Jennifer L. Cleveland

Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings - 2003

This report consolidates previous recommendations and adds new ones for infection control in dental settings. Recommendations are provided regarding 1) educating and protecting dental health-care personnel; 2) preventing transmission of bloodborne pathogens; 3) hand hygiene; 4) personal protective equipment; 5) contact dermatitis and latex hypersensitivity; 6) sterilization and disinfection of patient-care items; 7) environmental infection control; 8) dental unit waterlines, biofilm, and water quality; and 9) special considerations (e.g., dental handpieces and other devices, radiology, parenteral medications, oral surgical procedures, and dental laboratories). These recommendations were developed in collaboration with and after review by authorities on infection control from CDC and other public agencies, academia, and private and professional organizations.

Occupational blood exposures in dentistry: a decade in review.

This review summarizes data from self-reported and observational studies describing the nature, frequency, and circumstances of occupational blood exposures among US dental workers between 1986 and 1995. These studies suggest that, among US dentists, percutaneous injuries have declined steadily over the 10-year period. Data also suggest that, in 1995, most dental workers (dentists, hygienists assistants, and oral surgeons) experienced approximately three injuries per year. Work practices (eg, using an instrument instead of fingers to retract tissue), safer instrumentation or design (eg, self-sheathing needles, changes in dental-unit design), and continued worker education may reduce occupational blood exposures in dentistry further.

Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in an HIV dental clinic.

OBJECTIVE To investigate possible transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in a dental setting. DESIGN A retrospective, descriptive study of dental workers (DWs), patients, and practice characteristics. PATIENTS Two dental workers (DW1 and DW2) with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and MDR-TB. SETTING A hospital-based (Hospital X) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) dental clinic in New York City. METHODS To identify dental patients with tuberculosis (TB), patients treated in the dental clinic at Hospital X during 1990 were cross-matched with those listed in the New York City Department of Health Tuberculosis Registry. Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from both DWs and from dental patients with TB were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and typed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Infection control practices were reviewed. RESULTS M tuberculosis isolates infecting DW1 and DW2 were resistant to isoniazid and rifampin and had identical RFLP patterns. DW1 and DW2 worked in close proximity to each other in a small HIV dental clinic in Hospital X during 1990. Of 472 patients treated in the dental clinic in 1990, 41 (8.7%) had culture-proven M tuberculosis infection. Of these 41, 5 had isolates with resistance patterns similar to both DWs; however, for four available isolates, the RFLP patterns were different from the patterns of the DWs. Sixteen of the 41 patients received dental treatment while potentially infectious. Dental patients were not routinely questioned about TB by dental staff, nor were all dental staff screened routinely for TB. No supplemental environmental measures for TB were employed in the dental clinic in 1990. CONCLUSIONS Our investigation suggests that MDR-TB transmission may have occurred between two DWs in an HIV dental clinic. Opportunities for transmission of TB among dental staff and patients were identified. TB surveillance programs for DWs and appropriate infection control strategies, including worker education, are needed to monitor and minimize exposure to TB in dental settings providing care to patients at risk for TB.

Occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus: risk, prevention, and management ☆

Current data indicate that the risk for transmitting bloodborne pathogens in dental health care settings is low. Pre-exposure hepatitis B vaccination and the use of standard precautions to prevent exposure to blood are the most effective strategies for preventing DHCP from occupational infection with HIV, HBV or HCV. Each dental health care facility should develop a comprehensive written program for preventing and managing occupational exposures to blood that: (1) describes the types of blood exposures that may place DHCP at risk for infection; (2) outlines procedures for promptly reporting and evaluating such exposures; and (3) identifies a health care professional who is qualified to provide counseling and perform all medical evaluations and procedures in accordance with the most current USPHS recommendations. Finally, resources should be available that permit rapid access to clinical care, testing, counseling, and PEP for exposed DHCP and the testing and counseling of source patients.

Evaluating infection control practices among dentists in Vâlcea, Romania, in 1998

OBJECTIVES To evaluate infection control knowledge and practices, provide training on universal-standard precautions (USP), and improve infection control knowledge and practices among dentists. SETTING Private and public dental offices in Vâlcea, Romania. METHODS Information about the use of hepatitis B vaccine, knowledge of and training in USP, perceived risks of disease transmission, and infection control practices was gathered from a sample of dentists through interviews, direct observations, and a survey administered during a training session. RESULTS Interviews among dentists and direct observations of infection control practices revealed that resources were often scarce in public clinics; however, availability of supplies in private or public clinics often did not correlate with adherence to proper infection control. Of 125 registered dentists, 46 (37%) attended the session and completed the survey. Of these, 75% worked in public clinics, 40% in private practices, and a few in both. More than 50% believed that the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) was low in their patients compared with the Romanian population. Only 26% of dentists had received hepatitis B vaccine. Dentists reported a mean of six percutaneous injuries a year. Most (89%) reported that gloves were effective in preventing HBV transmission; 24% wore them for every patient. Most used dry heat sterilization; however, chemical disinfectants were also used. CONCLUSIONS Resources were limited, receipt of hepatitis vaccine was low, and infection control knowledge and practices varied. Training and education are needed regarding the importance of USP, hepatitis B vaccination, and alternative practices when resources are insufficient.

Percutaneous injuries during oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures

PURPOSE This study estimated the frequency of percutaneous injuries (Pls) to dental health-care workers during oral and maxillofacial surgery and examined the circumstances surrounding the incidents. MATERIAL AND METHODS A self-reported, prospective study was conducted to document Pls incurred during oral and maxillofacial surgery performed on outpatients and inpatients over 1-month and 6-month periods, respectively. Among the study variables examined were the numbers of patients treated, number and types of procedures performed, duration of treatment, numbers and types of health care workers at risk, treatment setting, and number of injuries. RESULTS Four injuries were recorded during 362 operating room procedures on 236 inpatients, for a rate of 1.1 Pls per 100 procedures (95% confidence interval: 0.3 to 2.8) and 1.7 Pls per 100 patients (95% confidence interval: 0.5 to 4.6). These four injuries occurred during 1,665 person-procedures (mean number of workers present at each procedure times the total number of procedures) for a rate of 0.24 Pls per 100 person-procedures (95% confidence interval: 0.1 to 1.0). Three injuries took place during fracture reductions; two were caused by surgical wire and the third by a needlepoint Bovie tip. One injury occurred during orthognathic surgery and involved a Woodson elevator. Residents recorded no injuries while treating 521 outpatients (0 Pls per 100 patients; 95% confidence interval: 0 to 0.6). CONCLUSION The results support previous findings that Pls rarely occur during outpatients oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. However, the findings suggest that operating room procedures for oral and maxillofacial surgery that use wire or involve fracture reduction may be associated with an increased risk of injury. Strategies such as using a cork or sponge to cap sharp wires or instruments, and protecting hands and fingers by double gloving, may be used to decrease the risk of Pl.

Occupational blood exposure and HIV infection among oral and maxillofacial surgeons

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine occupational blood exposure and the seroprevalence of HIV infection among oral and maxillofacial surgeons. STUDY DESIGN Three hundred twenty-one oral and maxillofacial surgeons attending an annual meeting voluntarily and anonymously participated in an HIV serosurvey and completed a questionnaire assessing practice and demographic factors. Statistical tests included the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the chi-squared test. RESULTS Eighty percent of those who completed the survey reported one or more blood-skin contacts within the previous month. The mean number of percutaneous injuries within the previous year was 2.36 +/- 0.2. Wire was most commonly associated with percutaneous injuries. Oral maxillofacial surgeons who reported three or more percutaneous injuries performed more fracture reductions than oral and maxillofacial surgeons reporting no percutaneous injuries (p < 0.01). No participant was HIV-positive; the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was 1.15%. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that the occupational risk for HIV infection in oral surgery is very low even though most oral and maxillofacial surgeons experienced blood contact. Associations of percutaneous injuries with fracture reductions and wire may assist in the development of new techniques and equipment to minimize blood exposures.

Factors Associated with Hepatitis B Vaccine Response Among Dentists

The objective of this study was to evaluate personal and immunization factors associated with serologic evidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine response. A study was conducted using data from United States dentists participating from 1987 to 1991 in the Health Screening Program of the American Dental Associations annual session. This study included dentists (n = 507) who (1) received their most recent dose of HBV vaccine within the previous 10 months, (2) completed a core questionnaire, and (3) were tested for HBV markers (HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc) and were found not to have evidence of past or present infection. Non-responders were defined as dentists testing negative for all three markers (n = 100). Responders were defined as dentists having serological evidence of anti-HBs alone (n = 407). Logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship of vaccine response to the variables sex, age, number of vaccine doses, site of vaccination, type of vaccine, and history of hepatitis. Vaccine response was most strongly associated with sex, age, and number of doses. Factors unrelated to vaccine response included type of vaccine and history of hepatitis. Adherence to the recommended number of doses and early vaccination are critical to adequate protection against hepatitis B infection of dentists, who are often exposed to blood and other body fluids.

Total Diagnostic Delay in Oral Cancer may be Related to Advanced Disease Stage at Diagnosis

Article Title and Bibliographic Information Is diagnostic delay related to advanced-stage oral cancer? Gomez I, Seoane J, Varela-Centelles P, Diz P, Takkouche B. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:541-6. Reviewers Jennifer L. Cleveland, DDS, MPH, Gina Thornton-Evans, DDS, MPH Purpose/Question To assess whether total diagnostic delay in oral cancer is related to advanced stages of the disease at diagnosis Source of Funding CIBER en Epidemiologia y Salud Publica” (CIBER-ESP). Spain provided support to one coauthor (B.T.) Type of Study/Design Systematic review with meta-analysis of data Level of Evidence Level 2: Limited–quality patient-oriented evidence Strength of Recommendation Grade Grade B: Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence

CDC weighs in on TADs

Double-package or double-wrap surgical instruments so that the outer package (which might have been contaminated during storage or transport) is removed when setting up for the surgical procedure. 3. Chemical indicators should be on the outside and inside of the package. Some self-seal sterilization pouches have internal chemical indicators printed inside the package. If the pouch does not have an internal chemical indicator, indicator strips can be added to the the instrument package or cassette before sealing. The internal chemical indicator ensures that the sterilizing agent (steam) touched the surface of the instruments. An internal chemical indicator provides a higher level of sterility assurance but is not required at this time. 4. Sterilize. 5. Allow the sterile instruments packages to dry in the autoclave; do not remove wet packages. 6. Store sterile instrument packages in closed or covered cabinets or drawers.