Jennifer J. Huang

Benefit of statin pretreatment in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in different adult patient population: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective Previous studies have suggested that statin pretreatment prevents contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). However, single randomised trials are limited in their number of patients. This meta-analysis aims to assess the role of statin use in CIN prevention, as well as to determine patient subgroups that will benefit from statin pre-treatment. Methodology We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing statin pretreatment versus placebo for preventing CIN. Our main outcome was the risk of CIN within 1–5 days after contrast administration. Results Data analysed from nine randomised studies with a total of 5143 patients, where 2559 received statins and 2584 received placebo, showed that statin pretreatment was associated with significant reduction in risk of CIN (MH-RR=0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.64, Z=4.49, p<0.00001). This beneficial effect of statin was also seen in patients with baseline renal impairment (MH-RR=0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.72, p=0.0008) and also those who were cotreated with NAC (MH-RR=0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.83, p=0.01). Conclusions Statin pretreatment leads to significant reduction in CIN, and should be strongly considered in all patients who are planned for diagnostic and interventional procedures involving contrast-media administration.

The role of vitamin supplementation in the prevention of cardiovascular disease events

The production, sale, and consumption of multiple vitamins is a multibillion‐dollar industry. Most Americans take some form of supplement ostensibly for prevention of cardiovascular disease. It has been claimed that vitamin A retards atherogenesis. Vitamin C is an antioxidant and is thought to possibly decrease free radical‐induced endothelial injury, which can lead to atherosclerotic plaque formation. Vitamin E has been extensively studied for its possible effects on platelet function as well as inhibition of foam‐cell formation. Low levels of vitamin D have been thought to negatively impact myocardial structure and increase the risk for cardiovascular events. Increased intake of vitamin B6, B12, and folate has been associated with reduction of homocysteine levels; elevated homocysteine blood levels have been associated with the occurrence of stroke, heart attack, and cardiovascular death. The purpose of this study was to review the currently available literature for vitamin supplementation with respect to prevention of cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, the current evidence suggests no benefit exists with vitamin supplementation in the general US population. Further research is needed to evaluate whether there are specific populations that might benefit from vitamin supplementation.

Combining antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy (triple therapy): what are the risks and benefits?

Most patients with mechanical heart valves and many patients with atrial fibrillation will require long-term anticoagulation therapy. For patients with mechanical prosthetic valves, only warfarin is indicated. However, for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk for embolic stroke, one of the newer antithrombotic medications, such as rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban, also can be used. Patients with indications for antithrombotic therapy often will have coexisting vascular disease, such as coronary artery disease, requiring concomitant antiplatelet therapy with aspirin alone or more commonly with a dual antiplatelet regimen, aspirin and clopidogrel, or prasugrel or ticagrelor. The risks and benefits of this approach are still not well defined, and current guidelines have included recommendations based primarily on expert opinion.

Atrial Appendage Thrombosis Risk Is Lower for Atrial Flutter Compared with Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND The risk of stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation is established. However, the evidence surrounding the risk of thromboembolism in patients with atrial flutter is not as clear. We hypothesized that atrial flutter would have indicators of less risk for thromboembolism compared with atrial fibrillation on transesophageal echocardiography, thereby possibly leading to a lower stroke risk. METHODS A retrospective review of 2225 patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography was performed. Those with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter were screened. Exclusion criteria were patients being treated with chronic anticoagulation, the presence of a prosthetic valve, moderate to severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis, congenital heart disease, or a history of heart transplantation. A total of 114 patients with atrial fibrillation and 55 patients with atrial flutter met the criteria and were included in the analysis. RESULTS Twelve patients (11%) in the atrial fibrillation group had left atrial appendage thrombus versus zero patients in the atrial flutter group (P < .05). The prevalence of spontaneous echocardiography contrast was significantly higher and left atrial appendage emptying velocity was significantly lower in the atrial fibrillation group compared with the atrial flutter group (P < .001). No spontaneous contrast was seen when the left atrial appendage emptying velocity was >60 cm/sec. CONCLUSIONS Patients with atrial flutter have a lower incidence of left atrial appendage thrombi, higher left atrial appendage emptying velocity, and less left atrial spontaneous contrast compared with patients with atrial fibrillation, suggesting a lower risk for potential arterial thromboembolism.