Jens Jørgen Mortensen
Technical University of Denmark
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jens Jørgen Mortensen.
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter | 2010
J. Enkovaara; C. Rostgaard; Jens Jørgen Mortensen; Jingzhe Chen; Marcin Dulak; Lara Ferrighi; Jeppe Gavnholt; Christian Glinsvad; V. Haikola; Heine Anton Hansen; Henrik H. Kristoffersen; M. Kuisma; Ask Hjorth Larsen; L. Lehtovaara; Mathias P. Ljungberg; Olga Lopez-Acevedo; Poul Georg Moses; J. Ojanen; Thomas Olsen; Vivien Gabriele Petzold; Nichols A. Romero; Stausholm-Møller J; Mikkel Strange; Georgios Tritsaris; Marco Vanin; Michael Walter; Bjørk Hammer; Hannu Häkkinen; Georg K. H. Madsen; Risto M. Nieminen
Electronic structure calculations have become an indispensable tool in many areas of materials science and quantum chemistry. Even though the Kohn-Sham formulation of the density-functional theory (DFT) simplifies the many-body problem significantly, one is still confronted with several numerical challenges. In this article we present the projector augmented-wave (PAW) method as implemented in the GPAW program package (https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw) using a uniform real-space grid representation of the electronic wavefunctions. Compared to more traditional plane wave or localized basis set approaches, real-space grids offer several advantages, most notably good computational scalability and systematic convergence properties. However, as a unique feature GPAW also facilitates a localized atomic-orbital basis set in addition to the grid. The efficient atomic basis set is complementary to the more accurate grid, and the possibility to seamlessly switch between the two representations provides great flexibility. While DFT allows one to study ground state properties, time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) provides access to the excited states. We have implemented the two common formulations of TDDFT, namely the linear-response and the time propagation schemes. Electron transport calculations under finite-bias conditions can be performed with GPAW using non-equilibrium Green functions and the localized basis set. In addition to the basic features of the real-space PAW method, we also describe the implementation of selected exchange-correlation functionals, parallelization schemes, ΔSCF-method, x-ray absorption spectra, and maximally localized Wannier orbitals.
Physical Review B | 2005
Jens Jørgen Mortensen; L. Hansen; Karsten Wedel Jacobsen
A grid-based real-space implementation of the Projector Augmented Wave (PAW) method of P. E. Blochl [Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)] for Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations is presented. The use of uniform 3D real-space grids for representing wave functions, densities and potentials allows for flexible boundary conditions, efficient multigrid algorithms for solving Poisson and Kohn-Sham equations, and efficient parallelization using simple real-space domain-decomposition. We use the PAW method to perform all-electron calculations in the frozen core approximation, with smooth valence wave functions that can be represented on relatively coarse grids. We demonstrate the accuracy of the method by calculating the atomization energies of twenty small molecules, and the bulk modulus and lattice constants of bulk aluminum. We show that the approach in terms of computational efficiency is comparable to standard plane-wave methods, but the memory requirements are higher.
Physical Review B | 2010
Marco Vanin; Jens Jørgen Mortensen; André K. Kelkkanen; J. M. García-Lastra; Kristian Sommer Thygesen; Karsten Wedel Jacobsen
We use density functional theory (DFT) with a recently developed van der Waals density functional (vdW-DF) to study the adsorption of graphene on Al, Cu, Ag, Au, Pt, Pd, Co and Ni(111) surfaces. In constrast to the local density approximation (LDA) which predicts relatively strong binding for Ni,Co and Pd, the vdW-DF predicts weak binding for all metals and metal-graphene distances in the range 3.40-3.72 \AA. At these distances the graphene bandstructure as calculated with DFT and the many-body G
Physical Review B | 2009
Ask Hjorth Larsen; Marco Vanin; Jens Jørgen Mortensen; Kristian Sommer Thygesen; Karsten Wedel Jacobsen
_0
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2008
Michael Walter; Hannu Häkkinen; Lauri Lehtovaara; Martti J. Puska; Jussi Enkovaara; C. Rostgaard; Jens Jørgen Mortensen
W
Surface Science | 1998
Jens Jørgen Mortensen; Bjørk Hammer; J.K Nørskovi
_0
Physical Review Letters | 2005
Jens Jørgen Mortensen; Kristen Kaasbjerg; Søren L. Frederiksen; Jens K. Nørskov; James P. Sethna; Karsten Wedel Jacobsen
method is basically unaffected by the substrate, in particular there is no opening of a band gap at the
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2009
Poul Georg Moses; Jens Jørgen Mortensen; Bengt I. Lundqvist; Jens K. Nørskov
K
Surface Science | 1997
Y. Morikawa; Jens Jørgen Mortensen; Bjørk Hammer; Jens K. Nørskov
-point.
Journal of Physical Chemistry B | 2011
Andreas Møgelhøj; André K. Kelkkanen; K. Thor Wikfeldt; Jakob Schiøtz; Jens Jørgen Mortensen; Lars G. M. Pettersson; Bengt I. Lundqvist; Karsten Wedel Jacobsen; Anders Nilsson; Jens K. Nørskov
We present an implementation of localized atomic-orbital basis sets in the projector augmented wave PAW formalism within the density-functional theory. The implementation in the real-space GPAW code provides a complementary basis set to the accurate but computationally more demanding grid representation. The possibility to switch seamlessly between the two representations implies that simulations employing the local basis can be fine tuned at the end of the calculation by switching to the grid, thereby combining the strength of the two representations for optimal performance. The implementation is tested by calculating atomization energies and equilibrium bulk properties of a variety of molecules and solids, comparing to the grid results. Finally, it is demonstrated how a grid-quality structure optimization can be performed with significantly reduced computational effort by switching between the grid and basis representations.