Jennifer Howcroft

Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors

BackgroundFalls are a prevalent issue in the geriatric population and can result in damaging physical and psychological consequences. Fall risk assessment can provide information to enable appropriate interventions for those at risk of falling. Wearable inertial-sensor-based systems can provide quantitative measures indicative of fall risk in the geriatric population.MethodsForty studies that used inertial sensors to evaluate geriatric fall risk were reviewed and pertinent methodological features were extracted; including, sensor placement, derived parameters used to assess fall risk, fall risk classification method, and fall risk classification model outcomes.ResultsInertial sensors were placed only on the lower back in the majority of papers (65%). One hundred and thirty distinct variables were assessed, which were categorized as position and angle (7.7%), angular velocity (11.5%), linear acceleration (20%), spatial (3.8%), temporal (23.1%), energy (3.8%), frequency (15.4%), and other (14.6%). Fallers were classified using retrospective fall history (30%), prospective fall occurrence (15%), and clinical assessment (32.5%), with 22.5% using a combination of retrospective fall occurrence and clinical assessments. Half of the studies derived models for fall risk prediction, which reached high levels of accuracy (62-100%), specificity (35-100%), and sensitivity (55-99%).ConclusionsInertial sensors are promising sensors for fall risk assessment. Future studies should identify fallers using prospective techniques and focus on determining the most promising sensor sites, in conjunction with determination of optimally predictive variables. Further research should also attempt to link predictive variables to specific fall risk factors and investigate disease populations that are at high risk of falls.

Analysis of dual-task elderly gait in fallers and non-fallers using wearable sensors

Dual-task (DT) gait involves walking while simultaneously performing an attention-demanding task and can be used to identify impaired gait or executive function in older adults. Advancment is needed in techniques that quantify the influence of dual tasking to improve predictive and diagnostic potential. This study investigated the viability of wearable sensor measures to identify DT gait changes in older adults and distinguish between elderly fallers and non-fallers. A convenience sample of 100 older individuals (75.5±6.7 years; 76 non-fallers, 24 fallers based on 6 month retrospective fall occurrence) walked 7.62m under single-task (ST) and DT conditions while wearing pressure-sensing insoles and tri-axial accelerometers at the head, pelvis, and left and right shanks. Differences between ST and DT gait were identified for temporal measures, acceleration descriptive statistics, Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) quartiles, ratio of even to odd harmonics, center of pressure (CoP) stance path coefficient of variation, and deviations to expected CoP stance path. Increased posterior CoP stance path deviations, increased coefficient of variation, decreased FFT quartiles, and decreased ratio of even to odd harmonics suggested increased DT gait variability. Decreased gait velocity and decreased acceleration standard deviations (SD) at the pelvis and shanks could represent compensatory gait strategies that maintain stability. Differences in acceleration between fallers and non-fallers in head posterior SD and pelvis AP ratio of even to odd harmonics during ST, and pelvis vertical maximum Lyapunov exponent during DT gait were identified. Wearable-sensor-based DT gait assessments could be used in point-of-care environments to identify gait deficits.

Wearable-Sensor-Based Classification Models of Faller Status in Older Adults.

Wearable sensors have potential for quantitative, gait-based, point-of-care fall risk assessment that can be easily and quickly implemented in clinical-care and older-adult living environments. This investigation generated models for wearable-sensor based fall-risk classification in older adults and identified the optimal sensor type, location, combination, and modelling method; for walking with and without a cognitive load task. A convenience sample of 100 older individuals (75.5 ± 6.7 years; 76 non-fallers, 24 fallers based on 6 month retrospective fall occurrence) walked 7.62 m under single-task and dual-task conditions while wearing pressure-sensing insoles and tri-axial accelerometers at the head, pelvis, and left and right shanks. Participants also completed the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire, six minute walk test, and ranked their fear of falling. Fall risk classification models were assessed for all sensor combinations and three model types: multi-layer perceptron neural network, naïve Bayesian, and support vector machine. The best performing model was a multi-layer perceptron neural network with input parameters from pressure-sensing insoles and head, pelvis, and left shank accelerometers (accuracy = 84%, F1 score = 0.600, MCC score = 0.521). Head sensor-based models had the best performance of the single-sensor models for single-task gait assessment. Single-task gait assessment models outperformed models based on dual-task walking or clinical assessment data. Support vector machines and neural networks were the best modelling technique for fall risk classification. Fall risk classification models developed for point-of-care environments should be developed using support vector machines and neural networks, with a multi-sensor single-task gait assessment.

Elderly fall risk prediction using static posturography

Maintaining and controlling postural balance is important for activities of daily living, with poor postural balance being predictive of future falls. This study investigated eyes open and eyes closed standing posturography with elderly adults to identify differences and determine appropriate outcome measure cut-off scores for prospective faller, single-faller, multi-faller, and non-faller classifications. 100 older adults (75.5 ± 6.7 years) stood quietly with eyes open and then eyes closed while Wii Balance Board data were collected. Range in anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) center of pressure (CoP) motion; AP and ML CoP root mean square distance from mean (RMS); and AP, ML, and vector sum magnitude (VSM) CoP velocity were calculated. Romberg Quotients (RQ) were calculated for all parameters. Participants reported six-month fall history and six-month post-assessment fall occurrence. Groups were retrospective fallers (24), prospective all fallers (42), prospective fallers (22 single, 6 multiple), and prospective non-fallers (47). Non-faller RQ AP range and RQ AP RMS differed from prospective all fallers, fallers, and single fallers. Non-faller eyes closed AP velocity, eyes closed VSM velocity, RQ AP velocity, and RQ VSM velocity differed from multi-fallers. RQ calculations were particularly relevant for elderly fall risk assessments. Cut-off scores from Clinical Cut-off Score, ROC curves, and discriminant functions were clinically viable for multi-faller classification and provided better accuracy than single-faller classification. RQ AP range with cut-off score 1.64 could be used to screen for older people who may fall once. Prospective multi-faller classification with a discriminant function (-1.481 + 0.146 x Eyes Closed AP Velocity—0.114 x Eyes Closed Vector Sum Magnitude Velocity—2.027 x RQ AP Velocity + 2.877 x RQ Vector Sum Magnitude Velocity) and cut-off score 0.541 achieved an accuracy of 84.9% and is viable as a screening tool for older people at risk of multiple falls.

Prospective Fall-Risk Prediction Models for Older Adults Based on Wearable Sensors

Wearable sensors can provide quantitative, gait-based assessments that can translate to point-of-care environments. This investigation generated elderly fall-risk predictive models based on wearable-sensor-derived gait data and prospective fall occurrence, and identified the optimal sensor type, location, and combination for single and dual-task walking. 75 individuals who reported six month prospective fall occurrence (75.2 ± 6.6 years; 47 non-fallers and 28 fallers) walked 7.62 m under single-task and dual-task conditions while wearing pressure-sensinginsoles and tri-axial accelerometers at the head, pelvis, and left and right shanks. Fall-risk classificationmodels were assessed for all sensor combinations and three model types: neural network, naïve Bayesian, and support vector machine. The best performing model used a neural network, dual-task gait data, and input parameters from head, pelvis, and left shank accelerometers (accuracy = 57%, sensitivity = 43%, and specificity = 65%). The best single-sensor model used a neural network, dual-task gait data, and pelvis accelerometer parameters (accuracy = 54%, sensitivity = 35%, and specificity = 67%). Single-task and dual-task gait assessments provided similar fall-risk model performance. Fall-risk predictive models developed for point-of-care environments should use multi-sensor dual-task gait assessment with the pelvis location considered if assessment is limited to a single sensor.

Understanding dynamic stability from pelvis accelerometer data and the relationship to balance and mobility in transtibial amputees

This study investigated whether pelvis acceleration-derived parameters can differentiate between dynamic stability states for transtibial amputees during level (LG) and uneven ground (UG) walking. Correlations between these parameters and clinical balance and mobility measures were also investigated. A convenience sample of eleven individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation walked on LG and simulated UG while pelvis acceleration data were collected at 100Hz. Descriptive statistics, Fast Fourier Transform, ratio of even to odd harmonics, and maximum Lyapunov exponent measures were derived from acceleration data. Of the 26 pelvis acceleration measures, seven had a significant difference (p≤0.05) between LG and UG walking conditions. Seven distinct, stability-relevant measures appeared in at least one of the six regression models that correlated accelerometer-derived measures to Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS), and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) scores, explaining up to 100% of the variability in these measures. Of these seven measures, medial-lateral acceleration range was the most frequent model variable, appearing in four models. Anterior-posterior acceleration standard deviation and stride time appeared in three models. Pelvis acceleration-derived parameters were able to differentiate between LG and UG walking for transtibial amputees. UG walking provided the most relevant data for balance and mobility assessment. These results could translate to point of patient contact assessments using a wearable system such as a smartbelt or accelerometer-equipped smartphone.

Faller Classification in Older Adults Using Wearable Sensors Based on Turn and Straight-Walking Accelerometer-Based Features

Faller classification in elderly populations can facilitate preventative care before a fall occurs. A novel wearable-sensor based faller classification method for the elderly was developed using accelerometer-based features from straight walking and turns. Seventy-six older individuals (74.15 ± 7.0 years), categorized as prospective fallers and non-fallers, completed a six-minute walk test with accelerometers attached to their lower legs and pelvis. After segmenting straight and turn sections, cross validation tests were conducted on straight and turn walking features to assess classification performance. The best “classifier model—feature selector” combination used turn data, random forest classifier, and select-5-best feature selector (73.4% accuracy, 60.5% sensitivity, 82.0% specificity, and 0.44 Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient (MCC)). Using only the most frequently occurring features, a feature subset (minimum of anterior-posterior ratio of even/odd harmonics for right shank, standard deviation (SD) of anterior left shank acceleration SD, SD of mean anterior left shank acceleration, maximum of medial-lateral first quartile of Fourier transform (FQFFT) for lower back, maximum of anterior-posterior FQFFT for lower back) achieved better classification results, with 77.3% accuracy, 66.1% sensitivity, 84.7% specificity, and 0.52 MCC score. All classification performance metrics improved when turn data was used for faller classification, compared to straight walking data. Combining turn and straight walking features decreased performance metrics compared to turn features for similar classifier model—feature selector combinations.

Analysis of dual-task elderly gait using wearable plantar-pressure insoles and accelerometer

Dual-task gait allows assessment of impaired executive function and mobility control in older individuals, which are risk factors of falls. This study investigated gait changes in older individuals due to the addition of a cognitive load, using wearable pressure-sensing insole and tri-axial accelerometer measures. These wearable sensors can be applied at the point-of-care. Eleven elderly (65 years or older) individuals walked 7.62 m with and without a verbal fluency cognitive load task while wearing FScan 3000E pressure-sensing insoles in both shoes and a Gulf Coast X16-1C tri-axial accelerometer at the pelvis. Plantar-pressure derived parameters included center of force (CoF) path and temporal measures. Acceleration derived measures were descriptive statistics, Fast Fourier Transform quartile, ratio of even-to-odd harmonics, and maximum Lyapunov exponent. Stride time, stance time, and swing time all significantly increased during dual-task compared to single-task walking. Minimum, mean, and median CoF stance velocity; cadence; and vertical, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral harmonic ratio all significantly decreased during dual-task walking. Wearable plantar pressure-sensing insole and lower back accelerometer derived-measures can identify gait differences between single-task and dual-task walking in older individuals and could be used in point-of-care environments to assess for deficits in executive function and mobility impairments.

Understanding responses to gait instability from plantar pressure measurement and the relationship to balance and mobility in lower-limb amputees.

BACKGROUND Measuring responses to a more unstable walking environment at the point-of-care may reveal clinically relevant strategies, particularly for rehabilitation. This study determined if temporal measures, center of pressure-derived measures, and force impulse measures can quantify responses to surface instability and correlate with clinical balance and mobility measures. METHODS Thirty-one unilateral amputees, 11 transfemoral and 20 transtibial, walked on level and soft ground while wearing pressure-sensing insoles. Foot-strike and foot-off center of pressure, center of pressure path, temporal, and force impulse variables were derived from F-Scan pressure-sensing insoles. FINDINGS Significant differences (P<0.05) between level and soft ground were found for temporal and center of pressure path measures. Twenty regression models (R(2) ≤ 0.840), which related plantar-pressure-derived measures with clinical scores, consisted of nine variables. Stride time was in eight models; posterior deviations per stride in six models; mean CoP path velocity in five models; and anterior-posterior center of pressure path coefficient of variation, percent double-support time, and percent stance in four models. INTERPRETATION Center of pressure-derived parameters, particularly temporal and center of pressure path measures, can differentiate between level and soft ground walking for transfemoral and transtibial amputees. Center of pressure-derived parameters correlated with clinical measures of mobility and balance, explaining up to 84.0% of the variability. The number of posterior deviations per stride, mean CoP path velocity stride time, anterior-posterior center of pressure path coefficient of variation, percent double-support time, and percent stance were frequently related to clinical balance and mobility measures.

Static Posturography of Elderly Fallers and Non-Fallers with Eyes Open and Closed

Static posturography can be used to assess pos- tural balance, which is important for activities of daily living. For older adults, poor postural balance can indicate increased fall risk. This study investigated eyes open and eyes closed static posturography assessments of 100 elderly participants (= 65 years) in two-feet stance. Twenty-four of these people had fallen in the previous six months. Range in anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) motion; center of pressure (CoP) root mean square distance from mean; AP, ML, and resultant CoP velocity; and percent body weight on left and right feet were calculated from Wii Balance Board vertical force data. All AP measures and resultant CoP velocity were significantly greater with eyes closed than eyes open for fallers and non- fallers. ML CoP velocity was significantly greater with eyes closed than open for fallers. The largest percent increase from eyes open to eyes closed was for AP velocity, followed by 2D velocity for both fallers and non-fallers. Therefore, AP-based center of pressure-derived posturography measures appear to be sensitive to changes in postural control due to elimination of visual input. Significant differences were not found between fallers and non-fallers.