Jennifer L. Robertson

Uncovering How and When Environmental Leadership Affects Employees’ Voluntary Pro-environmental Behavior:

Environmental sustainability at the firm level is largely shaped by and dependent on individual-level pro-environmental behavior. Accordingly, investigating the antecedents of employees’ environmentally friendly behavior has become the focus of much scholarly inquiry. Research in this area has identified environmentally specific transformational leadership as an important antecedent. Little is known, however, about the mechanisms through which this type of leadership affects employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior, and the conditions under which any such effects are enhanced or attenuated. The present research sought to fill this gap. Data from 125 employee dyads revealed that environmentally specific transformational leadership directly and indirectly affects employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior, and the indirect effect is only present for employees who are moderate, high, and very high in environmental locus of control. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report findings from two studies that compare the nature (construct validity) and relative effects (incremental predictive validity) of environmentally specific transformational leadership (ETFL) to general transformational leadership. Design/methodology/approach The nature of ETFL was investigated in an empirical study based on a sample of 185 employees. The relative effects of ETFL were examined in an experimental study based on a sample of 155 university students. Findings A confirmatory factor analysis showed that environmentally specific and general transformational leadership are empirically distinct but related. Findings from the experimental study revealed that compared to general transformational leadership and a control condition, participants exposed to ETFL he confederate leader’s environmental values and priorities more highly and engaged in higher levels of pro-environmental behaviors. Research limitations/implications Questions concerning ecological and external validity arise out of the experimental study. Future research should contrast the relative effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership across various organizational and cultural conditions. Limitations associated with demand characteristics are also of concern in the experimental study. Future research should include an environmental focus in the control condition to exclude any possible threats related to demand characteristics. Practical implications Results from these two studies provide useful information regarding within-organization environmental leadership training by suggesting that maximal individual and organizational environmental change may best be achieved by training leaders to be as specific as possible regarding their values, priorities and goals. Social implications This research suggests that leaders should engage in ETFL behaviors to have the greatest positive impact on corporate environmental sustainability, and by extension, climate change. Originality/value In two separate studies, the construct and incremental predictive validity of ETFL were assessed.