Jennifer M. Eremin

Breast cancer chemoresistance: Emerging importance of cancer stem cells

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have recently been documented in solid tumours. Evidence has suggested that CSCs are involved in carcinogenesis, tumour invasion and metastases, and resistance to various forms of therapies, including chemotherapy. Breast CSCs are characterised by the expression of CD44 but lack of CD24 (CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells). The mechanisms involved in chemoresistance of breast CSCs are complex and not clearly defined. Overexpression of ABC transporters, detoxification enzymes (aldehyde dehydrogenase), low cell turn over rate and the ability to activate the DNA check point response are possibly all involved. Innovative therapies, based on a better understanding of CSCs, should lead to enhanced and long-term cure rates in breast cancer.

Annexins in human breast cancer: Possible predictors of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used in women who have large or locally advanced breast cancers. However, up to 70% of women who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy fail to achieve a complete pathological response in their primary tumour (a surrogate marker of long-term survival). Five proteins, previously identified to be linked with chemoresistance in our in vitro experiments, were identified histochemically in pre-treatment core needle biopsies from 40 women with large or locally advanced breast cancers. Immunohistochemical staining with the five proteins showed no single protein to be a predictor of response to chemotherapy. However, pre-treatment breast cancer specimens that were annexin-A2 positive but annexin-A1 negative correlated with a poor pathological response (p=0.04, Fishers exact test). The mechanisms by which annexins confer chemoresistance have not been identified, but may be due to inhibition of apoptosis. Annexin-A1 has been shown to enhance apoptosis, whilst annexin-A2, by contrast, inhibits apoptosis.

Effects on quality of life, anti-cancer responses, breast conserving surgery and survival with neoadjuvant docetaxel: a randomised study of sequential weekly versus three-weekly docetaxel following neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with primary breast cancer

BackgroundWeekly docetaxel has occasionally been used in the neoadjuvant to downstage breast cancer to reduce toxicity and possibly enhance quality of life. However, no studies have compared the standard three weekly regimen to the weekly regimen in terms of quality of life. The primary aim of our study was to compare the effects on QoL of weekly versus 3-weekly sequential neoadjuvant docetaxel. Secondary aims were to determine the clinical and pathological responses, incidence of Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS), Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS).MethodsEighty-nine patients receiving four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide were randomised to receive twelve cycles of weekly docetaxel (33 mg/m2) or four cycles of 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m2). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast and psychosocial questionnaires were completed.ResultsAt a median follow-up of 71.5 months, there was no difference in the Trial Outcome Index scores between treatment groups. During weekly docetaxel, patients experienced less constipation, nail problems, neuropathy, tiredness, distress, depressed mood, and unhappiness. There were no differences in overall clinical response (93% vs. 90%), pathological complete response (20% vs. 27%), and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates (49% vs. 42%). Disease-free survival and overall survival were similar between treatment groups.ConclusionsWeekly docetaxel is well-tolerated and has less distressing side-effects, without compromising therapeutic responses, Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) or survival outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting.Trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN09184069

Monitoring the response of large (>3 cm) and locally advanced (T3-4, N0-2) breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake

Background and aim99mTc-Sestamibi (MIBI) scintimammography has an established role in the diagnosis of breast cancer. As a functional imaging technique, it may also be useful in assessing the response to chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the technique for this purpose. MethodsTwenty-six patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for large or locally advanced breast cancer were monitored using the tumour to background ratio measured on MIBI scintimammograms. Patients were assessed and the size of the tumour was measured by callipers and ultrasonography before and at the end of treatment. Patients were assessed as complete, partial or non-responders. Following chemotherapy, patients proceeded to surgery with pathological evaluation of the operative specimen. ResultsTwenty-four of the 26 patients showed a reduction in MIBI uptake on completion of chemotherapy. Residual tumour was demonstrated on the scintimammogram in four patients and all had significant residual disease on histology. In the remaining 22 patients, the final scintimammogram was negative, although three patients were assessed as non-responders and had large residual tumours on histology. ConclusionA positive MIBI scan is highly predictive of the presence of significant residual disease on completion of chemotherapy. However, a negative MIBI scan does not rule out the presence of considerable residual tumour. Whereas ultrasound and clinical assessment may underestimate the response to chemotherapy, MIBI imaging tends to overestimate the response.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with large and locally advanced breast cancer : Chemoresistance and prediction of response to drug therapy

Patients with large and locally advanced breast cancer (LLABC) present with a therapeutic challenge and undergo multimodality treatment. Many such patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to surgery. However, a number of these patients do not respond well to NAC and only a percentage (usually less than 30%) obtains a complete or optimal response. A range of mechanisms are believed to be involved in this chemoresistance, including ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter overexpression, dysregulation of apoptosis and possibly increased numbers of cancer stem cells. The chemoresistant processes may be due to more than one mechanism. The ability to predict a response to NAC would be beneficial, targeting expensive and toxic drug treatment to those likely to respond and providing a therapeutic strategy for further post-operative chemotherapy. Currently, many biomarkers have been studied with a view to establishing a predictor of response. However, no single biomarker appears to be effective. Genomics is a novel biotechnological process which is being used to predict response to drug therapy; this work is currently at an early stage of development

Generation in vivo of peptide-specific cytotoxic T cells and presence of regulatory T cells during vaccination with hTERT (class I and II) peptide-pulsed DCs

BackgroundOptimal techniques for DC generation for immunotherapy in cancer are yet to be established. Study aims were to evaluate: (i) DC activation/maturation milieu (TNF-α +/- IFN-α) and its effects on CD8+ hTERT-specific T cell responses to class I epitopes (p540 or p865), (ii) CD8+ hTERT-specific T cell responses elicited by vaccination with class I alone or both class I and II epitope (p766 and p672)-pulsed DCs, prepared without IFN-α, (iii) association between circulating T regulatory cells (Tregs) and clinical responses.MethodsAutologous DCs were generated from 10 patients (HLA-0201) with advanced cancer by culturing CD14+ blood monocytes in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 supplemented with TNF-α [DCT] or TNF-α and IFN-α [DCTI]. The capacity of the DCs to induce functional CD8+ T cell responses to hTERT HLA-0201 restricted nonapeptides was assessed by MHC tetramer binding and peptide-specific cytotoxicity. Each DC preparation (DCT or DCTI) was pulsed with only one type of hTERT peptide (p540 or p865) and both preparations were injected into separate lymph node draining regions every 2–3 weeks. This vaccination design enabled comparison of efficacy between DCT and DCTI in generating hTERT peptide specific CD8+ T cells and comparison of class I hTERT peptide (p540 or p865)-loaded DCT with or without class II cognate help (p766 and p672) in 6 patients. T regulatory cells were evaluated in 8 patients.Results(i) DCTIs and DCTs, pulsed with hTERT peptides, were comparable (p = 0.45, t-test) in inducing peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses. (ii) Class II cognate help, significantly enhanced (p < 0.05, t-test) peptide-specific CD8+T cell responses, compared with class I pulsed DCs alone. (iii) Clinical responders had significantly lower (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test) T regs, compared with non-responders. 4/16 patients experienced partial but transient clinical responses during vaccination. Vaccination was well tolerated with minimal toxicity.ConclusionAddition of IFN-α to ex vivo monocyte-derived DCs, did not significantly enhance peptide-specific T cell responses in vivo, compared with TNF-α alone. Class II cognate help significantly augments peptide-specific T cell responses. Clinically favourable responses were seen in patients with low levels of circulating T regs.

Oncological emergencies: clinical importance and principles of management

Oncological emergencies are common conditions associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Delay in diagnosis and treatment can result in unfavourable outcomes. Cancer itself, cancer-related hormones or cytokines, or treatment effects can cause emergency problems. Febrile neutropaenia, frequently associated with chemotherapy, can lead to life-threatening conditions. Treatment requires systematic evaluation and early empirical antibiotics. Hypercalcaemia of malignancy is the most common metabolic emergency in cancer patients. Non-specific clinical features may cause delay in diagnosis and increase morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes active fluid resuscitation, diuretics and intravenous bisphosphonates. Superior vena cava syndrome is usually caused by external compression. Computerised tomography is useful to confirm diagnosis, evaluate the extent of disease and guide invasive tissue diagnosis. Treatment and prognosis depend on the underlying malignancies. Spinal cord compression is a true emergency due to risk of permanent neurological impairment. Localised back pain is the most common presenting symptom while late presentation of neurological deficit is associated with irreversible outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging is the investigation of choice. Treatment includes corticosteroids, radiotherapy and/or decompressive surgery.SAMPHAO S., EREMIN J.M. & EREMIN O. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care19, 707–713 Oncological emergencies: clinical importance and principles of management Oncological emergencies are common conditions associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Delay in diagnosis and treatment can result in unfavourable outcomes. Cancer itself, cancer-related hormones or cytokines, or treatment effects can cause emergency problems. Febrile neutropaenia, frequently associated with chemotherapy, can lead to life-threatening conditions. Treatment requires systematic evaluation and early empirical antibiotics. Hypercalcaemia of malignancy is the most common metabolic emergency in cancer patients. Non-specific clinical features may cause delay in diagnosis and increase morbidity and mortality. Treatment includes active fluid resuscitation, diuretics and intravenous bisphosphonates. Superior vena cava syndrome is usually caused by external compression. Computerised tomography is useful to confirm diagnosis, evaluate the extent of disease and guide invasive tissue diagnosis. Treatment and prognosis depend on the underlying malignancies. Spinal cord compression is a true emergency due to risk of permanent neurological impairment. Localised back pain is the most common presenting symptom while late presentation of neurological deficit is associated with irreversible outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging is the investigation of choice. Treatment includes corticosteroids, radiotherapy and/or decompressive surgery.

Crucial Contributions by T Lymphocytes (Effector, Regulatory, and Checkpoint Inhibitor) and Cytokines (TH1, TH2, and TH17) to a Pathological Complete Response Induced by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Breast Cancer

The tumour microenvironment consists of malignant cells, stroma, and immune cells. Prominent tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer are associated with a good prognosis and are predictors of a pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The contribution of different T effector/regulatory cells and cytokines to tumour cell death with NAC requires further characterisation and was investigated in this study. Breast tumours from 33 women with large and locally advanced breast cancers undergoing NAC were immunohistochemically (intratumoural, stromal) assessed for T cell subsets and cytokine expression using labelled antibodies, employing established semiquantitative methods. Prominent levels of TILs and CD4+, CD8+, and CTLA-4+ (stromal) T cells and CD8+ : FOXP3+ ratios were associated with a significant pCR; no association was seen with FOXP3+, CTLA-4+ (intratumoural), and PD-1+ T cells. NAC significantly reduced CD4+, FOXP3+, CTLA-4+ (stromal) (concurrently blood FOXP3+, CTLA-4+ Tregs), and PD-1+ T cells; no reduction was seen with CD8+ and CTLA-4+ (intratumoural) T cells. High post-NAC tumour levels of FOXP3+ T cells, IL-10, and IL-17 were associated with a failed pCR. Our study has characterised further the contribution of T effector/regulatory cells and cytokines to tumour cell death with NAC.

The stem cell factor antibody enhances the chemotherapeutic effect of adriamycin on chemoresistant breast cancer cells

BackgroundThe outcome of chemotherapy in breast cancer is strongly influenced by multidrug resistance (MDR). Several surrogate markers of chemoresistance have been identified including - CD24 (cluster differentiation 24) expression, stem cell growth factor (SCF), B-cell lymphocyte protein 2 (Bcl-2) and annexin V. The present study aimed to examine the expression of CD24 in the sensitive breast cancer cell line MCF-7 (Michigan Foudation-7) and MCF-7/adriamycin resistant (MCF-7/AdrRes) cells, and, if minimal effective doses of the anthracycline drug adriamycin (0.579 μM and 88.2 μM) would be enhanced by the antibody to SCF (anti-SCF).MethodsCD24 expression was analysed by flow cytometry. Both Bcl-2 and annexin V protein expression were quantitatively assessed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).ResultsIn MCF-7/AdrRes cells the expression of CD24 was significantly higher compared to MCF-7 cells, 86.6% and 16.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. Bcl-2 expression was significantly increased in the presence of adriamycin and SCF (p < 0.038) and decreased in the presence of adriamycin and anti-SCF. When adriamycin, anti-SCF and SCF were combined or when adriamycin was used alone the decrease in Bcl-2 expression was insignificantly altered. In the presence of both adriamycin and SCF the expression of annexin V was decreased. However, it was significantly increased in the presence of adriamycin and anti-SCF (p < 0.042), as well as adriamycin, anti-SCF and SCF combined.In MCF-7 cells the effect of adriamycin alone or with either SCF, anti-SCF or anti-SCF or SCF combined, did not significantly alter the expression of Bcl-2. However, in the presence of both adriamycin and SCF the expression of annexin V was decreased, but was significantly increased in the presence of adriamycin and anti-SCF (p < 0.001), adriamycin, anti-SCF and SCF combined and adriamycin alone. Our results demonstrate that anti-SCF with low dose of adriamycin reduces Bcl-2 expression in MCF-7/AdrRes cells and increases annexin V expression in both MCF7/AdrRes and MCF-7 cells.ConclusionAdding anti-SCF to the chemotherapeutic regime of adriamycin may strongly enhance its chemotherapeutic effect in the treatment of patients with breast cancer.

Vaccination therapy in malignant disease

Improvement in survival among patients with early malignancy is well established in various cancers. However, long-term survival in those with advanced malignancy has changed little and this poses a major therapeutic challenge to clinicians. Anti-cancer immunotherapy is a novel approach, which is still experimental, but offers a new therapeutic strategy. In this review, we discuss the basic immunological interplay between the host immune system and the tumour, mechanisms of anti-tumour immune responses induced by immunotherapy and key in vivo pilot studies of active specific immunotherapy in various sold cancers, carried out during the last five years.