Jenny Bird

High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation as consolidation therapy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after previous autologous stem-cell transplantation (NCRI Myeloma X Relapse [Intensive trial]): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Relapsed multiple myeloma has no standard treatment, and the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has not been fully defined. We aimed to compare high-dose melphalan plus salvage ASCT with cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had previously undergone ASCT. METHODS This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study recruited patients aged at least 18 years with multiple myeloma who needed treatment for first progressive or relapsed disease at least 18 months after a previous ASCT from 51 centres across the UK. Before randomisation, eligible patients received bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) induction therapy and then underwent peripheral blood stem-cell mobilisation and harvesting if applicable. Eligible patients (with adequate stem-cell harvest) were randomly assigned (1:1), using an automated telephone randomisation line, to either high-dose melphalan 200 mg/m(2) plus salvage ASCT or oral cyclophosphamide (400mg/m(2) per week for 12 weeks). Randomisation was stratified by length of first remission or plateau and response to PAD re-induction therapy. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00747877, and EudraCT, number 2006-005890-24. FINDINGS Between April 16, 2008, and Nov 19, 2012, 297 patients were registered, of whom 293 received PAD re-induction therapy. Between Aug 26, 2008, and Nov 16, 2012, 174 patients with sufficient PBSCs were randomised to salvage ASCT (n=89) or cyclophosphamide (n=85). After a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 19-42), median time to progression was significantly longer in the salvage ASCT than in the cyclophosphamide group (19 months [95% CI 16-25] vs 11 months [9-12]; hazard ratio 0·36 [95% CI 0·25-0·53]; p<0·0001). Frequently reported (in >10% of patients) grade 3-4 adverse events with PAD induction, salvage ASCT, and cyclophosphamide were: neutropenia (125 [43%] of 293 patients after PAD, and 63 [76%] of 83 patients in the salvage ASCT group vs 11 [13%] of 84 patients in the cyclophosphamide group), thrombocytopenia (150 [51%] after PAD, and 60 [72%] vs four [5%], respectively), and peripheral neuropathy (35 [12%] after PAD, and none vs none, respectively). INTERPRETATION This study provides evidence for the improved efficacy of high-dose melphalan plus salvage ASCT when compared with cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma eligible for intensive therapy, which might help to guide clinical decisions regarding the management of such patients. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.

UK Myeloma Forum (UKMF) and Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG): guidelines for the investigation of newly detected M‐proteins and the management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)

Avon Haematology Unit, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, Department of Haematology, St Helier Hospital, Carshalton, Surrey, UK, Department of Haematology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, Department of Medicine, Malmo University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden, Division of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, Department Haematology, University College, London, Glasgow Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK, Department of Haematology, NTNU/St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Department of Haematology, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Department of Haematology Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark, and Myeloma UK.

Molecular detection of clonally rearranged cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell harvests from multiple myeloma patients.

Summary. Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are increasingly used for autologous reconstitution following high‐dose chemotherapy in multiple myeloma but it is unclear whether these cells are less likely to be contaminated with malignant cells than bone marrow (BM). We have investigated this using immunoglobulin heavy‐chain (IgH) gene fingerprinting, a polymerase chain reaction based technique with a sensitivity of 0.1–0.01% (10‐3 ‐ 10‐4). We have looked for patient‐specific IgH rearrangements in leukapheresis samples from eight myeloma patients undergoing PBPC harvest. Seven were in first remission (six partial, one complete) and one in second complete remission. Mobilization of PBPC was accomplished using cyclophosphamide (4 or 7 mg/m2) and rhG‐ or GM‐CSF. Between two and five leukaphereses were performed in each patient. Patient‐specific IgH rearrangements were identified in diagnostic BM in all patients and bands of identical size were found in one or more leukaphereses from 6/8 patients. Overall, 14/32 leukaphereses were shown to be contaminated. Two patients who showed contamination of at least one PBPC harvest had BM harvests in which contaminating cells were not detectable, suggesting that PBPC are not necessarily less likely to be contaminated than marrow stem cells.

A randomized study of VAD therapy with either concurrent or maintenance interferon in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

This randomized study was designed to determine whether response to VAD chemotherapy could be prolonged by using rh α‐2b‐interferon (IFN) at a dose of 3 mU three times per week, either concurrently with VAD (VIC) or as maintenance after completion of VAD (VIF). Maintenance IFN was given for 9 months in order for the duration of IFN therapy to be similar in both groups. 72 patients were randomized between December 1988 and August 1993. The majority of patients had poor prognostic features. The objective response rate was similar in each arm, 78% in VIF and 77% in VIC. Of the 56 responders, 33 have relapsed, three died in remission, and 18 proceeded to high‐dose therapy, withdrew for other reasons or were lost to follow‐up and were censored from analysis at the relevant time point. Only two patients remain in remission (both in partial remission). Median PFS was 15 months for both VIF and VIC, compared with 16.5 months for a historic control group treated with VAD alone (n.s.), The estimated median survival in VIF was 43 months and in VIC 22 months, compared with 45 months in the historic controls (n.s.). These findings indicate that neither maintenance nor concurrent IFN prolongs response to VAD.

Race and Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Blacks are twice as likely to develop and die from multiple myeloma (MM), and are less likely to receive an autologous hematopoietic-cell transplant (AHCT) for MM compared to Whites. The influence of race on outcomes of AHCT for MM is not well described. We compared the probability of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease progression, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among Black (N=303) and White (N=1892) recipients of AHCT for MM, who were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) from 1995 to 2005. The Black cohort was more likely to be female, and had better Karnofsky performance scores, but lower hemoglobin and albumin levels at diagnosis. Black recipients were younger and more likely to be transplanted later in their disease course. Disease stage and treatment characteristics prior to AHCT were similar between the 2 groups. Black and White recipients had similar probabilities of 5-year OS (52% versus 47%, P=.19) and PFS (19% versus 21%, P=.64) as well as cumulative incidences of disease progression (72% versus 72%, P=.97) and NRM (9% versus 8%, P=.52). In multivariate analyses, race was not associated with any of these endpoints. Black recipients of AHCT for MM have similar outcomes compared to Whites, suggesting that the reasons underlying lower rates of AHCT in Blacks need to be studied further to ensure equal access to effective therapy.

The effect of salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation on overall survival in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (final results from BSBMT/UKMF Myeloma X Relapse [Intensive]): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND The Myeloma X trial previously reported improved durability of response (time to disease progression) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) compared with oral cyclophosphamide in patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after a first ASCT. We report the final overall survival results of the trial. METHODS BSBMT/UKMF Myeloma X was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at 51 centres in the UK. Eligible patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after a previous ASCT were re-induced with intravenous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, 11), intravenous doxorubicin (9 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-4), and oral dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1-4, 8-11, and 15-18 during cycle 1 and days 1-4 during cycles 2-4), with supportive care as per local institutional protocols before randomisation in a 1:1 ratio to either high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) and salvage ASCT or weekly oral cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m(2) per week for 12 weeks). Randomisation was by permuted blocks stratified by length of first remission and response to re-induction treatment. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression; the study was also powered to detect a difference in the secondary endpoint, overall survival. Further secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving an objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, toxic effects and safety, pain, and quality of life. Prespecified exploratory endpoints included time to second objective disease progression (PFS2). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00747877, and the European Clinical Trials Database, number 2006-005890-24, and is now in long-term follow-up. FINDINGS Between April 16, 2008, and Nov 19, 2012, 297 patients were registered into the study and 174 were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose melphalan and salvage ASCT (n=89) or oral weekly cyclophosphamide (n=85). 173 (58%) of 297 patients relapsed after more than 24 months from first ASCT. 75 (43%) of 174 randomised patients had died at follow-up: salvage ASCT (n=31 [35%]) versus oral weekly cyclophosphamide (n=44 [52%]). Updated time to disease progression shows continued advantage in the salvage ASCT group compared with the weekly cyclophosphamide group (19 months [95% CI 16-26] vs 11 months [9-12]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·31-0·64] log-rank p<0·0001). Median overall survival was superior in the salvage ASCT group compared with weekly cyclophosphamide group (67 months [95% CI 55-not estimable] vs 52 months [42-60]; log-rank p=0·022; HR 0·56 [0·35-0·90], p=0·0169). Time to second objective disease progression was superior in the salvage ASCT group compared with the weekly cyclophosphamide group (67 months [52-not estimable] vs 35 months [31-43]; HR 0·37 [0·24-0·57], log-rank p<0·0001). During extended follow-up, no further treatment-related or treatment-unrelated adverse events were reported. 15 second primary malignancies were reported in 12 patients (salvage ASCT [n=7] vs oral weekly cyclophosphamide [n=5]). The cumulative incidence of second primary malignancies at 60 months after trial entry was 5·2% (2·1-8·2). INTERPRETATION Salvage ASCT increases overall survival during consolidation of re-induction treatment in patients with multiple myeloma at first relapse after a first ASCT. The delay of salvage ASCT to third-line treatment or later might not confer the same degree of advantage as seen with salvage ASCT at first relapse. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, Janssen-Cilag, and Chugai Pharma UK.

Guidelines on the diagnosis and investigation of AL amyloidosis.

Julian D. Gillmore, Ashutosh Wechalekar, Jenny Bird, Jamie Cavenagh, Stephen Hawkins, Majid Kazmi, Helen J. Lachmann, Philip N. Hawkins and Guy Pratt on behalf of the BCSH Committee National Amyloidosis Centre, Division of Medicine, UCL, London, Department of Haematology, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, Department of Haematology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, Department of Haematology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, Departments of Oncology and Haematology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, and Department of Haematology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Survival for patients with chronic leukemias in the US and Britain: Age-related disparities and changes in the early 21st century

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are highly treatable conditions occurring primarily in older patients. Lower survival among older people has been reported in both conditions, but newer treatments may change both the overall survival rate and the relative risk associated with aging. Here, we examine survival for patients with CLL and CML in the United States (US) and England.

Time to redefine Myeloma

In November 2014 the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) revised the definition of multiple myeloma, such that asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma without any of the traditional ‘CRAB’ (hypercalcaemia, renal impairment, anaemia, bone disease) end organ damage criteria but with one of three new criteria would be recommended to start treatment. Previously, the standard of care for such patients was expectant management. These three new criteria are: greater than 60% clonal plasma cells on bone marrow biopsy, a serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio of >100 (the involved sFLC must be >100 mg/l) and greater than one unequivocal focal lesion on advanced imaging (low dose whole body computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography). Although this would appear to affect a small number of patients, the impact of these changes are broad, leading to an increased use of advanced imaging, a debate around the management of patients previously diagnosed with smouldering myeloma, changed terminology and clinical trial design and an extension of the use of biomarkers. For the first time the philosophy of treatment in myeloma will change from treatment initiation only being triggered by overt end organ damage to an era where sub clinical risk factors will also be taken into account.

United Kingdom Myeloma Forum (UKMF) position statement on the use of bendamustine in myeloma.

Bendamustine is a unique bifunctional alkylating agent with promising activity in myeloma. Despite the increasing number of studies demonstrating its efficacy in both the upfront and relapse settings, including patients with renal insufficiency, the optimal use of bendamustine, in terms of dosage, schedule and combination with other agents, has yet to be defined. It is currently licensed for use as frontline treatment with prednisolone for patients with myeloma who are unsuitable for transplantation and who are contraindicated for thalidomide and bortezomib. Studies in relapsed/refractory patients are currently ongoing with other combinations. Given the increasing data to date, the UK Myeloma Forum believes that bendamustine with steroids alone or in combination with a novel agent could be considered for patients with multiply relapsed myeloma. This document provides guidance for the use of bendamustine for patients with myeloma until the results of definitive studies are available.