Jeremy S. Peterman
Temple University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jeremy S. Peterman.
Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology | 2014
Chiaying Wei; Alexandra L. Hoff; Marianne A. Villabø; Jeremy S. Peterman; Philip C. Kendall; John Piacentini; James T. McCracken; John T. Walkup; Anne Marie Albano; Moira Rynn; Joel Sherrill; Dara Sakolsky; Boris Birmaher; Golda S. Ginsburg; Courtney P. Keeton; Elizabeth A. Gosch; Scott N. Compton; John S. March
The present study examined the psychometric properties, including discriminant validity and clinical utility, of the youth self-report and parent-report forms of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) among youth with anxiety disorders. The sample included parents and youth (N = 488, 49.6% male) ages 7 to 17 who participated in the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study. Although the typical low agreement between parent and youth self-reports was found, the MASC evidenced good internal reliability across MASC subscales and informants. The main MASC subscales (i.e., Physical Symptoms, Harm Avoidance, Social Anxiety, and Separation/Panic) were examined. The Social Anxiety and Separation/Panic subscales were found to be significantly predictive of the presence and severity of social phobia and separation anxiety disorder, respectively. Using multiple informants improved the accuracy of prediction. The MASC subscales demonstrated good psychometric properties and clinical utilities in identifying youth with anxiety disorders.
American Journal of Psychiatry | 2015
Philip C. Kendall; Jeremy S. Peterman
Anxiety disorders are common in adolescents (ages 12 to 18) and contribute to a range of impairments. There has been speculation that adolescents with anxiety are at risk for being treatment nonresponders. In this review, the authors examine the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for adolescents with anxiety. Outcomes from mixed child and adolescent samples and from adolescent-only samples indicate that approximately two-thirds of youths respond favorably to CBT. CBT produces moderate to large effects and shows superiority over control/comparison conditions. The literature does not support differential outcomes by age: adolescents do not consistently manifest poorer outcomes relative to children. Although extinction paradigms find prolonged fear extinction in adolescent samples, basic research does not fully align with the processes and goals of real-life exposure. Furthermore, CBT is flexible and allows for tailored application in adolescents, and it may be delivered in alternative formats (i.e., brief, computer/Internet, school-based, and transdiagnostic CBT).
Journal of Anxiety Disorders | 2016
Jeremy S. Peterman; Matthew M. Carper; R. Meredith Elkins; Jonathan S. Comer; Donna B. Pincus; Philip C. Kendall
The present study examined (a) whether sleep related problems (SRPs) improved following cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for youth with anxiety disorders, (b) whether variables that may link anxiety and SRPs (e.g., pre-sleep arousal, family accommodation, sleep hygiene) changed during treatment, and (c) whether such changes predicted SRPs at posttreatment. Youth were diagnosed with anxiety at pretreatment and received weekly CBT that targeted their principal anxiety diagnosis at one of two specialty clinics (N=69 completers, Mage=10.86). Results indicated that parent-reported SRPs improved from pre- to post-treatment and that treatment responders with regard to anxiety yielded greater SRP improvements than nonresponders. Parent report of bedtime resistance and sleep anxiety showed significant improvements. Youth reported lower rates of SRPs compared to their parents and did not demonstrate pre- to post-treatment changes in SRPs. Pre-sleep arousal and family accommodation decreased over treatment but did not predict lower SRPs at posttreatment. Higher accommodation was correlated with greater SRPs. Sleep hygiene evidenced no change and did not mediate links between accommodation and posttreatment SRPs.
Depression and Anxiety | 2016
Elana R. Kagan; Jeremy S. Peterman; Matthew M. Carper; Philip C. Kendall
Parental accommodation refers to the ways in which a parent modifies their behavior to avoid or reduce the distress their child experiences. Parents of youth with anxiety disorders have been found to accommodate their childs anxiety in a variety of ways that contribute to the maintenance of the disorder. The current study evaluated the relationship between parental accommodation and the outcome of treatment for youth with anxiety.
Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology | 2016
Jeremy S. Peterman; Matthew M. Carper; Philip C. Kendall
Exposure has been identified as key to effective treatment of youth anxiety. However, the precise theoretical mechanisms of exposure are a matter of debate. Emotional processing theory emphasizes the need for fear activation during exposure and its habituation both within and across exposures. Despite the popularity of the theory to explain exposure, it has not been tested with anxious youth. To determine whether emotional processing theory parameters predict anxiety severity, coping abilities, and global functioning after cognitive-behavioral treatment. The present study examined 72 youth (Mage = 10.50 years; 45% female; 87.5% non-Hispanic Caucasian) diagnosed with an anxiety disorder and who received family or individual CBT. Three exposure habituation variables—initial fear activation (peak anxiety), within-session habituation, and between-session habituation—were assessed using Subjective Units of Distress and examined as predictors of outcome at posttreatment and at 1-year follow-up. Outcomes were measured using the Coping Questionnaire, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children, Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale, Children’s Global Assessment Scale, and clinician severity ratings on the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule. Emotional processing theory variables did not predict any anxiety outcomes at posttreatment or follow-up with one exception: Initial fear activation predicted less anxiety at follow-up among youth without GAD. In addition, within- and between-session habituation were not associated with one another. Between-session habituation was not associated with initial fear activation. These findings suggest a limited role of habituation within cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety in youth. An alternative to emotional processing theory, inhibitory learning theory, is discussed.
Clinical Case Studies | 2015
Jeremy S. Peterman; Alexandra L. Hoff; Elizabeth A. Gosch; Philip C. Kendall
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the first-line psychological intervention for youth with an anxiety disorder. Despite the prevalence of anxiety in youth with physical disabilities, the application and evaluation of CBT for such youth is sparse. The current report illustrates ways to adapt, implement, and evaluate CBT for youth with anxiety and a physical disability describing “Olivia,” a 12-year-old Caucasian female with generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, panic attacks, and cerebral palsy. Olivia received 24 one-hour sessions of outpatient CBT over the course of 9 months. At post-treatment, Olivia no longer met criteria for any anxiety diagnosis by parent- and child-report, with gains maintained at 2-month follow-up. Important therapeutic issues for working with comorbid anxious and physically challenged youth are addressed, such as therapeutic engagement, working within a multidisciplinary team, conflation of psychological and physical symptoms, parental accommodation, family interaction patterns, and modification of exposures and related treatment strategies.
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice | 2015
Jeremy S. Peterman; Kendra L. Read; Chiaying Wei; Philip C. Kendall
Child Psychiatry & Human Development | 2015
Jeremy S. Peterman; Matthew M. Carper; Philip C. Kendall
Rutter's Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 2015
Philip C. Kendall; Jeremy S. Peterman; Colleen M. Cummings; Anita Thapar; Daniel S. Pine; James F. Leckman; Stephen Scott; Margaret J. Snowling; Eric Taylor
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | 2015
Kendra L. Read; Cara A. Settipani; Jeremy S. Peterman; Philip C. Kendall; Scott N. Compton; John Piacentini; James T. McCracken; Lindsey Bergman; John T. Walkup; Dara Sakolsky; Boris Birmaher; Anne Marie Albano; Moira Rynn; Golda S. Ginsburg; Courtney P. Keeton; Elizabeth A. Gosch; Cynthia Suveg; Joel Sherrill; John S. March