Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jennifer H. McDaniel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jennifer H. McDaniel.


Biomaterials | 2011

The Determination of Stem Cell Fate by 3D Scaffold Structures through the Control of Cell Shape

Girish Kumar; Christopher K. Tison; Kaushik Chatterjee; P. Scott Pine; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Marc L. Salit; Marian F. Young; Carl G. Simon

Stem cell response to a library of scaffolds with varied 3D structures was investigated. Microarray screening revealed that each type of scaffold structure induced a unique gene expression signature in primary human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs). Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that treatments sorted by scaffold structure and not by polymer chemistry suggesting that scaffold structure was more influential than scaffold composition. Further, the effects of scaffold structure on hBMSC function were mediated by cell shape. Of all the scaffolds tested, only scaffolds with a nanofibrous morphology were able to drive the hBMSCs down an osteogenic lineage in the absence of osteogenic supplements. Nanofiber scaffolds forced the hBMSCs to assume an elongated, highly branched morphology. This same morphology was seen in osteogenic controls where hBMSCs were cultured on flat polymer films in the presence of osteogenic supplements (OS). In contrast, hBMSCs cultured on flat polymer films in the absence of OS assumed a more rounded and less-branched morphology. These results indicate that cells are more sensitive to scaffold structure than previously appreciated and suggest that scaffold efficacy can be optimized by tailoring the scaffold structure to force cells into morphologies that direct them to differentiate down the desired lineage.


Scientific Data | 2016

Extensive sequencing of seven human genomes to characterize benchmark reference materials.

Justin M. Zook; David N. Catoe; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Lindsay Vang; Noah Spies; Arend Sidow; Ziming Weng; Yuling Liu; Christopher E. Mason; Noah Alexander; Elizabeth Henaff; Alexa B. R. McIntyre; Dhruva Chandramohan; Feng Chen; Erich Jaeger; Ali Moshrefi; Khoa Pham; William Stedman; Tiffany Liang; Michael Saghbini; Zeljko Dzakula; Alex Hastie; Han Cao; Gintaras Deikus; Eric E. Schadt; Robert Sebra; Ali Bashir; Rebecca Truty; Christopher C. Chang; Natali Gulbahce

The Genome in a Bottle Consortium, hosted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is creating reference materials and data for human genome sequencing, as well as methods for genome comparison and benchmarking. Here, we describe a large, diverse set of sequencing data for seven human genomes; five are current or candidate NIST Reference Materials. The pilot genome, NA12878, has been released as NIST RM 8398. We also describe data from two Personal Genome Project trios, one of Ashkenazim Jewish ancestry and one of Chinese ancestry. The data come from 12 technologies: BioNano Genomics, Complete Genomics paired-end and LFR, Ion Proton exome, Oxford Nanopore, Pacific Biosciences, SOLiD, 10X Genomics GemCode WGS, and Illumina exome and WGS paired-end, mate-pair, and synthetic long reads. Cell lines, DNA, and data from these individuals are publicly available. Therefore, we expect these data to be useful for revealing novel information about the human genome and improving sequencing technologies, SNP, indel, and structural variant calling, and de novo assembly.


Genome Biology | 2012

Mediation of Drosophila autosomal dosage effects and compensation by network interactions

John H. Malone; Dong-Yeon Cho; Nicolas R Mattiuzzo; Carlo G. Artieri; Lichun Jiang; Ryan K. Dale; Harold E. Smith; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Sarah A. Munro; Marc L. Salit; Justen Andrews; Teresa M. Przytycka; Brian Oliver

BackgroundGene dosage change is a mild perturbation that is a valuable tool for pathway reconstruction in Drosophila. While it is often assumed that reducing gene dose by half leads to two-fold less expression, there is partial autosomal dosage compensation in Drosophila, which may be mediated by feedback or buffering in expression networks.ResultsWe profiled expression in engineered flies where gene dose was reduced from two to one. While expression of most one-dose genes was reduced, the gene-specific dose responses were heterogeneous. Expression of two-dose genes that are first-degree neighbors of one-dose genes in novel network models also changed, and the directionality of change depended on the response of one-dose genes.ConclusionsOur data indicate that expression perturbation propagates in network space. Autosomal compensation, or the lack thereof, is a gene-specific response, largely mediated by interactions with the rest of the transcriptome.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Synthetic Spike-in Standards Improve Run-Specific Systematic Error Analysis for DNA and RNA Sequencing

Justin M. Zook; Daniel V. Samarov; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Shurjo K. Sen; Marc L. Salit

While the importance of random sequencing errors decreases at higher DNA or RNA sequencing depths, systematic sequencing errors (SSEs) dominate at high sequencing depths and can be difficult to distinguish from biological variants. These SSEs can cause base quality scores to underestimate the probability of error at certain genomic positions, resulting in false positive variant calls, particularly in mixtures such as samples with RNA editing, tumors, circulating tumor cells, bacteria, mitochondrial heteroplasmy, or pooled DNA. Most algorithms proposed for correction of SSEs require a data set used to calculate association of SSEs with various features in the reads and sequence context. This data set is typically either from a part of the data set being “recalibrated” (Genome Analysis ToolKit, or GATK) or from a separate data set with special characteristics (SysCall). Here, we combine the advantages of these approaches by adding synthetic RNA spike-in standards to human RNA, and use GATK to recalibrate base quality scores with reads mapped to the spike-in standards. Compared to conventional GATK recalibration that uses reads mapped to the genome, spike-ins improve the accuracy of Illumina base quality scores by a mean of 5 Phred-scaled quality score units, and by as much as 13 units at CpG sites. In addition, since the spike-in data used for recalibration are independent of the genome being sequenced, our method allows run-specific recalibration even for the many species without a comprehensive and accurate SNP database. We also use GATK with the spike-in standards to demonstrate that the Illumina RNA sequencing runs overestimate quality scores for AC, CC, GC, GG, and TC dinucleotides, while SOLiD has less dinucleotide SSEs but more SSEs for certain cycles. We conclude that using these DNA and RNA spike-in standards with GATK improves base quality score recalibration.


Biomaterials | 2014

Ontology analysis of global gene expression differences of human bone marrow stromal cells cultured on 3D scaffolds or 2D films

Bryan A. Baker; P. Scott Pine; Kaushik Chatterjee; Girish Kumar; Nancy J. Lin; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Marc L. Salit; Carl G. Simon

Differences in gene expression of human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs) during culture in three-dimensional (3D) nanofiber scaffolds or on two-dimensional (2D) films were investigated via pathway analysis of microarray mRNA expression profiles. Previous work has shown that hBMSC culture in nanofiber scaffolds can induce osteogenic differentiation in the absence of osteogenic supplements (OS). Analysis using ontology databases revealed that nanofibers and OS regulated similar pathways and that both were enriched for TGF-β and cell-adhesion/ECM-receptor pathways. The most notable difference between the two was that nanofibers had stronger enrichment for cell-adhesion/ECM-receptor pathways. Comparison of nanofibers scaffolds with flat films yielded stronger differences in gene expression than comparison of nanofibers made from different polymers, suggesting that substrate structure had stronger effects on cell function than substrate polymer composition. These results demonstrate that physical (nanofibers) and biochemical (OS) signals regulate similar ontological pathways, suggesting that these cues use similar molecular mechanisms to control hBMSC differentiation.


Biomolecular Detection and Quantification | 2016

An international comparability study on quantification of mRNA gene expression ratios: CCQM-P103.1

Alison S. Devonshire; Rebecca Sanders; Alexandra S. Whale; Gavin Nixon; Simon Cowen; Stephen L. R. Ellison; Helen C. Parkes; P. Scott Pine; Marc L. Salit; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Sarah A. Munro; Steve Lund; Satoko Matsukura; Yuji Sekiguchi; Mamoru Kawaharasaki; José Mauro Granjeiro; Priscila Falagan-Lotsch; Antonio Marcos Saraiva; Paulo Couto; Inchul Yang; Hyerim Kwon; Sang-Ryoul Park; Tina Demšar; Jana Žel; Andrej Blejec; Mojca Milavec; Lianhua Dong; Ling Zhang; Zhiwei Sui; Jing Wang

Measurement of RNA can be used to study and monitor a range of infectious and non-communicable diseases, with profiling of multiple gene expression mRNA transcripts being increasingly applied to cancer stratification and prognosis. An international comparison study (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM)-P103.1) was performed in order to evaluate the comparability of measurements of RNA copy number ratio for multiple gene targets between two samples. Six exogenous synthetic targets comprising of External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) standards were measured alongside transcripts for three endogenous gene targets present in the background of human cell line RNA. The study was carried out under the auspices of the Nucleic Acids (formerly Bioanalysis) Working Group of the CCQM. It was coordinated by LGC (United Kingdom) with the support of National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA) and results were submitted from thirteen National Metrology Institutes and Designated Institutes. The majority of laboratories performed RNA measurements using RT-qPCR, with datasets also being submitted by two laboratories based on reverse transcription digital polymerase chain reaction and one laboratory using a next-generation sequencing method. In RT-qPCR analysis, the RNA copy number ratios between the two samples were quantified using either a standard curve or a relative quantification approach. In general, good agreement was observed between the reported results of ERCC RNA copy number ratio measurements. Measurements of the RNA copy number ratios for endogenous genes between the two samples were also consistent between the majority of laboratories. Some differences in the reported values and confidence intervals (‘measurement uncertainties’) were noted which may be attributable to choice of measurement method or quantification approach. This highlights the need for standardised practices for the calculation of fold change ratios and uncertainties in the area of gene expression profiling.


BMC Biotechnology | 2016

Evaluation of the External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) reference material using a modified Latin square design

P. Scott Pine; Sarah A. Munro; Jerod R. Parsons; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Jean Lozach; Timothy G. Myers; Qin Su; Sarah M. Jacobs-Helber; Marc L. Salit

BackgroundHighly multiplexed assays for quantitation of RNA transcripts are being used in many areas of biology and medicine. Using data generated by these transcriptomic assays requires measurement assurance with appropriate controls. Methods to prototype and evaluate multiple RNA controls were developed as part of the External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) assessment process. These approaches included a modified Latin square design to provide a broad dynamic range of relative abundance with known differences between four complex pools of ERCC RNA transcripts spiked into a human liver total RNA background.ResultsERCC pools were analyzed on four different microarray platforms: Agilent 1- and 2-color, Illumina bead, and NIAID lab-made spotted microarrays; and two different second-generation sequencing platforms: the Life Technologies 5500xl and the Illumina HiSeq 2500. Individual ERCC controls were assessed for reproducible performance in signal response to concentration among the platforms. Most demonstrated linear behavior if they were not located near one of the extremes of the dynamic range. Performance issues with any individual ERCC transcript could be attributed to detection limitations, platform-specific target probe issues, or potential mixing errors. Collectively, these pools of spike-in RNA controls were evaluated for suitability as surrogates for endogenous transcripts to interrogate the performance of the RNA measurement process of each platform. The controls were useful for establishing the dynamic range of the assay, as well as delineating the useable region of that range where differential expression measurements, expressed as ratios, would be expected to be accurate.ConclusionsThe modified Latin square design presented here uses a composite testing scheme for the evaluation of multiple performance characteristics: linear performance of individual controls, signal response within dynamic range pools of controls, and ratio detection between pairs of dynamic range pools. This compact design provides an economical sample format for the evaluation of multiple external RNA controls within a single experiment per platform. These results indicate that well-designed pools of RNA controls, spiked into samples, provide measurement assurance for endogenous gene expression studies.


BMC Genomics | 2015

Using mixtures of biological samples as process controls for RNA-sequencing experiments

Jerod Parsons; Sarah A. Munro; P. Scott Pine; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Michele G. Mehaffey; Marc L. Salit

BackgroundGenome-scale “-omics” measurements are challenging to benchmark due to the enormous variety of unique biological molecules involved. Mixtures of previously-characterized samples can be used to benchmark repeatability and reproducibility using component proportions as truth for the measurement. We describe and evaluate experiments characterizing the performance of RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) measurements, and discuss cases where mixtures can serve as effective process controls.ResultsWe apply a linear model to total RNA mixture samples in RNA-seq experiments. This model provides a context for performance benchmarking. The parameters of the model fit to experimental results can be evaluated to assess bias and variability of the measurement of a mixture. A linear model describes the behavior of mixture expression measures and provides a context for performance benchmarking. Residuals from fitting the model to experimental data can be used as a metric for evaluating the effect that an individual step in an experimental process has on the linear response function and precision of the underlying measurement while identifying signals affected by interference from other sources. Effective benchmarking requires well-defined mixtures, which for RNA-Seq requires knowledge of the post-enrichment ‘target RNA’ content of the individual total RNA components. We demonstrate and evaluate an experimental method suitable for use in genome-scale process control and lay out a method utilizing spike-in controls to determine enriched RNA content of total RNA in samples.ConclusionsGenome-scale process controls can be derived from mixtures. These controls relate prior knowledge of individual components to a complex mixture, allowing assessment of measurement performance. The target RNA fraction accounts for differential selection of RNA out of variable total RNA samples. Spike-in controls can be utilized to measure this relationship between target RNA content and input total RNA. Our mixture analysis method also enables estimation of the proportions of an unknown mixture, even when component-specific markers are not previously known, whenever pure components are measured alongside the mixture.


bioRxiv | 2018

Reproducible integration of multiple sequencing datasets to form high-confidence SNP, indel, and reference calls for five human genome reference materials

Justin M. Zook; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Hemang Parikh; Sean Alistair Irvine; Len Trigg; Rebecca M. Truty; Cory Y. McLean; Francisco M. De La Vega; Chunlin Xiao; Stephen T. Sherry; Marc L. Salit

Benchmark small variant calls from the Genome in a Bottle Consortium (GIAB) for the CEPH/HapMap genome NA12878 (HG001) have been used extensively for developing, optimizing, and demonstrating performance of sequencing and bioinformatics methods. Here, we develop a reproducible, cloud-based pipeline to integrate multiple sequencing datasets and form benchmark calls, enabling application to arbitrary human genomes. We use these reproducible methods to form high-confidence calls with respect to GRCh37 and GRCh38 for HG001 and 4 additional broadly-consented genomes from the Personal Genome Project that are available as NIST Reference Materials. These new genomes’ broad, open consent with few restrictions on availability of samples and data is enabling a uniquely diverse array of applications. Our new methods produce 17% more high-confidence SNPs, 176% more indels, and 12% larger regions than our previously published calls. To demonstrate that these calls can be used for accurate benchmarking, we compare other high-quality callsets to ours (e.g., Illumina Platinum Genomes), and we demonstrate that the majority of discordant calls are errors in the other callsets, We also highlight challenges in interpreting performance metrics when benchmarking against imperfect high-confidence calls. We show that benchmarking tools from the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health can be used with our calls to stratify performance metrics by variant type and genome context and elucidate strengths and weaknesses of a method.


Journal of Genomics | 2016

External RNA Controls Consortium Beta Version Update.

Hangnoh Lee; P. Scott Pine; Jennifer H. McDaniel; Marc L. Salit; Brian Oliver

Spike-in RNAs are valuable controls for a variety of gene expression measurements. The External RNA Controls Consortium developed test sets that were used in a number of published reports. Here we provide an authoritative table that summarizes, updates, and corrects errors in the test version that ultimately resulted in the certified Standard Reference Material 2374. We have noted existence of anti-sense RNA controls in the material, corrected sub-pool memberships, and commented on control RNAs that displayed inconsistent behavior.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jennifer H. McDaniel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc L. Salit

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Scott Pine

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl G. Simon

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah A. Munro

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Justin M. Zook

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick S. Pine

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bryan A. Baker

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David N. Catoe

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Girish Kumar

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kaushik Chatterjee

National Institute of Standards and Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge