Jens Trentmann

Prospective, Randomized Single-center Trial to Compare Cryoplasty versus Conventional Angioplasty in the Popliteal Artery: Midterm Results of the COLD Study

PURPOSE To evaluate safety and efficacy of cryoplasty versus conventional angioplasty for focal popliteal arterial occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with focal atherosclerotic stenoses and occlusions of the popliteal artery were randomized to cryoplasty or conventional angioplasty as the initial treatment strategy. The primary objective was target lesion patency. The secondary endpoint was treatment success without the need for stents. Duplex ultrasonography was performed at 3, 6, 9, and 15 months. RESULTS Eighty-six patients (mean age, 72 years; age range, 50-94 years) were enrolled in this study. Forty patients were randomized to cryoplasty and 46 to conventional angioplasty. Demographics, risk factors, clinical stage of disease, and lesion details were comparable. On intention-to-treat basis, initial success was 35% for cryoplasty versus 54% for conventional angioplasty (P = .02). The rate of grade C dissection was 35% after cryoplasty and 26% after conventional angioplasty (P = .4). Optional long-term percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed in 58% of cryoplasty patients. The rate of stent placement for dissection and/or residual stenosis was 30% after cryoplasty (including long-term dilation) and 39% after conventional angioplasty (P = .34). The mean (+/-standard deviation) target lesion patency at 9 months was 79.3% +/- 7.5 for cryoplasty and 66.7% +/-8.1 for conventional angioplasty; however, the results are not significant (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS Cryoplasty of the popliteal artery alone showed a lower anatomic success when compared with conventional angioplasty. Combined with optional long-term PTA, however, stent placement was not needed more often. There was a trend toward higher patency after cryoplasty, but differences were not statistically significant and results of long-term follow-up have to be awaited.

Total Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with the Dual 6-F Perclose-AT Preclosing Technique: A Case-control Study

PURPOSE To determine the safety and efficacy of total percutaneous access closure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with a suture-mediated preclosing technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred thirty-two femoral access sites in 70 patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair were closed percutaneously with off-label use of two F-6 Perclose AT devices preapplied at a 90 degrees angle. Femoral access sizes ranged from 12 to 24 F. Technical success, complications, and procedure and access closure times were evaluated. Follow-up with computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging was scheduled at 1-4 days and 3, 6, and 12 months and used to obtain groin hematoma and scar severity scores (grades 1-3). Data were compared with those from a cohort of 67 patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with surgical femoral cutdown. RESULTS Technical success was achieved with the preclosing technique in 127 of the 132 arteries (96.2%). Two to four closure devices were used per groin. Five technical failures were managed intraoperatively with surgical suture. There was no access-related mortality and no late groin complications. The mean procedure duration was 91 minutes +/- 32, and the mean access closure time was 12 minutes +/- 9. For surgical management, the mean procedure time was 153 minutes +/- 112 (P < .05), and the mean closure time was 12 minutes +/- 13 (not statistically significant). Hematoma severity score at 1-4 days was 1.8 for total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair and 2.1 for surgical closure. Scar severity scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were 1.1, 1.0, and 1.0 for total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair and 2.4, 2.4, and 2.3 for surgical management, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair with a dual 6-F-Perclose preclosing technique is safe and effective. Compared with femoral cutdown, there are fewer late groin complications and scar tissue formation is less severe.

Leash Your Guiding Catheter: Or How to Obtain a Stable Catheter Position for Crossover Iliac Embolization Procedures

We present a safe and quick technique for crossover embolization procedures of the internal iliac artery with high-profile guiding catheter systems, after a pull-through maneuver with establishment of a crossover catheter-snare system. The attached snare is used to stabilize and direct the guiding catheter.