Jennifer Martindale-Adams

Enhancing the Quality of Life of Dementia Caregivers from Different Ethnic or Racial Groups: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Context Providing care for patients with dementia can pose enormous burdens that may be eased with assistance and support. Needs may differ by race or ethnicity. Contributions The investigators randomly assigned Hispanic, black, and white dementia caregivers to receive written educational materials or an intensive intervention to improve caregiver quality of life. The specific interventions were determined by caregivers, were delivered via trained personnel and telephone support groups, and targeted several dimensions of need. The study found that quality of life improved for Hispanic and white caregivers and for black spousal caregivers in the intervention group but not in the control group. The intervention had no detectable effect on the number of care recipients who were institutionalized. Cautions The study used only a single 6-month follow-up assessment, combined heterogeneous cultures and ethnicities into 3 groups, and excluded some ethnicities. Implications An intensive intervention targeting several dimensions of caregiver need improved caregiver quality of life without an apparent effect on care recipient institutionalization. The effect did not differ by caregiver race or ethnicity. The Editors Caring for a family member with dementia is extremely stressful, contributes to psychiatric and physical illness, and increases the risk for death (1, 2). The accumulating evidence on the personal, social, and health effects of dementia caregiving has generated a broad range of intervention studies, including randomized trials aimed at decreasing the burden and stress of caregiving. Several studies have demonstrated statistically significant effects in reducing caregiver burden, lowering caregiver depression, and delaying institutionalization of care recipients (1, 3, 4) through either targeted interventions that treat a specific caregiver problem, such as depression, or broad-based multicomponent interventions that include counseling, case management, and telephone support. Persistent limitations of caregiver intervention research are the paucity of well-controlled randomized trials, the limited range of outcomes examined, small sample sizes and insufficient power, geographic limitations, inadequate racial or ethnic variation, and a scarcity of comprehensive multicomponent interventions (4). Indeed, none of the 41 randomized clinical trials published in the last 5 years met Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) recommendations for reporting randomized trials (5), and many have serious methodologic problems that call into question the reported findings (4). To address these limitations, the National Institute on Aging and the National Institute of Nursing Research funded a multisite research program designed to develop and test an effective caregiver intervention: the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimers Caregiver Health (REACH) study. We performed the study in 2 phases. In the first phase (REACH I), we tested several different interventions at 6 U.S. sites to identify the most promising approaches to decreasing caregiver burden and depression (6). Results from the study showed that active treatments were superior to control conditions in reducing caregiver burden and that active engagement in skills training statistically significantly reduced caregiver depression (7, 8). The existing literature and findings from REACH I helped guide the design of the REACH II intervention (7, 8). We based the REACH II study on the premise that caregivers can have problems in several areas at varying levels of intensity, and thus, interventions must be responsive to variations in needs among caregivers. The findings from REACH I also suggest that interventions that use active techniques, such as role-playing and interactive practice, are more effective at improving outcomes, such as depression symptoms, compared with more passive methods, such as providing information (7). We based the REACH II intervention on these assumptions and designed the intervention to maximize outcomes by systematically targeting several problem areas, tailored the intervention to respond to the needs of each individual, and actively engaged the caregiver in the intervention process. We hypothesized that participants assigned to the intervention would do better than those in the control group on several indicators of caregiver quality of life, including depression, burden, self-care, and social support and care recipient problem behaviors, and that these differences would be largest among Hispanic or Latino persons because they have lower access to support services (8). In additional analyses, we assessed the effects of treatment on rates of caregiver clinical depression and care recipient institutional placement, as well as the benefits derived from study participation. Methods Caregivers Eligibility criteria for caregivers included the following: Hispanic or Latino, white or Caucasian, or black or African-American race or ethnicity; age 21 years or older; living with or sharing cooking facilities with the care recipient; providing care for a relative with diagnosed Alzheimer disease or related disorders for at least 4 hours per day for at least the past 6 months; and reported distress associated with caregiving (reported at least 2 of the following 6 items at baseline assessment: felt overwhelmed, felt like they often needed to cry, were angry or frustrated, felt they were cut off from family or friends, reported moderate to high levels of general stress, or felt their health had declined). We excluded caregivers who were involved in another caregiver intervention study, who had participated in REACH I, or who had an illness that would prevent 6 months of study participation. Other requirements were logistic, including having a telephone, planning to remain in the geographic area for at least 6 months, and competency in either English or Spanish (see Appendix Table 1 for a detailed list of exclusions). Appendix Table 1. Reasons for Ineligibility Care Recipients To be eligible for the study, caregivers had to confirm that their relative had diagnosed Alzheimer disease or related disorders. In addition, we screened care recipients for a history of severe mental illness, head injury, Parkinson disease, or stroke, and we administered the MiniMental State Examination (MMSE) (9). We excluded patients who were bedbound with MMSE scores of 0 because we felt that our intervention had little to offer caregivers who were caring for such patients. Moreover, being bedbound is a risk factor for institutional placement or death, and we sought to exclude caregivers who were likely to transition out of the caregiving role within the 6-month study. For patients who scored more than 23 on the MMSE or had other conditions, such as head injury, we required a physicians diagnosis of Alzheimer disease or related disorders. Procedures We recruited caregiver and care recipient dyads at 5 sites: Birmingham, Alabama; Memphis, Tennessee; Miami, Florida; Palo Alto, California; and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Enrollment began in June 2002, and follow-up ended in August 2004. Recruitment occurred in memory disorder clinics, primary care clinics, social service agencies, physician offices, churches, and community centers and by using professionally designed brochures, public service announcements on radio stations, newspaper articles, television, targeted newsletters, and community presentations. We translated all intervention materials and assessment instruments into Spanish for the Hispanic or Latino participants by using established techniques for forward-and-back translation and allowing for regional variation in language expression. We used bilingual and bicultural staff at the 3 sites that recruited Hispanic or Latino participants: Palo Alto, Philadelphia, and Miami. At all sites, assessors and interventionists received cultural sensitivity training and were certified before entering the field. Certified assessors were blinded to group assignment of study participants. The institutional review boards of all 5 site institutions and the coordinating center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, approved the study. We obtained written informed consent from all caregivers and from care recipients whenever possible. Caregivers provided consent on behalf of care recipients who could not do so on their own. After telephone screening (n= 995) and baseline assessment (n= 670), we randomly assigned participants (n= 642) to the intervention or control group (Figure). We stratified randomization by using a block size of 2 or 4 within strata defined by the 5 intervention sites, 3 racial or ethnic groups (Hispanic or Latino, white or Caucasian, and black or African American), and 2 caregivercare recipient relationships (spouse or nonspouse). We performed randomization at the coordinating center by using a computer-generated algorithm and a standard protocol for transmitting randomization information between the coordinating center and the study sites. We administered 1 of 3 follow-up batteries, on the basis of care recipient status at follow-up (full follow-up, bereavement battery, or placement battery), to study participants 6 months after randomization when the intervention was completed. To maximize the number of individuals who could be included in the outcome analyses, we ensured that the 3 batteries were as similar as possible. We did not ask caregivers about caregiver burden and care recipient functional status if their care recipients had died; thus, we could not include these caregivers in the primary outcome analysis (10). Figure. Study flow diagram. *See Appendix Table 1 for reasons for ineligibility. See Appendix Table 2 (for reasons for unavailable end points and types of 6-month follow-up. Appendix Table 2. Reasons for Unavailable End Points and Types of 6-Month Follow-up Trial Groups Intervention The intervention involved a range of strategies: provision of informat

Interdisciplinary geriatric primary care evaluation and management: two-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The long‐term efficacy of interdisciplinary outpatient primary care Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) has not been proven. This article focuses on results obtained during the 2 years of the study.

The Cost-Effectiveness of a Behavior Intervention with Caregivers of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

OBJECTIVES: To examine the cost‐effectiveness of a randomized, clinical trial of a home‐based intervention for caregivers of people with dementia.

Translation of a Dementia Caregiver Support Program in a Health Care System—REACH VA

BACKGROUND Based on the National Institute on Aging/National Institute of Nursing Research Resources for Enhancing Alzheimers Caregiver Health (REACH) randomized controlled trial (REACH II), REACH VA (Department of Veterans Affairs) was the first national clinical translation of a proven behavioral intervention for dementia caregivers, running from September 2007 through August 2009. This article describes the population and outcomes of the REACH VA translation of REACH II into the VA. METHODS Clinical staff members from 24 VA Medical Center Home-Based Primary Care programs in 15 states delivered the intervention to stressed caregivers of patients with dementia. Like REACH II, the 6-month REACH VA intervention, structured through a protocol and individualized through a risk assessment, targeted education, support, and skills training to address caregiving risk areas of safety, social support, problem behaviors, depression, and health through 12 individual in-home and telephone sessions and 5 telephone support group sessions. Staff members of the Memphis VA Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee, collected data on burden, depression, health and healthy behaviors, caregiving frustrations, social support, dementia-related behaviors, and time spent providing care and on duty. RESULTS From baseline to 6 months, caregivers reported significantly decreased burden, depression, impact of depression on daily life, caregiving frustrations, and number of troubling dementia-related behaviors. A 2-hour decrease in hours per day on duty approached significance. Caregivers (96%) believed that the program should be provided by the VA to caregivers. CONCLUSIONS This clinical translation achieved outcomes similar to the REACH II randomized controlled trial, providing clinically significant benefits for caregivers of a veteran with a progressive dementing disease. This model of caregiver support can inform public policy in providing assistance to caregivers.

Social marketing as a framework for recruitment: Illustrations from the REACH study

Objectives:Recruitment is often the most challenging aspect of research with older persons. Social marketing—applying marketing techniques to influence the behavior of target audiences to improve their welfare—can help researchers identify factors that influence recruitment. Methods:Illustrations of social marketing principles are provided from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health project, a national Alzheimer’s caregivers study that targeted ethnic and racial minorities. Results:Social marketing principles—the six Ps of participants, product, price, place, promotion, and partners—provide a theoretical framework for organizing and planning recruitment activities, including developing varying strategies to define the target audience (participants), develop the intervention (product), manage time and trouble (price), target the audience, improve accessibility (place), promote the study, and develop and work with partners. Discussion:Strategies to enhance recruitment are often undertaken without a comprehensive plan. Asocial marketing plan provides a framework to map out the steps in recruitment that will be needed and to plan for allocations of time, staff, and resources.

Dementia Caregivers' Most Pressing Concerns

This primary-care-based study was designed to determine needs as identified by the informal caregiver. A total of 165 caregivers identified selected topics of concern. Depressed caregivers requested more information about depression, adult day care, grief, caregiver feelings, and relaxation. Caregivers of individuals with mild dementia requested more information on confusion, driving, patient depression, shadowing, telling the patient and others, grief, and depression. Behavioral (activities, combativeness, communication, confusion) and stress (healthy lifestyle, grief, relaxation, depression) needs were similar across race, gender, and relationship. However, the clinical characteristics of caregivers (depression) and care recipients (cognitive impairment severity) affected behavioral and stress and coping needs.

REACH VA: Moving from Translation to System Implementation

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Resources for Enhancing All Caregivers Health in the Department of Veterans Affairs (REACH VA) has been implemented in the VA system as a national program for caregivers. DESIGN AND METHODS We describe the trajectory of REACH VA from national randomized clinical trial through translation to national implementation. The implementation is examined through the six stages of the Fixsen and Blasé implementation process model: exploration and adoption, program installation, initial implementation, full operation, innovation, and sustainability. Different drivers that move the implementation process forward are important at each stage, including staff selection, staff training, consultation and coaching, staff evaluation, administrative support, program evaluation/fidelity, and systems interventions. RESULTS Caregivers in the REACH VA 4 session intervention currently implemented in the VA had similar outcomes to longer REACH interventions, including Resources for Enhancing Alzheimers Caregivers Health (REACH II). Caregivers experienced significant decreases in burden, depression, anxiety, number of troubling patient behaviors reported, caregiving frustrations, stress symptoms (feeling overwhelmed, feeling like crying, being frustrated as a result of caregiving, being lonely), and general stress. Effect sizes (Cohens d) for these significant variables were between small and medium ranging from .24 to .46. IMPLICATIONS The implementation of REACH VA provides a road map for implementation of other behavioral interventions in health care delivery settings. Lessons learned include the importance of implementing a proven, needed intervention, support from both leadership and clinical staff, willingness to respond to staff and organization needs and modify the intervention while preserving its integrity, and fitting the intervention into ongoing routines and practices.

Easing Reintegration: Telephone Support Groups for Spouses of Returning Iraq and Afghanistan Service Members

Spouses of returning Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom, OIF) and Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom, OEF) military service members report increased depression and anxiety post deployment as they work to reintegrate the family and service member. Reconnecting the family, renegotiating roles that have shifted, reestablishing communication patterns, and dealing with mental health concerns are all tasks that spouses must undertake as part of reintegration. We tested telephone support groups focusing on helping spouses with these basic reintegration tasks. Year-long telephone support groups focused on education, skills building (communication skills, problem solving training, cognitive behavioral techniques, stress management), and support. Spouse depression and anxiety were decreased and perceived social support was increased during the course of the study. In subgroup analyses, spouses with husbands whose injuries caused care difficulties had a positive response to the intervention. However, they were more likely to be depressed, be anxious, and have less social support compared to participants who had husbands who had no injury or whose injury did not cause care difficulty. Study findings suggest that this well-established, high-access intervention can help improve quality of life for military spouses who are struggling with reintegration of the service member and family.

Data and safety monitoring in social behavioral intervention trials: the REACH II experience

Background Psychosocial and behavioral interventions trials targeting a broad range of complex social and behavioral problems such as smoking, obesity and family caregiving have proliferated in the past 30 years. At the same time the use of Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) to monitor the progress and quality of intervention trials and the safety of study participants has increased substantially. Most of the existing literature and guidelines for safety monitoring and reporting of adverse events focuses on medical interventions. Consequently, there is little guidance for investigators conducting social and behavior trials. Purpose This paper summarizes how issues associated with safety monitoring and adverse event reporting were handled in the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimers Caregiver Health (REACH II) program, a multi-site randomized clinical trial, funded by the National Institutes on Aging (NIA) and the National Institutes of Nursing Research (NINR), that tested the efficacy of a multicomponent social/behavioral intervention for caregivers of persons with Alzheimers disease. Methods A task force was formed to define adverse events for the trial and protocols for reporting and resolving events that occurred. The task force conducted a review of existing polices and protocols for data and safety monitoring and adverse event reporting and identified potential risks particular to the study population. An informal survey regarding data and safety monitoring procedures with investigators on psychosocial intervention trials was also conducted. Results Two categories of events were defined for both caregivers and patients; adverse events and safety alerts. A distinction was also made between events detected at baseline assessment and those detected post-randomization. Standardized protocols were also developed for the reporting and resolution of events that occurred and training of study personnel. Results from the informal survey indicated wide variability in practices for data safety and monitoring across psychosocial intervention trials. Conclusions Overall, the REACH II experience demonstrates that existing guidelines regarding safety monitoring and adverse event reporting pose unique challenges for social/behavioral intervention trials. Challenges encountered in the REACH II program included defining and classifying adverse events, defining “resolution” of adverse events and attributing causes for events that occurred. These challenges are highlighted and recommendations for addressing them in future studies are discussed.

A Trial of Dementia Caregiver Telephone Support

The purpose of this study was to determine if telephone support groups for dementia caregivers have an effect on bother with patient behaviours, burden, depression, and general well-being. The randomized controlled trial compared telephone support groups (15 groups of 5 or 6 caregivers) with control groups (print materials). Groups met 14 times over 1 year. The 1-hour sessions included content on education, coping skills, and support. Data were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. The sample comprised 154 caregivers, 77 per arm, providing care to veterans with dementia or a veteran caregiver. Bother was found to differ significantly at baseline. There were no significant treatment effect differences between study arms. Participants anecdotally reported improvement. It was concluded that telephone support groups are an efficient way to interact with caregivers. Further research should test different models of care. Interventions that are targeted to specific needs or occur frequently may provide better support for caregivers of individuals with a worsening condition.