Jennifer Yeagle

Impact of Cochlear Implants on the Functional Health Status of Older Adults

Objectives To assess the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life changes in older adults aged 50 years and above.

Cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral Ménière's syndrome.

Objective To evaluate the indications and clinical outcomes (audiologic and vestibular) in patients with Ménières syndrome who have undergone cochlear implantation. Study Design This is a retrospective review of patients at a large tertiary academic medical center. Patients Nine patients were included in the study with AAO-HNS criteria for diagnosis of Ménières syndrome as well as bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss as an indication for undergoing cochlear implantation. Audiologic criteria for implantation were considered in the context of speech recognition performance with well-fit, powerful hearing aids noting large fluctuations in performance levels in some patients. In all cases, the poorer hearing ear was implanted. Seven subjects had bilateral disease and had progressed to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The average age of the patients was 61 years. Six patients had undergone previous surgery to control vertigo, including endolymphatic shunt surgery and vestibular nerve section. No patient had received previous treatment with intra-tympanic gentamicin. Symptoms of Ménières syndrome had been present in all patients for at least 10 years before implantation. Intervention Cochlear Implantation. Main Outcome Measures Pre- and Postoperative audiometric scores (monosyllable words/phonemes, Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) sentences, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) in quite/noise (+10 db)), pre- and postoperative vestibular symptoms (number of vestibular attacks, aural fullness, tinnitus). Results Follow-up after implantation ranged from 1 to 5 years. Average 6 month postimplantation scores were: monosyllable words/phonemes = 52%/65%, CID sentences = 82%, HINT in quiet/noise = 70%/50%. Average 1-year postimplant scores were: monosyllable words/phonemes = 60%/76%, CID sentences = 97%, HINT in quiet/noise = 89%/78%. Postoperative speech recognition scores were, on average, substantially greater than preoperative scores. While there were few complications associated with implantation, some patients experienced alterations in their implant performance in association with fluctuations in vestibular symptoms. Conclusions Patients with advanced binaural involvement with Ménières Disease may present a challenge to conventional criteria for cochlear implant candidacy because of fluctuating symptoms. We observed significant benefit over baseline in a consecutive series of patients with Ménières syndrome who progressed to bilateral, severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss and underwent cochlear implantation. Further, previous vestibular surgery, including labyrinthectomy, does not contraindicate cochlear implantation.

Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.

Objective: To investigate the results of cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) and bilateral vestibular schwannoma. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Three academic tertiary referral centers. Patients: Seven patients with NF2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma who lost hearing in at least one ear after treatment of their tumor (surgery or radiation therapy). Intervention: Cochlear implantation after treatment of their vestibular schwannoma. Main Outcome Measure: Postimplantation audiometric scores (pure-tone average thresholds, consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words/phonemes, Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) sentences, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) quiet/noise, and Monosyllable, Trochee, Spondee (MTS) recognition/category tests), patient satisfaction, and device use patterns. Results: The average age at implantation was 40 years (range, 16-57 yr). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 88 months after implantation. Three patients were implanted with residual useful hearing in the contralateral ear, whereas four patients had no hearing in the contralateral ear. Hearing loss was due to surgical excision of tumor (n = 5) or gamma-knife radiotherapy (n = 2). Postactivation pure-tone average thresholds in the implanted ear ranged from 30 to 55 dB (average, 32.5 dB), although speech reception testing varied considerably among subjects. Despite this variability, all patients continue to use the device on a daily basis. Conclusion: In selected cases of deafness in patients with NF2 where there has been anatomic preservation of the auditory nerve after acoustic neuroma resection or radiation therapy, cochlear implantation may offer some improvement in communication skills, including the possibility of open-set speech communication in some patients. These results compare favorably to the auditory brainstem implant offering an alternative for hearing rehabilitation in patients with NF2.

Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation in Older Adults: Literature Review and Proposal of a Conceptual Framework

To review studies investigating cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in older adults, and to develop a conceptual framework demonstrating important interactions between characteristics of hearing disability, aging, and the CI intervention.

Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear

Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that patients with residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear had the same cochlear implant benefit whether the implanted ear had profound or severe hearing loss. Design: A retrospective chart review of adult cochlear implant recipients with postlingual hearing loss. Patients were categorized according to the pure-tone average of the implanted and contralateral ears as (a) bilateral profound, (b) severe-profound, and (c) bilateral severe. The results of a test battery of spoken language measures were compared among patients belonging to these hearing categories at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, using a t-test and multivariate regression analyses. Results: The presence of residual hearing in one or both ears was associated with significantly higher postoperative speech perception scores compared with participants with bilateral profound hearing loss. Among participants with similar amounts of residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear, however, there was no difference in speech recognition scores between those with profound and those with severe hearing loss in the implanted ear. Conclusions: Among participants with asymmetric hearing loss, there is no additional benefit to implanting the better-hearing ear that can be preserved for use with a hearing aid for better speech understanding in noise and sound localization. These results suggest that the additional benefit received by patients with residual hearing is mediated by trophic effects on crossed pathways in the central nervous system and is independent of the preoperative functional status of the implanted ear.

Improvements in visual attention in deaf infants and toddlers after cochlear implantation

The aims of this study were to examine the development of visual attention in deaf and hearing infants and toddlers, and assess whether improvements in visual attention were observed in the deaf sample after 12 months of cochlear implantation. A novel puppet task, based on a measure of attention developed with normally hearing infants, was administered to 88 deaf and 42 normal-hearing children at three time points: baseline, six and 12 months post-implantation for the deaf sample. At baseline, deaf children demonstrated significantly more inattentive looks during the puppet skits than hearing children, and these looks were of longer duration, confirming the results of prior studies which have documented deficits in visual attention in deaf children. Longitudinal analyses showed significant decreases in the frequency of inattentive looks for both groups, with a significant decrease in the duration of inattentive looks only for the cochlear implant group. The largest decrease in duration of off-task looks occurred at six months post-implantation, indicating that improvements occurred rapidly after restoration of auditory input. These results provided support for the ‘division of labor’ hypothesis which suggests that deaf children with no access or limited access to sound must monitor their environment visually, making it difficult for them to focus and attend to specific tasks. Cochlear implantation appeared to alter the developmental trajectory of visual attention in a positive manner. The clinical implications of visual attention for the development of early language, reading and social skills are discussed.

Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.

Objectives/Hypothesis: The study tested the hypothesis that among patients with similar levels of residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear, speech perception outcome is the same whether or not the implanted ear has profound or severe levels of hearing loss.

Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study

Objective: To evaluate mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants who are enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDACI) multicenter study. Study Design: Longitudinal evaluation during 24 months of speech processor maps of children with cochlear implants prospectively enrolled in the study. Setting: Six tertiary referral centers. Subjects: One hundred eighty-eight children enrolled in the CDACI study who were 5 years old or younger at the time of enrollment. Of these children, 184 received unilateral implants, and 4 received simultaneous bilateral implants. Intervention: Children attended regular mapping sessions at their implant clinic as part of the study protocol. Maps were examined for each subject at 4 different time intervals: at device activation and 6, 12, and 24 months postactivation. Main Outcome Measures: Mean C/M levels (in charge per phase) were compared for 4 different time intervals, for 3 different devices, for 6 different implant centers, and for children with normal and abnormal cochleae. Results: All 3 types of implant devices demonstrate significant increases in C/M levels between device activation and the 24-month appointment. Significant differences in mean C/M levels were noted between devices. Children with cochlear anomalies demonstrate significantly greater C/M levels than children with normal cochleae. Conclusion: The CDACI study has enabled us to evaluate the mapping characteristics of pediatric patients who use 3 different devices and were implanted at a variety of implant centers. Analysis of such data enables us to better understand the mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants.

Rehabilitation and Psychosocial Determinants of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Older Adults

Objective: The cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to be associated with better hearing, cognitive abilities, and functional independence. There is variability however in how much benefit each recipient derives from his or her CI. This study’s primary objective is to determine the effects of individual and environmental characteristics on CI outcomes. Design: Seventy-six adults who developed postlingual severe to profound hearing loss and received their first unilateral CI at 65 years and older were eligible for the study. Fifty-five patients were asked to participate and the 33 (60%) with complete data were classified as “group 1.” The remaining patients were placed in “group 2.” Primary outcomes included changes in quality of life and open-set speech perception scores. Independent variables included age, health status, trait emotional intelligence (EI), comfort with technology, and living arrangements. Survey outcomes and audiological measurements were collected prospectively at 12 months after surgery, whereas preoperative data were collected retrospectively. Comparisons between groups 1 and 2 were made. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Spearman correlations, Mann–Whitney tests, Chi-square tests, and linear regressions were performed only on group 1 data. Results: Having a CI was associated with improved quality of life and speech perception. Familiarity with electronic tablets was associated with increased 12-month postoperative AzBio gains when adjusted for preoperative AzBio scores (adjusted p = 0.019), but only marginally significant when a family-wise error correction was applied (p = 0.057). Furthermore, patients who lived with other people scored at least 20 points higher on the AzBio sentences than those who lived alone (adjusted p = 0.046). Finally, consultation with an auditory rehabilitation therapist was associated with higher self-reported quality of life (p = 0.035). Conclusion: This study suggests that in a cohort of older patients cochlear implantation is associated with a meaningful increase in both quality of life and speech perception. Furthermore, it suggests the potential importance of adjunct support and services, including the tailoring of CI rehabilitation sessions depending on the patient’s familiarity with technology and living situation. Investment in rehabilitation and other services is associated with improvements in quality of life and may mitigate clinical, individual and social risk factors for poor communication outcome.