our approach to prioritize threat management strategies for 53 species of conservation concern in the Pilbara, Australia. We followed a structured elicitation approach to collect information on the benefits and costs of implementing 17 different conservation strategies during a 3-day workshop with 49 stakeholders and experts in the biodiversity, conservation, and management of the Pilbara. We compared the performance of our complementarity priority threat management approach with a current cost-effectiveness ranking approach. A complementary set of 3 strategies: domestic herbivore management, fire management and research, and sanctuaries provided all species with >50% chance of persistence for
Oecologia | 2010
Jennifer Firn; Andrew S. MacDougall; Susanne Schmidt; Yvonne M. Buckley
4.7 million/year over 20 years. Achieving the same result cost almost twice as much (
Scientific Reports | 2016
Sharif Ahmed Mukul; John Herbohn; Jennifer Firn
9.71 million/year) when strategies were selected by their cost-effectiveness ranks alone. Our results show that complementarity of management benefits has the potential to double the impact of priority threat management approaches.
Global Change Biology | 2015
Jennifer Firn; Ramona Maggini; Iadine Chadès; Sam Nicol; Belinda Walters; Andrew Reeson; Tara G. Martin; Hugh P. Possingham; Jean-Baptiste Pichancourt; Rocio Ponce-Reyes; Josie Carwardine
Invasive plant species can form dense populations across large tracts of land. Based on these observations of dominance, invaders are often described as competitively superior, despite little direct evidence of competitive interactions with natives. The few studies that have measured competitive interactions have tended to compare an invader to natives that are unlikely to be strong competitors because they are functionally different. In this study, we measured competitive interactions among an invasive grass and two Australian native grasses that are functionally similar and widely distributed. We conducted a pair-wise glasshouse experiment, where we manipulated both biotic factors (timing of establishment, neighbour identity and density) and abiotic factors (nutrients and timing of water supply). We found that the invader significantly suppressed the performance of the natives; but its suppression ability was contingent on resource levels, with pulsed water/low nutrients or continuous watering reducing its competitive effects. The native grasses were able to suppress the performance of the invader when given a 3-week head-start, suggesting the invader may be incapable of establishing unless it emerges first, including in its own understorey. These findings provide insight for restoration, as the competitive effect of a functionally similar invader may be reduced by altering abiotic and biotic conditions in favour of natives.
Collaboration
Dive into the Jennifer Firn's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs