Jennifer S. Chang

Hippocampal Dose With Radiosurgery for Multiple Intracranial Targets The Rationale for Proactive Beam Shaping

Stereotactic radiosurgery provides conformal treatment of intracranial lesions, but when multiple lesions are treated, cumulative dose to structures such as the hippocampi may be increased. We analyzed hippocampal dose for patients treated with radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases. We then investigated a means to minimize hippocampal dose. We randomly selected 8 patients treated with single-session, frame-based radiosurgery for 6 to 12 intracranial metastases. Standard planning was employed to deliver 16 to 20 Gy to each lesion without hippocampal avoidance. Each case was replanned using the software’s dynamic shaping function to minimize direct beam hippocampal irradiation, while maintaining conformality and target coverage. With standard planning, the maximum hippocampal dose varied from 0.8 to 9.0 Gy but was >3 Gy only when a lesion was <10 mm from the hippocampus. There was no clear correlation between hippocampal dose and the number or the total volume of lesions. Replanning with direct beam avoidance decreased the mean hippocampal dose by an average of 35% but increased treatment time by a mean of 20%. Sparing was most pronounced when the closest lesion was in close proximity to the hippocampus. This is the first study reporting hippocampal dose for multilesion intracranial radiosurgery. It illustrates that when multiple intracranial targets are treated with radiosurgery, substantial hippocampal dose can result. Active beam shielding and optimization can lower hippocampal dose, especially with lesions <10 mm from the hippocampus. These results raise the prospect that the risk of neurocognitive side effects may be further decreased with a hippocampal-sparing approach.

Estimating the probability of underdosing microscopic brain metastases with hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Whole-brain radiation for brain metastases can result in cognitive side effects. Hippocampal-sparing techniques have been developed to decrease morbidity, but they carry the risk of underdosing lesions near the hippocampus due to the unavoidable dose gradient from the hippocampal surface to the prescription isodose surface. This study examines the impact of variable levels of hippocampal sparing on the underdosing of potential brain metastases. MATERIALS/METHODS Helical intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were developed for hippocampal-sparing whole-brain treatment. For all plans, 30Gy was prescribed in 10 fractions to result in mean hippocampal doses of 6-12Gy. From a series of expanded shells, we determined the distance from the hippocampus at which the parenchyma would receive less than specified doses. Then, using published data, a mathematical model was constructed to predict the incident probability of potential brain metastases receiving different doses for different levels of hippocampal sparing. RESULTS Whole-brain radiation plans were able to spare the hippocampi to mean doses of 7-12Gy under our planning constraints; more stringent constraints compromised brain coverage. The dose gradients were ∼4% per mm, regardless of the hippocampal constraint, and they decreased sharply by a factor of almost 4 at approximately 15mm from the hippocampi. A mathematical model was constructed and combined the plan information with published data on the distribution of brain metastases, to determine the percentage of potential brain metastases receiving specified doses, as a function of technique and level of hippocampal sparing. CONCLUSIONS Our results describe the characteristics of an array of hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiation dose distributions. These can be used as a decision-making guideline for weighing the benefit of decreased dose to the hippocampi against the cost of decreased dose to potential brain metastases when deciding on a hippocampal-sparing whole-brain irradiation treatment approach.

Evaluation of popular drug information resources on clinically useful and actionable pharmacogenomic information

BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomics is the study of how genes affect a persons response to drugs. This descriptive study assessed whether popular drug information resources provide clinically useful pharmacogenomic (PGx) information. METHODS Four resources (package inserts, Lexicomp, Micromedex 2.0, and Epocrates) were evaluated for information about twenty-seven drugs. RESULTS There was wide variability of PGx information. Whereas Lexicomp included relevant PGx biomarker information for all 27 drugs, Epocrates did in less than 50% of the drugs. None of the resources had monographs that fully incorporated Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) recommendations in more than 30% of the drugs. CONCLUSION Lexicomp appears to be most useful PGx drug information resource, but none of the resources are sufficient.

Technical Note: Feasibility study of titanium markers in choroidal melanoma localization for proton beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of the use of titanium fiducial markers to minimize the metallic artifact seen with tantalum markers which causes significant distortion on postoperative orbital CT scans. METHOD We designed and constructed the titanium markers in the shop of Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis, CA. The markers were placed on an eyeball phantom. The eyeball was inserted into the Rando phantom in the orbital space. The Rando phantom was imaged with coplanar x rays on Nucletron simulator at UCSF, on digital panel on the eye beam line at CNL eye treatment facility and on CT scanner at UCSF. RESULTS The titanium markers can be clearly seen on the hard copy of x rays and on digital panel. The CT scan of an orbit using tantalum markers on the right eye and titanium markers on the left eye shows the metal artifact from tantalum markers. Titanium markers show very little distortion on CT images. CONCLUSION The present study describes these markers and their relative benefit in comparison with tantalum marker, which has been used for localizing ocular tumor for decades.