Jente Boelaert
Ghent University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jente Boelaert.
Metabolomics | 2014
Jente Boelaert; R. t’Kindt; Eva Schepers; Lucie Jorge; Griet Glorieux; Nathalie Neirynck; Frederic Lynen; Patrick Sandra; Raymond Vanholder; Koen Sandra
Here we report a metabolomics discovery study conducted on blood serum samples of patients in different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Metabolites were monitored on a quality controlled holistic platform combining reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in both negative and positive ionization mode and gas chromatography coupled to quadrupole mass spectrometry. A substantial portion of the serum metabolome was thereby covered. Eighty-five metabolites were shown to evolve with CKD progression of which 43 metabolites were a confirmation of earlier reported uremic retention solutes and/or uremic toxins. Thirty-one unique metabolites were revealed which were increasing significantly throughout CKD progression, by a factor surpassing the level observed for creatinine, the currently used biomarker for kidney function. Additionally, 11 unique metabolites showed a decreasing trend.
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2017
Jente Boelaert; Frederic Lynen; Griet Glorieux; Eva Schepers; Nathalie Neirynck; Raymond Vanholder
A typical characteristic of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the progressive loss in renal function over a period of months or years with the concomitant accumulation of uremic retention solutes in the body. Known biomarkers for the kidney deterioration, such as serum creatinine or urinary albumin, do not allow effective early detection of CKD, which is essential towards disease management. In this work, a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometric (HILIC-TOF MS) platform was optimized allowing the search for novel uremic retention solutes and/or biomarkers of CKD. The HILIC-ESI-MS approach was used for the comparison of urine and plasma samples from CKD patients at stage 3 (n = 20), at stage 5 not yet receiving dialysis (n = 20) and from healthy controls (n = 20). Quality control samples were used to control and ensure the validity of the metabolomics approach. Subsequently the data were treated with the XCMS software for multivariate statistical analysis. In this way, differentiation could be achieved between the measured metabolite profile of the CKD patients versus the healthy controls. The approach allowed the elucidation of a number of metabolites that showed a significant up- and downregulation throughout the different stages of CKD. These compounds are cinnamoylglycine, glycoursodeoxycholic acid, 2-hydroxyethane sulfonate, and pregnenolone sulfate of which the identity was unambiguously confirmed via the use of authentic standards. The latter three are newly identified uremic retention solutes.
Toxins | 2016
Jente Boelaert; Eva Schepers; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot; Raymond Vanholder; Frederic Lynen
Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis, and its structural isomer symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) are uremic toxins accumulating in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a robust UPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of ADMA and SDMA in human serum. Chromatographic separation after butyl ester derivatization was achieved on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column, followed by tandem mass spectrometric detection. After validation, the applicability of the method was evaluated by the analysis of serum samples from 10 healthy controls and 77 CKD patients on hemodialysis (CKD5HD). Both ADMA (0.84 ± 0.19 µM vs. 0.52 ± 0.07 µM) and SDMA concentrations (2.06 ± 0.82 µM vs. 0.59 ± 0.13 µM) were significantly (p < 0.001) elevated in CKD5HD patients compared to healthy controls. In general, low degrees of protein binding were found for both ADMA and SDMA. In addition, an established commercially available ELISA kit was utilized on the same samples (n = 87) to compare values obtained both with ELISA and UPLC-MS/MS. Regression analysis between these two methods was significant (p < 0.0001) but moderate for both ADMA (R = 0.78) and SDMA (R = 0.72).
Seminars in Dialysis | 2015
Raymond Vanholder; Jente Boelaert; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot
This publication reviews the currently available methods to identify uremic retention solutes, to determine their biological relevance and to quantify their removal. The analytical methods for the detection of uremic solutes have improved continuously, allowing the identification of several previously unknown solutes. Progress has been accelerated by the development of comprehensive strategies such as genomics, proteomics and the latest “omics” area, metabolomics. Those methodologies will be further refined in future. Once the concentration of solutes of interest is known based on targeted analysis, their biological relevance can be studied by means of in vitro, ex vivo, or animal models, provided those are representative for the key complications of the uremic syndrome. For this to come to pass, rigid protocols should be applied, e.g., aiming at free solute concentrations conform those found in uremia. Subsequently, the decrease in concentration of relevant solutes should be pursued by nondialysis (e.g., by influencing nutritional intake or intestinal generation, using sorbents, modifying metabolism, or preserving renal function) and dialysis methods. Optimal dialysis strategies can be sought by studying solute kinetics during dialysis. Clinical studies are necessary to assess the correct impact of those optimized strategies on outcomes. Although longitudinal studies of solute concentration and surrogate outcome studies are first steps in suggesting the usefulness of a given approach, ultimately hard outcome randomized controlled trials are needed to endorse evidence‐based therapeutic choices. The nonspecificity of dialysis removal is however a handicap limiting the chances to provide proof of concept that a given solute or group of solutes has definite biological impact.
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2013
Jente Boelaert; Frederic Lynen; Griet Glorieux; Sunny Eloot; Maria Van Landschoot; Marie-Anne Waterloos; Pat Sandra; Raymond Vanholder
Journal of Renal Nutrition | 2013
Nathalie Neirynck; Griet Glorieux; Jente Boelaert; Eva Schepers; Sophie Liabeuf; Annemieke Dhondt; Ziad A. Massy; Raymond Vanholder
Archive | 2014
Jente Boelaert
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2013
Nathalie Neirynck; Griet Glorieux; Jente Boelaert; Sophie Liabeuf; Ziad A. Massy; Raymond Vanholder
High-Performance-Liquid-Phase Separations and Related Techniques, 39th International symposium, Abstracts | 2013
Jente Boelaert; Eva Schepers; Griet Glorieux; Raymond Vanholder; Frederic Lynen
High-Performance-Liquid-Phase Separations and Related Techniques, 39th International symposium, Abstracts | 2013
Jente Boelaert; Griet Glorieux; Eva Schepers; Nathalie Neirynck; Raymond Vanholder; Frederic Lynen