Jennifer K. Lue

Outcomes of Patients With Double-Hit Lymphoma Who Achieve First Complete Remission

Purpose Patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL) rarely achieve long-term survival following disease relapse. Some patients with DHL undergo consolidative autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) to reduce the risk of relapse, although the benefit of this treatment strategy is unclear. Methods Patients with DHL who achieved first complete remission following completion of front-line therapy with either rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or intensive front-line therapy, and deemed fit for autoSCT, were included. A landmark analysis was performed, with time zero defined as 3 months after completion of front-line therapy. Patients who experienced relapse before or who were not followed until that time were excluded. Results Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years were 80% and 87%, respectively, for all patients (n = 159). Three-year RFS and OS rates did not differ significantly for autoSCT (n = 62) versus non-autoSCT patients (n = 97), but 3-year RFS was inferior in patients who received R-CHOP compared with intensive therapy (56% v 88%; P = .002). Three-year RFS and OS did not differ significantly for patients in the R-CHOP or intensive therapy cohorts when analyzed by receipt of autoSCT. The median OS following relapse was 8.6 months. Conclusion In the largest reported series, to our knowledge, of patients with DHL to achieve first complete remission, consolidative autoSCT was not associated with improved 3-year RFS or OS. In addition, patients treated with R-CHOP experienced inferior 3-year RFS compared with those who received intensive front-line therapy. When considered in conjunction with reports of patients with newly diagnosed DHL, which demonstrate lower rates of disease response to R-CHOP compared with intensive front-line therapy, our findings further support the use of intensive front-line therapy for this patient population.

Brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1–2 trial

BACKGROUND Brentuximab vedotin is currently approved for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkins lymphoma who previously received an autologous stem cell transplant or two previous multiagent chemotherapy regimens, and for patients with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-T-cell lymphoma who previously received at least one chemotherapy regimen. A high proportion of patients with CD30-expressing relapsed or refractory lymphomas have durable responses to single-agent brentuximab vedotin and show longer progression-free survival than do patients treated with chemotherapy. In patients with Hodgkins lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, treatment with bendamustine alone only achieves modest improvements in progression-free survival compared with that for chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to explore the safety and clinical activity of the combination of brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkins lymphoma and anaplastic large-T-cell lymphoma. METHODS In this international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial, eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory Hodgkins lymphoma or anaplastic large-T-cell lymphoma, had biopsy-proven CD30-positive tumours, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, and received at least one previous multiagent chemotherapy regimen. In phase 1, patients were assigned following a 3+3 dose-escalation design to one of four cohorts to receive one dose of either 1·2 mg/kg or 1·8 mg/kg of brentuximab vedotin intravenously on day 1 of a 21 day cycle, plus one dose of bendamustine (70 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, or 90 mg/m2) on days 1 and 2 of the treatment cycle. In phase 2, all patients were assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine at the recommended phase 2 dose from phase 1. The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity for phase 1, and the proportion of patients achieving an overall response in phase 2. For both phases 1 and 2, all patients receiving at least one dose of study drug were evaluable for toxicity and all patients completing at least one cycle of therapy were evaluable for response. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01657331. FINDINGS Between July 26, 2012, and May 31, 2017, we enrolled and assigned 65 patients to treatment (64 [98%] with Hodgkins lymphoma and one [2%] with anaplastic large-T-cell lymphoma; 28 [43%] during phase 1 and 37 [57%] during phase 2). In the phase 1 part, the maximum tolerated dose of the combination was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in three (11%) of 28 patients, including grade 4 neutropenia at 1·8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin plus 80 mg/m2 of bendamustine in two (7%) patients and diffuse rash at 1·2 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin plus 70 mg/m2 of bendamustine in one (4%) patient. The recommended phase 2 dose was deemed to be 1·8 mg/kg of brentuximab vedotin and 90 mg/m2 of bendamustine, which are the standard doses of the drugs when given as single agents. In the phase 2 part, an overall response was achieved in 29 (78% [95% CI 62-91]) of 37 patients. Serious adverse events included grade 3 lung infection in five (14%) of 37 patients in the phase 2, and grade 3-4 neutropenia in 16 (25%) of 65 patients across phases 1 and 2. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION This study shows that brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine, with a favourable safety profile, is an active salvage regimen for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkins lymphoma. This salvage regimen can potentially serve as an efficacious and safe alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy before autologous stem cell transplant. FUNDING Seattle Genetics, Lymphoma Research Fund of Columbia University and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and National Institutes of Health.

Epigenetics and Lymphoma: Can We Use Epigenetics to Prime or Reset Chemoresistant Lymphoma Programs?

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a diverse group of lymphocyte-derived neoplasms. Although a heterogeneous group of malignancies, it has become apparent that epigenetic alterations, such as disturbances of DNA methylation and histone modification, are a common occurrence in both B cell and T cell lymphomas, contributing to lymphomagenesis. As a result, the use of epigenetic targeted therapy has been incorporated into various pre-clinical and clinical studies, demonstrating significant efficacy in lymphoma, with vorinostat becoming the first epigenetic therapy to receive FDA approval in any malignancy. The role of epigenetic drugs is evolving, with its potential use in combination therapy as well as a means of overcoming chemotherapy resistance. In this review, we discuss the epigenetic alterations in non-Hodgkin lymphomas as well as provide an overview of current epigenetic drugs and their role in clinical practice, and on-going clinical trials.

Brentuximab vedotin and bendamustine produce high complete response rates in patients with chemotherapy refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

K.L., Gray, T.A., Saulino, A. & Collins, F.S. (1991) Interactions of Sp1 with the human c globin promoter: binding and transactivation of normal and mutant promoters. Blood, 78, 1853–1863. Jane, S.M., Gumucio, D.L., Ney, P.A., Cunningham, J.M. & Nienhuis, A.W. (1993) Methylation-enhanced binding of Sp1 to the stage selector element of the human c-globin gene promoter may regulate development specificity of expression. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 13, 3272–3281. Jiang, Z., Luo, H.Y., Huang, S., Farrell, J.J., Davis, L., Th eberge, R., Benson, K., Riolueang, S., Viprakasit, V., Al-Allawi, N.A.S., € Unal, S., G€ umr€ uk, F., Akar, N., Bas ak, A.N., Osorio, L., Badens, C., Pissard, S., Joly, P., Campbell, A.D., Gallagher, P.G., Steinberg, M.H., Forget, B.G. & Chui, D.H.K. (2016) The genetic basis of asymptomatic codon 8 frame-shift (HBB: c.25_26delAA) b-thalassemia homozygotes. British Journal of Haematology, 172, 958–965. Lek, M., Karczewski, K.J., Minikel, E.V., Samocha, K.E., Banks, E., Fennell, T., O’Donnell-Luria, A.H., Ware, J.S., Hill, A.J., Cummings, B.B., Tukiainen, T., Birnbaum, D.P., Kosmicki, J.A., Duncan, L.E., Estrada, K., Zhao, F., Zou, J., Pierce-Hoffman, E., Berghout, J., Cooper, D.N., Deflaux, N., DePristo, M., Do, R., Flannick, J., Fromer, M., Gauthier, L., Goldstein, J., Gupta, N., Howrigan, D., Kiezun, A., Kurki, M.I., Moonshine, A.L., Natarajan, P., Orozco, L., Peloso, G.M., Poplin, R., Rivas, M.A., RuanoRubio, V., Rose, S.A., Ruderfer, D.M., Shakir, K., Stenson, P.D., Stevens, C., Thomas, B.P., Tiao, G., Tusie-Luna, M.T., Weisburd, B., Won, H.H., Yu, D., Altshuler, D.M., Ardissino, D., Boehnke, M., Danesh, J., Donnelly, S., Elosua, R., Florez, J.C., Gabriel, S.B., Getz, G., Glatt, S.J., Hultman, C.M., Kathiresan, S., Laakso, M., McCarroll, S., McCarthy, M.I., McGovern, D., McPherson, R., Neale, B.M., Palotie, A., Purcell, S.M., Saleheen, D., Scharf, J.M., Sklar, P., Sullivan, P.F., Tuomilehto, J., Tsuang, M.T., Watkins, H.C., Wilson, J.G., Daly, M.J. & MacArthur, D.G.; for the Exome Aggregation Consortium (2016) Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature, 536, 285–291. Menzel, S., Garner, C., Gut, I., Matsuda, F., Yamaguchi, M., Heath, S., Foglio, M., Zelenika, D., Boland, A., Rooks, H., Best, S., Spector, T.D., Farrall, M., Lathrop, M. & Thein, S.L. (2007) A QTL influencing F cell production maps to a gene encoding a zinc-finger protein on chromosome 2p15. Nature Genetics, 39, 1197–1199. Ronchi, A., Nicolis, S., Santoro, C. & Ottolenghi, S. (1989) Increased Sp1 binding mediates erythroid-specific overexpression of a mutated (HPFH) c-globin promoter. Nucleic Acids Research, 17, 10231–10234. Sykes, K. & Kaufman, R. (1990) A naturally occurring c-globin gene mutation enhances SP1 binding activity. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 10, 95–102.

A phase I study of romidepsin and pralatrexate reveals marked activity in relapsed and refractory T-cell lymphoma

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a group of rare malignancies characterized by chemotherapy resistance and poor prognosis. Romidepsin and pralatrexate were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL, exhibiting response rates of 25% and 29% respectively. Based on synergy in preclinical models of PTCL, we initiated a phase 1 study of pralatrexate plus romidepsin in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. This was a single institution dose-escalation study of pralatrexate plus romidepsin designed to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and response rates. Patients were treated with pralatrexate (10 to 25 mg/m2) and romidepsin (12 to 14 mg/m2) on 1 of 3 schedules: every week × 3 every 28 days, every week × 2 every 21 days, and every other week every 28 days. Treatment continued until progression, withdrawal of consent, or medical necessity. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and evaluable for toxicity. Coadministration of pralatrexate and romidepsin was safe, well tolerated, with 3 DLTs across all schedules (grade 3 oral mucositis × 2; grade 4 sepsis × 1). The recommended phase 2 dose was defined as pralatrexate 25 mg/m2 and romidepsin 12 mg/m2 every other week. Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 57% (13/23) across all patients and 71% (10/14) in PTCL. The phase 1 study of pralatrexate plus romidepsin resulted in a high response rate in patients with previously treated PTCL. A phase 2 study in PTCL will determine the efficacy of the combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01947140.

DUAL INHIBITION OF EZH2 AND HDAC IS SYNERGISTIC IN EZH2 DYSREGULATED LYMPHOMAS

rubicin, epirubicin, vinblastine, etoposide, paclitaxel, and topotecan. RTI‐79s PK characteristics are similar to rifabutin and exhibited no overt toxicity in mice at high doses. RTI‐79 did not exacerbate the known cardiotoxicity associated with doxorubicin as evaluated by body weight, CBCs, and heart function via echocardiograms. RTI‐79 rapidly induced intracellular ROS and increased both mitochondrial membrane potential and fission. The anti‐oxidant quercetin antagonized both RTI‐79‐induced ROS and potentiation of doxorubicin cytotoxicity. RTI‐79 reduced expression of the anti‐oxidant regulator protein, Nrf‐2, potentially through upregulation of SYVN1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that interacts directly with Nrf‐2. Moreover, RTI‐79 caused upregulation of proteins involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR). Conclusions: RTI‐79 has a broad spectrum of action in both double‐ and triple‐hit DLBCL and synergizes with many different chemotherapeutics to restore drug sensitivity. RTI‐79 works by increasing intracellular ROS, primarily superoxide, through redox cycling. RTI‐79 triggers the UPR that results in increased ubiquitination and loss of Nrf‐2. Thus, RTI‐79 induces oxidative stress by increasing ROS and reducing Nrf‐ 2s ability to respond to ROS. This unique pleiotropic chemosensitizing mechanism provides a novel approach for treating drug resistant cancers.

Therapeutic Options for Aggressive T-Cell Lymphomas

T-cell lymphomas (TCL) are a rare, heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas associated with very poor prognosis with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Epigenetic-based therapy, such as with histone deacetylase inhibitors, was initially discovered to be efficacious in TCL. In recent years, our understanding of the mechanisms driving T-cell lymphomagenesis has validated the use of epigenetic-based drugs and has also led to the development of novel agents with promising efficacy in pre-clinical and early clinical trials. These new treatments play upon the prominent existence of epigenetic and immune dysfunction present in T-cell lymphomas. With these advances, novel therapeutic regimens combining traditional chemotherapy as well as epigenetic and/or immunotherapy serve as promising future treatment options for TCL. In this review, we discuss the traditional methods of treatment for TCL as well as novel agents and combinations that will likely change the treatment paradigms resulting in better clinical outcomes.

Emerging EZH2 Inhibitors and Their Application in Lymphoma

Purpose of ReviewEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) is histone methyltransferase and catalyzes the methylation of histone 3 lysine 27, a mark of transcriptional repression. Various studies have elucidated the complex role of EZH2 in both normal biology and tumorigenesis. Here, we critically review the emerging role of EZH2 in malignancies, the development of small molecule inhibitors of EZH2, and their application in lymphoma.Recent FindingsActivating mutations and overexpression of EZH2 are found in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). As a result, several EZH2 inhibitors have been developed and entered clinical investigation. Tazemetostat, first-in-class EZH2 inhibitor, demonstrated enhanced clinical activity in mutant follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B cell lymphoma.SummaryWith the early activity noted by tazemetostat in B cell lymphomas, the role of EZH2 inhibition in NHL is becoming more evident. This can be leveraged in future rationale combinations to enhance the activity of EZH2 inhibitors.

Vitamin D and Reduction of Breast Cancer Risk

Vitamin D is not only essential in bone metabolism and calcium homeostasis but also has anticarcinogenic properties in multiple malignancies, including breast cancer. Vitamin D deficiency is a potentially modifiable risk factor that may be easily targeted for breast cancer risk reduction through supplementation. Several epidemiological studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between dietary intake and blood levels of vitamin D and breast cancer risk; however, the results have been inconsistent. Despite some promising findings, further randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplements are needed to determine the role of vitamin D in breast cancer prevention.