Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jeremy D. Schmit is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jeremy D. Schmit.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011

Physical limits of cells and proteomes

Ken A. Dill; Kingshuk Ghosh; Jeremy D. Schmit

What are the physical limits to cell behavior? Often, the physical limitations can be dominated by the proteome, the cell’s complement of proteins. We combine known protein sizes, stabilities, and rates of folding and diffusion, with the known protein-length distributions P(N) of proteomes (Escherichia coli, yeast, and worm), to formulate distributions and scaling relationships in order to address questions of cell physics. Why do mesophilic cells die around 50 °C? How can the maximal growth-rate temperature (around 37 °C) occur so close to the cell-death temperature? The model shows that the cell’s death temperature coincides with a denaturation catastrophe of its proteome. The reason cells can function so well just a few degrees below their death temperature is because proteome denaturation is so cooperative. Why are cells so dense-packed with protein molecules (about 20% by volume)? Cells are packed at a density that maximizes biochemical reaction rates. At lower densities, proteins collide too rarely. At higher densities, proteins diffuse too slowly through the crowded cell. What limits cell sizes and growth rates? Cell growth is limited by rates of protein synthesis, by the folding rates of its slowest proteins, and—for large cells—by the rates of its protein diffusion. Useful insights into cell physics may be obtainable from scaling laws that encapsulate information from protein knowledge bases.


Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences | 2012

Classification of protein aggregates

Linda O. Narhi; Jeremy D. Schmit; Karoline Bechtold-Peters; Deepak K. Sharma

Comparison of protein aggregates/self-associated species between laboratories and across disciplines is complicated by the imprecise language presently used to describe them. In this commentary, we propose a standardized nomenclature and classification scheme that can be applied to describe all protein aggregates. Five categories are described under which a given aggregate may be independently classified: size, reversibility/dissociation, conformation, covalent modification, and morphology. Possible subclassifications within each category, several examples of applications of the nomenclature, and difficulties in making appropriate assignments will be discussed.


Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences | 2012

CommentariesClassification of Protein Aggregates1

Linda O. Narhi; Jeremy D. Schmit; Karoline Bechtold-Peters; Deepak K. Sharma

Comparison of protein aggregates/self-associated species between laboratories and across disciplines is complicated by the imprecise language presently used to describe them. In this commentary, we propose a standardized nomenclature and classification scheme that can be applied to describe all protein aggregates. Five categories are described under which a given aggregate may be independently classified: size, reversibility/dissociation, conformation, covalent modification, and morphology. Possible subclassifications within each category, several examples of applications of the nomenclature, and difficulties in making appropriate assignments will be discussed.


Biophysical Journal | 2011

What Drives Amyloid Molecules To Assemble into Oligomers and Fibrils

Jeremy D. Schmit; Kingshuk Ghosh; Ken A. Dill

We develop a theory for three states of equilibrium of amyloid peptides: the monomer, oligomer, and fibril. We assume that the oligomeric state is a disordered micellelike collection of a few peptide chains held together loosely by hydrophobic interactions into a spherical hydrophobic core. We assume that fibrillar amyloid chains are aligned and further stabilized by steric zipper interactions-hydrogen bonding, steric packing, and specific hydrophobic side-chain contacts. The model makes a broad set of predictions that are consistent with experimental results: 1), Similar to surfactant micellization, amyloid oligomerization should increase with peptide concentration in solution. 2), The onset of fibrillization limits the concentration of oligomers in the solution. 3), The extent of Aβ fibrillization increases with peptide concentration. 4), The predicted average fibril length versus monomer concentration agrees with data on α-synuclein. 5), Full fibril length distributions agree with data on α-synuclein. 6), Denaturants should melt out fibrils. And finally, 7), added salt should stabilize fibrils by reducing repulsions between amyloid peptide chains. It is of interest that small changes in solvent conditions can tip the equilibrium balance between oligomer and fibril and cause large changes in rates through effects on the transition-state barrier. This model may provide useful insights into the physical processes underlying amyloid diseases.


Biomacromolecules | 2015

Stable, metastable, and kinetically trapped amyloid aggregate phases.

Tatiana Miti; Mentor Mulaj; Jeremy D. Schmit; Martin Muschol

Self-assembly of proteins into amyloid fibrils plays a key role in a multitude of human disorders that range from Alzheimer’s disease to type II diabetes. Compact oligomeric species, observed early during amyloid formation, are reported as the molecular entities responsible for the toxic effects of amyloid self-assembly. However, the relation between early-stage oligomeric aggregates and late-stage rigid fibrils, which are the hallmark structure of amyloid plaques, has remained unclear. We show that these different structures occupy well-defined regions in a peculiar phase diagram. Lysozyme amyloid oligomers and their curvilinear fibrils only form after they cross a salt and protein concentration-dependent threshold. We also determine a boundary for the onset of amyloid oligomer precipitation. The oligomeric aggregates are structurally distinct from rigid fibrils and are metastable against nucleation and growth of rigid fibrils. These experimentally determined boundaries match well with colloidal model predictions that account for salt-modulated charge repulsion. The model also incorporates the metastable and kinetic character of oligomer phases. Similarities and differences of amyloid oligomer assembly to metastable liquid–liquid phase separation of proteins and to surfactant aggregation are discussed.


Journal of Physical Chemistry B | 2014

Entanglement model of antibody viscosity.

Jeremy D. Schmit; Feng He; Shradha Mishra; Randal R. Ketchem; Christopher E. Woods; Bruce A. Kerwin

Antibody solutions are typically much more viscous than solutions of globular proteins at equivalent volume fraction. Here we propose that this is due to molecular entanglements that are caused by the elongated shape and intrinsic flexibility of antibody molecules. We present a simple theory in which the antibodies are modeled as linear polymers that can grow via reversible bonds between the antigen binding domains. This mechanism explains the observation that relatively subtle changes to the interparticle interaction can lead to large changes in the viscosity. The theory explains the presence of distinct power law regimes in the concentration dependence of the viscosity as well as the correlation between the viscosity and the charge on the variable domain in our antistreptavidin IgG1 model system.


Physical Review Letters | 2009

Lattice model of diffusion-limited bimolecular chemical reactions in confined environments.

Jeremy D. Schmit; Ercan Kamber; Jane Kondev

We study the effect of confinement on diffusion limited bi-molecular reactions within a lattice model where a small number of reactants diffuse amongst a much larger number of inert particles. When the number of inert particles is held constant the rate of the reaction is slow for small reaction volumes due to limited mobility from crowding, and for large reaction volumes due to the reduced concentration of the reactants. The reaction rate proceeds fastest at an intermediate confinement corresponding to volume fraction near 1/2 and 1/3 in two and three dimensions, respectively. We generalize the model to off-lattice systems with hydrodynamic coupling and predict that the optimal reaction rate for mono-disperse colloidal systems occurs when the volume fraction is ∼ 0.18. Finally, we discuss the application of our model to bi-molecular reactions inside cells as well as the dynamics of confined polymers.


Physical Review Letters | 2014

Self-Assembly at a Nonequilibrium Critical Point

Stephen Whitelam; Lester O. Hedges; Jeremy D. Schmit

We use analytic theory and computer simulation to study patterns formed during the growth of two-component assemblies in two and three dimensions. We show that these patterns undergo a nonequilibrium phase transition, at a particular growth rate, between mixed and demixed arrangements of component types. This finding suggests that principles of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics can be used to predict the outcome of multicomponent self-assembly, and suggests an experimental route to the self-assembly of multicomponent structures of a qualitatively defined nature.


Journal of Chemical Physics | 2011

Electrostatics and aggregation: How charge can turn a crystal into a gel

Jeremy D. Schmit; Stephen Whitelam; Ken A. Dill

The crystallization of proteins or colloids is often hindered by the appearance of aggregates of low fractal dimension called gels. Here we study the effect of electrostatics upon crystal and gel formation using an analytic model of hard spheres bearing point charges and short range attractive interactions. We find that the chief electrostatic free energy cost of forming assemblies comes from the entropic loss of counterions that render assemblies charge-neutral. Because there exists more accessible volume for these counterions around an open gel than a dense crystal, there exists an electrostatic entropic driving force favoring the gel over the crystal. This driving force increases with increasing sphere charge, but can be counteracted by increasing counterion concentration. We show that these effects cannot be fully captured by pairwise-additive macroion interactions of the kind often used in simulations, and we show where on the phase diagram to go in order to suppress gel formation.


Journal of Physical Chemistry B | 2010

The Stabilities of Protein Crystals

Jeremy D. Schmit; Ken A. Dill

We describe a model for protein crystallization equilibria. The model includes four terms, (1) protein translational entropy opposes crystallization, (2) proteins are attracted to each other by a nonelectrostatic contact free energy favoring crystallization, (3) proteins in the crystal repel each other but, to a greater extent, attract counterions sequestered in the crystal, which favors crystallization, and (4) the translational entropy of the counterions opposes their sequestration into the crystal, opposing crystallization. We treat the electrostatics using the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation, and we use unit cell information from native protein crystals to determine the boundary conditions. This model predicts the stabilities of protein crystals as functions of temperature, pH, and salt concentrations, in good agreement with the data of Pusey et al. on tetragonal and orthorhombic crystal forms of lysozyme. The experiments show a weak dependence of crystal solubility on pH. According to the model, this is because the entropic cost to neutralize the crystal is compensated by favorable protein-salt interactions. Experiments also show that adding salt stabilizes the crystal. Cohns empirical law predicts that the logarithm of solubility should be a linear function of salt. The present theory predicts nonlinearity, in better agreement with the experiments. The model shows that the salting out phenomena is not due to more counterion shielding but to lowered counterion translational entropy. Models of this type may help guide faster and better ways to crystallize proteins.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jeremy D. Schmit's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ken A. Dill

Stony Brook University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alex J. Levine

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen Whitelam

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Louis R. Nemzer

Nova Southeastern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge