Jennifer N. Cooper

Feasibility of a Nonoperative Management Strategy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Children

BACKGROUND For decades, urgent operation has been considered the only appropriate management of acute appendicitis in children. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. STUDY DESIGN A prospective nonrandomized clinical trial of children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis comparing nonoperative management with urgent appendectomy was performed. The primary result was 30-day success rate of nonoperative management. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of disability days, missed school days, hospital length of stay, and measures of quality of life and health care satisfaction. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were enrolled during October 2012 to October 2013; 30 chose nonoperative management and 47 chose surgery. There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics. The immediate and 30-day success rates of nonoperative management were 93% (28 of 30) and 90% (27 of 30). There was no evidence of progression of appendicitis to rupture at the time of surgery in the 3 patients for whom nonoperative management failed. Compared with the surgery group, the nonoperative group had fewer disability days (3 vs 17 days; p < 0.0001), returned to school more quickly (3 vs 5 days; p = 0.008), and exhibited higher quality of life scores in both the child (93 vs 88; p = 0.01) and the parent (96 vs 90; p = 0.03), but incurred a longer length of stay (38 vs 20 hours; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children is feasible, with a high 30-day success rate and short-term benefits that include quicker recovery and improved quality of life scores. Additional follow-up will allow for determination of longer-term success rate, safety, and cost effectiveness.

Effectiveness of Patient Choice in Nonoperative vs Surgical Management of Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

IMPORTANCE Current evidence suggests that nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis is safe, but overall effectiveness is determined by combining medical outcomes with the patients and familys perspective, goals, and expectations. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of patient choice in nonoperative vs surgical management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective patient choice cohort study in patients aged 7 to 17 years with acute uncomplicated appendicitis presenting at a single pediatric tertiary acute care hospital from October 1, 2012, through March 6, 2013. Participating patients and families gave informed consent and chose between nonoperative management and urgent appendectomy. INTERVENTIONS Urgent appendectomy or nonoperative management entailing at least 24 hours of inpatient observation while receiving intravenous antibiotics and, on demonstrating improvement of symptoms, completion of 10 days of treatment with oral antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the 1-year success rate of nonoperative management. Successful nonoperative management was defined as not undergoing an appendectomy. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of the rates of complicated appendicitis, disability days, and health care costs between nonoperative management and surgery. RESULTS A total of 102 patients were enrolled; 65 patients/families chose appendectomy (median age, 12 years; interquartile range [IQR], 9-13 years; 45 male [69.2%]) and 37 patients/families chose nonoperative management (median age, 11 years; IQR, 10-14 years; 24 male [64.9%]). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The success rate of nonoperative management was 89.2% (95% CI, 74.6%-97.0%) at 30 days (33 of 37 children) and 75.7% (95% CI, 58.9%-88.2%) at 1 year (28 of 37 children). The incidence of complicated appendicitis was 2.7% in the nonoperative group (1 of 37 children) and 12.3% in the surgery group (8 of 65 children) (P = .15). After 1 year, children managed nonoperatively compared with the surgery group had fewer disability days (median [IQR], 8 [5-18] vs 21 [15-25] days, respectively; P < .001) and lower appendicitis-related health care costs (median [IQR],

Morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal atresia.

4219 [

Does delay in appendectomy affect surgical site infection in children with appendicitis

2514-

High failure rate of nonoperative management of acute appendicitis with an appendicolith in children

7795] vs

Prior opportunities to identify abuse in children with abusive head trauma

5029 [

Variation in Utilization of Computed Tomography Imaging at Tertiary Pediatric Hospitals

4596-

Does timing of neonatal inguinal hernia repair affect outcomes

5482], respectively; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE When chosen by the family, nonoperative management is an effective treatment strategy for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, incurring less morbidity and lower costs than surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01718275.

Single-stage versus multi-stage pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: practice trends and outcomes in infants.

BACKGROUND This study reports national estimates of population characteristics and outcomes for patients with esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and evaluates the relationships between hospital volume and outcomes. METHODS Patients admitted within 30 days of life who had International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedure codes relevant to EA/TEF during 1999-2012 were identified with the Pediatric Health Information System database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes, including predictors of in-hospital mortality, were examined up to 2 years after EA/TEF repair. RESULTS We identified 3,479 patients with EA/TEF treated at 43 childrens hospitals; 37% were premature and 83.5% had ≥1 additional congenital anomaly, with cardiac anomalies (69.6%) being the most prevalent. Within 2 years of discharge, 54.7% were readmitted, 5.2% had a repeat TEF ligation, 11.4% had a repeat operation for their esophageal reconstruction, and 11.7% underwent fundoplication. In-hospital mortality was 5.4%. Independent predictors of mortality included lower birth weight, congenital heart disease, other congenital anomalies, and preoperative mechanical ventilation. There was no relationship between hospital volume and mortality or repeat TEF ligation. CONCLUSION This study describes population characteristics and outcomes, including predictors of in-hospital mortality, in EA/TEF patients treated at childrens hospitals across the United States. Across these hospitals, rates of mortality or repeat TEF ligation were not dependent on hospital volume.

Variability in noncardiac surgical procedures in children with congenital heart disease

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between time from diagnosis to operation and surgical site infection (SSI) in children undergoing appendectomy. METHODS Pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy in 2010-2012 were included. We collected data on patient demographics; length of symptoms; times of presentation, admission and surgery; antibiotic administration; operative findings; and occurrence of SSI. RESULTS 1388 patients were analyzed. SSI occurred in 5.1% of all patients, 1.4% of simple appendicitis (SA) patients, and 12.4% of complex appendicitis (CA) patients. SSI did not increase significantly as the length of time between ED triage and operation increased (all patients, p=0.51; SA patients, p=0.91; CA patients, p=0.44) or with increased time from admission to operation (all patients, p=0.997; SA patients, p=0.69; CA patients, p=0.96). However, greater length of symptoms was associated with an increased risk of SSI (p<0.05 for all, SA and CA patients). In univariable analysis, obesity, and increased admission WBC count were each associated with significantly increased SSI. In multivariable analysis, only CA was a significant risk factor for SSI (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION We found no significant increase in the risk of SSI related to delay in appendectomy. A future multi-institutional study is planned to confirm these results.