Jens Bösenberg
Max Planck Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jens Bösenberg.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2003
Albert Ansmann; Jens Bösenberg; Anatoli Chaikovsky; Adolfo Comeron; Sabine Eckhardt; Ronald Eixmann; Volker Freudenthaler; Paul Ginoux; L. Komguem; Holger Linné; Miguel Ángel López Márquez; Volker Matthias; Ina Mattis; Valentin Mitev; Detlef Müller; Svetlana Music; Slobodan Nickovic; Jacques Pelon; Laurent Sauvage; Piotr Sobolewsky; Manoj K. Srivastava; Andreas Stohl; Omar Torres; G. Vaughan; Ulla Wandinger; Matthias Wiegner
The spread of mineral particles over southwestern, western, and central Europe resulting from a strong Saharan dust outbreak in October 2001 was observed at 10 stations of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET). For the first time, an optically dense desert dust plume over Europe was characterized coherently with high vertical resolution on a continental scale. The main layer was located above the boundary layer (above 1-km height above sea level (asl)) up to 3–5-km height, and traces of dust particles reached heights of 7–8 km. The particle optical depth typically ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 above 1-km height asl at the wavelength of 532 nm, and maximum values close to 0.8 were found over northern Germany. The lidar observations are in qualitative agreement with values of optical depth derived from Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) data. Ten-day backward trajectories clearly indicated the Sahara as the source region of the particles and revealed that the dust layer observed, e.g., over Belsk, Poland, crossed the EARLINET site Aberystwyth, UK, and southern Scandinavia 24–48 hours before. Lidar-derived particle depolarization ratios, backscatter- and extinction-related Angstrom exponents, and extinction-to-backscatter ratios mainly ranged from 15 to 25%, −0.5 to 0.5, and 40–80 sr, respectively, within the lofted dust plumes. A few atmospheric model calculations are presented showing the dust concentration over Europe. The simulations were found to be consistent with the network observations.
Applied Optics | 2004
Gelsomina Pappalardo; Aldo Amodeo; M. Pandolfi; Ulla Wandinger; A. Ansmann; Jens Bösenberg; Volker Matthias; V. Amirdis; F. De Tomasi; M. Frioud; M. Iarlori; L. Komguem; A. Papayannis; F. Rocadenbosch; X. Wang
An intercomparison of the algorithms used to retrieve aerosol extinction and backscatter starting from Raman lidar signals has been performed by 11 groups of lidar scientists involved in the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET). This intercomparison is part of an extended quality assurance program performed on aerosol lidars in the EARLINET. Lidar instruments and aerosol backscatter algorithms were tested separately. The Raman lidar algorithms were tested by use of synthetic lidar data, simulated at 355, 532, 386, and 607 nm, with realistic experimental and atmospheric conditions taken into account. The intercomparison demonstrates that the data-handling procedures used by all the lidar groups provide satisfactory results. Extinction profiles show mean deviations from the correct solution within 10% in the planetary boundary layer (PBL), and backscatter profiles, retrieved by use of algorithms based on the combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar technique, show mean deviations from solutions within 20% up to 2 km. The intercomparison was also carried out for the lidar ratio and produced profiles that show a mean deviation from the solution within 20% in the PBL. The mean value of this parameter was also calculated within a lofted aerosol layer at higher altitudes that is representative of typical layers related to special events such as Saharan dust outbreaks, forest fires, and volcanic eruptions. Here deviations were within 15%.
Applied Optics | 2004
Christine Böckmann; Ulla Wandinger; A. Ansmann; Jens Bösenberg; V. Amiridis; Antonella Boselli; A. Delaval; F. De Tomasi; M. Frioud; Ivan Grigorov; A. Hagard; M. Horvat; M. Iarlori; L. Komguem; Stephan Kreipl; G. Larchevque; Volker Matthias; A. Papayannis; Gelsomina Pappalardo; F. Rocadenbosch; J. A. Rodrigues; Johannes Schneider; V. Shcherbakov; Matthias Wiegner
An intercomparison of aerosol backscatter lidar algorithms was performed in 2001 within the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network to Establish an Aerosol Climatology (EARLINET). The objective of this research was to test the correctness of the algorithms and the influence of the lidar ratio used by the various lidar teams involved in the EARLINET for calculation of backscatter-coefficient profiles from the lidar signals. The exercise consisted of processing synthetic lidar signals of various degrees of difficulty. One of these profiles contained height-dependent lidar ratios to test the vertical influence of those profiles on the various retrieval algorithms. Furthermore, a realistic incomplete overlap of laser beam and receiver field of view was introduced to remind the teams to take great care in the nearest range to the lidar. The intercomparison was performed in three stages with increasing knowledge on the input parameters. First, only the lidar signals were distributed; this is the most realistic stage. Afterward the lidar ratio profiles and the reference values at calibration height were provided. The unknown height-dependent lidar ratio had the largest influence on the retrieval, whereas the unknown reference value was of minor importance. These results show the necessity of making additional independent measurements, which can provide us with a suitable approximation of the lidar ratio. The final stage proves in general, that the data evaluation schemes of the different groups of lidar systems work well.
Applied Optics | 2004
V. Matthais; Volker Freudenthaler; Aldo Amodeo; I. Balin; Dimitris Balis; Jens Bösenberg; A. Chaikovsky; G. Chourdakis; Adolfo Comeron; A. Delaval; F. De Tomasi; Ronald Eixmann; A. Hagard; L. Komguem; Stephan Kreipl; R. Matthey; V. Rizi; J. A. Rodrigues; Ulla Wandinger; X. Wang
In the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network to Establish an Aerosol Climatology (EARLINET), 19 aerosol lidar systems from 11 European countries were compared. Aerosol extinction or backscatter coefficient profiles were measured by at least two systems for each comparison. Aerosol extinction coefficients were derived from Raman lidar measurements in the UV (351 or 355 nm), and aerosol backscatter profiles were calculated from pure elastic backscatter measurements at 351 or 355, 532, or 1064 nm. The results were compared for height ranges with high and low aerosol content. Some systems were additionally compared with sunphotometers and starphotometers. Predefined maximum deviations were used for quality control of the results. Lidar systems with results outside those limits could not meet the quality assurance criterion. The algorithms for deriving aerosol backscatter profiles from elastic lidar measurements were tested separately, and the results are described in Part 2 of this series of papers [Appl. Opt.43, 977–989 (2004)]. In the end, all systems were quality assured, although some had to be modified to improve their performance. Typical deviations between aerosol backscatter profiles were 10% in the planetary boundary layer and 0.1 × 10-6 m-1 sr-1 in the free troposphere.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2003
Henry E. Revercomb; David D. Turner; D. C. Tobin; Robert O. Knuteson; Wayne F. Feltz; J. C. Barnard; Jens Bösenberg; Shepard A. Clough; David R. Cook; Richard A. Ferrare; John E. M. Goldsmith; Seth I. Gutman; R. N. Halthore; Barry M. Lesht; James C. Liljegren; Holger Linné; J. Michalsky; V. Morris; W. Porch; S. Richardson; Beat Schmid; Michael E. Splitt; T. Van Hove; Ed R. Westwater; D. Whiteman
A series of water vapor intensive observation periods (WVIOPs) were conducted at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) site in Oklahoma between 1996 and 2000. The goals of these WVIOPs are to characterize the accuracy of the operational water vapor observations and to develop techniques to improve the accuracy of these measurements. The initial focus of these experiments was on the lower atmosphere, for which the goal is an absolute accuracy of better than 2% in total column water vapor, corresponding to ~1 W m−2 of infrared radiation at the surface. To complement the operational water vapor instruments during the WVIOPs, additional instrumentation including a scanning Raman lidar, microwave radiometers, chilled-mirror hygrometers, a differential absorption lidar, and ground-based solar radiometers were deployed at the ARM site. The unique datasets from the 1996, 1997, and 1999 experiments have led to many results, including the discovery and characterization of a large (> 25%) sonde-to-sonde variab...
Applied Optics | 1998
Jens Bösenberg
A comprehensive formulation of the differential absorption lidar (DIAL) methodology is presented that explicitly includes details of the spectral distributions of both the transmitted and the backscattered light. The method is important for high-accuracy water-vapor retrievals and in particular for temperature measurements. Probability estimates of the error that is due to Doppler-broadened Rayleigh scattering based on an extended experimental data set are presented, as is an analytical treatment of errors that are due to averaging in the nonlinear retrieval scheme. System performance requirements are derived that show that water-vapor retrievals with an accuracy of better than 5% and temperature retrievals with an accuracy of better than 1 K in the entire troposphere are feasible if the error that results from Rayleigh-Doppler correction can be avoided. A modification of the DIAL technique, high-spectral-resolution DIAL avoids errors that are due to Doppler-broadened Rayleigh backscatter and permits simultaneous water-vapor and wind measurements with the same system.
Atmospheric Research | 2002
Volker Matthias; Jens Bösenberg
Regular aerosol extinction and backscatter measurements using a UV Raman Lidar have been performed for almost 3 years in Hamburg in the frame of the German Lidar Network. A set of 92 aerosol extinction and 164 aerosol backscatter profiles has been used for statistical investigations. Mean values and variances of the aerosol extinction and backscatter in the boundary layer have been calculated. Large fluctuations during the whole year have been found. The measured aerosol extinction over Hamburg shows a seasonal cycle with highest values in early fall and a second less prominent peak in spring. An analysis of the data using back trajectories showed a dependence of the aerosol extinction on the origin of the air mass. The residence time of the air mass over industrialized areas was found to be an important parameter for the measured aerosol extinction at Hamburg. However, only a small part of the total variability could be explained by the air mass origin. For 75 cases of aerosol extinction measurements under cloud-free conditions, the aerosol backscatter profile and therefore, the lidar ratio as a function of altitude could be determined. Winter measurements of the lidar ratio are often close to model results for maritime aerosol, the summer measurements are close to the model results for urban or continental aerosols. The high quality of the data has been proven by intercomparisons with other lidar systems and with star photometer measurements of the aerosol optical depth during the Lindenberg Aerosol Characterization Experiment (LACE’98) field campaign. D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 1994
Christoph Senff; Jens Bösenberg; Gerhard Peters
Abstract A remote-sensing method to retrieve vertical profiles of water vapor flux in the convective boundary layer by using a differential absorption lidar and a radar-radio acoustic sounding system is described. The systems height range presently extends from 400 to 700 m above the surface, and flux data can be sampled with a height resolution of 75 m and a time resolution of 60 s. The results of a first measurement in July 1991 under predominantly convective conditions are presented. The resolution of the remote-sensing system apparently is sufficient to resolve the major contributions to the flux in the convective mixed layer. In addition, the advantages and limitations of this method are discussed.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2004
David J. Diner; Thomas P. Ackerman; Theodore L. Anderson; Jens Bösenberg; Amy Braverman; Robert J. Charlson; W. D. Collins; Roger Davies; Brent N. Holben; Chris A. Hostetler; Ralph A. Kahn; John V. Martonchik; Robert T. Menzies; Mark A. Miller; John A. Ogren; Joyce E. Penner; Philip J. Rasch; Stephen E. Schwartz; John H. Seinfeld; Graeme L. Stephens; Omar Torres; Larry D. Travis; Bruce A. Wielicki; Bin Yu
Aerosols exert myriad influences on the earths environment and climate, and on human health. The complexity of aerosol-related processes requires that information gathered to improve our understanding of climate change must originate from multiple sources, and that effective strategies for data integration need to be established. While a vast array of observed and modeled data are becoming available, the aerosol research community currently lacks the necessary tools and infrastructure to reap maximum scientific benefit from these data. Spatial and temporal sampling differences among a diverse set of sensors, nonuniform data qualities, aerosol mesoscale variabilities, and difficulties in separating cloud effects are some of the challenges that need to be addressed. Maximizing the long-term benefit from these data also requires maintaining consistently well-understood accuracies as measurement approaches evolve and improve. Achieving a comprehensive understanding of how aerosol physical, chemical, and radiative processes impact the earth system can be achieved only through a multidisciplinary, inter-agency, and international initiative capable of dealing with these issues. A systematic approach, capitalizing on modern measurement and modeling techniques, geospatial statistics methodologies, and high-performance information technologies, can provide the necessary machinery to support this objective. We outline a framework for integrating and interpreting observations and models, and establishing an accurate, consistent, and cohesive long-term record, following a strategy whereby information and tools of progressively greater sophistication are incorporated as problems of increasing complexity are tackled. This concept is named the Progressive Aerosol Retrieval and Assimilation Global Observing Network (PARAGON). To encompass the breadth of the effort required, we present a set of recommendations dealing with data interoperability; measurement and model integration; multisensor synergy; data summarization and mining; model evaluation; calibration and validation; augmentation of surface and in situ measurements; advances in passive and active remote sensing; and design of satellite missions. Without an initiative of this nature, the scientific and policy communities will continue to struggle with understanding the quantitative impact of complex aerosol processes on regional and global climate change and air quality.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2006
H. T. Mengelkamp; Frank Beyrich; Günther Heinemann; F. Ament; J. Bange; Franz H. Berger; Jens Bösenberg; Thomas Foken; B. Hennemuth; C. Heret; Sven Huneke; K. P. Johnsen; M. Kerschgens; W. Kohsiek; Jens-Peter Leps; Claudia Liebethal; H. Lohse; Matthias Mauder; W. M. L. Meijninger; Siegfried Raasch; C. Simmer; T. Spiess; A. Tittebrand; J. Uhlenbrock; R. Zittel
The representation of subgrid-scale surface heterogeneities in numerical weather and climate models has been a challenging problem for more than a decade. The Evaporation at Grid and Pixel Scale (EVA-GRIPS) project adds to the numerous studies on vegetation-atmosphere interaction processes through a comprehensive field campaign and through simulation studies with land surface schemes and mesoscale models. The mixture of surface types in the test area in eastern Germany is typical for larger parts of northern Central Europe. The spatial scale considered corresponds to the grid scale of a regional atmospheric weather prediction or climate model and to the pixel scale of satellite images. Area-averaged fluxes derived from point measurements, scintillometer measurements, and a helicopter-borne turbulence probe were widely consistent with respect to the sensible heat flux. The latent heat flux from the scintillometer measurements is systematically higher than the eddy covariance data. Fluxes derived from numerical simulations proved the so-called mosaic approach to be an appropriate parameterization for subgrid heterogeneity.